NGAS ATMS Cal/Val Activities and Findings Degui Gu, Alex Foo and Chunming Wang Jan 13, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CrIMSS EDR Performance Assessment and Tuning Alex Foo, Xialin Ma and Degui Gu Sept 11, 2012.
Advertisements

UPDATE ON BIAS TRENDS, DIRECT SUN CORRECTION, AND ROUGHNESS CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli May 10, 2011.
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
Presentation on OMPS Nadir Mapper Wavelength Shift Adjustment for Earth-view Measurements.
Scanner Characteristics
NGAS CrIS SDR Cal/Val Activity and Highlights Oct 23, 2012 Lihong Wang, Chunming Wang, Denise Hagan and Degui Gu.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
STAR Calibration Support for GOES Post Launch Test (PLT) X. Wu & F. Yu NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/SPB & NOAA.
MWR Algorithms (Wentz): Provide and validate wind, rain and sea ice [TBD] retrieval algorithms for MWR data Between now and launch (April 2011) 1. In-orbit.
Determining the accuracy of MODIS Sea- Surface Temperatures – an Essential Climate Variable Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Meteorology and Physical.
Suomi NPP ATMS CalVal Overview Fuzhong Weng, ATMS SDR Team Lead Presented at Suomi NPP SDR Science and Product Review NOAA Center for Weather and Climate.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for {JPSS Algorithm} Presented by Date.
The CrIS Instrument on Suomi-NPP Joel Susskind NASA GSFC Sounder Research Team (SRT) Suomi-NPP Workshop June 21, 2012 Washington, D.C. National Aeronautics.
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Development of AMSU-A Fundamental CDR’s Huan Meng 1, Wenze Yang 2, Ralph Ferraro 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/CoRP/Satellite Climate Studies Branch 2 NOAA Corporate.
25 June 2009 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility.
Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.
Page 1ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 ENVISAT VALIDATION WORKSHOP GOMOS Recommendations by the ESL team : Service.
Suomi NPP CrIS SDR Task Overview Yong Han, CrIS SDR Team Lead Suomi NPP SDR Product Review NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction (NCWCP) 5830.
Evaluation of the Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park; 2 STAR/NESDIS/NOAA Yuling Liu 1, Yunyue.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
MODIS Collection 6 MCST Proposed Changes to L1B. Page 2 Introduction MODIS Collection History –Collection 5 – Feb present –Collection 4 – Jan.
Evaluation of OMPS sensor and EV SDR performance Conclusions: Sensors are performing well Calibrations are very good; no sign of degradation Comparisons.
UW status/report: 1. Impact of new FIR filter 2. IDPS/ADL comparisons CrIS SDR Cal/Val Telecon 25-Apr-2012.
Implementation and Processing outline Processing Framework of VIIRS instrument monitoring System Processing Framework of VIIRS EV data Monitoring SD/SDSM.
VIIRS Product Evaluation at the Ocean PEATE Frederick S. Patt Gene C. Feldman IGARSS 2010 July 27, 2010.
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
CrIS SDR Provisional Readiness Review Lawrence Suwinski Joe Predina Laura Jairam This document is not subject to the controls of the International.
STAR CrIS SDR CalVal Task Performance Yong Han, Denis Tremblay, Xin Jin, Likun Wang and Yong Chen October 23-24, 2012, CrIS Review Meeting Provisional.
Analysis of Nonlinearity Correction for CrIS SDR April 25, 2012 Chunming Wang NGAS Comparisons Between V32 and V33 Engineering Packets.
Suomi NPP ATMS SDR Provisional Product Highlights Fuzhong Weng, ATMS SDR Team Managerial Lead (Acting) Suomi NPP SDR Product Review NOAA Center for Weather.
Mission Operations Review February 8-10, 2010 Cordoba, ARGENTINA SECTION 16.x Aquarius Science Commissioning and Acceptance Draft 2 Prepared by: Gary Lagerloef,
Cal/Val Tasks Status 13 January 12 Kris Robinson (781)
Suomi NPP CrIS SDR Provisional Product Highlight Yong Han, CrIS SDR Team Lead Suomi NPP SDR Product Review NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction.
Page 1 IDPS Dec 2004 NP-IDPS-042 HARDCOPY UNCONTROLLED NPP Deliverable Products Sizing Estimates Tyler Hall March 30th, 2006.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
6 Moon glint in AMSU Nigel Atkinson and Roger Saunders Met Office (UK)
NPP ATMS Instrument Performance SDR Product Review, 23 Oct Kent Anderson Chief Engineer, Civil Space Programs NG Electronic Systems Azusa, CA.
The Inter-Calibration of AMSR-E with WindSat, F13 SSM/I, and F17 SSM/IS Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 1 Presented to the AMSR-E Science Team June.
Visible optical depth,  Optically thicker clouds correlate with colder tops Ship tracks Note, retrievals done on cloudy pixels which are spatially uniform.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for Surface Reflectance Eric Vermote Sept 04, 2014.
Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First level 1b Leakage current analysis.
SDL CrIS Provisional SDR Status Review October 23, 2012 Mark Esplin, Vladimir Zavyalov, Mark Greenman, Ben Esplin, Deron Scott, Kevin Grant, Brandon Graham,
AVHRR Radiance Bias Correction Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate Studies University of Maryland Some concepts and some.
Collect 5 Calibration Issues Chris Moeller and others Univ. Wisconsin March 22, 2005 Presented at MCST Calibration breakout meeting, March 22, 2005.
VIIRS NCC Imagery at Beta CCR DR 4859 Dr. Thomas Kopp – Imagery Validation Lead Dr. Donald Hillger – Imagery Product Lead Mr. Ryan Williams - Imagery.
N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NPP DATA ACCESS Mitch Goldberg JPSS Program Scientist June 21, 2012.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
NCEP Assessment of ATMS Radiances Andrew Collard 1, John Derber 2 and Russ Treadon 2 1 IMSG at NOAA/NCEP/EMC 2 NOAA/NCEP/EMC 1NPP ATMS SDR Product Review13th.
MOLLY E. BROWN, PHD NASA GODDARD GIMMS Group Challenges of AVHRR Vegetation Data for Real Time Applications.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
Denis Tremblay 1, Yong Han 2, Yong Chen 3, Likun Wang 3, Xin Jin 2, Xiaozhen Xiong 2, Lihang Zhou 2 1 Science Data Processing Inc., 2 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR,
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
SST from MODIS AQUA and TERRA Kay Kilpatrick, Ed Kearns, Bob Evans, and Peter Minnett Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of.
Participating SDR Team Members Cross-track Infrared Sounder
In-orbit Microwave Reference Records
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
M. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Z. Cheng (QSS)
MODIS Characterization and Support Team Presented By Truman Wilson
NOAA-20 and Suomi NPP ATMS On-orbit Performance
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
MW Products and Deliverables
Calibration and Validation of Microwave Humidity Sounder onboard FY-3D Satellite Yang Guo, Songyan Gu NSMC/CMA Mar
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Presentation transcript:

