Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 10: Universal Service Copyright © 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ITU Interconnection Workshop 17 August 2001 Role of the Regulator K S Wong Office of the Telecommunications Authority Hong Kong, China.
Advertisements

Digital Divide: The End of Equality? Three generations of "Universal Service" Current situation and mechanisms Issues with "3rd generation" Universal Service.
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
DG Information Society PSC 1 The 1999 Communications Review Peter Scott DG Information Society Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
Federal Communications Commission Intergovernmental Advisory Committee
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
Federal Universal Service Overview NARUC Summer Meeting July 2007 Ray Baum Commissioner Oregon Public Utility Commission.
The New Authorisation Regime & the General Conditions Oftel Forum - 25 July 2002 Lucy Byers.
STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS Fixed-Mobile Convergence Regulatory Point of View Daniel Rosenne Director General, Ministry of Communications,
ECO 436 Industry Studies Seminar David G. Loomis Universal Service.
E-rate Modernization December 2, E-rate Basics Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-rate) – Authorized by the 1996 Telecommunications.
Regulation of Media Industries Regulation Generally speaking, why does the government regulate businesses and industries? Ensure free markets.
Position Paper: The Case For Universal Broadband Access By James Kim.
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
The Public Network Chapter 4 Tamra Dean.
Strategies to achieve Broadband For All: is the US the only answer? Renata Kowalska Lisbon, 17 th June 2010 US and broadband strategy in Poland.
Support For Rural America William Maher Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau July 2, 2003 Universal Service and The FCC.
The Public Network Chapter 4. Objectives In this chapter, you will learn to: Explain, in general terms, the structure of the public telephone network.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
March 2004Richard Stastny1 IP Communications in Europe Implications of Regulation Richard Stastny, ÖFEG* * The opinions expressed here may or may not be.
Jean Monnet Professor for European Integration Technical University Berlin Department of Computer Science Lithuania's future role in the European information.
DG Information Society 1 Liberalisation and regulation in Electronic Communications in the EU 2nd ICT Summit Istanbul, 3-6 September 2002 Hans-Peter Gebhardt.
Voice over Internet Protocol and its implications in Oregon SOMMER TEMPLET STAFF ATTORNEY JUNE 10, 2013.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
The Public Network Chapter 4. Objectives In this chapter, you will learn to: Explain, in general terms, the structure of the public telephone network.
Wireline Competition Bureau State of the Bureau Presentation January 20, 2006.
FROM TRADITIONAL LANDLINE TO IP TELEPHONY: A POSSIBLE ANOTHER WAY Bill Levis Colorado Consumer Counsel June 10, 2013.
Liberalization of Telecommunications in Europe Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006 Verona.
Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Jerker Torngren 2. Implementation of USO Comments and some Personal recommendations by Jerker Torngren 1.
Legal & Regulatory Classification of Broadband Demystifying Title II.
Broadband Services - Gaps/Challenges to be addressed and actions taken by Consumer Organizations Citizen consumer and civic Action Group (CAG), Chennai.
Implications of VoIP TC 310 May 28, Questions from Reviews Duty to Interconnect Reciprocal compensation Line of business v statutory line of business.
1 Wireline Competition Bureau Competition and Universal Service in a in a Dynamic Marketplace.
Telephony System Public switched telephone network
1 Intercarrier Compensation May 27, 2004 Glenn Brown
Cost Recovery Mechanisms MATI Tribal Telecommunications Conference June 7-9, 2004 Presented by Doug Kitch & Vince Wiemer Alexicon, Inc.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2006 Annual Report January 17, 2007.
ISOM 617 Distributed Information Systems. A Brief History of Information Systems 1950s: batch processing mainframes 1960s: data communications over phone.
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
Donnie DeFreitas Eastern Caribbean Telecommunications Authority (ECTEL) October 29 th 2008.
Presentation to Joint Oireachtas Committee [27/01/2016] Jeremy Godfrey, Chairperson Kevin O’Brien, Commissioner Gerry Fahy, Commissioner.
Competitive Universal Service TC 310 June 5, 2008.
Harmonisation in progress: the telecom regulation example Andrzej Chrzanowski Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation URTiP, Poland November 2004.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 3: Competition Copyright © 2007.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Prof. Karl Manheim Spring, : Interconnection Copyright © 2007.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Jerker Torngren 1. Universal Service Obligations The EU legislation A basic introduction Presented by Jerker Torngren 1.
Finnish NGA state-aid scheme Antti Kohtala Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland Digital Agenda Assembly, Brussels, 16th June 2011.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
A P LAN TO C ONNECT W EST V IRGINIA ’ S C OMMUNITIES.
Consumer rights when subscribing to a mobile telephony service.
Economics of Telecom TC 310 May 15, Discussion Point Which serves telecom customers better?  Free Market?  Regulated Market? Does this apply to.
11 th Report on European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2005 Viviane Reding – Commissioner DG Information Society and Media 20 February.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
Universal Service Issues Definition Availability Affordability Financing Implicit or Explicit Incumbent and/or new entrant.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 16: Internet III (Net Neutrality) Copyright © 2007.
© 2015 CT State Library. All rights reserved. 2 Contacts Maria Bernier E-rate Coordinator CT State Library Scott Taylor.
Workshop for West-African Telecommunication Regulators Abuja (Nigeria), September 21-22, 2000.
Liberalisation and regulation in the telecommunication sector: Theory and empirical evidence Week 3 The European Regulatory Framework for the Telecommunication.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Pent-Up Regulatory Change (U.S.)
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
The New Mexico Rural Universal Service Fund
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 10: Universal Service Copyright © 2007

Spring Universal Service in US Communications Act of 1934, § 1 “To make available, so far as possible, to all the people of the US, without discrimination … a rapid, efficient, Nationwide, & world-wide wire & radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges…” Mechanism Implicit (hidden) cross-subsidies by AT&T  Business subsidized residential; IX subsidized local  Due to horizontally & vertically integrated monopoly Does this work in a competitive market?

