Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Variable resolution or lateral boundary conditions Terry Davies Dynamics Research Yongming.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Advertisements

The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006SRNWP 9-12 October 2006, Zurich Variable resolution or lateral boundary conditions Terry Davies Dynamics Research Yongming.
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
1 Les règles générales WWOSC August, Montréal, Canada Didier Ricard 1, Sylvie Malardel 2, Yann Seity 1 Julien Léger 1, Mirela Pietrisi 1. CNRM-GAME,
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Draft Interoperability Proposal Terry Davies SRNWP Meeting October 8-11, 2007.
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Mar 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Bruce Macpherson, Marek Wlasak, Mark Naylor, Richard Renshaw Data Assimilation, NWP Assimilation developments.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office EWGLAM / COST-717.
C ontacts: Marit Helene Jensen, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O.Box 43 Blindern, N-0313 OSLO, NORWAY. HIRLAM at met.no.
CHOICES FOR HURRICANE REGIONAL ENSEMBLE FORECAST (HREF) SYSTEM Zoltan Toth and Isidora Jankov.
Real Time High-Resolution McGill University J. Gyakum 1, R. McTaggart- Cowan 1, P. Sisson 2 1 McGill University 2 National Weather Service.
Real Time High-Resolution McGill University J. Gyakum 1, R. McTaggart- Cowan 1, P. Sisson 2 1 McGill University 2 National Weather Service.
© Crown copyright Met Office SRNWP Interoperability Workshop, ECMWF, January 2008 SRNWP Interoperability Terry Davies Met Office.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
NWP at the Italian Meteorological Service: STATUS REPORT 29 th EWGLAM, Dubrovnik, 8-11 October 2007 Massimo Bonavita, Lucio Torrisi, Antonio Vocino and.
Forecasting and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) NOWcasting Description of atmospheric models Specific Models Types of variables and how to determine.
Numerical simulations of the severe rainfall in Pula, Croatia, on 25 th September 2010 Antonio Stanešić, Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan, Martina Tudor and Dunja.
ESA DA Projects Progress Meeting 2University of Reading Advanced Data Assimilation Methods WP2.1 Perform (ensemble) experiments to quantify model errors.
© Crown copyright Met Office Climate Projections for West Africa Andrew Hartley, Met Office: PARCC national workshop on climate information and species.
HWRF ERROR ANALYSIS T N Krishnamurti A.Thomas A. Simon Florida State University.
Development of a downscaling prediction system Liqiang Sun International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI)
NWP Activities at INM Bartolomé Orfila Estrada Area de Modelización - INM 28th EWGLAM & 13th SRNWP Meetings Zürich, October 2005.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson Presented by Terry Davies at SRNWP Meeting.
Regional GEM 15 km OPERATIONAL 48-h RUN (00 or 12 UTC) EVENT GEM-LAM 2.5 km GEM-LAM 1 km MC2-LAM 250 m T+5 T+12 T-1 T-3 36-h run 15-h run 6-h run Microscale.
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
Radar in aLMo Assimilation of Radar Information in the Alpine Model of MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger and Andrea Rossa MeteoSwiss.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
CCAM Regional climate modelling Dr Marcus Thatcher Research Scientist December 2007.
RC LACE 25th EWGLAM Meeting 6-9 October 2003, Lisbon1.
26 th EWGLAM & 11 th SRNWP meetings, Oslo, Norway, 4 th - 7 th October 2004 Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan RC LACE Data Manager Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological.
Sensitivity experiments with the Runge Kutta time integration scheme Lucio TORRISI CNMCA – Pratica di Mare (Rome)
Operational ALADIN forecast in Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service 26th EWGLAM & 11th SRNWP meetings 4th - 7th October 2004,Oslo, Norway Zoran.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK.
© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 The convective-scale Unified Model: Results from UK case studies Richard Forbes (JCMM, Met Office) October 2005.
Page 1© Crown copyright Scale selective verification of precipitation forecasts Nigel Roberts and Humphrey Lean.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 SRNWP Lead Centre Report on Data Assimilation 2005 for EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meeting October 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
Production of a multi-model, convective- scale superensemble over western Europe as part of the SESAR project EMS Annual Conference, Sept. 13 th, 2013.
© Crown copyright Met Office Downscaling ability of the HadRM3P model over North America Wilfran Moufouma-Okia and Richard Jones.
NWP models. Strengths and weaknesses. Morten Køltzow, met.no NOMEK
NCAS Unified Model Introduction Part 4b: UM Limited Area Models University of Reading, 3-5 December 2014.
Page 1 Developments in regional DA Oct 2007 © Crown copyright 2007 Mark Naylor, Bruce Macpherson, Richard Renshaw, Gareth Dow Data Assimilation and Ensembles,
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 DEVELOPMENT OF 1- 4KM RESOLUTION DATA ASSIMILATION FOR NOWCASTING AT THE MET OFFICE Sue Ballard, September 2005 Z. Li, M.
1 10/2003 © Crown copyright Unified Model Developments 2003 Clive Wilson NWP Met Office.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
A physical initialization algorithm for non-hydrostatic NWP models using radar derived rain rates Günther Haase Meteorological Institute, University of.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
LAM activities in Austria in 2003 Yong WANG ZAMG, AUSTRIA 25th EWGLAM and 10th SRNWP meetings, Lisbon,
Status of the NWP-System & based on COSMO managed by ARPA-SIM COSMO I77 kmBCs from IFSNudgingCINECA COSMO I22.8 kmBCs from COSMO I7 Interpolated from COSMO.
© Crown copyright Met Office Review topic – Impact of High-Resolution Data Assimilation Bruce Macpherson, Christoph Schraff, Claude Fischer EWGLAM, 2009.
Interfacing Model Components CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
March 2014 UM Limited Area Models What constitutes a LAM How to set one up in the UM How to start a LAM How to keep a LAM going Nesting LAMS Cascade example.
Emerging Research Opportunities at the Climate Modeling Laboratory NC State University (Presentation at NIA Meeting: 9/04/03) Fredrick H. M. Semazzi North.
Met Office Ensemble System Current Status and Plans
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
Overview of Downscaling
Fuzzy verification using the Fractions Skill Score
How do models work? METR 2021: Spring 2009 Lab 10.
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
Cold Air Outbreak: Constrain Case Study
Convective Scale Modelling Humphrey Lean et. al
COPE: The COnvective Precipitation Experiment. Met Office interests
25th EWGLAM & 10th SRNWP meetings
NWP Strategy of DWD after 2006 GF XY DWD Feb-19.
MOGREPS developments and TIGGE
Presentation transcript:

Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Variable resolution or lateral boundary conditions Terry Davies Dynamics Research Yongming Tang, Junichi Ishida

Page 2© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Convective scale NWP One-way nesting requires lateral boundary conditions from larger-scale model. Variable resolution LAM – still requires lbcs but high resolution region can be moved away from lateral boundaries.

Page 3© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik NWP Model Orography 12 km 4 km 1 km Height of model orography (m)

Page 4© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Variable resolution costs (relative to 4km) Area/  2 km1.85km1.5 km1 km 100% % % %

Page 5© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik May Case Nested model 1 km high resolution nested model and radar rainfall at 14 UTC 1 km4 km12 kmRadar

Page 6© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik May Case variable resolution model Rainfall at 15 UTC. The three regions of the variable resolution domain are also shown Radar 1km

Page 7© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Variable Resolution Grid Structure Grid varies from coarse resolution at the outer boundaries smoothly to a uniform fine resolution in the interior of the domain Uniform High Res zone Var-Res 2 Var-Res 1 Uniform Coarse Res 1 Uniform Coarse Res 2 Typically, there are 3 regions, and inflation ratio R 1 = R 2 = 5~10% e.g. = 1 km, R 1 = R 2 = 10 % N_vr = 34 / 24 / 15 points  = 25 / 10 / 4 km R2R2 R1R1

Page 8© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Variable Resolution Grid Structure Grid varies from coarse resolution at the outer boundaries smoothly to a uniform fine resolution in the interior of the domain Uniform High Res zone Var-Res 2 Var-Res 1 Uniform Coarse Res 1 Uniform Coarse Res 2 Typically, there are 3 regions, and inflation ratio R 1 = R 2 = 5~10% e.g. = 1 km, R 1 = R 2 = 10 % N_vr = 34 / 24 / 15 points  = 25 / 10 / 4 km R2R2 R1R1

Page 9© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Variable resolution  Being built into latest version of UM (switch for variable resolution).  Uses look-up tables for semi-Lagrangian searches (departure points and trajectories).  Other optimisations to code and changes to lateral boundaries for variable grids.  Work towards 1.5km variable resolution model for UK LAM for 2009 (new supercomputer).

Page 10© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Forecast Domain and orography Regular UM (12km) Var-Res UM (1.5-4km) Global: 432x325L38 Regular UM (12km): 250x250L38 Var-Res UM (1.5-4km): 484x557L38 Regular UM (4km): 288x360L38 Regular UM (1.5km): 300x300L38 Domain of Var-Res UM Domain of 4km UM High Resolution Zone Domain of 1.5km UM

Page 11© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Typhoon track Domain of Var-Res UM (1.5-4km) Domain of 4km UM High Resolution Zone Domain of 1.5km UM 12UTC 05th 00UTC 05th 00UTC 06th The red lines and boxes show the observed track and position of the typhoon Nabi. The initial time is Regular 12km UM: 12UTC on 5 th Var-Res UM: 13UTC on 5 th Regular 4km UM: 13UTC on 5 th Regular 1.5km UM: 14UTC on 5 th The eye of the typhoon at initial time is located in the outside of the high resolution area and the typhoon moves into the area through the transition area (Var-Res UM) or lateral boundary (1.5km UM).

Page 12© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Global UM12km UMObservation 4km UMVar-Res UM Precipitation forecast The 12kmUM, 4kmUM and Var-Res UM well reproduce the rain caused by the orographic forcing over the Kyushu island. Hourly precipitation at 21 UTC on 5 th September

Page 13© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Precipitation forecast 4km UM1.5km UM Var-Res UMObservation Hourly precipitation at 21 UTC on 5 th September The rain band round the eye of the typhoon in the1.5km and Var-Res UM are better than that in 4km UM. The rain band in the Var-Res UM is slightly better than that in the 1.5km UM. The typhoon in the 1.5km UM moved from outside of the domain through the lateral boundary and the 1.5km UM seems not to have enough time to develop the rain band (spin up problem).

Page 14© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Lateral boundaries  To run variable resolution LAM will still need lbcs.  Current lbcs use standard merging technique and wrong lateral boundary condition for solving for the pressure increment

Page 15© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Lateral boundaries  Semi-Lagrangian advection applies lbcs naturally.  Apply appropriate lbcs to Helmholtz equation instead of zero pressure increment at lateral boundaries.  Reorganise lbc updating during time step.

Page 16© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Lateral boundaries  For mpp, lateral boundary files do not need external halos – lbc files can be made 30% smaller.  It should also be possible to reduce the number of fields in the lbc file leading to further size reduction.  If interpolation to LAM is made on input, files could be even smaller.

Page 17© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik The End