Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division 2014 Edition Standards & Certification Criteria Final Rule.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
2014 Edition Release 2 EHR Certification Criteria Final Rule.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Eligible Hospitals (EH) & Critical Access Hospitals (CAH)
Recommendations on Certification of EHR Modules HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup April 11, 2014.
2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Proposed Rule
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Presenter James S. Dunnick, SESEDN LLC. Credentials: MD. FACC. CHCQM. CPC. Contact Information:
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) Certification Program June 19, 2013 Lauren Fifield, Policy Adviser, Practice Fusion.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Discussion of 2015 Ed. NPRM Certification/Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 2, 2014.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
PR’s Journey Towards Electronic Health Records Adoption & Meaningful Use PRESENTATION TO PR HIT SUMMIT Antonio Fernandez Regional Extension Center for.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Criteria for HIT Stimulus Funding: Meaningful Use and Certification Requirements May 4, 2010 Meaningful Use Critical Access Hospital September 16, 2010.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division Proposed Rule Standards & Certification Criteria 2014 Edition.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
CMS Proposed Changes for Meaningful Use in Mark Segal, Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs, GE Healthcare IT May 1, 2015.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup February 21, 2014.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
2015 Edition Final Rule: Overview of 2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria & Health IT Certification Program Provisions Elise Sweeney Anthony,
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Standards and Certification Requirements for Certified EHR Modules Dixie Baker, Chair Walter Suarez,
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
ONC HIT Certification Program Update Carol Bean, Ph.D. Director, Office of Certification Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT HIT Standards.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Presentation transcript:

Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division 2014 Edition Standards & Certification Criteria Final Rule

S&CC 2014 Edition Final Rule Major Themes Enhancing standards-based exchange Promoting EHR technology safety and security Enabling greater patient engagement Introducing greater transparency Reducing regulatory burden 1

S&CC and Meaningful Use Complementary but Different Scopes S&CC scope = “technical” – Specifies the capabilities EHR technology must include and how they need to perform in order to be certified. – It does not specify how the EHR technology needs to be used. Meaningful use scope = “behavioral” – Specifies how eligible providers need to use Certified EHR Technology in order to receive incentives. 2

NPRM Versus Final Rule S&CC August ‘12 § (a) Clinical (n=17) (b) Care Coordination (n=7) (c) CQMs (n=3) (d) Privacy and Security (n=9*) (e) Patient Engagement (n=3) (f) Public Health (n=6*) (g) Utilization (n=4) NPRM versus Final Rule 3 S&CC February ‘12 § (a) Clinical (n=18) (b) Care Coordination (n=6) (c) CQMs (n=3) (d) Privacy and Security (n=9*) (e) Patient Engagement (n=3) (f) Public Health (n=8) (g) Utilization (n=4) * = includes optional certification criteria

“New” Certification Criteria 4 Ambulatory & InpatientInpatient OnlyAmbulatory Only Electronic Notes Electronic medication administration record Secure messaging Image resultseRx (for discharge) Cancer case information Family Health History Transmission of electronic lab tests and values/results to ambulatory providers Transmission to cancer registries Amendments View, Download, & Transmit to 3 rd party Auto numerator recording Non-%-based measure use report Safety-enhanced design Quality management system Data Portability

“Revised” Certification Criteria 5 Ambulatory & InpatientAmbulatory Only Drug-drug, drug-allergy interaction checks Vital signs, body mass index, and growth charts eRx DemographicsCQMs (3 criteria)Clinical summaries Clinical information reconciliation Incorporate lab tests and values/results Problem listEnd-user device encryption Clinical decision support Auditable events and tamper-resistance Inpatient Only Drug-formulary checksAudit report(s) TOC – receive, display, and incorporate toc/referral summaries TOC – create and transmit toc/referral summaries Transmission of reportable lab tests and values/results Patient list creation Patient-specific education resources Smoking status Automated measure calculation Transmission to Immunization Registries Transmission to public health agencies – syndromic surveillance 5

“Unchanged” Certification Criteria 6 Ambulatory & Inpatient CPOEAdvance directives Medication listImmunization information Medication allergy listAutomatic log-off Authentication, access control, & authorization Emergency access IntegrityAccounting of disclosures Incorporate lab test results (inpatient only) Smoking status Vital signs, body mass index, and growth charts Drug-formulary checks Patient listsPatient reminders Public health surveillance Reportable laboratory tests and values/results These certification criteria would be “eligible” for “gap certification.”

