Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Constitution and the Branches of Government Landmark Civil Rights Cases.
Advertisements

Civil Rights in the Courts
■Essential Question ■Essential Question: –How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? ■Warm-Up Question: –?
Chapter 5 Equal Protection under the Law: Balancing Individual, State and Federal Rights.
Good Afternoon!! 1.NVC 2.HOT ROC: Quote Analysis 3.Snobfarm University: A Case Study 4.Affirmative Action: Yay or Nay? Essential Question: Is affirmative.
Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke 438 U.S. 265, 98 S.Ct Argued October 12, 1977 Decided June 28, 1978.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights Legal basis for civil rights Enforcing the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment Critical Supreme Court ruling in the battle.
Affirmative Action in Higher Education A Case Study of the Effects the Courts Have Had on the Admissions Processes of Higher Education Institutions.
Equal Protection of the Law Fourteenth Amendment Jessica Stickel Ashley Pollack Shannan Petchul.
6 – CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES. SWEATT V. PAINTER BACKGROUND In 1946, Heman Marion Sweatt, a black man, applied for admission to the University.
C IVIL R IGHTS AND P UBLIC P OLICY African Americans…
Affirmative Action. Under Federal Affirmative Action laws and regulations, public universities receiving federal funds must: o Maintain minority admissions.
30.4 The Movement Continues. Civil Rights movement in trouble: SCLC workers were determined to continue King’s work so they went ahead with the Poor People’s.
© 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder ’ s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Equality of Results vs Equality of Opportunity Andrew Adair x Michael Dotson.
Affirmative Action “Positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in area of employment, education, and business from which.
C IVIL R IGHTS AND P UBLIC P OLICY African Americans…
Margo Tillstrom Chris Makaryk Ariel Woldman Zach Morris.
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
Affirmative Action Has there been a move away from Affirmative Action in Recent Years?
Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
Brown V. Board of Education (1954)
Block 2 Carl Turner. Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978.
Copyright, 2000 © Prentice Hall Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Federal Civil Rights Laws Chapter 21 Section 3. Question As a Ten year old you bullied someone every day causing that kid great torment. Then you saw.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Objective 30D Understand the application and significance of the equal protection clause of the 14 th amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Matt Selby. BROWN VS BOARD OVERVIEW Segregation was commonplace in many public areas in the United States in the 50s 12 parents filed a suit against the.
Regents of the university of California v. bakke
Objective 30d Understand the application and significance of the Equal Protection clause of the 14 th Amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Regents of The University of California v. Bakke By Alicia M.
California vs. Bakke Anessa,Tierra and Keanna. Facts Covered under the 14 th amendment Bakke, a white medical school applicant,was turned and his spot.
Unit 3 Objectives 30d 30e 30f. 14 th Amendment No state shall make or enforce any law that shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens.
Goal 5.06A “The Civil Rights Struggle” I: Struggle for Rights A: Discrimination= unfair treatment based on prejudice against a certain group. B: Civil.
Discrimination in Employment. Affirmative Action  Taking positive steps to remedy past and current discrimination in employment and education.
EVENTS & RESULTS of the CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT ( )
Copyright, 2000 © Prentice Hall Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Ratifying the Constitution To ratify the Constitution, a battle would drag on for 2 years.
Section Outline 1 of 7 Our Enduring Constitution Section 2: A Flexible Framework I.The Role of the Supreme Court II.Equality and Segregation III.Equality.
Chapter 7 Section 2 A Flexible Framework. The Role of the Supreme Court Overturning a Decision – Court decisions set important precedents, but can be.
Practice Quiz Number #1 - #10
Supreme Court Activity: You Decide
GOOD AFTERNOON, 8TH PERIOD! PLEASE PICK UP A SHEET FROM THE TABLE
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Gov Review Video #48: Important Civil Rights To Know
Korematsu V. United States
Affirmative Action.
Team 3: Elizabeth, Dan, Courtney, Jonathan, Brittany, and Sarah
Lecture 41 Discrimination V
Bakke v. Board of Regents of California
OUR LIVING CONSTITUTION
Civil Rights.
Key Ch. 5 Vocabulary Review – AP Government
New Approaches to Civil Rights
Affirmative Action.
Bakke v. The board of regents in california
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? CPUSH Agenda for Unit 14.4:  Important.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Ch. 21—Equality Under the Law
Bryan Dee Graham Fuller Adam Nims Andrea Stoddard Greg Baumer
The Civil Rights Struggle
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Ap u.s. government & politics
Turbulent Times (The 1960s and 1970s
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Warm UP Is the Supreme Court a vehicle for change?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Topic 6 – Role of the people
Presentation transcript:

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978

Background Allan Bakke applied to 12 medical schools in He had been a National Merit Scholar at Coral Gables Senior High School. He was accepted as an undergraduate at the University of Minnesota, deferring tuition cost by joining Naval ROTC. He graduated with a GPA of Bakke had been rejected from medical school after applying more than twice and being evaluated personally by a student and still got rejected. Allan Bakke and the University of California and staff

Constitutional Issue In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled segregation by race in public schools to be unconstitutional. Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids racial discrimination in any program or activity receiving federal funding.

President at the Time

Supreme Court Decision Four justices joined with him to strike down the minority admissions program and admit Bakke. The other four justices dissented from that portion of the decision, but joined with Powell to find affirmative action permissible under some circumstances, though subject to an intermediate scrutiny standard of analysis. They also joined with Powell to reverse that portion of the judgement of the California Supreme Court that forbade the university to consider race in the admissions process.

Works Cited ia_v._Bakke ia_v._Bakke