Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp. 146-147) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
Advertisements

Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Categorical Reasoning
Logic. To Think Clearly Use reason, instead of relying on instinct alone What is Logic? – “the art of reasoning” – The study of truth – The ethics of.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Deduction and Induction
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
Deduction CIS308 Dr Harry Erwin. Syllogism A syllogism consists of three parts: the major premise, the minor premise, and the conclusion. In Aristotle,
Chapter 16: Venn Diagrams. Venn Diagrams (pp ) Venn diagrams represent the relationships between classes of objects by way of the relationships.
Your name Mediate Inference. your name Mediate Inference Commonly called as argument Has two major types: –Deduction/Deductive Arg./Syllogism Categorical.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Chapter 15: Rules for Judging Validity. Distribution (p. 152) Several of the rules use the notion of distribution. A term is distributed if it refers.
Chapter 18: Conversion, Obversion, and Squares of Opposition
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
Natural Deduction Proving Validity. The Basics of Deduction  Argument forms are instances of deduction (true premises guarantee the truth of the conclusion).
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
The construction of a formal argument
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Elements of Argument Logic vs. Rhetoric. Syllogism Major Premise: Advertising of things harmful to our health should be legally banned. Minor Premise:
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Deductive reasoning.
a valid argument with true premises.
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
Disjunctive Syllogism
THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
The second Meeting Basic Terms in Logic.
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Evaluating truth tables
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Hurley … Chapter 6.5 Indirect Truth Tables
Categorical syllogisms
4 Categorical Propositions
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
Syllogisms Basic Argumentation.
Syllogisms.
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms

Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms are composed of two premises and a conclusion. Categorical syllogisms have exactly three terms that are given the same meaning throughout the syllogism.

Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) The major term is the predicate term of the conclusion. –In a schematic of an argument form, it is represented by P. The minor term is the subject term of the conclusion. –In a schematic of an argument form, it is represented by S. The middle term is the term found in the premises but not in the conclusion. –In a schematic of an argument form, it is represented by M.

Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) The major premise contains the major term. The minor premise contains the minor term. The middle term is contained in both premises.

Standard Form Categorical Syllogisms (pp ) In a standard form categorical syllogism, each premise and the conclusion is a standard form categorical proposition. The order in which the premises and conclusion are arranged in standard form is: Major premise Minor premise Conclusion

Standard Form Categorical Syllogisms (pp ) When stating a syllogism in standard form you must find the conclusion first, since that tells which term is the major term (predicate term of the conclusion) and which term is the minor term (subject term of the conclusion).

Example: Into Standard Form You are given: Since no aardvarks are pianos, we may conclude that no Steinways are aardvarks, since all Steinways are pianos. The conclusion is: “No Steinways are aardvarks.” In standard form the argument is: Major premise: No pianos are aardvarks. Minor premise: All Steinways are pianos. Conclusion: No Steinways are aardvarks.

You’re only concerned with the form (pp ) The form is the structure of the argument The form has nothing to do with the truth or falsehood of the premises. Validity is a characteristic of the form. There are 256 distinct forms of categorical syllogisms, of which only 15 are valid.