PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Advertisements

Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Optimization of dynamic aperture for the ESRF upgrade Andrea Franchi on behalf of the ASD Beam Dynamics Group Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
June 14th 2005 Accelerator Division Overview of ALBA D. Einfeld Vacuum Workshop Barcelona, 12 th -13 th September 2005 General 10 th September 2005.
Intra-beam Scattering Study for Low Emittance of BAPS S.K.Tian(IHEP)
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
CLIC Pre-damping rings overview F. Antoniou, Y. Papaphilippou CLIC Workshop 2009.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
An ultra-low emittance lattices for Iranian Light Source Facility storage ring Esmaeil Ahmadi On behalf of beam dynamics group Iranian Light Source Facility.
LER2011 Lattice Team K. Soutome, Y. Shimosaki, T. Nakamura, M. Takao, T. Tanaka K. Soutome (JASRI / SPring-8) on behalf of SPring-8 Upgrade Working Group.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
LOW EMITTANCE CELL WITH LARGE DYNAMIC APERTURE
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Recent Studies of Injection System at
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Status of PEP-X Lattice Design Study
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
PETRA IV Lattice Studies
The new 7BA design of BAPS
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
SPEAR3 Lower Emittance & Nonlinear Dynamics
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions by Yuri Nosochkov, Y. Cai, K. Bane Mini-workshop on Dynamic Aperture Issues of USR IUCF, Bloomington, Nov , 2010

Outline Introduction of PEP-X Lattice design Optimization of dynamic aperture IBS emittance and Touschek lifetime Future plan –Emittance optimization Emittance 30 pm-rad storage design –PEP X soft x-ray FEL –PEP X ERL

Existing PEP-II rings 2.2 km existing rings in PEP tunnel Six 243 m arcs and six 123 m long straights 60 or 90 deg FODO lattice Can reach ~5 nm-rad emittance at 4.5 GeV (w/o wiggler) – too high for a modern light source No dispersion free straights for IDS

Design a new low emittance ring in the PEP-II tunnel. –~0.1 nm-rad emittance at 4.5 GeV for high brightness –>24 dispersion free straights for insertion devices –Use existing PEP-II tunnel and utilities PEP-X low emittance ring Same ring layout as PEP-II in the exist tunnel using existing RF system New optics with: Two DBA arcs yielding 30 ID straights Four TME arcs for low emittance ~90 m wiggler to reach ~0.1 nmrad emittance at 4.5 GeV FODO optics in long straights PEP-II based injection system(Horizontal injection)

R. Hettel et al EPAC08 Conceptual Layout of PEP-X with photon beamlines at SLAC

PEPX Lattice DBA TME Straight Injection x =1.523 y =0.508 x =0.373 y =0.124

DBA Supercell low b IDhigh b ID 4 harmonic sextupoles, 2 families 6 chromatic sextupoles, 4 families Two standard cells are combined into one supercell with a low and high ID beta:  x,y = 3.00, 6.07 m and  x,y = 16.04, 6.27 m. 8 supercells per arc.Two standard cells are combined into one supercell with a low and high ID beta:  x,y = 3.00, 6.07 m and  x,y = 16.04, 6.27 m. 8 supercells per arc. Phase advance is optimized for compensation of both sextupole and octupole driving terms and maximum dynamic aperture:  x /2  = 1.5+3/128,  y =  x /3. Phase advance is optimized for compensation of both sextupole and octupole driving terms and maximum dynamic aperture:  x /2  = 1.5+3/128,  y =  x /3. Harmonic sextupoles are added for further reduction of the resonance effects and amplitude dependent tune spread.Harmonic sextupoles are added for further reduction of the resonance effects and amplitude dependent tune spread.

TME cell 7.6 m cell with ~0.1 nm-rad intrinsic emittance. 32 standard and 2 matching cells per arc. X and Y phase advance is set near 3  /4 and  /4 for compensation of sextupole and octupole effects and maximum dynamic aperture. X and Y phase advance is set near 3  /4 and  /4 for compensation of sextupole and octupole effects and maximum dynamic aperture. Optimized for maximum momentum compaction.

Injection straight section Existing PEP-II injection straight with 4 additional quads. PEP-II vertical injection optics is changed to horizontal to avoid vertical injection oscillations in the IDs. PEP-II vertical injection optics is changed to horizontal to avoid vertical injection oscillations in the IDs. Large horizontal  x = 200 m at septum for larger injection acceptance. Large horizontal  x = 200 m at septum for larger injection acceptance. Existing 4 DC bump magnets and 2 fast kickers. Phase space diagram at injection point

Wiggler straight Dispersion in ~5 m wiggler section  DBA and TME arcs without wiggler yield e = 0.38 nm-rad 89.3 m wiggler is inserted in one long straight section yielding  = nm- rad. Wiggler is split in 18 identical sections to fit FODO cells.  Wiggler parameters optimized for strong damping effect: 10 cm period, 1.5 T field. The long wiggler can be split in half and placed in two separate straights for better handling of radiated power (4.7 MW at 1.5 A).

Optimization of wiggler parameters    vs L    vs B Based on analytic formulas: Most efficient damping for L < 100 m. More damping with a shorter period, higher field and lower  x, but the rate of reduction gradually decreases. High peak field requires a smaller gap which reduces vertical acceptance and increases resistive wall impedance. Selected parameters: 10 cm period, 1.5 T peak field, 89.3 m total length.

