Accountability Measures 2008 Central Piedmont Community College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Persistence and Completion Strategy Twenty-seven Best Practices Milestones and Momentum Points Win/Win Grant Reverse Transfer First-Term to First-Year.
Advertisements

Accountability, Accreditation and Institutional Effectiveness Professional Development Training.
Hope Opportunity Jobs Performance-Based Funding: A New Approach State Board of Community Colleges October 17, 2012.
SCC BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE Using Data to Support the Initiative Nga Pham May 22, 2009.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
Student Success Pilot Project Overview Student Success Pilot Project ITS Workgroup March 8, 2010.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Pass Rates in Paired and Unpaired Courses Fall 1998 Office of Institutional Research LaGuardia Community College.
Accountability Measures 2009 (based on data) Report for Central Piedmont Community College.
Graduation Student Success Pipeline All students 19% 0f students complete (degree/certificate, transfer, transfer-ready) within 3 years and 42% within.
2008 CAPP Summary Report Dr. Kandis Steele, Director of Academic Programs.
NO FAILURE ZONE!!! JENNINGS HIGH SCHOOL- 9 TH GRADE.
Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
Evaluating Developmental Programs National Center for Developmental Education
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
June 17, % of our high school students indicate their intention to go on to college. - OUS Post High School Plan Survey, 2003.
Background of Performance Measures identified 12 Performance Measures Baseline data collected in Performance Funding in Results.
Region VII College and Career Readiness Data AVATAR Initiatives.
The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures Annual Report to the Board of Trustees Academic Year
LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE NEW STUDENT ORIENTATION
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
LEADERSHIP COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 Update on Curriculum Enrollment, Student Characteristics & Student Success.
The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) AUGUST 2005.
DRE 099 Pilot PRESENTED BY ANGELINA OBERDAN AND HEIDI HUNTLEY (WITH SPECIAL THANKS TO KRIS DEANGELIS AND MARSI FRANCESCHINI) FROM CENTRAL PIEDMONT COMMUNITY.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
Expansion of Mandatory Placement for Developmental Education and English as a Second Language (ESL) Courses Academic Governing Council March 11, 2014.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
Fall 2011NEnd of Fall 2011 GRCC GPA FTIACs with HS GPA 3.00 or higher 2, FTIACs with HS GPA below ,
“Performance Measures – A Dialogue” INTRODUCTIONS Presenters Larry Dendy – Pitt Community College Ladelle Harmon – McDowell Community College Bill Lefevers.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Graduation, Completion, and Transfer ATD Data Team Subcommittee report January 2011.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. System Level Accountability Measures June 15, 2004.
LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE NEW STUDENT ORIENTATION
Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Accountability Committee.
Central Piedmont Community College 2011 Data Report for CMS High Schools (CMS Graduates Attending CPCC from Fall ) High School Principals’ Luncheon.
Earning College Credit While in High School David W. Carter and H. Grady Spruce High School Counselors Saturday, October 31, 2015.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures Annual Report Academic Year Department of Planning and Research.
Integrated Basic Skills & Certified Nursing Assistance Program In 2 quarters students are prepared to work as Certified Nursing Assistants upon completion.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
2013 NSHE Remedial Report Highlights EMBARGOED UNTIL May 6, 2014.
Cohort Graduation Rate. Cohort Graduation Rate Trends by Ethnicity 2014 N Size
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
CBM002 Refresher Training & CBM00S/CBM002 Update Planning and Accountability Staff THECB December 7, 2010.
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Development of Statewide Community College Value- Added Accountability Measures Michael J. Keller Director of Policy Analysis and Research Maryland Higher.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
Summer Data Conference – June 6, (2008) National Completion Goals (Lumina’s Big Goal: 60% of those will have an Associate Degree or above.
Central Piedmont Community College 2015 Data Report on CMS Graduates Attending CPCC Fall 2010 – 2014 High School Principals’ Luncheon.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability
Project A.S.A.P. Academic Success Action Plan
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
High School Principals’ Luncheon
Educational Master Plan
High School Principals’ Luncheon
SCC Basic Skills Initiative
CCTI Year Three Research Findings
Central Piedmont Community College
Governance Institute for Student Success (GISS) Wed
(CMS Graduates Attending CPCC from Fall )
Central Piedmont Community College
Perkins Core Indicators of Performance Report
Presented to the Strategic Planning Committee
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Measures 2008 Central Piedmont Community College

Progress of Basic Skills Students Benchmark: 75% of Basic Skills students will progress within the level, complete the level or advance to the next level. Of the 12,047 CPCC basic skills students, 68% progressed, completed or advanced. CPCC did not meet the benchmark. There were errors in our data and we have resubmitted the file.