July 2010 Final Rule Policy Static Definition Driven by Certification Criteria Revised Certified EHR Technology (CEHRT) Definition 7 August 2012 Final Rule Policy Dynamic Definition Driven by Meaningful Use

Revised CEHRT Definition and Interdependence Big picture The new regulatory framework provides more flexibility. The potential number of 2014 Edition certification criteria to which EHR technology would need to be certified (for an eligible provider to have EHR technology that meets the CEHRT definition) could be limited to the MU stage needs of an EHR technology developer’s customer. CEHRT Interdependence – Two views of the CEHRT Definition For eligible providers: – It is about having EHR technology(ies) certified to meet the Base EHR definition and just enough of 2014 Edition certification criteria to support their achievement of the MU stage they seek to meet. For EHR technology developers: – This new definition presents the opportunity to rethink the scope of EHR technology certifications sought. – Now able to seek “right size certifications” for their EHR technology based on their customers scope of practice and/or the MU stage that their customers will be seeking to achieve. 8

General Points to Remember Two types of certifications can be issued: – “Complete EHR” (i.e., EHR tech certified to all mandatory cert. criteria) – “EHR Module” (i.e., EHR tech certified to less than all mandatory cert. criteria) The scope of a certification issued to EHR technology represents only the capabilities for which the certification was sought/granted. EHR technology developers get to choose the type of certification sought for EHR technology and its scope (i.e., for EHR Modules, the number of cert. criteria to which it would be certified). – Additional capabilities beyond those for which certification criteria have been adopted are not within the scope of ONC’s regulatory framework and reflect a business decision made by the EHR technology developer if they are included with an EHR technology to which a certification is issued. 9

So what? What’s to be excited about? Now 3 ways to meet CEHRT definition Complete EHR – Generally provides overall assurance. – EPs would still need EHR technology certified to cancer registry certification criteria if they seek to meet that MU objective. EHR Module(s): – Combination of EHR Modules – Single EHR Module In the case of EHR Modules, it is now possible for an eligible provider to have just enough EHR technology certified to the 2014 Edition EHR certification criteria to meet the CEHRT definition. 10

Base EHR Edition CEHRT Easy as 1, 2, 3 + C* EP/EH/CAH would only need to have EHR technology with capabilities certified for the MU menu set objectives & measures for the stage of MU they seek to achieve. EP/EH/CAH would need to have EHR technology with capabilities certified for the MU core set objectives & measures for the stage of MU they seek to achieve unless the EP/EH/CAH can meet an exclusion. EP/EH/CAH must have EHR technology with capabilities certified to meet the Base EHR definition. 11 *C = CQMs

Edition EHR Certification Criteria Required to Satisfy the Base EHR Definition EHR technology that:Certification Criteria Includes patient demographic and clinical health information, such as medical history and problem lists Demographics § (a)(3)  Vital Signs § (a)(4)N/A Problem List § (a)(5)  Medication List § (a)(6)  Medication Allergy List § (a)(7)  Has the capacity to provide clinical decision support Drug-Drug and Drug-Allergy Interaction Checks § (a)(2)N/A Clinical Decision Support § (a)(8)  Has the capacity to support physician order entry Computerized Provider Order Entry § (a)(1)  Has the capacity to capture and query information relevant to health care quality Clinical Quality Measures § (c)(1) through (3)  Has the capacity to exchange electronic health information with, and integrate such information from other sources Transitions of Care § (b)(1) and (2)  Data Portability § (b)(7)  View, Download, and Transmit to 3rd Party § (e)(1)N/A Has the capacity to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of health information stored and exchanged Privacy and Security § (d)(1) through (8)  Certification Criteria Assigned to Final Base EHR Definition It is a definition. It is meant to be used like a checklist to meet the CEHRT definition. It is not “a Base EHR” or a singular type of EHR technology that has these capabilities. The Base EHR definition includes CQM requirements not specified in this table. 12

CEHRT: Show and Tell Final Rule Policy Ambulatory CEHRT = 32 CCEP MUS1 min = 27 CC *No MU core exclusions ** 5 MU menu deferral 2012 Final Rule Policy EP min = variable Ambulatory CEHRT = CC required by Base EHR def + those to meet MU stage “Right sized” certified EHR Module(s) Reality sized certified EHR Module(s)

