Q UANTUM C OMMUNICATION Aditi Sen(De) Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum t-designs: t-wise independence in the quantum world Andris Ambainis, Joseph Emerson IQC, University of Waterloo.
Advertisements

Use of Time as a Quantum Key By Caleb Parks and Dr. Khalil Dajani.
Quantum Information and the PCP Theorem Ran Raz Weizmann Institute.
Random non-local games Andris Ambainis, Artūrs Bačkurs, Kaspars Balodis, Dmitry Kravchenko, Juris Smotrovs, Madars Virza University of Latvia.
Quantum Computing MAS 725 Hartmut Klauck NTU
I NFORMATION CAUSALITY AND ITS TESTS FOR QUANTUM COMMUNICATIONS I- Ching Yu Host : Prof. Chi-Yee Cheung Collaborators: Prof. Feng-Li Lin (NTNU) Prof. Li-Yi.
Spin chains and channels with memory Martin Plenio (a) & Shashank Virmani (a,b) quant-ph/ , to appear prl (a)Institute for Mathematical Sciences.
Fixing the lower limit of uncertainty in the presence of quantum memory Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata Collaborators:
Quantum data locking, enigma machines and entropic uncertainty relations Saikat Guha, Patrick Hayden, Hari Krovi, Seth Lloyd, Cosmo Lupo, Jeffrey H. Shapiro,
QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY ABHINAV GUPTA CSc Introduction [1,2]  Quantum cryptography is an emerging technology in which two parties can secure network.
Quantum information as high-dimensional geometry Patrick Hayden McGill University Perspectives in High Dimensions, Cleveland, August 2010.
Short course on quantum computing Andris Ambainis University of Latvia.
Quantum Computing MAS 725 Hartmut Klauck NTU
Classical capacities of bidirectional channels Charles Bennett, IBM Aram Harrow, MIT/IBM, Debbie Leung, MSRI/IBM John Smolin,
Quantum Cryptography Qingqing Yuan. Outline No-Cloning Theorem BB84 Cryptography Protocol Quantum Digital Signature.
Superdense coding. How much classical information in n qubits? Observe that 2 n  1 complex numbers apparently needed to describe an arbitrary n -qubit.
Gate robustness: How much noise will ruin a quantum gate? Aram Harrow and Michael Nielsen, quant-ph/0212???
Avraham Ben-Aroya (Tel Aviv University) Oded Regev (Tel Aviv University) Ronald de Wolf (CWI, Amsterdam) A Hypercontractive Inequality for Matrix-Valued.
A Family of Quantum Protocols Igor Devetak, IBM Aram Harrow, MIT Andreas Winter, Bristol quant-ph/ IEEE Symposium on Information Theory June 28,
Quantum Algorithms I Andrew Chi-Chih Yao Tsinghua University & Chinese U. of Hong Kong.
CSEP 590tv: Quantum Computing
Quantum Key Establishment Wade Trappe. Talk Overview Quantum Demo Quantum Key Establishment.
BB84 Quantum Key Distribution 1.Alice chooses (4+  )n random bitstrings a and b, 2.Alice encodes each bit a i as {|0>,|1>} if b i =0 and as {|+>,|->}
Lo-Chau Quantum Key Distribution 1.Alice creates 2n EPR pairs in state each in state |  00 >, and picks a random 2n bitstring b, 2.Alice randomly selects.
EECS 598 Fall ’01 Quantum Cryptography Presentation By George Mathew.
Paraty, Quantum Information School, August 2007 Antonio Acín ICFO-Institut de Ciències Fotòniques (Barcelona) Quantum Cryptography.
Quantum Shannon Theory Patrick Hayden (McGill) 17 July 2005, Q-Logic Meets Q-Info.
Witnesses for quantum information resources Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata, India Collaborators: S. Adhikari,
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND IMPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION PROCESSING: Quantum TELEPORTATION K. Mangala Sunder Department of Chemistry IIT Madras.
Alice and Bob’s Excellent Adventure
Quantum Information, Communication and Computing Jan Kříž Department of physics, University of Hradec Králové Doppler Institute for mathematical physics.
ENTROPIC CHARACTERISTICS OF QUANTUM CHANNELS AND THE ADDITIVITY PROBLEM A. S. Holevo Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow.
