Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 1 Expertise.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nursing Diagnosis: Definition
Advertisements

Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition
Dr. Peter Collier Portland State University Sept 2010 PSU 2010 FRINQ Mentor Orientation First Generation Students : What We Know and How to Work With Them.
The Reasons of Improvement of Writing Skills by Deliberate Practice Hsin-I, Lee z z
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education Chapter 5 Individual Perception and Decision- Making 5-1 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 11/e Global Edition.
CHAPTER 1 Practical Business Research. A working definition: Any systematic attempt at collecting and interpreting data and evidence in order to inform.
Novice and Expert Programmers Gild Project University of Victoria Jeff Michaud.
Lecture 3 – Skills Theory
ICT IGCSE Expert Systems.
Talking about Teaching Staff and Departmental Development Unit Chris Butcher.
Modeling Human Reasoning About Meta-Information Presented By: Scott Langevin Jingsong Wang.
Rule Based Systems Alford Academy Business Education and Computing
Chapter 4 Validity.
King Saud University College of nursing Master program.
Skill Learning and Expertise. Anderson’s ACT Theory General theory of learning and problem solving Anderson (e.g., 1983, 1990, 1993, 1996) –Adaptive Control.
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
From the gym window most Sundays – I observe?. Deliberate Practice Colvin (2008) noted that exceptional performers, were not necessarily the most talented.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Task analysis 1 © Copyright De Montfort University 1998 All Rights Reserved Task Analysis Preece et al Chapter 7.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Educational Psychology Name and define the stages of mastery an individual is likely to pass through on the way to becoming an expert professional educator.
Expert Systems Infsy 540 Dr. Ocker. Expert Systems n computer systems which try to mimic human expertise n produce a decision that does not require judgment.
Why Johnny Can’t Apply: Using Cognitive Psychology to Redesign a Business Statistics Class Ronald Bruce Associate Professor Gwynedd Mercy University
Reasoning Abilities Slide #1 김 민 경 Reasoning Abilities David F. Lohman Psychological & Quantitative Foundations College of Education University.
Ch 6 Validity of Instrument
Developing Academic Leadership Capability 1. Learning Outcomes Be able to explain the general principles of the Integrated Competing Values Framework.
Expertise and Feedback Edna Salcedo Talboy
11 C H A P T E R Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems.
Leadership Competencies
Course Instructor: K ashif I hsan 1. Chapter # 2 Kashif Ihsan, Lecturer CS, MIHE2.
Nursing Theorist: Patricia Benner, R.N., P.h.D., FAAN,F.R.C.N.
Developing learner competency in the clinical environment GRACE Session 3 GRACE Program.
Demonstration and Verbal Instructions
Expertise Novices and experts Expertise and perception Expertise and memory Expertise and judgment Expertise and domain-specificity.
What IS a Journeyman Programmer? Why this program?
Information commitments, evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning evnironments Ying-Tien Wu & Chin-Chung Tsai Institute.
Linda A Headrick, MD, MS, FACP February 26, 2013.
Introduction For best practice, clinicians must make numerous decisions during the therapeutic process Clinical reasoning: “ Complex multi-faceted cognitive.
Assessing Your Learner Lawrence R. Schiller, MD, FACG Digestive Health Associates of Texas Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas.
Copyright  2003 by Dr. Gallimore, Wright State University Department of Biomedical, Industrial Engineering & Human Factors Engineering Human Aspects of.
Designing Effective HRD Programs Chapter 5 Human Resource Development.
Decision Making Chapter 7. Definition of Decision Making Characteristics of decision making: a. Selecting a choice from a number of options b. Some information.
Understanding the Practice of New Nurses. According to Benner’s Theory Novice to Expert – Novice – Advanced Beginner – Competent – Proficient – Expert.
Cognitive Science and Biomedical Informatics Department of Computer Sciences ALMAAREFA COLLEGES.
Problem-based Learning Cherdsak Iramaneerat Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital 1PBL.
U SER I NTERFACE L ABORATORY Situation Awareness a state of knowledge, from the processes used to achieve that state (situation assessment) not encompass.
Instructional Design John Penn. Instructional Design Banathy (1987) defines Instructional Design as a system of procedures for developing education and.
Development of Expertise. Expertise We are very good (perhaps even expert) at many things: - driving - reading - writing - talking What are some other.
Adult Learning Principles
RULES Patty Nordstrom Hien Nguyen. "Cognitive Skills are Realized by Production Rules"
Novice to Expert: What the Evidence Says
Artificial Intelligence, simulation and modelling.
Chapter 7: Learning and Decision Making Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CREATED BY JULLIA & NEETU
Decision Making ET 305, Spring 2016
Kate Perkins for the Ithaca Group. Setting the scene  Where has the CSfW come from?  What is it for? Who is it for? The framework  Skill Areas  Developmental.
Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems (9 th Ed., Prentice Hall) Chapter 12: Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems.
Prepared for NS5001 EAD Daniela Lehwaldt.  Provide a paradigm for (clinical) decision making  Development of decision making models  Hammond’s cognitive.
Chapter 13 Instructing Students.
First Due: A Tactical- Decision Game By Richard Llewellyn.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Dreyfus & Dreyfus Ethical Expertise
Oleh: Beni Setiawan, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan
Demonstration and Verbal Instructions
KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION
Meredith A. Henry, M.S. Department of Psychology
Building Organizational Support Capability
Competency-Based Approach
Presentation transcript:

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 1 Expertise

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 2 Expertise What is expertise? How is it acquired? What are some characteristics of expert behavior? How can expert behavior be distinguished from non-expert behavior?

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 3 Qualitative Model of Expertise Stage 1 - Novice Stage 2 - Beginner Stage 3 - Competence Stage 4 - Proficient Stage 5 - Expertise

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 4 Qualitative Model Stage 1 - Novice The instructor decomposes the task environment into context- free features the beginner can recognize without benefit of experience in the task domain. The beginner is given rules for determining actions on the basis of these features – much like a computer program.

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 5 Qualitative Model Stage 2 - Advanced Beginner After seeing a sufficient number of examples, students learn to recognize them. Instructional maxims now can refer to these new situational aspects, recognized on the basis of experience. For example, in chess, players begin to recognize such situational aspects as weakened king’s side.

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 6 Qualitative Model Stage 3 - Competence With more experience, the number of potentially relevant elements of a real-world situation becomes overwhelming. Competent performers have to decide for themselves what plan to choose without being sure that it will be appropriate in the particular situation. Successful plans induce euphoria, whereas mistakes are felt in the pit of the stomach.

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 7 Qualitative Model Stage 4 - Proficient Intuitive behavior gradually replaces reasoned responses as experience is assimilated and the performer’s theories are gradually replaced by associated responses. Proficient performers simply have not had enough experience with the wide possibility of responses to have rendered the best response automatic. Therefore, proficient performers, seeing the goal and the important features of the situation, must still decide what to do. To do so, they fall back on rule-based strategies.

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 8 Qualitative Model Stage 5 - Expertise The expert not only knows what needs to be achieved, based on mature and practiced situational discrimination, but also knows how to achieve the goal. Expert chess players can play at the rate of 5 to 10 seconds a move and even faster without any serious degradation in performance.

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 9 Influence of Irrelevant Information Why use soil judgment (Gaeth and Shanteau) as the context to study expertise and the use of irrelevant information? Based on the study, do experts always perform optimally? What is the impact of irrelevant information and how does training influence it? What is the role of perception in the this study? What do you suppose is an appropriate accuracy standard in applied research studies?

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 10 Hodgkin Biopsy Slides (Einhorn) Why are intra- & inter- judge reliability important? How is this demonstrated in the medical pathologist study? Why is convergent validity important? How is this demonstrated by the study? Why is discriminant validity important? How is this demonstrated by the study? Why is judgmental bias important? How is this demonstrated? How is accuracy demonstrated?

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 11 Interpreting X-Ray Images (Lesgold et al) What distinguishes expert performance? 1.The expert spends proportionally more time building up a basic representation of the problem before searching for a solution. 2.A schema with high probability of being at least in the right problem space is invoked very rapidly by the expert. Experts are able to tune their schemata to the specifics of the case. What is significant about the study? How does the findings and conclusions of this study compare with the Recognition-Primed Decisions model developed by Klein, 1993?

Copyright  2001 by Dr. Ling Rothrock, Wright State University Dr. Ling Rothrock Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering 12 References Dreyfus, H.L. (1997). Intuitive, Deliberative, and Calculative Models of Expert Performance. In C.E. Zsambok and G. Klein (Ed.), Naturalistic Decision Making (pp ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Einhorn, H.J. (1974). Expert Judgment: Some Necessary Conditions and an Example. Journal of Applied Psychology- 59(5), Kirlik, A., Walker, N., Fisk, A.D., and Nagel, K. (1996). Supporting Perception in the Service of Dynamic Decision Making. Human Factors-38(2), Klein, G.A. (1993). A Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid Decision Making. In G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, and C.E. Zsambok (Ed.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods (pp ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., and Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a Complex Skill: Diagnosing X-Ray Pictures. In M.T.H. Chi, R. Glaser, and M.J. Farr (Ed.), The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.