1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulating cloud-microphysical processes in CRCM5 Ping Du, Éric Girard, Jean-Pierre Blanchet.
Advertisements

Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München
03/2009 International MAHASRI/HyARC workshop T. NGO-DUC Page 1 International MAHASRI/HyARC workshop on Asian Monsoon Severe floods in Central Vietnam simulated.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
New Directions for WRF Land Surface Modeling 1 Polar WRF Workshop – 3 November 2011 Michael Barlage Research Applications Laboratory (RAL) National Center.
5/18/2015 Prediction of the 10 July 2004 Beijing Flood with a High- Resolution NWP model Ying-Hwa Kuo 1 and Yingchun Wang 2 1. National Center for Atmospheric.
Rapid Refresh and RTMA. RUC: AKA-Rapid Refresh A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of off-time or continuous observations.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Nesting. Eta Model Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model Previous called the Aviation (AVN) and Medium Range Forecast (MRF) models. Global model and 64 levels Relatively primitive.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
Improving Cloud Simulation in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Through Assimilation of GOES Satellite Observations Andrew White Advisor: Dr. Arastoo.
MODELING OF COLD SEASON PROCESSES Snow Ablation and Accumulation Frozen Ground Processes.
Nesting. Eta Model Eta Coordinate And Step Mountains MSL ground  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Diagram for the model structures Snow Cover and Runoff in Western China Guo-Yue Nu and Zong-Liang Yang The Dept. of Geological Sciences, The University.
NCEP Production Suite Review: Land-Hydrology at NCEP
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Status report from the Lead Centre for Surface Processes and Assimilation E. Rodríguez-Camino (INM) and S. Gollvik (SMHI)
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
Testing and Upcoming Implementation of the 20km RUC Stan Benjamin NOAA / FSL Georg Grell Steve.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
RUC Development - Applications to National C/V John Brown NOAA Forecast Systems Lab 19 April 2001.
Aerosols in WRF-CHEM Eric Stofferahn George Mason University _07:00:00 (UTC)
P1.85 DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED GOES PRODUCTS FOR GFS AND NAM Hui-Ya Chuang and Brad Ferrier Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, Washington DC Introduction.
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
Erik Crosman 1, John Horel 1, Chris Foster 1, Erik Neemann 1 1 University of Utah Department of Atmospheric Sciences Toward Improved NWP Simulations of.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Precipitation Verification of CAPS Real- time Forecasts During IHOP 2002 Ming Xue 1,2 and Jinzhong Min 1 Other contributors: Keith Brewster 1 Dan Weber.
WRF Problems: Some Solutions, Some Mysteries Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
Development and Testing of a Regional GSI-Based EnKF-Hybrid System for the Rapid Refresh Configuration Yujie Pan 1, Kefeng Zhu 1, Ming Xue 1,2, Xuguang.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Implementation and preliminary test of the unified Noah LSM in WRF F. Chen, M. Tewari, W. Wang, J. Dudhia, NCAR K. Mitchell, M. Ek, NCEP G. Gayno, J. Wegiel,
Current and Future Initialization of WRF Land States at NCEP Ken Mitchell NCEP/EMC WRF Land Working Group Workshop 18 June 2003.
NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD Impact of High-Frequency Variability of Soil Moisture on Seasonal.
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting February , 2008 Boulder, CO.
Boundary layer depth verification system at NCEP M. Tsidulko, C. M. Tassone, J. McQueen, G. DiMego, and M. Ek 15th International Symposium for the Advancement.
Incorporation and use of the NOAH LSM in the Coupled/Ocean Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS) ® Incorporation and use of the NOAH LSM in the.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
WRF/LSM Implementation and Verification Fei Chen, Mukul Tewari, and Wei Wang (NCAR) John Smart (NOAA/FSL) Collaborators: Ken Mitchell, Mike Ek (NCEP),
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Status of the Regional OSSE for Space-Based LIDAR Winds – July 2002 Steve Koch Adrian Marroquin Tom Schlatter John Smart Steve Weygandt Graham Feingold.
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC. RUC A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of offtime or continuous observations (not a 00.
Satellite Data Assimilation Activities at CIMSS for FY2003 Robert M. Aune Advanced Satellite Products Team NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ARAD Cooperative Institute for.
1 Xiaoyan Jiang, Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin 03/20/2007 Feedback between the atmosphere,
An advanced snow parameterization for the models of atmospheric circulation Ekaterina E. Machul’skaya¹, Vasily N. Lykosov ¹Hydrometeorological Centre of.
Land-Surface evolution forced by predicted precipitation corrected by high-frequency radar/satellite assimilation – the RUC Coupled Data Assimilation System.
2004 Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC Stan Benjamin Steve Weygandt NOAA / Forecast Systems Lab NY Courtesy:
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Simulation of the Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations and Analysis
Land surface analysis over India using High Resolution Land Data Assimilation System (HRLDAS) H P Nayak and M Mandal Centre for Oceans, Rivers, Atmosphere.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC Rapid Refresh-RR High Resolution Rapid Refresh-HRRR RTMA.
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Runoff Simulations in Region12 (or almost the State of Texas)
Presentation transcript:

1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003

2 Part 1: Current and Future Initialization of WRF Land States at FSL

3 Goal for use of WRF in the Rapid Update Cycle Use WRF model in Rapid Update Cycle (or Rapid Refresh) application at NCEP First step – test WRF model against current RUC hydrostatic model using common RUC initial conditions WRFRUC – WRF initialized with RUC-20 initial conditions, full-resolution native  coordinate data, including 3-d hydrometeor, land-sfc data

4 NCAR mass-coordinate dynamic core - v vertical sigma-p levels Initial conditions including land states for WRFRUC - native coordinate data from FSL RUC20 cycle including assimilation of observations not yet used in NCEP operational RUC20 – Coupled Data Assimilation System (CDAS) – available for outside users from the FSL ftp site in GRIB format Lateral boundary conditions from the same FSL RUC20 48h forecast RUC post-processing adapted to WRF output to produce RUC look-alike GRIB output WRFRUC model configuration

5 RUC CDAS - four-dimensional system (funded by GAPP) Uses a forward full-physics model Cycles surface/soil fields depending on the RUC atmospheric forcing Cycles 5 hydrometor species : cloud, ice, rain, snow and graupel. Cloud clearing/building based on GOES data New compared to RUC operational – 1.Forecast length (48-hour forecasts with hourly outputs) 2.Assimilation of: NEXRAD Radar reflectivity observations GPS precipitable water Boundary-layer profilers Mesonet observations collected at FS Main Goal: to improve 1-h precipitation forcing and the land surface model climate

6 24-hour precipitation accumulation ending at 1200 UTC 6 May 2003 RUC Control RUC CDAS Stage IV Rainfall

7 Spatial Correlation fields of 24-h Accumulated Precipitation ending at 1200 UTC 6 May 2003 (Dongsoo Kim) RUC CDAS RUC Control

8 Western US Diurnal cycle of biases from RUC control and RUC CDAS averaged for the period 1 December – 1 March m dew point 2-m temperature Western US

9 Two WRFRUC systems run at FSL in real time: 1.WRFRUC with 10-km horizontal resolution for the TAQ (Temperature and Air Quality) project - 48-hour forecasts twice a day (00 and 12 UTC, runs on JET since June 2002) 2. WRFRUC with 20-km horizontal resolution on CONUS domain - 24-hour forecasts twice a day (00 and 12 UTC, runs on JET since February 2003) - real-time fields

10 Physics options used in WRFRUC at FSL: - NCEP 5-class microphysics scheme (option 4) - RRTM longwave radiation (option 1) - Dudhia shortwave radiation (option 1) - Mellor-Yamada-Janjic Monin-Obukhov surface layer (option 2) - RUC land-surface model (option 3) - Mellor-Yamada-Janjic TKE scheme (option 2) - Kain-Fritsch (for CONUS) and Betts-Miller - Janjic (for TAQ) cumulus parameterization (option 1, 2) as of May 2003

11 Schematic presentation of processes included into RUC-LSM 6 levels in soil – 0, 5, 20, 40, 160, 300 cm State variables - volumetric soil moisture, soil temperature, snow cover/depth/temperature - cycled in RUC 1h cycle since 1997.