A Few Simple Applications to Cryptography Louis Salvail BRICS, Aarhus University.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 667 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Richard Cleve DC 2117 Lecture.
QCMC’06 1 Joan Vaccaro Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Centre for Quantum Computer Technology Griffith University Brisbane Group theoretic formulation of.
Aditi Sen (De) Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India.
Experimental generation and characterisation of private states Paweł Horodecki Wydział Fizyki Technicznej i Matematyki Stosowanej, Politechnika Gdańska.
Rei Safavi-Naini University of Calgary Joint work with: Hadi Ahmadi iCORE Information Security.
Q UANTUM C OMMUNICATION P ART 2 Aditi Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India.
The private capacities of a secret shared reference frame Patrick Hayden (McGill) with: PRA 75: (2005) ??? Stephen Bartlett Robert Spekkens arXiv:quant-ph/
Counterexamples to the maximal p -norm multiplicativity conjecture Patrick Hayden (McGill University) || | | N(½)N(½) p C&QIC, Santa Fe 2008.
Quantum Cryptography Zelam Ngo, David McGrogan. Motivation Age of Information Information is valuable Protecting that Information.
CS555Topic 251 Cryptography CS 555 Topic 25: Quantum Crpytography.
Bell Measurements and Teleportation. Overview Entanglement Bell states and Bell measurements Limitations on Bell measurements using linear devices Teleportation.
Quantum Information Theory Patrick Hayden (McGill) 4 August 2005, Canadian Quantum Information Summer School.
What is Qu antum In formation and T echnology? Prof. Ivan H. Deutsch Dept. of Physics and Astronomy University of New Mexico Second Biannual Student Summer.
Coherent Communication of Classical Messages Aram Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/
Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories Barcelona, 20 July 2007 Antonio Acín 1,2 J. Ignacio Cirac 3 Maciej Lewenstein 1,2 1 ICFO-Institut de Ciències Fotòniques.
Nawaf M Albadia
Efficiency of Multi-Qubit W states in Information Processing Atul Kumar IPQI-2014 IIT Jodhpur
Quantum Entanglement and Distillation in Information Processing Shao-Ming Fei
Coherent Classical Communication Aram Harrow, MIT Quantum Computing Graduate Research Fellow Objective Objective ApproachStatus Determine.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 467 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Richard Cleve DC 3524 Course.
Quantum Cryptography Antonio Acín
Entanglement and Optimal Strings of Qubits for Memory Channels Laleh Memarzadeh Sharif University of Technology IICQI 7-10 Sept 2007 Kish Island.
B OUNDS ON E NTANGLEMENT D ISTILLATION & S ECRET K EY A GREEMENT C APACITIES FOR Q UANTUM B ROADCAST C HANNELS Kaushik P. Seshadreesan Joint work with.
Coherent Communication of Classical Messages Aram Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/
Quantum Teleportation What does the future hold?.
Lecture from Quantum Mechanics. Marek Zrałek Field Theory and Particle Physics Department. Silesian University Lecture 11.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 467 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Richard Cleve DC 3524 Course.
Institute of Physics (IOP), Bhubaneswar
Unconditional Security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key-distribution protocol over a lossy and noisy channel Kiyoshi Tamaki * *Perimeter Institute for.
Invitation to Quantum Information III
Quantum Cryptography Alok.T.J EC 11.
Quantum Information Theory Introduction
Lev Vaidman 23 August 2004, Cambridge Zion Mitrani Amir Kalev
Information-Theoretic Security
Richard Cleve DC 3524 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 667 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Lecture.
Presentation transcript:

Q UANTUM C OMMUNICATION Aditi Sen(De) Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India

O UTLINE Communication Secure Communication Quantum Cryptography Communication

O UTLINE Communication Secure Communication Quantum Cryptography Communication Without security Classical info transmission Quantum state transmission

O UTLINE Communication Secure Communication Quantum Cryptography Communication Without security Classical info transmission Quantum state transmission

O UTLINE Communication Secure Communication Quantum Cryptography Communication Without security Classical info transmission Classical info transmission Quantum state transmission

C OMMUNICATION

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? At least 2 parties Sender Receiver Alice Bob Communication is a process by which information is sent by a sender to a receiver via some medium.

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? At least 2 parties Sender Receiver Alice Bob Communication is a process by which information is sent by a sender to a receiver via some medium.

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? At least 2 parties Sender Receiver Alice Bob Communication is a process by which information is sent by a sender to a receiver via some medium.

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? At least 2 parties Sender Receiver Alice Bob Communication is a process by which information is sent by a sender to a receiver via some medium.

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? At least 2 parties Sender Receiver Alice Bob a process by which information is sent by a sender to a receiver via some medium.

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? Alice (Encoder) Sends encodes Bob (Decoder) receives & decodes

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? information must be encoded in, and decoded from a physical system. encoding/Decoding red-green balls, sign of charge of a particle. Only orthogonal states Quantum World: Nonorthogonal states Classical World “Information is physical” ---Landauer

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? information must be encoded in, and decoded from a physical system. encoding/Decoding red-green balls, sign of charge of a particle. Only orthogonal states Quantum World: Nonorthogonal states Classical World “Information is physical” ---Landauer

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? information must be encoded in, and decoded from a physical system. encoding/decoding red-green balls, sign of charge of a particle. Only orthogonal states Quantum World: Nonorthogonal states Classical World “Information is physical” ---Landauer

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? information must be encoded in, and decoded from a physical system. encoding/decoding red-green balls, sign of charge of a particle. Only orthogonal states Quantum World: Nonorthogonal states Classical World “Information is physical” ---Landauer

W HAT IS C OMMUNICATION ? information must be encoded in, and decoded from a physical system. encoding/decoding red-green balls, sign of charge of a particle. Only orthogonal states Quantum World: Nonorthogonal states Classical World “Information is physical” ---Landauer Do quantum states advantageous?

Classical Information Transmission via Quantum States Part 1

Quantum Dense Coding Bennett & Wiesner, PRL 1992

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Sunny Snowing Windy Raining

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Sunny Snowing Windy Raining

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Sunny Windy

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Sunny Snowing Windy Raining

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Sunny Snowing Windy Raining

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Sunny Snowing Windy Raining 2 bits

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Sunny Snowing Windy Raining 2 bits Classical computer unit: Bit = one of {0, 1}

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining EncodingDecoding Distinguishable by color Alice Bob Sending

C LASSICAL P ROTOCOL Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining EncodingDecoding Distinguishable by color Alice Bob 2 bits 4 dimension

What abt Quantum?

Q UANTUM P ROTOCOL Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob B A Singlet state

Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob B A I U Alice performs unitary on her particle

Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob B A I U Creates 4 orthogonal states Singlet, Triplets Alice performs unitary on her particle

Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob B A I U Alice sends her particle to Bob

Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob I A B Bob has 2 particles: one of the triplets or singlet

Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob I A B Decoding 4 orthogonal states Possible to distinguish 4 orthogonal states Possible to distinguish

Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob I A B Decoding 4 orthogonal states Possible to distinguish 4 orthogonal states Possible to distinguish Decodes message

Message Sunny Snowing Windy Raining Alice Bob I A B Decoding 4 orthogonal states Possible to distinguish 4 orthogonal states Possible to distinguish 2 bits 2 dimension

M ORAL Classical Quantum Vs. Task: sending 2 bits Encoding: 4 Dimensions Encoding: 2 Dimensions

M ORAL Classical Quantum Vs. Task: sending 2 bits Encoding: 4 Dimensions Encoding: 2 Dimensions Bennett & Weisner, PRL 69, 2881 (’92).

