Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bunch-by-Bunch Instrumentation Module Design Goals: –Unified conceptual design for all bunch-by-bunch instrumentation Beam position monitoring Bunch tune.
Advertisements

ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
The EMMA Turn-by-Turn BPM System A. Kalinin ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory STFC EMMA Commissioning Workshop Daresbury Laboratory, 21 May 2009.
E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
Key Specifications for Tevatron BPM Hardware Architecture Choices Jim Steimel.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
Beam Instrumentation for Orbit Stability I. Pinayev.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
Performance Improvement of APS Booster Ring Dipole Magnet Power Supplies Ju Wang The 3 rd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle.
Booster Cogging Upgrades Craig Drennan, Kiyomi Seiya, Alex Waller.
M.Gasior, CERN-BE-BIBE-KT Innovation Day, 3 June Base Band Tune (BBQ) measurement systems - observing beam oscillations with sub-micrometre amplitudes.
1 FermiLab Recycler Ring BPM Upgrade Based on Digital Receiver Technology R. Webber, J. Crisp, P. Prieto, D. Voy, C. Breigel, C. McClure, M. Mengel, S.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the hardware components of the upgraded Main Injector BPM system. The figure shows 2 signal channels which produce one position.
BI day 2011 T Bogey CERN BE/BI. Overview to the TTpos system Proposed technical solution Performance of the system Lab test Beam test Planning for 2012.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
Initial Performance Results of the APS P0 (Transverse Bunch-to-Bunch) Feedback System N. DiMonte#, C.-Y. Yao, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
The Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Front-End Software Luciano Piccoli, Stephen Foulkes, Margaret Votava and Charles Briegel Fermi National Accelerator.
Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00 1 Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
Proposal for LHC Microwave Schottky Pickups Ralph J. Pasquinelli 3/9/2005.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
BI day /12/00 1 PIPOS Project (TT2 & TT10) (Beam performances) G. Vismara  Present situation  Proposals  Beam parameters  Technical solution.
F Fermilab July 6, 2005Recycler Damper Stability1 Recycler Damper High Frequency Stability Jim Crisp
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
Present Uses of the Fermilab Digital Signal Receiver VXI Module Brian Chase,Paul Joireman, Philip Varghese RF Embedded Systems (LLRF) Group.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Fermilab February 17, 2003Recycler BPM Front-end1 Duane C. Voy
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary Status, Motivation, and Directions.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
Plan for Beam Extraction using strip-line kicker with pulse bump orbit Present extraction kicker system Strip-line kicker system for ILC Beam extraction.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
F f Quadrupole Pick-Ups at CERN & Fermilab A.Jansson FNAL.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
Booster bpm’s Jim Crisp 3/29/06. Plate width and linearity with the response linearized along the axis 60 and 20 degree plates become nonlinear in the.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Accuracy of the orbit measurement by KEKB BPM system for the study of ILC damping ring H. Fukuma (KEK) Requirement for the accuracy of BPM data.
LEReC BPM Status P. Cernigla, R. Hulsart, R. Michnoff, Z. Sorrell June 2, 2016.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
> 50 dB ≤ 500 MHz Non-intercepting beam position measurement
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Limits on damping times
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
HL-LHC HEL BPM.
Presentation transcript:

Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel

Why an upgrade? Accuracy of current system is poor with coalesced bunches. Problems with reliable data acquisition (turn-by-turn) Blind to pbars.

Current Analog Frontend Considerable slope on position signal for coalesced bunches. Beam based trigger has jitter. Filters optimized for 6x6 operation. Always measuring first bunch in train.

Current Data Acquisition Only 8 bit ADC for full range. Communication uses obsolete GAS protocol. Data retrieval is unreliable and difficult to debug. Questions about triggering and correlation of samples for turn-by-turn analysis.

Pbar Sampling Status BPMs are externally terminated to allow for directional pickups at both ends. Pbar end of BPMs are currently terminated in the tunnel. We currently posses boxes with switches to allow changes between pbar and proton ends of BPM, but it interferes with the directionality of the BPM.