Complete ring lattice   Wiggler Symmetric locations of DBA and TME arcs and mirror symmetry with respect to injection point.

Main parameters of PEP-X ParameterDamping wiggler offDamping wiggler on Energy, E 0 [GeV]4.5 Beam current, I [A]1.5 Circumference, C [m] Emittance,  x [pm-rad, 0 current] Tunes, x / y / s 87.23/36.14/ /36.14/ RF voltage/frequency, [MV]/ [MHz]2.0/4768.9/476 Harmonic number, h3492 Energy loss, U 0 [MeV/turn] Current/charge per bunch [mA/nC]0.43/3.15 Momentum compaction,  5.816x x10 -5 Energy spread,   0.55x x10 -3 Bunch length,  z [mm] 33 Damping times,  x /  y /  s [ms] 101/127/7320.3/21.2/10.8  x /  y at ID center, [m] (low  ) 3.00/6.07  x /  y at ID center, [m] (high  ) 16.04/6.27

Optimization of dynamic aperture Choose phase advance in a periodic cell which yields a unit (+I) linear transfer matrix in both planes for a section made of these cells (such as DBA or TME arc). In such a system the second-order geometrical (on momentum) aberrations will vanish. Fine tune the DBA and TME cell phase advance to minimize the higher order resonance driving terms. Optimize sextupole strengths in the DBA and TME cells while keeping the linear chromaticity canceled. Optimize the machine betatron tunes in order to minimize the effects of strong resonances and obtain the largest possible dynamic aperture. Add geometric (harmonic) sextupoles at non-dispersive locations in order to minimize amplitude dependent tune shifts and high order resonance effects.

Dynamic aperture tune scan 2 x +2 y =247  x +2 y =248 x +2 y =160 Nominal tune: x =86.23 and y =36.14

Chromatic correction  DBA and TME sextupole positions and strengths as well as cell and long straight phase advance are optimized for maximum energy dependent aperture. Optimization of non-linear chromatic terms using MAD HARMON and empiric optimization of momentum dynamic aperture in LEGO tracking simulations  W-functions2 nd order dispersion Tune vs Dp/p

Tune shift with amplitude 2 weak harmonic sextupoles near each ID straight reduce the amplitude dependent tune shift and resonance driving terms generated by chromatic sextupoles and increase dynamic aperture for horizontal injection. Minor adjustment will be needed to accommodate realistic length harmonic sextupoles.

Frequency map analysis Strong chromatic sextupoles generate high order resonance driving terms Dynamic apertureTune spread

Dynamic aperture (1) Without errors PEP-II multipole field errors only (10 seeds   Dp/p up to 3% Effect of multipole errors is small

Dynamic aperture (2) Multipole + field + quad misalignmentMultipole + field + all misalignment Quad misalignment is ok. Sextupole misalignment needs better orbit correction at sextupoles. Horizontal injection aperture is ok.

Momentum aperture Acceptance versus  p/p Obtained in LEGO dynamic aperture tracking w/o errors

IBS emittance and Touschek lifetime PEP-X parameters used for IBS calculations 1% current stability will require top-off injection every few seconds

PEP-X brightness

Emittance Optimization

MBA CELL (on going study) Seven bends per cell 8 cells per arc Total 6 arcs 336 dipoles(240,96) 2.2 km arc length 1.5 km 6 m ID straight Emittance 27.8 pm-rad Tune x =114.23, y =43.14 Energy spread 6.3e-4 Bunch length 3 mm Energy accep. 3.6% Natural chromaticity -141/-121 FODO x = y = MBA x = y = 0.625

Chromatic correction  Pair of SD SF for chromaticity correction. Choose phase advance in a periodic cell which yields a unit (+I) linear transfer matrix in both planes for a section made of these. K2lSF = m^-2, combined with QF K2lSD = m^-2 combined with dipole W-functions2 nd order dispersion Tune vs Dp/p

Dynamic aperture bare lattice  x = 11.5 m,  x =1 8  m  y = 10.3 m  x =1.7  m 1% coupling

PEP X ERL Fit into PEPX ring. Superconducting RF 1.3 GHz, 20MV/m m long Linac accelerate, decelerate of energy range 150 MeV to 5 GeV. Try to accommodate both PEPX and ERL operation. e - 5 GeV e MeV

PEP X soft x-ray FEL PEP-X ultra-low emittance, high peak current, FEL exponential gain (without saturation) at soft xray wavelengths can occur on a turn-by-turn basis Equilibrium energy spread (red dashed curve) and FEL power at r  = 3.3 nm (blue solid curve) as a function of the undulator length Z. Huang et al., NIM A 593, 120 (2008)

Conclusion The baseline lattice for PEP-X is presented. It uses DBA and TME cell optics and ~90 m damping wiggler yielding 30 ID straights and an ultra-low emittance. Photon brightness of ~10 22 (ph/s/mm 2 /mrad 2 /0.1 % BW) can be reached at 1.5 A for 3.5 m IDs at 10 keV. Dynamic aperture is adequate to accommodate a conventional off-axis injection system. More challenge designs of PEP-X Horizontal emittance to reach diffraction limit of 10 KeV photon-showing good progress Storage ring FEL ERL option