D ENSE C ODING FOR ARBITRARY STATE Hiroshima, J. Phys. A ’01; Ziman & Buzek, PRA ’03, Bruss, D’Ariano, Lewenstein, Macchiavello, ASD, Sen, PRL’ 04 Hiroshima, J. Phys. A ’01; Ziman & Buzek, PRA ’03, Bruss, D’Ariano, Lewenstein, Macchiavello, ASD, Sen, PRL’ 04

B A Alice & Bob share a state

B A Alice’s aim: to send classical info i Alice’s aim: to send classical info i Encoding

B A Alice’s aim: to send classical info i which occurs with probability p i Alice’s aim: to send classical info i which occurs with probability p i Encoding

UiUi UiUi B A Alice performs p i, U i Encoding

UiUi UiUi B A Alice performs p i, U i she produces the ensemble E = {p i,  i } Alice performs p i, U i she produces the ensemble E = {p i,  i } Encoding

UiUi UiUi B A Alice performs p i, U i she produces the ensemble E = {p i,  i } Alice performs p i, U i she produces the ensemble E = {p i,  i } Encoding

UiUi UiUi B A Alice performs p i, U i she produces the ensemble E = {p i,  i } Alice performs p i, U i she produces the ensemble E = {p i,  i } Alice sends her particle to Bob Sending

AB Alice Bob Decoding

AB Alice Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Decoding

AB Alice Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Decoding Bob measures and obtains outcome j with prob q j

AB Alice Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Decoding Post measurement ensemble: E |j= {p i|j,  i|j }

AB Alice Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Decoding Post measurement ensemble: E |j= {p i|j,  i|j } Mutual information: i

AB Alice Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Decoding Mutual information: i I acc = max I(i:M)

AB Alice Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Bob’s task: Gather info abt i = Maximal classical information from E= {p i,  i }. = Maximal classical information from E= {p i,  i }. Decoding I acc = max I (i:M)

H OLEVO T HEOREM 1973 Initial ensemble E = {p i,  i }

H OLEVO T HEOREM 1973 Initial ensemble E = {p i,  i }

H OLEVO T HEOREM 1973 Initial ensemble E = {p i,  i } d: dimension of  i

H OLEVO T HEOREM 1973 Initial ensemble E = {p i,  i } Bit per qubit

AB Alice Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Bob’s task: Gather info abt i Accessible information = Maximal classical information from E = {p i,  i }. Accessible information = Maximal classical information from E = {p i,  i }. Decoding

DC C APACITY Dense coding capacity: maximization over all encodings i.e. over all { p i, U i } C = Max I acc

DC C APACITY Dense coding capacity: maximization over all encodings i.e. over all { p i, U i } C = Max I acc = Max Holevo quantity obtained by Bob

DC C APACITY Dense coding capacity: maximization over all encodings i.e. over all { p i, U i } C = Max I acc = Max Holevo quantity obtained by Bob Holevo can be achieved asymptotically Schumacher, Westmoreland, PRA 56, 131 (’97)

DC C APACITY Dense coding capacity: maximization over all encodings i.e. over all { p i, U i } C = Max I acc = Max

DC C APACITY Dense coding capacity: maximization over all encodings i.e. over all { p i, U i } C = Max I acc = Max

C = Max DC C APACITY

C = Max DC C APACITY

C = Max DC C APACITY

C = log 2 d A + S(ρ B ) - S(ρ AB )

DC C APACITY C = log 2 d A + S(ρ B ) - S(ρ AB ) I B = S(ρ B ) - S(ρ AB ) > 0 A state is dense codeable

C LASSIFICATION OF STATES Entangled S DC In 2  2, 2  3

DC C APACITY : K NOWN /U NKNOWN Single Sender – Single Receiver Solved

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK

W HY QUANTUM DENSE CODING NETWORK ? Point to point communication has limited commercial use

W HY QUANTUM DENSE CODING NETWORK ? To build a quantum computer, or communication network To build a quantum computer, or communication network

W HY QUANTUM DENSE CODING NETWORK ? To build a quantum computer, or communication network, classical info transmission To build a quantum computer, or communication network, classical info transmission

W HY QUANTUM DENSE CODING NETWORK ? To build a quantum computer, or communication network, classical info transmission via quantum state in network To build a quantum computer, or communication network, classical info transmission via quantum state in network

Dense Coding Network 1

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Bob Debu Charu Nitu Alice Receivers Sender

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Bob Debu Charu Nitu Alice Receivers Sender Task: Alice individually sends classical info to all the receivers Task: Alice individually sends classical info to all the receivers