Scope of BPM Upgrade Cabling and processing hardware for 224 BPMs. Data acquisition algorithms for processing hardware. Synchronization and triggering system for all BPMs. Software for hardware communication, data processing, and user interface.

Stripline Properties Directionality ~ 26 dB Response peaks at around 375 MHz Peak product of response and form factor (for full bucket) at ~80 MHz Best fundamental response at 53 MHz or 106 MHz Graph showing the product of the strip- line response and the beam form factor for a full bucket.

Bunch Properties Coalesced Protons Particles/bunch: 30e e9 # of bunches: 1 – 36 Bunch length 3  : 4.5ns – 10ns Coalesced Pbars Particles/bunch: 3e e9 # of bunches: 1 – 36 Bunch length 3  : 4.5ns – 10ns

Peak & Average Signal Levels Peak specified current will be ~10A. Peak voltage from single stripline will be ~200V. Peak DC current of protons ~80mA. Peak fundamental sum voltage from BPM ~1.4V. Simulation of peak current from a single Gaussian bunch with 300e9 particles and 1.5ns .

Beam Distribution Standard Store Configuration Pilot Tuning Injection Ramp Pbar Only Studies

Standard HEP Store Bucket spacing is 18.9ns (53.1 MHz) Store consists of 3 batches of 12 bunches. Within a batch, bunch separation is 21 buckets. 140 bucket separation between batches. Pbars and protons have same configuration.

Standard Store Spectrum

Pilot Tuning Use a single coalesced bunch or uncoalesced batch for tuning. Uncoalesced batch consists of 30 low intensity bunches in consecutive buckets. Very important to have repeatability between pilot position measurements and 36 bunch position measurements.

Injection Protons injected one bunch at a time. After protons are injected, pbars are injected 4 bunches at a time and then cogged. Important to maintain average position orbit through the injection process.

Ramp Protons and pbars are accelerated. Magnets and correctors are varying wildly to respond to changes in bending strength as beam accumulates more energy. Largest rate of closed orbit position changes in acceleration process.

Studies Arbitrary configuration Beam may occupy any number of buckets. Arbitrary intensity and orbits. May involve only protons or only pbars.

Specification Definitions Scope: Specifications refer to final data output to user (includes all averaging). Absolute Position Accuracy Relative Position Accuracy Position Linearity Orbit Position Resolution Long Term Position Stability Specification Range

Absolute Position Accuracy Creates a limit to the sum of the uncalibrated position offset and the relative error at full range. Dictates how well we know the position of the beam relative to the center of the quad for all beam conditions, positions, and time.

Relative Position Accuracy Describes the limit of the position error variation as a function of beam displacement. Does not include offset errors, but does include scale errors, non-linearities, and random errors. Takes precedence over absolute position accuracy for small displacement.

Position Linearity Describes how much the relative position can deviate from a linear function. Similar to relative position error, but scale errors do not affect it.

Orbit Position Resolution Refers to the smallest change in beam position that the BPM system can reliably observe. Affected by noise and other random errors.

Long Term Position Stability Refers to the BPMs’ ability to give the same position value for the same beam position and intensity over a time period of multiple stores or one week shutdown. The BPM readings should not vary by more than the amount specified over a one week time span.

Specification Range Refers to the amount of BPM aperture, relative to center, in which the listed specifications remain valid. Beyond these points, the specification becomes more relaxed.

BPM Specs Absolute Accuracy Relative Accuracy Linearity Ideal Reading Actual Beam Position BPM Reading Arbitrary reference point for relative accuracy spec

Processing Definitions BPM Frontend Bandwidth Modes: Flash Bandwidth Modes: Closed Orbit Time Stamp

BPM Front End Analog combining, filtering, mixing, and amplifying of BPM stripline signals. A/D, memory organization Single channel internal processing Single channel triggering

Bandwidth Modes: Flash Take a fast sample of positions relative to a clock event, state change, or manual command. Bandwidth must be of the order of or greater than revolution frequency. Used to diagnose problems of a fast nature: Injection misteering, kicker misfires.

