07 Aug 2007 C1C Adam Stooke USAF Academy Physics Department SIST Outbrief Supervisor: Yuriy Pischalnikov, Technical Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FORCE MEASUREMENT.
Advertisements

1 Analysis of Test Results 2 What we’ll have to do: Load-Deflection curve. Load Vs Strain curve for steel and concrete Find yield load (  s = 0.002)
WP-M3 Superconducting Materials PArametric COnverter Detector INFN_Genoa Renzo Parodi.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Introduction to strain gauges and beam bending. Labs and work You need to let us know (while working, not after the fact) if labs are taking too long.
325 MHz RF Cave and SC Spoke Cavity Tests Robyn Madrak – Accelerator Physics Center (APC) for the HINS/Project X Group.
PRESENTATION ON LOAD CELL AND ITS APPLICATION
Case Study – Application of Sensors in measuring torque and thrust produced by propellers in small unmanned quad-rotor helicopter.
Wireless System for TPS Sensors Presented By: Tye Reid and Greg Swanson.
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- XFEL Tuner Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup New Saclay design.
Wheatstone Bridge Discussion D2.6. Wheatstone Bridge Measuring Resistance Strain Gauges.
Piezo Studies and Temperature Measurements Ruben Carcagno May 11, 2005.
Strain Gauges By Ross, James and Peter. What is a Strain Gauge? A strain gauge is a sensor that converts force, pressure, tension, weight etc into electrical.
Mechanical Measurement Lab, T.Dijoud
Differential Transformer
Thin Films for Superconducting Cavities HZB. Outline Introduction to Superconducting Cavities The Quadrupole Resonator Commissioning Outlook 2.
Topic 1 different attributes that characterize sensors ETEC 6405.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Glassy Carbon Tests at HiRadMat 14 March 2014 C. Garion2 Outline: Introduction Context: Transparent.
EWEC 2007 Centre for Renewable Energy Sources Wind Turbine Testing Laboratory WT Load Measurements: A Comparison between Load- Based and Analytical Calibration.
Page 1 Jean Delayen HyeKyoung Park Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
Salman Tariq Accelerator Division Mechanical Support Department
Performance Improvement of APS Booster Ring Dipole Magnet Power Supplies Ju Wang The 3 rd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle.
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
Shuichi Noguchi,SRF2007,10.71 New Tuners for ILC Cavity Application Shuichi Noguchi KEK.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
1 M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler and Z. Celik-Butler, Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
ILC FAST TUNER R&D PROGRAM at FNAL Status Report CC2 Piezo Test Preliminary Results Ruben Carcagno (on behalf of the FNAL FAST TUNER Working Group) 4/5/06.
Carlo Pagani University of Milano & INFN Milano - LASA WP8 Tuner Status & Perspective ILC-HiGrade Kick-Off Meeting DESY, Hamburg 29 August 2008 Material.
Performance of magnetostrictive element at LHe environment 12th International Conference MIXDES 2005 Performance of magnetostrictive element at LHe environment.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF UKRAINE The E.O. Paton Electric Welding Institute (PWI) DATABASE AND METODOLOGY FOR MONITORING DYNAMIC DEFORMATION IN EXPLOSION.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
By Dr. Hong Zhang For Freshman Engineering Clinic.
Preliminary Results from First Blade Tuner Tests in HTS Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Serena Barbannoti Matteo Scorrano.
Strain gauges, resistors review, and capacitors. Cantilever beams.
Dan O. Popa, Intro to EE, Freshman Practicum, Spring 2015 EE 1106 : Introduction to EE Freshman Practicum Lab-Lecture 7: Strain gage and Wheatstone Bridge.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
Warren Schappert Yuriy Pischalnikov FNAL SRF2011, Chicago.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
Magnet and ferrites tests Luciano Elementi Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
Strain Sensing at High Altitude Annual Arizona Space Grant Consortium ASCEND! Andy Gee Pima Community College Mentor: Mike Sampogna Pima Community.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control FNAL experience Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for Resonance Control Group Fermilab- Los Alamos MaRIE Project Meeting March.
Superconducting RF: Resonance Control Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for W. Schappert, Y.Pischalnikov, J.Holzbauer PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 15.
Engineering of the power prototype of the ESRF HOM damped cavity* V. Serrière, J. Jacob, A. Triantafyllou, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, L. Goirand, B. Ogier * This.
Engineering Design of Raon SC Cavities Myung Ook Hyun SCL Team Myung Ook Hyun SCL Team.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
3. Signal conditioning Sensors are very rarely directly connected to the registering instruments, as the signal may be too weak, incompatible or noisy.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
T5.2: Harmonization - Material and Component Reference
5. Strain and Pressure Sensors
R. Paparella, INFN-Milan, LASA Laboratory, Segrate, Italy
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Mechanical Measurement Lab, EDMS no
Mechanical setups Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup
Cavity resonance control
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
Design and Optimization of Force-Reduced Superconducting Magnets
Tutorial in Mechanical Properties
High gradients in TESLA nine-cell cavities
Elastic properties of materials
Physics Design on Injector I
TOPIC- Load cell A load cell is a transducer that is used to create an electrical signal whose magnitude is directly proportional to the force being.
Optical fiber based sensors for low temperature and superconductors
Presentation transcript:

07 Aug 2007 C1C Adam Stooke USAF Academy Physics Department SIST Outbrief Supervisor: Yuriy Pischalnikov, Technical Division

Resonance Control: Pre-Load & A Case Study in Measurement

Outline Superconducting Radio Frequency (SCRF) Cavities Resonance & Tuning Measuring the Preload Current Configuration New Hardware Profile Recommended Improvements