NGAS ATMS Cal/Val Activities and Findings Degui Gu, Alex Foo and Chunming Wang Jan 13, 2012

NGAS Responsibilities for NPP ATMS Cal/Val NGAS ATMS team supports NPP ATMS Cal/Val by applying our in-depth knowledge of ATMS sensor hardware, ATMS SDR algorithm science and algorithm operational implementation at IDPS Main responsibilities include –Support the Cal/Val team to verify IDPS xDR data products including data format, content and quality –Support to DR investigation and anomaly resolution –Support to fine tuning of algorithm code and LUTs/processing coefficients –Provide LUT and PCT updates and perform verification testing using operational code on GRAVITE ADA 2

ATMS RDR Verification Activity and Results 3 Verified ATMS RDR data product by inspection and monitoring of selected ATMS RDR products, including science RDRs, Calibration RDRs, and Engineering RDRs Converted PRT readings (counts) into physical temperatures to evaluate stability and uniformity of the warmload calibration target temperatures Analyzed calibration data consistency to assess calibration accuracy Findings: –Warmload temperatures were stable, showing small and repeatable orbital patterns of temperature variability ~0.2K for KAV bands and ~0.4K for WG bands, respectively. Also noticed some diurnal variability with a daily temperature variation of ~0.5K for KAV bands and ~0.7K for the WG bands, respectively –Warmload temperatures were uniform, with typical temperature contrasts around mK and maximum contrasts around 100mK among different PRTs within each band –Examination of calibration data (WC, DC, PRT temperatures and Gains) revealed some degree of inconsistency between calibration data, likely affecting SDR calibration accuracy. Some channels are more affected (e.g., channel 16 and channel 1) than others Empirical bias correction or possible algorithm enhancement may need to be developed to minimize the scan and scene dependent SDR radiance errors for the channels affected most