Bandwidth Modes: Closed Orbit Lower bandwidth but more precise mode. Will include more internal averaging. Data access triggered by clock event, state change, manual command, or continuous update. Max 1Hz data request rate.

Time Stamp Time value associated with each sample point, used to synchronize data from different channels. Time stamp must be synchronized around the ring for successful diagnostic of injection errors and kicker misfires.

Key Specifications Absolute Position Accuracy: 1.0 mm Relative Position Accuracy: 5% Long Term Position Stability: 0.02 mm Best Orbit Position Resolution: 0.02mm Position Linearity: 1.5% Specification Range:  15mm Total number of BPM channels required: 244 x 2

Resolution Requirement Details Store and pilot distributions: use key specifications. Ramp and injection distributions: Close orbit resolution 0.05mm. Studies Over range

Studies Arbitrary mode, will specify resolution for different dynamic ranges. > 200e9 particles or >100e9 particles/bunch – 0.02mm 200e9 > particles > 50e9 or 100e9 > particles/bunch > 30e9 – 0.1mm 50e9 > particles > 10e9 or 30e9 > particles/bunch > 3e9 – 0.25mm Always use least stringent specification.

Over Range Specs for beam off center 15mm-25mm Absolute Position Accuracy: 2.0 mm Relative Position Accuracy: 5% Long Term Position Stability: not needed, we need to re-steer immediately Best Orbit Position Resolution: 0.2mm Position Linearity: part of relative position accuracy spec No specs for beam off center more that 25mm

Processing Specifications Bandwidth of flash mode:~50 kHz Bandwidth of closed orbit mode:~100 Hz Flash mode time stamp precision:10 μs Closed orbit mode time stamp precision:500 μs Frames of internal storage/mode:512

Functional Justification Tune Orbits Injection Diagnostics Orbit Smoothing during HEP Orbits up the Ramp for Shots Abort/Quench Conditions Lattice Function Measurements

User Interface Requirements User interface must run from a control room console. Interface should be multi-user. It should set up the BPMs for the appropriate user measurements. It should retrieve the data from the BPMs. It should correlate and present the BPM data in a usable fashion.

Priority for Multi-user Data Aquisition Data acquisition in progress Preprogrammed automatic acquisition Manual closed orbit acquisition Manual flash acquisition

BPM System Settings Closed Orbit/Flash Mode Select Proton/Pbar Mode Select Arm and Trigger Settings for Automated Measurements Quantity of Flash Mode Data to Download

BPM Data Cluster BPM Azimuthal Position Trigger Settings Closed Orbit/Flash Mode Setting Proton/Pbar Setting Size of Data Array Trigger Event for Current Data Acquisition Arm Event for Current Data Acquisition Array of: Position readings Intensity readings Time stamp for each read

Plotting Packages Plot Closed Orbit (all BPMs) Plot Difference Orbit (closed orbit/all BPMs) Plot Flash Orbit (all BPMs) Plot Flash Data (single BPM) Plot Flash FFT (single BPM)

Calibration & Maintenance The calibration system must maintain the specifications. Specifications are only required to hold over period given by long term stability. Beyond this calibration required. Diagnostics must be good enough to pinpoint fault in any replaceable component.

Misc Notes Tune measurement not specified, but feature of system. Pbar positions only specified for pbar only stores. High intensity pbars will interfere with proton position accuracy and linearity.

Turn-by-turn Turn-by-turn operation not specified, but a feature of the system due to first turn orbits. Currently, no justification for ring wide turn-by-turn capability. Lattice phase advance? Local coupling? Can turn-by-turn information be collected by a few wide-band systems?

Cost and Schedule Keep total cost below $300k Have design plan finished by Oct. ‘03. Begin ordering components and installing during Fall/Winter ‘03. Have system commissioned by April ’04.

Priorities Reliability Closed orbit position resolution Closed orbit position accuracy Flash position resolution Flash memory depth Turn-by-turn synchronization and processing

Questions Do we need ring wide turn-by-turn capability? Do we need to expand/loosen our specifications on pbar positions? Do we need to expand the scope of the project to include a small number of wide- band processors?