Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRUTH TABLES Section 1.3.
Advertisements

TRUTH TABLES The general truth tables for each of the connectives tell you the value of any possible statement for each of the connectives. Negation.
Truth Functional Logic
Truth Tables Presented by: Tutorial Services The Math Center.
Use a truth table to determine the validity or invalidity of this argument. First, translate into standard form “Martin is not buying a new car, since.
John Rosson Thursday February 15, 2007 Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 3, Logic.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
CS128 – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science
Review: Logic of Categories = Categorical Logic.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.2 – 1.3 (Modus Tollens) Conditional and Valid & Invalid Arguments.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING: PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC Purposes: To analyze complex claims and deductive argument forms To determine what arguments are valid or not.
Syllabus Every Week: 2 Hourly Exams +Final - as noted on Syllabus
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Today’s Topics n Review Logical Implication & Truth Table Tests for Validity n Truth Value Analysis n Short Form Validity Tests n Consistency and validity.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Propositional Logic USEM 40a Spring 2006 James Pustejovsky.
Through the Looking Glass, 1865
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
3.2 – Truth Tables and Equivalent Statements
Logic ChAPTER 3.
Validity: Long and short truth tables Sign In! Week 10! Homework Due Review: MP,MT,CA Validity: Long truth tables Short truth table method Evaluations!
Elementary Logic PHIL Intersession 2013 MTWHF 10:00 – 12:00 ASA0118C Steven A. Miller Day 4.
1.1 Sets and Logic Set – a collection of objects. Set brackets {} are used to enclose the elements of a set. Example: {1, 2, 5, 9} Elements – objects inside.
Chapter 3 Section 4 – Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
3.6 Analyzing Arguments with Truth Tables
Section 1-4 Logic Katelyn Donovan MAT 202 Dr. Marinas January 19, 2006.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence.
Deduction, Proofs, and Inference Rules. Let’s Review What we Know Take a look at your handout and see if you have any questions You should know how to.
BY: MISS FARAH ADIBAH ADNAN IMK. CHAPTER OUTLINE: PART III 1.3 ELEMENTARY LOGIC INTRODUCTION PROPOSITION COMPOUND STATEMENTS LOGICAL.
Chapter 5 – Logic CSNB 143 Discrete Mathematical Structures.
Ch.2 Reasoning and Proof Pages Inductive Reasoning and Conjecture (p.62) - A conjecture is an educated guess based on known information.
Logic Disjunction A disjunction is a compound statement formed by combining two simple sentences using the word “OR”. A disjunction is true when at.
Deductive Arguments.
CSNB143 – Discrete Structure LOGIC. Learning Outcomes Student should be able to know what is it means by statement. Students should be able to identify.
Chapter Four Proofs. 1. Argument Forms An argument form is a group of sentence forms such that all of its substitution instances are arguments.
LOGIC Lesson 2.1. What is an on-the-spot Quiz  This quiz is defined by me.  While I’m having my lectures, you have to be alert.  Because there are.
1 DISJUNCTIVE AND HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMS DISJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONS: E.G EITHER WHALES ARE MAMMALS OR THEY ARE VERY LARGE FISH. DISJUNCTS: WHALES ARE MAMMALS.(P)
Chapter 3: Semantics PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning March 13, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Propositional Logic Fall Term 2006 North Central College.
Chapter 8 – Symbolic Logic Professor D’Ascoli. Symbolic Logic Because the appraisal of arguments is made difficult by the peculiarities of natural language,
Thinking Mathematically
LOGIC.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 1 Section 1.1 Wed, Jan 12, 2005.
Section 1.1. Section Summary Propositions Connectives Negation Conjunction Disjunction Implication; contrapositive, inverse, converse Biconditional Truth.
CSNB143 – Discrete Structure Topic 4 – Logic. Learning Outcomes Students should be able to define statement. Students should be able to identify connectives.
Propositional Logic A symbolic representation of deductive inference. Use upper case letters to represent simple propositions. E.g. Friday class rocks.
TRUTH TABLES. Introduction The truth value of a statement is the classification as true or false which denoted by T or F. A truth table is a listing of.
6.6 Argument Forms and Fallacies
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Section 1.1. Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false. Examples of propositions: a) The Moon is made of green.
TRUTH TABLES Edited from the original by: Mimi Opkins CECS 100 Fall 2011 Thanks for the ppt.
 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Discrete Mathematical Structures: Theory and Applications 1 Logic: Learning Objectives  Learn about statements (propositions)  Learn how to use logical.
 Statement - sentence that can be proven true or false  Truth value – true or false  Statements are often represented using letters such as p and q.
Chapter 1. Chapter Summary  Propositional Logic  The Language of Propositions (1.1)  Logical Equivalences (1.3)  Predicate Logic  The Language of.
Chapter 1 Logic and proofs
L = # of lines n = # of different simple propositions L = 2 n EXAMPLE: consider the statement, (A ⋅ B) ⊃ C A, B, C are three simple statements 2 3 L =
March 23 rd. Four Additional Rules of Inference  Constructive Dilemma (CD): (p  q) (r  s) p v r q v s.
Logical functors and connectives. Negation: ¬ The function of the negation is to reverse the truth value of a given propositions (sentence). If A is true,
6.1 Symbols and Translation
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
Logical Forms.
TRUTH TABLES.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
The Method of Deduction
Arguments in Sentential Logic
Presentation transcript:

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Truth Functional Logic Known as symbolic logic Uses logical operators Uses truth tables Useful in translating claims into categorical statements Useful in determining validity

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Truth Tables Sample truth table Modus Ponens PQ P  Q TTT TFF FTT FFT all possible combinations of truth value for all components of a truth functional compound statement corresponding truth value of the compound statement

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Logical Operators Represent the relationships between the "truth values" of the compound sentences we make with them Truth functional analysis is simply a way of keeping track of this. Symbols ~ = not (negation) & = and (conjunction)  if, then (conditional) v = either or (disjunction)

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Logical Operators Negation Negation simply reverses the truth value of the component statement to which it is applied The symbol "~" will be used to represent the logical operator negation Thus "~P" or “not P” represents the negation of P Negation operates on a single component statement, P. Since P is either true or false (not true), our truth table for negation required only two lines. P = The weather is great. ~P = The weather is not great. P~P TF FT

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Logical Operators Conjunction The components of a conjunction are called "conjuncts". "P" stands for the first conjunct and the letter "Q" stand for the second, and the symbol "&" represents the logical operator conjunction. Conjunction operates with a compound statement. Since P and Q may be either true or false, our truth table for conjunction will require four lines. PQ P & Q TTTTTT TFFTFF FTFFTF FFFFFF The weather is great and I wish you were here.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Logical Operators Disjunctions Component statements called “disjuncts” At least one of the disjuncts is true (possibly both) The letters "P" and "Q" represent the two disjuncts and the symbol "v" represent the operator disjunction Thus "P v Q" represents the statement "Either P or Q" o PQ P v Q TTTTTT TFTTFT FTTFTT FFFFFF Either you party or you study.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Logical Operators Conditionals Compound statements in which the “if” statement is the antecedent and the “then” statement is the consequent The consequent depends on the truth of the antecedent and follows the antecedent "P" represents the antecedent and "Q" represents the consequent. The symbol "  " represents the logical operator implication. Thus "P  Q" represents the conditional "If P then Q". o -- “only if” has the effect of reversing the conditional relationship between the antecedent and consequent (see Figure 7.5 for examples) o PQ P  Q TTTTTT TFFTFF FTTFTT FFTFFT If you study, then you are likely to do better on the quiz.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Argument Forms Deductively Valid modus ponens based on one hypothetical statement and the affirmation of its antecedent (1)P  Q (2)P (3) Q If there is good water on Earth, then there is adequate support for life on Earth. There is good water on Earth. So, there is adequate support for life on Earth.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Argument Forms Deductively Valid modus tollens based on one hypothetical statement and the denial of its consequent (1)P  Q (2b)~Q (3b) ~P If there’s good water on Earth, then there is adequate support for life on Earth. There’s not good water on Earth. (The water on Earth is polluted.) So, there is not adequate support for life on Earth.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Argument Forms Deductively Valid hypothetical syllogism based on two hypothetical statements as premises, where the consequent of the first is the antecedent of the second. (1)P  Q (2d)Q  R (3d) P  R If there is life on Mars, then there is adequate life support on Mars. If there is adequate life support on Mars, then a manned mission to Mars is feasible. If there is life on Mars, then a manned mission to Mars is feasible.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Argument Forms Deductively Valid disjunctive syllogism based on a disjunction and the denial of one of its disjuncts (1)P v Q (2)~P (3) Q Either the battery is dead or there is a short in the ignition switch. The battery is not dead. There is a short in the ignition switch.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Argument Forms Deductively Invalid fallacy of denying the antecedent based on a hypothetical statement and the denial of its antecedent (1)P  Q (2c)~P (3c) ~Q If a figure is square then it has four sides. This figure (a rhombus) is not a square. This figure (a rhombus) does not have four sides.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Argument Forms Deductively Invalid fallacy of asserting the consequent based on a hypothetical statement and the affirmation of its consequent. (1)P  Q (2a)Q (3a) P If a figure is square, then it has four sides. This rhombus has four sides. This rhombus is square.

Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Dilemma An argument form or strategy combining hypothetical and disjunctive premises which seeks to prove its point by showing that it is implied by each of two alternatives, at least one of which must be true