01/03/ /19/2011 ATMS Warmload Temperature Stability Assessment 4 11/10/ /19/2011 KAV Bands WG Bands Warmload temperatures vary in narrow range (0.5K for KAV bands and 0.7K for WG bands), showing repeatable patterns related to orbital phase. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS

ATMS Warmload Temperature Uniformity Assessment 5 01/03/ /19/ /10/ /19/2011 KAV Bands WG Bands Warmload temperatures are uniform (typical temperature contrast of 40-50mk). Larger contrast up to around 100mK at certain orbital positions. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS

Warmload Temperature Contrast Patterns 6 Warmload temperature contrast spiked around the north pole for the WG bands. Similar spikes occurred at ~45 degree south for the KAV bands. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS

ATMS Calibration Data Consistency Assessment (1) 7 ATMS calibration data consistency check. Channel 20. Nov 18, Data downloaded from GTP. Cold counts and warm counts vary in phase, and gains are relatively flat. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS CHANNEL 20 GAIN Variability (%). Shifted 2% Warm (R) and Cold (G) Counts Variability (%). Shifted 1-1.2% PRT Temperature Variability (%)

ATMS Calibration Data Consistency Assessment (2) 8 ATMS calibration data consistency check. Channel 16. Nov 18, Data downloaded from GTP. Cold counts have more variability than warm counts, and gains also show significant variability. Need further investigation and assessment of impact on SDR quality. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS CHANNEL 16 GAIN Variability (%). Shifted 2% Warm (R) and Cold (G) Counts Variability (%). Shifted 1-1.2% PRT Temperature Variability (%)

ATMS SDR Verification Activity and Results 9 Verified ATMS SDR data product by inspection and monitoring of selected ATMS SDR contents, including Brightness Temperatures, Geolocations, and Quality Flags –Generated global images for qualitative assessment of brightness temperature and geolocation quality –Generated remap SDRs using NG offline Cal/Val tool and compared to Ops product to verify remap SDR quality –Computed daily averages of brightness temperature as a function of footprint position to evaluate geometry effects and possible scan-dependent biases –Examined ATMS-Only EDR product to assist evaluation of ATMS SDR quality Supported anomaly resolution and DR investigation to improve SDR data product quality

ATMS Brightness Temperature Images: Channel 1 10 ATMS channel 1 brightness temperature image (without antenna and bias correction). Ascending orbits Data downloaded from GRAVITE. Alex Foo, Chunming Wang and Degui Gu, NGAS

ATMS Brightness Temperature Images: Channel ATMS channel 17 brightness temperature image (without antenna and bias correction). Descending orbits Data downloaded from GRAVITE. Alex Foo, Chunming Wang and Degui Gu, NGAS

ATMS Remap SDR Quality Assessment (1) 12 ATMS Remap SDR image Ascending orbits. Channel 16. IDPS products were using B-G LUT based on perfect ATMS/CrIS co-alignment, perfect antenna pattern, and near nadir synchronization between the two sensors. OFFLINE Remap SDRs were generated using NGAS Cal/Val tool that uses the latest B-G LUT. The differences in resulted Remapped SDRs are significant and consistent with previous NGAS estimates. Alex Foo, Chunming Wang and Degui Gu, NGAS

13 Results preliminary Averaged brightness temperatures for each scan position Data analyzed: Jan 3, 2012 ATMS Remap SDR Quality Assessment (2)

Expected ATMS Remap SDR Quality Improvement using the updated B-G remapping coefficient LUT 14 Significant improvement to ATMS Remap SDR quality is expected with Build MX5.1 which uses the updated B-G LUT, derived from the measured ATMS/CrIS co-alignment, the actual ATMS/CrIS synchronization, and the measured ATMS antenna pattern. Results based on analysis of ATMS SDRs. Similar results for other days. Alex Foo, Chunming Wang and Degui Gu, NGAS

