Usability The user’s ability to access and operate the functionality provided by complex systems (Johnson, 2006) The extent to which a product can be used.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEVELOPING A METHODOLOGY FOR MS3305 CW2 Some guidance.
Advertisements

Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation
Dialog on - Usability Düsseldorf / PVpage 1 USABILITY Based on a lecture by Raino Vastamäki, Research Director Adage Oy in Kiljava on May 2003.
Ch 11 Cognitive Walkthroughs and Heuristic Evaluation Yonglei Tao School of Computing and Info Systems GVSU.
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
Part 4: Evaluation Days 25, 27, 29, 31 Chapter 20: Why evaluate? Chapter 21: Deciding on what to evaluate: the strategy Chapter 22: Planning who, what,
Heuristic Evaluation. Sources for today’s lecture: Professor James Landay: stic-evaluation/heuristic-evaluation.ppt.
Heuristics  Basis  Evaluators –Qualifications –Training  Preparation –Scenario  Results –List of problems –Severity –Group synthesis.
Heuristic Evaluation Evaluating with experts. Discount Evaluation Techniques  Basis: Observing users can be time- consuming and expensive Try to predict.
Evaluation Through Expert Analysis U U U
Evaluating with experts
Heuristic Evaluation.
Usability 2004 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Evaluation: Inspections, Analytics & Models
10th Workshop "Software Engineering Education and Reverse Engineering" Ivanjica, Serbia, 5-12 September 2010 First experience in teaching HCI course Dusanka.
Review an existing website Usability in Design. to begin with.. Meeting Organization’s objectives and your Usability goals Meeting User’s Needs Complying.
Evaluate the Usability of a User Interface Tool or Toolkit Assignment 1 Assignment 1 Evaluate the Usability of a User Interface Tool or Toolkit T. H Ranasinghe.
UX testing for mobile app Marine embe
Human Factors in Medical Devices ● Alan Coulson ● Software Engineer ● LifeScan Scotland Ltd.
Usability 2009 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Heuristic evaluation IS 403: User Interface Design Shaun Kane.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Analytical evaluation Chapter 15.
Human-Computer Interaction
CS3205: HCI in SW Development More on Detailed Design: Guidance and Color.
Heuristic Evaluation VINCENT SCHOENMAKERS CARLOS A. TIJERINA IBARRA EDGAR I. VILLANUEVA.
Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics
U SABILITY T ESTING. Software Quality Flexibility Adaptability Readability Testability Portability Reusability Interoperability Expandability Accountability.
Heuristic evaluation of user interface Dušanka Bošković Computing and Informatics, Master Programme Faculty of Electrical Engineering Sarajevo, 2011/12.
Usability Evaluation/LP Usability: how to judge it.
10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design.
Usability Expert Review Anna Diubina. What is usability? The effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction with which specified users achieve specified goals.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2012 / Semester 1 / week 5 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
Heuristic Evaluation and Discount Usability Engineering Taken from the writings of Jakob Nielsen – inventor of both.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Heuristic Evaluation of MealpayPlus website Ruidi Tan Rachel Vilceus Anant Patil Junior Anthony Xi Li Kinberley Seals Niko Maresco.
What is interaction design? Eileen Kraemer CSCI 4800/6800 University of Georgia.
Unit 5: Fundamentals of Usability in HIT Systems – What Does It Matter? Component 7: Working with HIT Systems.
Y ASER G HANAM Heuristic Evaluation. Roadmap Introduction How it works Advantages Shortcomings Conclusion Exercise.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation Q1, 2. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs Start Q3 Reviewers tend to use guidelines, heuristics and checklists.
Human-computer interaction: users, tasks & designs User modelling in user-centred system design (UCSD) Use with Human Computer Interaction by Serengul.
1 chapter 7 design rules. 2 Designing for maximum usability – the goal of interaction design Principles of usability –general understanding Standards.
Developed by Tim Bell Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of Canterbury Human Computer Interaction.
Heuristic Evaluation Short tutorial to heuristic evaluation
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
Equipping you for the unexpected challenges of Testing Emma My Knife– Mando.
Administrivia  Feedback from the mid-term evaluation  Insights from project proposal.
Introduction to Evaluation “Informal” approaches.
Fall 2002CS/PSY Predictive Evaluation (Evaluation Without Users) Gathering data about usability of a design by a specified group of users for a particular.
Ten Usability Heuristics with Example.. Page 2 Heuristic Evaluation Heuristic evaluation is the most popular of the usability inspection methods. Heuristic.
COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH Vigneshwar Poojar. The cognitive walkthrough is a formalized way of imagining people’s thoughts and actions when they use an interface.
History of Health Information Technology in the U.S. History of Health IT Organizations Lecture b – Standards Development Organizations This material Comp5_Unit16.
Master Medical Informatics Biomedical Research and evaluation Methodology Maarten Buiter Khalid Bohoudi Mark de Groot Evelyn Lai Usability evaluation of.
APPLE MAPS FOR APP Heuristic Evaluation By Rayed Alakhtar.
Ten Usability Heuristics These are ten general principles for user interface design. They are called "heuristics" because they are more in the nature of.
Component 7: Working with HIT Systems Unit 5: Fundamentals of Usability in HIT Systems – What Does It Matter? This material was developed by Johns Hopkins.
Discount Evaluation User Interface Design. Startup Weekend Wellington CALLING ALL DESIGNERS, DEVELOPERS AND IDEAS FOLK: Startup Weekend returns to Wellington.
Asking Users and Experts Li Zhang (Jacey) Yuewei Zhou (Joanna)
Heuristic Evaluation May 4, 2016
Midterm in-class Tuesday, Nov 6
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 15 Usability Evaluation
Human-Computer Interaction
Evaluation Techniques 1
CS 522: Human-Computer Interaction Usability and HCI Topics
Usability and Human Factors
Heuristic Evaluation Jon Kolko Professor, Austin Center for Design.
Evaluation ECE 695 Alexander J. Quinn March 30, 2018.
Chapter 26 Inspections of the user interface
Nilesen 10 hueristics.
Presentation transcript:

Usability The user’s ability to access and operate the functionality provided by complex systems (Johnson, 2006) The extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use (Schumacher et al, n.d). Perceived usefulness & perceived ease of use (J. Kim, 2011)

Challenges in Usability Poor usability: user’s don’t want to use the system, inefficient system use, ineffective system use Designers: Fail to consider end user requirements (Johnson, 2006) Complex computer applications (2006) Impact patient outcomes negatively (2006) Indirect consequence: costs (2006)

Usability Heuristics 5 components of usability (J. Kim, 2011) – Learnability, efficiency, memorability, errors, satisfaction 10 usability heuristics (Nielsen, 1994) – Visibility of system status, match between system and real world, user control and freedom, consistency and standards, error prevention, recognition, flexibility, aesthetic design, help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors, help and documentation

Usability heuristics for medical devices (J. Kim, 2011) – Minimize memory, informative feedback, user’s language, closure, consistency

Challenges and Solutions Usability Heuristics of importance: – Match between system and real world – Error prevention: Unintended user action  use error. App should verify information – Aesthetic design: larger screens, resolution, layout (Lu et al, 2005) – Visibility of system status: if system every goes down, have backup – Consistency and standards: speak the users’ language, have consistent icons – User control and freedom: SBAR

Schumacher, R. M., Patterson, E. S., North, R., Zhang, J., Lowry, S. Z., Quinn, M. T., Ramaiah, M., &, (n.d.). Technical evaluation, testing and validation of the usability of electronic health records. National Institute of Standards and Technology US Department of Commerce.

References Johnson, C. W. (2006). Why did that happen? exploring the proliferation of barely usable software in healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. Kim, J. (2011). Analysis and design of health information systems lecture two. Unpublished raw data, Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada. Lu, Y. C., Xiao, Y., Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2005). A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Nielson, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Diego, USA: Academic Press. Schumacher, R. M., Patterson, E. S., North, R.,Zhang, J., Lowry, S. Z., Quinn, M. T., Ramaiah, M., &, (n.d.). Technical evaluation, testing and validation of the usability of electronic health records. National Institute of Standards and Technology US Department of Commerce.