Progress of Basic Skills Students The aggregate passing rate for the students enrolled across the state in basic skills courses, 80% progressed within the level, completed the level or advanced to the next level. Of the 58 colleges, 55 met the benchmark.

Passing Rates for State Licensure Exams Benchmark: an aggregate institutional passing rate of 80% for all first-time test-takers plus no passing rate falling below 70% for any single exam.

Passing Rates for State Licensure Exams Exam Area# Taking Exam # Passing Exam %Passing Exam Basic Law Enforcement232296% Dental Hygiene19 100% Physical Therapy Assistant12975% Emerg. Med. Tech (EMT) % Nursing525096% Real Estate – Sales % Total/Aggregate Pass Rate %

Passing Rates for State Licensure Exams The College met the benchmark. Of the 58 colleges, 33 met the aggregate institutional pass rate of 80% with an average of 83%.

Performance of College Transfer Students Benchmark: 83% of the combined community college cohort will be in good academic standing (GPA of 2.0 or greater). 87% of CPCC associate degree transfer students were in good academic standing. 76% of those with 24+ hours were in good academic standing. Of the combined cohort of 440 transfer students 81% were in good academic standing. The College did not meet the benchmark.

Performance of College Transfer Students Of community college graduates who transferred to a UNC institution within a year, 89% had a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0. Of those earning 24 hours or more and transferring to a UNC institution, 81% had a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0. When data were combined, 84% of the transfer students had a GPA of 2.0 or greater. Of the 58 colleges, 37 met the benchmark.

Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses Benchmark: 75% passing rate for all developmental courses (grades A-C). For the academic year, 76% of the College’s developmental course completers received a grade of A, B or C.

Actual Course Success English82% A-C Grades Math70% A-C Grades Reading83% A-C Grades Total Aggregate Pass Rate 76%

Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses The College met the benchmark. Of students enrolled in developmental courses across the state, 81% had a grade of C or better. Of the 58 colleges, 43 met the standard.

Developmental Student Success in Subsequent College Level Courses Benchmark: 80% of students who took developmental courses will pass the “gatekeeper” English and/or mathematics course for which the developmental course serves as prerequisite (grade of D or better). For the academic year, 87% of developmental students passes the “gatekeeper” course.

Actual Course Success College Level Courses English89% Math85% Combined87%

Developmental Student Success in Subsequent College Level Courses The College met the benchmark Of students who completed developmental courses across the system, 88% had a grade of D or better in subsequent college-level courses. Of the 58 colleges, 48 met the standard.

Student Satisfaction of Completers and Non-completers Benchmark: 90% of the combined respondents (completers and non- completers) will report being satisfied with the quality of the college's programs and services. Of the 967 completers and non- completers surveyed, 98% were satisfied with the quality of CPCC programs and services (99% of non- completers and 98% of completers)

Student Satisfaction of Completers and Non-completers Of survey respondents system-wide, 98% of completers and 95% of non- completers responded that they were satisfied. A combined total of 97% were satisfied. Of the 58 colleges, 57 met the benchmark.

Curriculum Student Progress Benchmark: 65% of students from a given fall term will persist (graduate or be retained). Of the 11,064 program declared students in Fall 2006, 65% graduated, returned or transferred in Fall The College met the benchmark.

Curriculum Student Progress Of the Fall 2006 system-wide cohort, 68% had graduated, returned to enroll or transferred by Fall Of the 58 colleges, 50 met the benchmark.

Business and Industry Satisfaction Benchmark: 90% of respondents will rate services provided as “very good” or “excellent.” Of the 357 survey respondents from CPCC’s region, 91% were satisfied with services provided. The College met the benchmark.

Business and Industry Satisfaction System-wide, 38,056 surveys were completed. Of those, 94% indicated that the customized training they received was excellent or very good. All 58 colleges met the benchmark.

Overall College Success Progress of Basic Skills Students(not met) Licensure Pass Rates (met) College Transfer Success (not met) Passing Rates in Dev. Courses (met) Success of Dev. Students in College Level Courses (met) Student Satisfaction (met) Student Persistence (met) Business/Industry Satisfaction (met)

State Numbers 13 colleges met all 8 benchmarks 18 colleges met 7 of 8 benchmarks 21 colleges met 6 of 8 benchmarks 3 colleges met 5 of 8 benchmarks 2 colleges met 4 of 8 benchmarks 1 college met 3 of 8 benchmarks Seven colleges were recognized as institutions of excellence.