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Bob Debu Charu Nitu Alice Receivers R. Prabhu, A. K. Pati, ASD, U. Sen, PRA ’ 2013 R. Prabhu, ASD, U. Sen, PRA’ 2013 R. Nepal, R. Prabhu, ASD, U. Sen, PRA’ 2013 Sender

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Bob Debu Charu Nitu Alice Receivers R. Prabhu, A. K. Pati, ASD, U. Sen, PRA ’ 2013 R. Prabhu, ASD, U. Sen, PRA’ 2013 R. Nepal, R. Prabhu, ASD, U. Sen, PRA’ 2013 Sender Ujjwal’s Talk Prabhu’s Talk Ujjwal’s Talk Prabhu’s Talk

Dense Coding Network 2

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver Several senders & a single receiver

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver Task: All senders send classical info {i k, k=1,2,..N} to a receiver Task: All senders send classical info {i k, k=1,2,..N} to a receiver Several senders & a single receiver

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver Task: All senders send classical info {i k, k=1,2,..N} to a receiver Task: All senders send classical info {i k, k=1,2,..N} to a receiver

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver senders perform U i k, k=1,2,..N on her parts

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver Senders create ensemble

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver Senders create ensemble

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver Senders send ensemble to Bob

D ENSE C ODING N ETWORK Alice Debu Charu Nitu Bob Senders Receiver Bob’s task: gather info abt

DC C APACITY NETWORK DC capacity network maximization over all encodings i.e. over all { p { i}, U { i } } C = Max I acc = Max Holevo quantity obtained by Bob

DC C APACITY N ETWORK C =C =C =C = Bruss, D’Ariano, Lewenstein, Macchiavello, ASD, Sen, PRL’ 04 Bruss, Lewenstein, ASD, Sen, D’Ariano, Macchiavello, Int. J. Quant. Info. ’05

DC C APACITY N ETWORK C =C =C =C = Bruss, D’Ariano, Lewenstein, Macchiavello, ASD, Sen, PRL’ 04 Bruss, Lewenstein, ASD, Sen, D’Ariano, Macchiavello, Int. J. Quant. Info. ’05 Tamoghna’s Poster

DC C APACITY : K NOWN /U NKNOWN Single Sender – Single Receiver Many Senders – Single Receiver Solved

Dense Coding Network 3

D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS Alice (A 1 ) Alice (A 2 ) Bob (B 1 ) Bob (B 2 )

D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS Alice (A 1 ) Alice (A 2 ) Bob (B 1 ) Bob (B 2 ) LOCC i1i1 i2i2

D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS Alice (A 1 ) Alice (A 2 ) Bob (B 1 ) Bob (B 2 )

D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS Alice (A 1 ) Alice (A 2 ) Bob (B 1 ) Bob (B 2 ) Alices send her particles to Bobs

D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS Bob (B 1 ) Bob (B 2 ) Bobs task: gather info abt i k by LOCC

D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS Bob (B 1 ) Bob (B 2 ) Bobs task: gather info abt i k by LOCC LOCC

C = Max D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS

C = Max Max LOCC Holevo bound Maximization over all encodings i.e. over all {p i, U i } D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS

C = Max Max LOCC Holevo bound Maximization over all encodings i.e. over all {p i, U i } Badziag, Horodecki, ASD, Sen, PRL’03 D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS

C = Max Max LOCC Holevo bound Maximization over all encodings i.e. over all {p i, U i } Bruss, D’Ariano, Lewenstein, Macchiavello, ASD, Sen, PRL’ 04 D ISTRIBUTED DC: T WO RECEIVERS

DC C APACITY : K NOWN /U NKNOWN Single Sender – Single Receiver Many Senders – Single Receiver Solved

DC C APACITY : K NOWN /U NKNOWN Single Sender – Single Receiver Many Senders – Single Receiver Solved Many Senders – Two Receivers

DC C APACITY : K NOWN /U NKNOWN Single Sender – Single Receiver Many Senders – Single Receiver Solved Many Senders – Two Receivers Partially Solved

DC C APACITY : K NOWN /U NKNOWN Single Sender – Single Receiver Many Senders – Single Receiver Solved Many Senders – Two Receivers Partially Solved Many Senders – Many Receivers Not Solved 