Revised CEHRT Definition Effective Dates and Options EHR Reporting Period FY/CY 2011FY/CY 2012FY/CY 2013FY/CY2014 MU Stage 1 MU Stage 1 or MU Stage 2 EPs, EHs, and CAHs have 3 options: 1)EHR technology that has been certified to all applicable 2011 Edition EHR certification criteria. 2)EHR technology that has been certified to all applicable 2011 Edition or equivalent 2014 Edition EHR certification criteria certification criteria. 3)EHR technology certified to the 2014 Edition EHR certification criteria that meets the Base EHR definition and would support ability to achieve MU stage 1 and successfully report the CQMs. All EPs, EHs, and CAHs must have EHR technology certified to the 2014 Edition EHR certification criteria that meets the Base EHR definition and would support the objectives, measures, and their ability to successfully report the CQMs, for the MU stage that they seek to achieve Edition EHR technology supports the achievement of either meaningful use stage. Certification is not tied to MU stages. No “Stage 1 Certified” or “Stage 2 Certified” in perpetuity. Same Policy

Illustrated: Two Types of Certifications Issued “Complete EHR” or “EHR Module” 15 Universe of EHR technology capabilities (e.g., all of what XYZ’s EHR technology includes) 2014Ed Complete EHR definition Generally supports MUS1 or MUS2 achievement Certified to all mandatory 2014Ed CC for setting EHR Module certified to number of 2014Ed necessary to support MUS1 Base EHR definition = certified EHR Module Inner square = EHR Module certified to number of 2014Ed CC less than MUS1 (or MUS2) Outer square = EHR Module certified to number of 2014Ed CC necessary to support MUS2 Point to remember: Certification’s scope does NOT address all capabilities included in EHR technology 2014 Edition Scope Stops Here MUS1 MUS2 EHR Module certified to less than Base EHR definition 6 6

A Different Look: Understanding the CEHRT Definition and the Minimum Number of Certification Criteria to which EHR Technology would need to be certified 16 Base EHR MU1 Core MU1 Menu MU2 Menu Base EHR MU1 Core MU2 Menu 2014 Edition Complete EHR Stage 1 EP/EH Stage 2 EP/EH Base EHR MU1 Core MU1 Menu Stage 1 EP/EH Vendor A Vendor B Base EHR MU1 Core MU1 Menu Stage 1 EP/EH w/exclusions Vendor A Vendor B Vendor A Vendor B 2014 Edition EHR Module Approaches Base EHR MU1 Core MU2 Menu Vendor X Stage 2 EP/EH w/exclusions Stage 2 EP/EH Base EHR MU1 Core MU2 Menu Vendor A Vendor B Vendor C Base EHR MU1 MU

ONC HIT Certification Program Final Changes Temporary Certification Program Sunsets – Upon 2014 Edition final rule effective date Program Name Change – “ONC HIT Certification Program” Revisions to EHR Module Certification Requirements – Privacy and Security Certification Policy Will not require upfront certification to P&S for the 2014 Edition CC Policy outcome now reflected in Base EHR definition (which includes all P&S CC) – Other tweaks to make certification more efficient 17

ONC HIT Certification Program Final Changes (cont.) Application of certain new certification criteria to EHR technology – § (g)(1): Automated numerator recording – § (g)(3): Safety-enhanced design 8 Medication related certification criteria: CPOE; Drug-drug, drug-allergy interaction checks; Medication list; Medication allergy list; Clinical decision support; eMAR; e-prescribing; and Clinical information reconciliation. – § (g)(4): Quality management system Price Transparency: ONC-ACBs are required to ensure that EHR technology developers notify eligible providers about additional types of costs (i.e., one-time, ongoing, or both) that affect a certified Complete EHR or certified EHR Module’s total cost of ownership for the purposes of achieving meaningful use. Test Result Transparency: The final rule requires that ONC-ACBs submit a hyperlink of the test results used to issue a certification to a Complete EHR or EHR Module. 18

Aug 2012 – Final rule issued Sept 2012 – Oct 2012 – Weekly waves of test procedures and electronic test tools published – Test Procedures and tools available for comment Nov 2012 – Dec 2012 – Testing workshop – National Coordinator approves 2014Ed test procedures Testing and certification to 2014 Edition available early What’s Next? Anticipated Timeline