12 WRFRUC initialization needed: Changes to WRF SI (Brent Shaw) – use of native RUC vertical coordinate rather than isobaric levels to provide initial fields of atmospheric variables including hydrometeors (vapor, cloud, ice, rain, snow, graupel) The most recent official release of WRF SI includes all these changes

13 REAL changes for WRFRUC initialization : Changes to REAL (Dave Gill) accommodate for level structure in RUC soil domain pass through hydrometeor fields Further changes needed to pass through from SI to WRF model other land-surface related variables such as : 2 fields for snow temperature snow density water vapor mixing ratio at surface liquid volumetric soil moisture and others

14 WRFRUC LSM uses : -soil and vegetation parameters, vegetation fraction and albedo provided by WRF SI -cycled soil temperature and moisture from RUC20 (RUC and WRFRUC use the same LSM, land-use and soil classifications, and the same parameter tables) -cycled snow depth and temperature from RUC20 -ice in soil is initialized in WRF Atmospheric forcing is provided by WRF. Still need from WRF modeling framework: -precipitation type (solid versus liquid) -option in surface driver for implicit solution of energy and moisture budgets

15 Vegetation types – both provided by WRF SI (24 USGS classes) RUC20 WRF10 Land-use parameters: roughness length emissivity plant coefficient

16 RUC20 WRF10 Soil types – both provided by WRF SI (16 classes) Soil parameters – look-up table

17 Soil moisture analysis Valid 0000 UTC 17 June 2003 RUC20 WRF10

18 RUC10 Terrain Elevation (dm) TAQ domain RUC20

19 Surface temperature 0000 UTC, 17 June 2003 RUC20

20 Part 2: Evaluation of LSM performance

21 RUC LSM participated in:  Project for the Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) - Phase 2d  Snow Models Intercomparison Project (SNOWMIP) – Phase 1 RUC LSM is implemented in: Operational RUC20 at NCEP Real-time RUC20 at FSL (CDAS) MM5 chemistry package (Georg Grell) used for - air quality predictions - regional climate simulations (FSL, Germany, Israel) WRF model

22 Improved 1-d (PILPS 2d – Valdai, Russia) total runoff and snow water equivalent forecasts with improved snow and soil physics in MAPS land- surface model Total runoff Snow water equivalent Skin temperature November May 1977

23 Effects of frozen soil physics on the simulation of the melting seasons, Valdai, Russia ( ) Dates when snow ablation starts Dates when snow pack is all melted (Smirnova et al., JGR (2000), 105, )

24 SNOWMIP, an intercomparison of snow models: first results P. Etchevers, E. Martin, R. Brown et al. ISSW meeting, August 2002

25 NESDIS daily snow cover 7 January January 2003 Cycled field of snow depth from operational RUC20 at NCEP Valid at 2100 UTC 8 January 2003

26 WRF RUC 12-h forecast Valid 1200 UTC 29 January 2003

27 WRF-10 RUC h forecast of surface temperature from RUC and WRF against RUC-20 analysis 1800 UTC 29 January 2003 RUC-20

28 Hartford, CT 9 June UTC – 11 June UTC Station verification for TAQ project

29 Boston, MA 9 June UTC – 11 June UTC Station verification for TAQ project

30 Worcester, MA 9 June UTC – 11 June UTC Station verification for TAQ project

31 VariableRUCWRFRUC Wind spd – s.d Wind spd bias Temp –s.d.2.7 Temp – bias-00z Dewpoint – s.d Dewpoint – bias h surface forecasts verified vs. METAR obs 11 April – 11 June 2003 RUC-20 vs. WRFRUC-20 – all METARs in domain

32 12-h winds aloft forecasts – verified against rawinsonde RUC-20 vs. WRFRUC-20

33 RUC-20 (Grell- Devenyi cumulus) WRFRUC-20 (KF cumulus) 21-h forecasts Valid 2100 UTC 10 June 2003