Geometry Effects on ATMS Brightness Temperature 15 Daily average brightness temperatures showing effects of sensor viewing geometry. Shown are brightness temperature difference from nadir views. Data collected on January 8, Most of the cross scan temperature variation are likely due to surface emissivity and limb effects, but may also contain some calibration errors due to uncorrected sidelobe effects. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS

Geometry Effects on ATMS Brightness Temperature 16 Same as previous slide, but for a different day (January 5, 2012). Similar geometry effects. Exact values are somewhat different, and may be resulted from changes in scene conditions. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS

ATMS Retrieved Atmosphere Temperature (500mb) 17 Atmospheric Temperature (K) at ~500 mb produced from ATMS SDRs, which are not corrected for antenna beam efficiency and scan-dependent biases. Ascending orbits Data downloaded from GRAVITE. Xialin Ma and Degui Gu, NGAS

ATMS Retrieved Atmosphere Moisture (500mb) 18 Atmospheric water vapor mixing ratio (g/kg) at ~500 mb produced from ATMS SDRs, which are not corrected for antenna beam efficiency and scan-dependent biases. Ascending orbits Data downloaded from GRAVITE. Xialin Ma and Degui Gu, NGAS

ATMS SDR Data Product Improvement with PCT Updates 19 Supported anomaly resolution and DR investigation to improve SDR data product quality –DR4462: space view and blackbody antenna position error flags triggered Findings: The flags were triggered correctly because RDR values are out of bound (set to tight). No error in ATMS SDR algorithm code, and sensor is working properly, consistent with prelaunch TVAC test behavior Resolution: updated the PCT to relax the threshold values –DR4463: cold count quality flag not triggered when cold counts were below thresholds Findings: The CC_LIMIT flag didn’t get triggered when cold count was below the limit because a parameter named “chkConsistWcCc” in the PCT file was incorrectly set to “false”. When this parameter is set to false, a number of calibration related quality flags including CC_Limit will never get triggered. NGAS conducted the investigation on ADA, and later received confirmation from Raytheon that the operational code has the same setting Resolution: updated the PCT to set “chkConsistWcCc = True” –DR 4413: Incorrect CrIS/ATMS synchronization parameters in Remap algorithm PCT Findings: Worked with MIT-LL and DPA to re-calculate the expected time difference between ATMS FOV47 and CrIS FOR15 based on NPP operation scenario that they are synchronized at the start of scan Resolution: updated the affected PCT parameters and performed functional testing on G- ADA. CCR is being processed by DPA/DPE for operational implementation

Blackbody Antenna Position Error Caused by Position #1 Resolver Counts Deviation 20 ATMS Blackbody Antenna Position Error Quality Flag was triggered because Blackbody Pos #1 Resolver counts deviate from the expected value (35286) more than the preset threshold (7). Positions 2-4 are within the bound and do not trigger the flag. This is consistent with TVAC data that showed position #1 has larger deviation from the expected counts. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS Table constructed from ATMS Calibration data book

ATMS SDR Quality Flag Inspection ATMS SDR Geolocation Quality Inspection GPS Anomaly Impact on ATMS SDR Product 21 GPS anomaly occurred on Jan 4, 2012, and was shut off for troubleshooting. Impact on ATMS data products were evaluated. Inspection of ATMS SDR data showed antenna error flags being triggered and geolocation data containing fill values around 23:00:22. Independent inspection of RDRs by MIT-LL revealed RDR anomaly in the same time period. Alex Foo and Degui Gu, NGAS

Next Steps Continue to support the Cal/Val team to verify and validate xDR data products Continue to support DR investigation and anomaly resolution Perform functional testing of algorithm code and LUT updates on G-ADA Assess ATMS SDR accuracy and quantify scan-dependent biases Develop effective approach to correct scene and scan-dependent biases and to assess impact on CrIMSS EDR performance 22

Summary and Conclusion ATMS xDR products have been verified –ATMS sensor is stable –IDPS product generation algorithms perform consistently –Expect improved SDR product quality from Build MX5.1 –Additional algorithm LUT updates are being processed by DPA/DPE –Need more data and analyses to characterize sensor sidelobe effects and to evaluate impact on SDR calibration accuracy –Need to update PCT and/or develop algorithm code enhancement correct scene and scan dependent calibration errors 23