Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Advertisements

Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The MERIT High-Power Target Experiment Muon Collider Design Workshop BNL December 3-7, 2007.
Task Force on Project X for Muon Collider Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Proton Driver at Fermilab Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab IDS-NF 7 th Plenary Meeting Oct 17-19,2011.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
J. Pozimski UKNF WP1 meeting 10 March 2010 UKNF WP1 milestone table status.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.How is neutrino beam produced? 2.Physics.
KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Proton Delivery to Target Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP 2012 Winter Meeting March 7, 2012.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer May 31, Initial Design Overview For design purposes, the following is assumed –H - beam comes from PIP II and follow-on.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Proton Beam for PRISM Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab 5 th Workshop Project X Physics – Muons November 8, 2010.
K. McDonald MAP Technical Board Meeting Nov 1, FY11 Target System Budget Proposal K. McDonald Princeton U. (November 1, 2010)
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
Proton Driver / Project X Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab August 30, 2012.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Context of the Neutrino Factory Neutrino factory (2018) –4MW proton driver –p +   +   +  e + e  Linear e + e − collider (2014/5) –Leptons at 0.4.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Project X as a Muon Facility Platform Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee November 7-9, 2011.
Target On axis field [scale /20 T] Target Magnets Decay-Channel Triplets Taper magnets.
Research and development toward a future Muon Collider Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of Muon Accelerator Program Draft.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Meson Production Efficiencies
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Background Simulations at Fermilab
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
He Zhang, David Douglas, Yuhong Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 09/04/2014
Presentation transcript:

Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting

Simple Interface Just draw a line!

Physical Interface Infrastructure ◦ Magnet power “cables” ◦ Cooling lines for magnets and shielding Replacement of target module as consumable ◦ Can Final Focus remain in situ? Or move out of the way? Alignment? Vacuum? Pictures by V Graves via K McDonald

Vacuum Window Was necessary for mercury containment ◦ In fact, a double window was required Any window prior to target station has to withstand full beam power in small area Window creates “pre-target” which will create showers prior to solenoid ◦ Also increases beam emittance If target is in air, then proton beam will activate air within solenoid ◦ Will likely have to wait for full-volume air exchange before accessing target station after running beam

Solenoid Field Calculation/Graph by B Weggel via K McDonald [m] Magnetic Field Strength normalized to full 20T field Final Focus element(s) within “fringe”. What are the effects?

Beam – The True Interface Beam goes from Proton Driver Realm to Target Station Domain. The physical beam size is set by the size of the target. Beam emittance is set by the Proton Driver rings (and transport line collimation) One then calculates β * ◦ Which in turns determines beam size/lattice parameters at Final Focus elements based upon spacing between target and FF elements

Beam Power Upgrade - Energy To handle more charge per bunch, the Proton Driver may have to increase beam energy from 6.75 GeV to 8 GeV. ◦ Changes beam path in target station solenoid field ◦ Affects beam dump

Beam Power Upgrade - Bunches Beam energy may not be enough and will require several bunches to simultaneously arrive on target ◦ Avoiding infrastructure  Especially true if liquid target ◦ Beam separation at Final Focus to match desired beams-target interactions (crossing- angles)

Possible crazy idea 1MW on single rod will last ~month 4MW on single rod will last ~week Or liquid target Or…. 4MW on four rods will last ~month Muon Production Penalty ◦ Rods not centered to solenoid “tilted” axis ◦ Shadowing

Summary: Not a simple boundary Proton beam parameters at target will set scale and location of final focus element(s) Target maintenance physical requirements will set distance between final focus element(s) and target infrastructure Number of beams will affect target infrastructure