Superconducting RF Cavity

Operational Hurdle: Cost Energy/Power Consumption Land, Materials, Production Precision

Energy Savings SC RF Cavities Electromagnetic Resonance Narrow-band Power Supply 1.3 GHz f 1/2 f 1/2 ≈ 200 Hz 1 µm  400 Hz

Detuning Microphonics Lorentz Force

Pulse Mode

Lorentz Force Detuning 35 MV/m  500 ~ 600 Hz

Tuning

Pre-Load

Data Analysis Tension! Fickle Calibration

Measurement Equipment

Measurement Sensitivities SS 316 E = 193 GPa 50 lbs  11.5 µε  8 mΩ

Temperature Calibration, 5 K, 80 mK  8 mΩ

RTD 5 K, 80 mK  4 Ω

Performance Profile Range Resolution Current 100  ……10 μ  mA 1 k  μ  mA 10 k  ……...1 m  μA 100 k  …….10 m  μA 1 M  m  μA 10 M   μA Resolution Noise Reduction Mode Aperture Time LabVIEW 8.2 NI-DMM 2.7 (PXI 4071) NI-SWITCH 3.3 (PXI 2501) Vishay Resistor 350 Ω (0.005%) 4-wire measurement

Performance Profile SETTINGSRESULTS Range: 1 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: high-orderApt. time: 6σ = Time = 5.2 Range: 10 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: high-orderApt. time: 6σ = Time = 5.4 Range: 1 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: second-orderApt. time: 2σ = Time = 1.9 Range: 10 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = 0.11 Noise- rej: second-orderApt. time: 2σ = 0.030Time = 2.1 Range: 1 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: normalApt. time: 1σ = Time = 1.1 Range: 10 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: normalApt. time: 1σ = Time = 1.3 *Time is seconds for switching and reading 50 point multipoint*Each set of statistics covers 5,000 measurements SG: 8 mΩ

Performance Profile *Time is seconds for switching and reading 50 point multipoint*Each set of statistics covers 5,000 measurements SETTINGSRESULTS Range: 100 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: high-orderApt. time: 6σ = 0.20Time = 6.4 Range: 1 M  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = 3.81 Noise- rej: high-orderApt. time: 6σ = 0.68Time = 10.2 Range: 100 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: second-orderApt. time: 2σ = 0.038Time = 3.1 Range: 1 M  Resolution: 7 ½µ = 319.4Range = Noise- rej: second-orderApt. time: 2σ = 1.0Time = 6.9 Range: 100 k  Resolution: 7 ½µ = Range = Noise- rej: normalApt. time: 1σ = 0.038Time = 2.3 Range: 1 M  Resolution: 7 ½µ = 320.6Range = Noise- rej: normalApt. time: 1σ = 2.1Time = 6.0 RTD: 4 Ω 1 µA

Performance Profile *Time is seconds for switch connect and 20 point multipoint read *Each set of statistics covers 200 measurements. SETTINGSRESULTS Resolution: 5 ½ Noise- rej: high-order µ = σ = 7.1 Range = Time = 5.08 Resolution: 6 ½ Noise- rej: high-order µ = σ = 0.82 Range = Time = 9.9 Resolution: 7 ½ Noise- rej: high-order µ = σ = 0.36 Range = Time = 32 Resolution: 5 ½ Noise- rej: second-order µ = σ = 7.6 Range = Time = 5.2 Resolution: 6 ½ Noise- rej: second-order µ = σ = 0.86 Range = 4.93 Time = 9.9 Resolution: 7 ½ Noise- rej: second-order µ = σ = 0.34 Range = Time = 32 Resolution: 5 ½ Noise- rej: normal µ = 348 σ = 13 Range = Time = 5.2 Resolution: 6 ½ Noise- rej: normal µ = σ = 0.76 Range = Time = 9.9 Resolution: 7 ½ Noise- rej: normal µ = σ = 0.36 Range = Time = 32 *Range is 10 MΩ for all. RTD: 4 Ω 1 µA

Sensor Improvements Reliability Accuracy How? Decrease demands

Bullet Modification Material SS 316: E = 193 GPa Al 2014-T4: E = 70 GPa Nearly 3 times the strain Size 10 x 10 x 10 mm 7.5 x 7.5 x 10 mm Nearly 2 times the stress Industry standard for measurements: µε 50 lbs: 8 mΩ  40 mΩ 80 mK  400 mK Improve from 115 µε to ~600 µε

Bullet Modification RequirementMaterial Property Maximum Compressive Force: 10,000 N Maximum Compressive Stress: 178 MPa Compressive Strength: 425 MPa Shear Force: 450 N Shear Stress: 64 MPa Shear Strength: 262 MPa Spring constant >> 9 N/µm (Latest setting of CuBe 2 disc springs in HTS) Spring constant: 394 N/µm (1.93 kN/µm for SS 316, 1 cm 3 ) *Bullet material requirements and properties for a 7.5 x 7.5 x 10 mm bullet of aluminum 2014-T4

Gauge Modification Placement of Temperature Sensors

Gauge Modification Gauge Selection 4 K  Karma-alloy S-T-C number

Gauge Modification Gauge Configuration Wheatstone Bridge Full Poisson Bridge

Gauge Modification Gauge Configuration Wheatstone Bridge Half Bridge (Bending)

Conclusion Cavity Resonance Control Piezostack Preload Bullet & Strain Gauge Temperature Compensation New: Bullet SG Configuration Control & Measurement Hardware

Questions? C1C Adam Stooke USAF Academy Physics Department Supervisor: Yuriy Pischalnikov Technical Division