2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with a Base EHR: Electronic notes ( (a)(9)) Drug-formulary checks ( (a)(10)) Image results ( (a)(12)) Family health history ( (a)(13)) Advance directives ( (a)(17)) eRx ( (b)(3)) Transmission of e-lab tests & values/results to providers ( (b)(6)) Base EHR MU Core MU Menu CPOE ( (a)(1)) Demographics ( (a)(3)) Problem list ( (a)(5)) Medication list ( (a)(6)) Medication allergy list ( (a)(7)) Clinical decision support ( (a)(8)) Transitions of care ( (b)(1) & (2)) Data portability ( (b)(7)) Clinical quality measures ( (c)(1) - (3)) Privacy and Security CC: o Authentication, access control, & authorization ( (d)(1)) o Auditable events & tamper resistance ( (d)(2)) o Audit report(s) ( (d)(3)) o Amendments ( (d)(4)) o Automatic log-off ( (d)(5)) o Emergency access ( (d)(6)) o End-user device encryption ( (d)(7)) o Integrity ( (d)(8)) o Accounting of disclosures* ( (d)(9)) Drug-drug, drug-allergy interaction checks ( (a)(2)) Vital signs, BMI, & growth charts ( (a)(4)) Smoking status ( (a)(11)) Patient list creation ( (a)(14)) Patient-specific education resources ( (a)(15)) eMAR ( (a)(16)) Clinical information reconciliation ( (b)(4)) Incorporate lab tests & values/results ( (b)(5)) View, download, & transmit to 3 rd Party ( (e)(1)) Immunization information ( (f)(1)) Transmission to immunization registries ( (f)(2)) Transmission to PH agencies – syndromic surveillance ( (f)(3)) Transmission of reportable lab tests & values/results ( (f)(4)) 2014 ed. certification criteria for which certification may be required: Automated numerator recording ( (g)(1)) Automated measure calculation ( (g)(2)) Safety-enhanced design ( (g)(3)) Quality management system ( (g)(4)) *= optional 20

Technology Definition for MU Stage 1 Do you have a 2014 Edition Complete EHR for the Ambulatory (EPs) or Inpatient (EHs/CAHs) Setting? Do you have EHR Technology that meets the new Certified EHR Technology definition for Meaningful Use Stage 1? EP Do you have EHR technology that has been: Certified to ≥ 9 CQMs  ≥ 6 from CMS’ recommended core set  Address ≥ 3 domains from the set selected by CMS for EPs? Do you have EHR technology that has been: Certified to ≥ 9 CQMs  ≥ 6 from CMS’ recommended core set  Address ≥ 3 domains from the set selected by CMS for EPs? EH/ CAH EH/ CAH Yes No Yes Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria required to meet the Base EHR definition? § : (a)(1),(3)&(5-8) – CPOE/Demogfrx/ProbList/ MedList/MedAllergyList/CDS (b)(1),(2)&(7) – TOC/Data Port (c)(1)-(3) – CQMS (d)(1)-(8) – P&S Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria required to meet the Base EHR definition? § : (a)(1),(3)&(5-8) – CPOE/Demogfrx/ProbList/ MedList/MedAllergyList/CDS (b)(1),(2)&(7) – TOC/Data Port (c)(1)-(3) – CQMS (d)(1)-(8) – P&S Do you have EHR technology that has been: Certified to ≥ 16 CQMs from CMS’ selected set for EH/CAHs  Address ≥ 3 domains from the set selected by CMS for EH/CAHs? Do you have EHR technology that has been: Certified to ≥ 16 CQMs from CMS’ selected set for EH/CAHs  Address ≥ 3 domains from the set selected by CMS for EH/CAHs? Note: To meet the CEHRT definition, EHR technology will need to have been certified to:  Automated numerator recording ( (g)(1)) or Automated measure calculation ( (g)(2));  Safety-enhanced design ( (g)(3)); and  Quality management system ( (g)(4)) Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EH/CAH Core Objectives you seek to achieve and for which you cannot meet a MU exclusion? § : (a)(2) – DD/DA (a)(11) – Smoking (a)(4) – Vitals (e)(1) – VDTx3 Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EH/CAH Core Objectives you seek to achieve and for which you cannot meet a MU exclusion? § : (a)(2) – DD/DA (a)(11) – Smoking (a)(4) – Vitals (e)(1) – VDTx3 Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Core Objectives you seek to achieve and for which you cannot meet a MU exclusion? § : (a)(2) – DD/DA (b)(3) – eRx (a)(4) – Vitals (e)(1) – VDTx3 (a)(11) – Smoking (e)(2) – Clinical Sum Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Core Objectives you seek to achieve and for which you cannot meet a MU exclusion? § : (a)(2) – DD/DA (b)(3) – eRx (a)(4) – Vitals (e)(1) – VDTx3 (a)(11) – Smoking (e)(2) – Clinical Sum Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Menu Objectives you seek to meet? § : (a)(10) – RxFormulary (b)(5) – Incorp Lab (a)(14) – Pt List (f)(1) – Immz Info (a)(15) – Pt Edu (f)(2) – Immz Tx (b)(4) – ClinInfoRec (f)(3) – Syn Surv Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Menu Objectives you seek to meet? § : (a)(10) – RxFormulary (b)(5) – Incorp Lab (a)(14) – Pt List (f)(1) – Immz Info (a)(15) – Pt Edu (f)(2) – Immz Tx (b)(4) – ClinInfoRec (f)(3) – Syn Surv Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EH/CAH Menu Objectives you seek to meet? § : (a)(10) – RxFormulary (b)(5) – Incorp Lab (a)(14) – Pt List (f)(1) – Immz Info (a)(15) – Pt Edu (f)(2) – Immz Tx (a)(17) – AD (f)(3) – Syn Surv (b)(4) – ClinInfoRec (f)(4) – ELR Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EH/CAH Menu Objectives you seek to meet? § : (a)(10) – RxFormulary (b)(5) – Incorp Lab (a)(14) – Pt List (f)(1) – Immz Info (a)(15) – Pt Edu (f)(2) – Immz Tx (a)(17) – AD (f)(3) – Syn Surv (b)(4) – ClinInfoRec (f)(4) – ELR START HERE 21

