2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Perception
Advertisements

PROJECT CLARION Module IV: Scientific Investigation
Sections 2 and 3 Chapter 1. Review of the Scientific Method The scientific method is not a list of rules that must be followed but a general guideline.
The results of repeated observations and/or experiments concerning a naturally occurring event (phenomenon) are reasonably the same when performed and.
September 8th 2005Advances in Computer Games 111 Enhancing Search Efficiency by Using Move Categorization Based on Game Progress in Amazons Yoshinori Higashiuchi.
Research Methods & Approaches
2002/11/15Game Programming Workshop1 A Neural Network for Evaluating King Danger in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Information Science Saga University.
Selective Attention A tale of bottlenecks and basketballs.
October 28th 2001GPW20011 Using Castle and Assault Maps for Guiding Opening and Middle Game Play in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen (Saga University) Jeff Rollason.
Plausible Move Generation Using Move Merit Analysis in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen (Electrotechnical Laboratory) Hitoshi Matsubara (Future University Hakodate)
© Michael Lacewing Representative realism Michael Lacewing
Decision Making.
Shared Perceptual Basis of Emotional Expression and Trustworthiness Impressions From Faces Nikolaas N. Oosterhof & Alexander Todorov Kira Bucca.
Nature of Science Science Nature of Science Environmental Science Outline: Outline: Science As a Way of Knowing Science As a Way of Knowing  Scientific.
Selling the Product, or the Music? Lindsay Michel 9 th Grade.
Biomimicry Lesson two: Introduction Learning objectives To introduce biomimicry, recapping on the technological and biological cycles, considering that.
Biology and You Section 1: Themes of Biology
2004/11/13GPW20041 What Shogi Programs Still Cannot Do - A New Test Set for Shogi - Reijer Grimbergen and Taro Muraoka Department of Informatics Yamagata.
2009/11/14GPW20091 Analysis of the Behavior of People Solving Sudoku Puzzles Reijer Grimbergen School of Computer Science, Tokyo University of Technology.
Introduction to Biology and Homeostasis Section 2 Scientific Processes Biology Fall 2010.
Demonstration and Verbal Instructions
Chapter 1 Biology and You.
Planning to Guide Opening and Middle Game Play in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen (Electrotechnical Laboratory) Hitoshi Matsubara (Future University Hakodate)
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Science answers questions with experiments.
Biology and YouSection 2 Section 2: Scientific Methods Preview Bellringer Key Ideas Beginning a Scientific Investigation Scientific Experiments Scientific.
Experimental design. Observation Observation – A process that helps gain information. Sight, smell, touch, taste, hearing – Example related to the game-
PYIWIT'021 Threat Analysis to Reduce the Effects of the Horizon Problem in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Information Science Saga University.
Neural Network Implementation of Poker AI
The Cognitive Perspective Computers vs. Humans. Starter (10 mins) Name the 5 perspectives in Psychology. Name the 5 perspectives in Psychology. Name 3.
 There is no single “scientific method”  Most scientific investigations tend to have common stages involved  These stages include: Making/collecting.
To name two contrasting theories of perception To explain what is meant by the phrase ‘Top Down’ processing To Outline Richard Gregory’s theory of perception.
2008/09/30Computers and Games Cognitive Modeling of Knowledge-Guided Information Acquisition in Games Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics.
2006/6/30SIGGI-161 The Society of Shogi - A Research Agenda - Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics Yamagata University.
Format for Developing Problem Questions What is the relationship between ____________ and ____________? and ____________? Slide 2.1.
Moon Phases And some basic ideas about science and the scientific method.
PUTTING TO A BIGGER HOLE: GOLF PERFORMANCE RELATES TO PERCEIVED SIZE Erika Larose CLPS 1500 Jessica Witt, 2008.
Computers and Games Board Maps and Hill-Climbing for Opening and Middle Game Play in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen (Saga University) Jeff Rollason (Oxford.
Scientific Method. What is the scientific method? It is a process that is used to find answers to questions about the world around us.
What Is Science?. 1. Science is limited to studying only the natural world. 2. The natural world are those phenomena that can be investigated, discovered,
Perception. Introduction 5 senses: sight, touch, sound, taste and smell Sacrifice a sense? Least & most willing? Least = vision – identified with knowledge.
Competitor Research: Positioning. Competitor Research-Positioning Positioning is something you do to the mind of the prospect It is not enough to invent.
Lesson Overview Lesson Overview What Is Science? Chapter 1 The Science of Biology.
Using Castle Maps for Guiding Opening and Middle Game Play in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen (Saga University) Jeff Rollason (Oxford Softworks)
© 2001 Laura Snodgrass, Ph.D.1 Experimental Psychology Introduction.
Plausible Move Generation Using Move Merit Analysis with Cut-off Thresholds in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen (Electrotechnical Laboratory)
Biology and YouSection 2 Section 2: Scientific Methods Preview Bellringer Key Ideas Beginning a Scientific Investigation Scientific Experiments Scientific.
Cognitive Modeling Cogs 4961, Cogs 6967 Psyc 4510 CSCI 4960 Mike Schoelles
The Science of Psychology
Section 2: Scientific Methods
Section 2: Scientific Methods
Demonstration and Verbal Instructions
Central Limit Theorem, z-tests, & t-tests
Using Bitboards for Move Generation in Shogi
7. Scientific Method- = The systematic approach to problem solving that involves observation and experimentation.
Section 2: Scientific Methods
Scientific Methods Science in Practice.
Chapter 1 The scientific method.
Charles N. Elliott, Paul A. Story
On the Relation Between Perception, Memory and Cognition in Games
The Pew Research Center has also examined perceptions of genetically modified foods and found that only 42 percent of U.S. adults believe that most scientists.
Before we begin… Fold a piece of paper in 3 to create a name card. Write your (preferred) name on the front. Make sure it is clear and bold so I can.
Unit 1 Scientific Inquiry
Chapter 1 Section 2 How Scientists Work
Week 1-2 Standards: Scaled Goals:
Gregory’s Theory of Constrictive Perception
Area of Investigation Point: ______________________________
Experiment Design and Purpose
Week 1-2 Standards: Scaled Goals:
The Effect of Smell on Memory
Eye vs. Ear.
Presentation transcript:

2008/11/08GPW20081 A Reproduction Experiment Concerning the Relation Between Perceptual Features and Memory in Shogi Reijer Grimbergen Department of Informatics Yamagata University

2008/11/08GPW20082 Outline Where do we want to go? A reproduction experiment in shogi Experimental results Conclusions and future work

2008/11/08GPW20083 Where do we want to go? Using Marvin Minsky’s Society of Mind theory for game playing What are the primitive agents? Input agents: perception of board and pieces Output agents: playing moves First step Studying perception to understand input agents

2008/11/08GPW20084 Hypotheses about perception Hypothesis 1: It is easier to perceive one’s own pieces than the pieces of the opponent

2008/11/08GPW20085 Hypotheses about perception Hypothesis 2: It is easier to perceive pieces in hand than pieces on the board

2008/11/08GPW20086 Hypotheses about perception Hypothesis 3: It is easier to perceive pieces that are promoted than pieces that are not promoted

2008/11/08GPW20087 Hypotheses about perception Hypothesis 4: Pieces closer to oneself are easier to perceive than pieces further away

2008/11/08GPW20088 Hypotheses about perception Hypothesis 5: Bigger pieces are easier to perceive than smaller pieces

2008/11/08GPW20089 Reproduction experiment Seven subjects Early twenties Only rudimentary knowledge of shogi Ten positions Each hypothesis tested by using two positions Perceptual features related to the other hypotheses identical Reproduction Each position was shown for 5 seconds Reproduce the position

2008/11/08GPW Reproduction experiment Hypothesis 1: It is easier to perceive one’s own pieces than the pieces of the opponent

2008/11/08GPW Results Hypothesis 1: It is easier to perceive one’s own pieces than the pieces of the opponent SubjectPosition 1Position 2 S1Opponent pieceOwn piece S2Own piece S3Own pieceOpponent piece S4Own pieceOpponent piece S5Opponent pieceOwn piece S6Own pieceOpponent piece S7Opponent pieceOwn piece

2008/11/08GPW Reproduction experiment Hypothesis 2: It is easier to perceive pieces in hand than pieces on the board

2008/11/08GPW Results Hypothesis 2: It is easier to perceive pieces in hand than pieces on the board SubjectPosition 3Position 4 S1Board piece S2Board piece S3Board piece S4Piece in handBoard piece S5Board piece S6Board piece S7Board piece

2008/11/08GPW Reproduction experiment Hypothesis 3: It is easier to perceive pieces that are promoted than pieces that are not promoted

2008/11/08GPW Results Hypothesis 3: It is easier to perceive pieces that are promoted than pieces that are not promoted SubjectPosition 5Position 6 S1Promoted piece S2Unpromoted piecePromoted piece S3Promoted pieceUnpromoted piece S4Promoted pieceUnpromoted piece S5Unpromoted piece S6Unpromoted piecePromoted piece S7Unpromoted piecePromoted piece

2008/11/08GPW Reproduction experiment Hypothesis 4: Pieces closer to oneself are easier to perceive than pieces further away

2008/11/08GPW Results Hypothesis 4: Pieces closer to oneself are easier to perceive than pieces further away SubjectPosition 7Position 8 S1Close piece S2Close piece S3Close piece S4Far piece S5Close pieceFar piece S6Close piece S7Far piece

2008/11/08GPW Reproduction experiment Hypothesis 5: Bigger pieces are easier to perceive than smaller pieces

2008/11/08GPW Results Hypothesis 5: Bigger pieces are easier to perceive than smaller pieces SubjectPosition 9Position 10 S1Bigger pieceSmaller piece S2Bigger pieceSmaller piece S3Smaller pieceBigger piece S4Smaller pieceBigger piece S5Bigger pieceSmaller piece S6Bigger pieceSmaller piece S7Bigger pieceSmaller piece

2008/11/08GPW Conclusions Hypothesis 1 and 3 must be discarded No evidence that one’s own pieces are easier to perceive than the pieces of the opponent No evidence that promoted pieces are easier to perceive than non-promoted pieces Hypothesis 2, 4 and 5 unclear Size, closeness and the difference between pieces in hand and on the board may be factors influencing perception

2008/11/08GPW Future Work Further investigate hypotheses Increase the number of subjects Primary assumption correct? Are pieces that are reproduced first really easier to remember? Build a working system