The Determinants of Redeveloping Sites in a City- the Taipei Experience Tzuchin Lin, Yu-Hsiang Tsai Dept. of Land Economics National Chengchi University TAIWAN 1 ERES 13 June-16 June 2012, Edinburgh
Outlines Site Redevelopment in a City Variable Selection and Visual Inspection Regression Model and Results Conclusions 2
Site Redevelopment in a City YearsSin-Yi Housing price index (Q4) New Floor Space as % of total stock Household Units % 894, % 906, % 914, % 923, % 933, % 941, % 947, % 958, ,418 3 Housing price, new floor spaces, and household units over time
Site Redevelopment in a City Built sites need to be redeveloped – buildings are short of supply – buildings have been significantly deteriorated A city – where land is scarce – site redevelopment is commonly observed – Lin (2012): half of demolished buildings only reached half of their physical life 4
Site Redevelopment in a City When a building was torn down – benefits from a new building exceed the benefits of continuing use of an old building (demolition costs considered) – previous studies focused on what determines the timing of demolishing a building – what determines the redevelopment pace of a city as a whole through replacement of buildings 5
Site Redevelopment in a City Taipei – 9,593 inhabitants per km 2 – housing price more than doubles within last 10 years – an ideal place for investigation 6
Site Redevelopment in a City Factors that affect site redevelopment – macro factors: income level, housing stock, population changes – site and building: zoning, building age, land acquisition – location: distance to city centre, accessibility to facilities 7
Variable Selection and Visual Inspection Data Sources – government records -- permits to demolish and construct a building ( ) -- public buildings and public facilities are excluded – government statistics -- population, household number, income, building age, building vacancy rate – city zoning map -- metro stations 8
Variable Selection and Visual Inspection Analytical unit- neighborhood 9
Variable Selection and Visual Inspection Percentage of net floor space 10 Net floor spaces Max. allowable floor spaces over 9 years
11
Variable Selection and Visual Inspection 12 Ahigh-higha new metro line Bhigh-high financial hub (Taipei 101) Clow-low old and run-down neighborhoods A B C unit-L i high-high low-low low-high
Regression Results Dependent variable – percentage of net floor space Independent variable – rate of changes in population – rate of changes in household number – income level (low, medium, high) – average building ages – variation of building ages – building vacancy rate – metro station (yes, no) 13 Net floor spaces Max. allowable floor spaces over 9 years Macro factors Site and building Location
Regression Results 14 Dependent var Independent var Rate of net floor space increase β Standard- ized β T valueP value Constant0.209* Rate of changes in population Rate of changes in household number 0.531** Income level: medium 0.042** Income level: high 0.089** Average building ages ** Variation of building ages Building vacancy rate Metro station: yes 0.042** R2R ** Unit-Li number449 * : α<0.05 **: α<0.01
Spatial Regression 15 Spatial Reg Type Independent Var Spatial Lag ModelSpatial Error Model βZ valueP valueβZ valueP value Ρ Constant 0.183** ** Rate of changes in population Rate of changes in household number 0.527** ** Income level: medium 0.037* * Income level: high 0.082** ** Average building ages ** ** Variation of building ages Building vacancy rate Metro station: yes 0.041** ** Λ R2R Diagnose OLSSpatial LagSpatial Error Test type Test valueP valueTest valueP valueTest valueP value LR test LM-lag LM-error * : α<0.05 **: α<0.01
Conclusions Taipei has continued growing through replacement of old buildings – increase: 386, decrease: 22, unchanged: 41 (mostly in building-restricted areas) Household number matters more than population: demographical changes New floor supply was unable to press down the rising price 16
Site redevelopment has not produced spillover effects New floor supply are more likely to appear in wealthy neighborhoods than in run-down areas 17
Thank you for your listening! 18