Eps: Technology definition for MU Stage 1 Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria required to meet the Base EHR definition? § : (a)(1),(3)&(5-8) – CPOE/Demogfrx/ProbList/ MedList/MedAllergyList/CDS (b)(1),(2)&(7) – TOC/Data Port (c)(1)-(3) – CQMS (d)(1)-(8) – P&S Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria required to meet the Base EHR definition? § : (a)(1),(3)&(5-8) – CPOE/Demogfrx/ProbList/ MedList/MedAllergyList/CDS (b)(1),(2)&(7) – TOC/Data Port (c)(1)-(3) – CQMS (d)(1)-(8) – P&S EPs: Do you have EHR Technology that meets the new Certified EHR Technology definition for Meaningful Use Stage 1? Yes Do you have a 2014 Edition Complete EHR for the Ambulatory Setting? Yes No Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Core Objectives you seek to achieve and for which you cannot meet a MU exclusion? § : (a)(2) – DD/DA (b)(3) – eRx (a)(4) – Vitals (e)(1) – VDTx3 (a)(11) – Smoking (e)(2) – Clinical Sum Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Core Objectives you seek to achieve and for which you cannot meet a MU exclusion? § : (a)(2) – DD/DA (b)(3) – eRx (a)(4) – Vitals (e)(1) – VDTx3 (a)(11) – Smoking (e)(2) – Clinical Sum Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Menu Objectives you seek to meet? § : (a)(10) – RxFormulary (b)(5) – Incorp Lab (a)(14) – Pt List (f)(1) – Immz Info (a)(15) – Pt Edu (f)(2) – Immz Tx (b)(4) – ClinInfoRec (f)(3) – Syn Surv Is your EHR technology certified to the following certification criteria to support the MU1 EP Menu Objectives you seek to meet? § : (a)(10) – RxFormulary (b)(5) – Incorp Lab (a)(14) – Pt List (f)(1) – Immz Info (a)(15) – Pt Edu (f)(2) – Immz Tx (b)(4) – ClinInfoRec (f)(3) – Syn Surv Do you have EHR technology that has been: Certified to ≥ 9 CQMs  ≥ 6 from CMS’ recommended core set  Address ≥ 3 domains from the set selected by CMS for EPs? Do you have EHR technology that has been: Certified to ≥ 9 CQMs  ≥ 6 from CMS’ recommended core set  Address ≥ 3 domains from the set selected by CMS for EPs? No Note: To meet the CEHRT definition, EHR technology will need to have been certified to:  Automated numerator recording ( (g)(1)) or Automated measure calculation ( (g)(2));  Safety-enhanced design ( (g)(3)); and  Quality management system ( (g)(4)) No START HERE 22

But wait, there’s more! Check back to: Now: – CEHRT Infographic flows and Bull’s eye diagrams Coming soon: – Grids comparing MU1 and MU2 w/ 2014 Ed. – Standards resource page where all the adopted standards as part of the 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria will be listed with URLs to where you can find/access them. 23

Questions 24