Spring Universal Service in US Telecommunications Act of 1996, § 254 “Quality services should be available at just, reasonable, and affordable rates Consumers in all regions of the Nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services… that are reasonably compar-able to those services provided in urban areas and that are available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates charged for similar services in urban areas.”

Spring Basic Principles of Univ. Service 47 USC § 254 (b) Quality services should be affordable Subsidized access in rural & high cost areas and by low-income consumers Equitable contribution by all telecom providers Explicit (transparent) and stable support mechanisms (collection, administration) Telecom servcs (including Internet) by schools, libraries, and rural health care facilities (e-rate) Can these work in a competitive environment?

Spring Who Pays for Univ. Service? Telcos providing interstate telecom services All LECs, IXCs, Wireless, other large telcos  Internet Telephony (VoIP)? Yes (Order, 21 June 2006)Order, 21 June 2006  Information service providers (ISPs, ESPs)? No “Contribution Factor” for Q = 9.7%Q  Adjusted quarterly based on outlay (2006 = $7.3B)  Goes into USF (Universal Service Fund) Consumers Telcos can (usually do) pass costs through Surcharges on all telecommunications services

Spring 20076

7

8 Who Receives Univ. Service? Telcos § 102: “A common carrier … shall be eligible to receive universal service support … and shall … offer the services that are supported by Federal universal service support mechanisms” Benefits passed on to eligible consumers  Eligibility an evolving concept Who gets Universal Service What services are included

Spring What Services 47 USC § 2549(c) Universal Service is an evolving level of telecom services that the FCC shall establish periodically, taking into account advances in telecom & information technologies that  are essential to education, public health, or public safety  have been subscribed to by a substantial majority of residential customers  are being deployed in public telecom networks  are consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity Lifeline and Linkup

Spring Federal-State Joint B d on UnivSvc TCA § 254: “the Commission shall institute and refer to a Federal-State Joint Board … in order to implement [UService], including the definition of the services that are suppor-ted by Federal universal service support mechanisms” FSJBUS Makes recommendations to FCC Administered by Universal Service Admin Co.Universal Service Admin Co.

Spring Services Authorized by FSJBUS Access to PSTN voice grade single party service  access to IX  operator/directory/emergency services DTMF (dual tone multi frequency) Advanced services no for high cost areas and low-income users yes for schools, libraries, rural health care  internet, on-line data services  eRate

Spring The eRate Schools & Libraries Support Mechanism Eligible services:  Telecommunications Services (telephony)  Internet Access (broadband)  Internal Connections (routers, wiring) Application Process Cumbersome & Expensive  All specifications and bids must be included  Many schools failed to apply The US Army Corps of Engineers did it for LAUSD

Spring Universal Service in EU Universal Service Directive (2002/23/EC) Telco obligation to provide minimum set of services to all locations at affordable price  How does this differ from US approach? How are designated telcos compensated?  Special & Common tariffs Geographical averaging Minimum set of services (compare Lifeline)  Public funding  Levies on competitors/users (sector specific funding) Technologically neutral, so as not to distort convergence

Spring Universal Service in EU Universal Service Directive (2002/23/EC) Compare the EU compensation schemes to US  How can distributional equity be achieved in a competitive system?  How can it be achieved without market distortion? Leased Line Service Special Directive (92/44/EEC, et al)  Telcos with SMP must provide leased lines at cost  A form of Universal Service to facilitate ecommerce

Spring Universal Service in EU Services covered Single Fixed Connection and Access to PSTN  Voice and (slow) data services (dial-up Internet)  DTMF (tone dialing) urged but not required Operator, Directory & Emergency Services Public Telephones Disabled Access (quality of service not yet defined) Beyond Wireline Telephony Interoperability for Digital TV “Must Carry” of TV & radio programming

Spring Universal Service in EU Keeping Prices Affordable A la carte options Contract & tariff transparency Itemized billing Number portability (not including wireless) Consumer Protection  Dispute resolution  No disconnect to essential services How do these differ from the US method?

Spring Universal Service in EU Implementation UK Regulations (2003 No. 33) Periodic Review under Art Review by EC (7/4/2006) 2006 Review by EC  Declines to extend to mobile phones 2G market is sufficiently competitive to keep prices low  Declines to extend to Internet access “Take-up” not yet a majority of consumers  Declines to change scope of universal service Pay phones still required (despite cost inefficiency)

Spring Wireless Universal Service Not in EU US - on Tribal Lands Services covered  Wireless local loop (WLL) or mobile wireless Rationale  Low penetration rate on reservations (18-60%)  Wireless is cost efficient vs. wireline & incremental Compensation for Telco providers  Bidding credits (public treasury)