Mass and environment quenching  (Peng et al 2010, 2012) from Peng et al (2012) centrals satellites Two “separable effects” Mass-quenching: Depends on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Star formation histories and environment Bianca M. Poggianti INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova WE ARE ALL AFTER THE BIG PICTURE: 1)To what extent,
Advertisements

Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
David Cole, Walter Dehnen, Mark Wilkinson University of Leicester Dark Matter in clusters, groups and galaxies Nottingham-Birmingham extragalactic workshop.
A simple model to explain the high gas content of galaxy UGC 8802 Ruixiang Chang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Collaborators: Jinliang Hou Shiyin Shen.
Halo White Dwarf Controversy Painting by Lynette Cook Ben R. Oppenheimer UC-Berkeley Nigel Hambly, Andrew Digby University of Edinburgh Simon Hodgkin Cambridge.
How special are brightest group and cluster galaxies? Anja von der Linden et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 867 On the prevalence of radio-loud active galactic.
An Evolutionary Connection between AGNs and GALEX UV-excess Early-type Galaxies Hyun-Jin Bae*, Kiyun Yun, Yumi Choi, and Suk-Jin Yoon Department of Astronomy.
Xiaohu Yang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Partner group of MPA Collaborators: Yu Wang (SHAO), H.J. Mo (UMass), F.C. van den Bosch (MPIA), Neal Katz.
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Mass determination Kauffmann et al. determined masses using SDSS spectra (Hdelta & D4000) Comparison with our determination: Relative.
Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
What Does Clustering Tell Us About the Buildup of the Red Sequence Tinker & Wetzel 2009 Presented by Brandon Patel.
Statistical Properties of Radio Galaxies in the local Universe Yen-Ting Lin Princeton University Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Yue Shen, Michael.
Rand (2000) NGC 5775 Hα map. D = 24.8 Mpc It is an interacting galaxy.
Statistical Properties of Radio Galaxies in the local Universe Yen-Ting Lin Princeton University Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Yue Shen, Michael.
Distances. Parallax Near objects appear to move more than far objects against a distant horizon. Trigonometric parallax is used to measure distance to.
ACCRETION MODELS FOR BLACK HOLE EVOLUTION Francesco Shankar In collaboration with: D. Weinberg J. Miralda-Escude’ L. Ferrarese A. Cavaliere S. Mathur CCAPP/OSU.
Evolution and environment The halo model –Environmental effects in the SDSS –Halo mass vs. local density Mark correlations –SDSS galaxies and their environments.
Metallicity and the control of star-formation* Simon Lilly ETH Zurich * based on Lilly, Carollo, Renzini, Pipino & Peng (2013) ApJ Matteucci Meeting,
Feedback & Large Surveys Harry Ferguson (STScI). Feedback Behroozi Halo quenching Quasar mode AGN Radio Mode AGN (SNe) SNe Satellites: Ram pressure,
I N T R O D U C T I O N The mechanism of galaxy formation involves the cooling and condensation of baryons inside the gravitational potential well provided.
Benjamin D. Oppenheimer Leiden Observatory Simone Weinmann, Romeel Dave, Kristian Finlator, Jason Tumlinson, Rob Crain & others.
Galactic Metamorphoses: Role of Structure Christopher J. Conselice.
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
The Gas Properties of Galaxies on and off of a Star-Forming Sequence David Schiminovich + GALEX Science Team Columbia University.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
Satellite Galaxies (Observation) Open Questions No answers Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Cosmological Galaxy Formation
Galaxy Growth: The role of environment Simone Weinmann (MPA Garching) Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann, Frank van den Bosch, Anna Pasquali, Dan McIntosh,
Deciphering the CIB 12 Oct 2012 Banyuls MODELING COUNTS AND CIBA WITH MAIN SEQUENCE AND STARBURST GALAXIES Matthieu Béthermin CEA Saclay In collaboration.
MARK CORRELATIONS AND OPTIMAL WEIGHTS ( Cai, Bernstein & Sheth 2010 )
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
1 On star-formation compactness & bulges: the ALMA view  IR (z~2) =  IR (z~0) x 6  IR (z~4) =  IR (z~0) x 12  IR (z) =  IR (z~0) x (1+z) 2.5 vs 
AIMS OF G ALACTIC C HEMICAL E VOLUTION STUDIES To check / constrain our understanding of stellar nucleosynthesis (i.e. stellar yields), either statistically.
Kathryn Mummah What happened before I showed up What you need to know astronomically What I did & the results of my summer at Fermi.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Katarina Kovač (ETH Zürich) Environmental quenching disentangled: centrals, satellites, and galactic conformity Katarina Kovač, ETH Zürich Collaborators:
The dynamics of the gas regulator model and the implied cosmic sSFR-history Yingjie Peng Cambridge Roberto Maiolino, Simon J. Lilly, Alvio Renzini.
The epoch of star formation for th e most massive galaxies Sarah Brough (AAO)
Q1: Quenching and the cessation of star-formation 1 1.The "Q" word and its meaning a.Is quenching a good word to describe the end of star-formation in.
Xiaohu Yang ( 杨小虎 ) Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Partner group of MPA Collaborators: H.J. Mo (UMass), F.C. van den Bosch (MPIA), A. Pasquali (MPiA),
Evolution of galaxies and dark matter halos Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Main Collaborators: Chunyan Jiang ( 姜春艳), Cheng Li (李成), Donghai.
Interpreting the relationship between galaxy luminosity, color, and environment. Andreas Berlind (NYU, CCPP) SPH predictions: Michael Blanton (NYU) David.
The GOOD NICMOS Survey (GNS): Observing Massive Galaxies at z > 2 Christopher J. Conselice (University of Nottingham) with Asa Bluck, Ruth Gruethbacher,
Galaxy Evolution in Groups and Clusters Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Galaxy evolution in z=1 groups The Gemini GEEC2 survey Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The Mass-Dependent Role of Galaxy Mergers Kevin Bundy (UC Berkeley) Hubble Symposium March, 2009 Masataka Fukugita, Richard Ellis, Tom Targett Sirio Belli,
Maracalagonis, 24/05/ Semi-Analytic Modeling of Galaxy Formation PhD student: Elena Ricciardelli Supervisor: prof. Alberto Franceschini.
BULGE FRACTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF STAR FORMATION IN SAMI GALAXIES Greg Goldstein PhD student, Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University Supervisors:
David V. Stark In collaboration with: Sheila Kannappan, Kathleen Eckert, Jonathan Florez, Kirsten Hall, Linda Watson, Erik Hoversten, Joseph Burchett,
盘状星系的颜色和颜色梯度 常 瑞 香 (上海天文台 ) 合作者:沈世银 刘成则 侯金良 邵正义 颜色 - 星等关系 颜色梯度 盘状星系的演化模型.
The Active to Passive Transition Alvio Renzini, Ringberg Schloss, May 21, 2010 ● Star Formation ceases in many galaxies, first in the most massive ones,
Low mass galaxy problems in SAMs Cathy Caviglia. Fiducial model ● Low mass galaxies form stars too efficiently and too early ● f * =M star /M halo.
Towards Realistic Modeling of Massive Star Clusters Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan) graduate student Hui Li.
Genevieve J. Graves University of California, Santa Cruz
The morphology and angular momentum of simulated galaxy populations
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Galaxy populations within clusters in the 2PIGG catalogue
Satellite Quenching and Structural Change
Possibility of UV observation in Antarctica
‘3D’ Data Sets are ABSOLUTELY Crucial to Answer the Important Questions of Galaxy Formation and Evolution Galaxy dynamical masses, gas masses Spatially.
Specific Star Formation Rates to z=1.5
Quenching of the star formation activity in cluster galaxies
On the
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs
Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The sSFR-M∗ relation part I σsSFR -M∗ as a function of sample, SFR indicator and environment L. J. M. Davies et al. Liu.
SDSS-IV MaNGA: The Spatial Distribution of Star Formation and its Dependence on Mass, Structure and Environment (arXiv: v1) 胡 宁
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Compact Star-Forming Galaxies as Old Starbursts Becoming Quiescent
Presentation transcript:

Mass and environment quenching  (Peng et al 2010, 2012) from Peng et al (2012) centrals satellites Two “separable effects” Mass-quenching: Depends on mass but not environment Satellite quenching: Depends on environment but not on mass But are they actually the same thing? NB  sat measures the differential effect of the environment on top of effect of mass (or vice versa).

Variation of  sat in 1-d in m sat, m h, m cen, , R and sSFR cen Essential to control in halo mass. Conformity in satellites that are carefully matched in all five of m star, m halo, , R, m cen Bottom line: Environmental quenching effects as measured by  sat are 2.5 times stronger in satellites with quenched centrals than those of SF centrals after taking into account all other effects Revisit of environment effects in SDSS (Knobel et al 2014) “conformity” (Weinmann+ 2006)

Galaxies as (not) probabilistic systems “probability of quenching” Galaxies are (probably) not probabilistic systems. The apparent probabilistic aspect of quenching reflects incomplete knowledge, i.e. the presence of “hidden variables”. Observed fraction of systems quenched Conformity implies that there must be a “hidden common variable” that is playing an important role in linking the quenching of centrals and environmental effects in satellites. Environmental-quenching (largely) caused by halo-wide effects consequent to mass-quenching of the central by whatever mechanism. Both mass- and environment-quenching are both caused by halo-wide effects shared by centrals and satellites of a given halo (incl. formation history of halo)

Another argument in favour: Environment-quenching of (reasonably massive) satellites starts to be important at 11.5 < log m h < This is the halo mass (of centrals) that is associated with the Schechter stellar M* that is associated with mass- quenching. Also: independence of structure on whether mass- or environment- quenched (Carollo et al 2014)

Expected!! Distribution of most environment variables for satellites is independent of the satellite’s mass! But note this requires quenching “response” to be independent of satellite mass. m halo m cen  r/r rms But then why do satellite-quenching and mass-quenching have such different dependencies on galaxy mass?