Proportional chambers with cathode readout in high particle flux environment Michał Dziewiecki.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
Advertisements

General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
Radiation Detection ionization chambers (dosimeters, pulse chambers, particle track chambers) scintillation detectors semiconductor detectors photographic.
Results from first tests of TRD prototypes for CBM DPG Frühjahrstagung Münster 2011 Pascal Dillenseger Institut für Kernphysik Frankfurt am Main.
Atsuhiko Ochi Kobe University 4/10/ th RD51 collaboration meeting.
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
E/π identification and position resolution of high granularity single sided TRD prototype M. Târzilă, V. Aprodu, D. Bartoş, A. Bercuci, V. Cătănescu, F.
Tracking detectors/1 F.Riggi.
1 Introduction to Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Technologies Emmanuel Wirth.
Henrik Tydesjö May O UTLINE - The Quark Gluon Plasma - The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) The PHENIX Experiment - QGP Signals Event-by-Event.
Position sensing in a GEM from charge dispersion on a resistive anode Bob Carnegie, Madhu Dixit, Steve Kennedy, Jean-Pierre Martin, Hans Mes, Ernie Neuheimer,
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
N_TOF fission data of interest for ADS
Sourav Tarafdar Banaras Hindu University For the PHENIX Collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Measurement of electrons from Heavy Quarks at PHENIX.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Silicon Detectors and DAQ principles for a physics experiment.
Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers for beam loss monitors Lee Liverpool University weekly meeting.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
SPHENIX GEM Tracker R&D at BNL Craig Woody BNL sPHENIX Design Study Meeting September 7, 2011.
Status of DRIFT II Ed Daw representing the DRIFT collaboration: Univ. of Sheffield, Univ. of Edinburgh, Occidental College, Univ. of New Mexico Overview.
Data is sent to PC. Development of Front-End Electronics for time projection chamber (TPC) Introduction Our purpose is development of front-end electronics.
15 th CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany, April 12-16, 2010Wang Yi, Tsinghua University R&D status of low resistive glass and high rate.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Linear Collider TPC R&D in Canada Bob Carnegie, Madhu Dixit, Dean Karlen, Steve Kennedy, Jean-Pierre Martin, Hans Mes, Ernie Neuheimer, Alasdair Rankin,
CJ Barton Department of Physics INTAG Meeting – GSI – May 2007 Large Acceptance Bragg Detector at ISOLDE.
TIDE TESTS AT GDD LAB M. Casiraghi and F. Vasi. New detector configuration Low pressure chamber anode.
GEM: A new concept for electron amplification in gas detectors Contents 1.Introduction 2.Two-step amplification: MWPC combined with GEM 3.Measurement of.
Yosuke Watanabe….. University of Tokyo, RIKEN A, KEK C, Development of a GEM tracker for E16 J-PARC 1 Thanks to ???????????
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
Study of Charged Hadrons Spectra with the Time Expansion Chamber of the PHENIX Experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Dmitri Kotchetkov University.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
TPC PAD Optimization Yukihiro Kato (Kinki Univ.) 1.Motivation 2.Simple Monte Carlo simulation 3.PAD response 4.PAD response for two tracks 5.Summary &
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility(CEBAF) is the central particle accelerator at JLab. CEBAF is capable of producing electron beams.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
April 22nd, 2004Nigel Lockyer / Young-Kee Kim1 Drift Chambers AMY experiment at e + e - TRISTAN collider CDF experiment B = 3 T B = 1.4 T.
Studies of the possibility to use of a Gas Pixel Detector (GPD) as a fast track trigger device George Bashindzhagyan (Speaker,
Dmitri Ossetski Obninsk State University Department of Applied Mathematics
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
The GEM activities at Tsinghua University Zhigang Xiao 1, Yan Huang 1, Rensheng Wang 1, Haiyan Gao 1,2 1 Department of Physics, Tsinghua University 2 Dept.
First phase of McGill Thin Gap Chamber Testing Facility F. Cormier, B. Lefebvre, S. Robertson, B. Vachon Department of Physics, McGill University Motivation.
Development of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Shahnoor Habib For HEP Group, UT Arlington Oct. 12, 2002 TSAPS Fall ’02, UT Brownsville Simulation.
How do we see particles? Detectors and data acquisition for physics experiments Alessandro Scordo International Masterclass /02/2013 LNF, Frascati.
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
Goddard February 2003 R.Bellazzini - INFN Pisa A new X-Ray Polarimeter based on the photoelectric effect for Black Holes and Neutron Stars Astrophysics.
Chapter V Radiation Detectors.
XIII workshop on RPC and related detectors. GENT university, Belgium, Feb Wang Yi, Tsinghua University 1 Development and test of real-size.
ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker End-cap Quality Control and the Characterization of Straw Deformations Michael Kagan University of Michigan Supervisor:
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Search for a New State of Matter A state of matter not seen since the first few microseconds after the Big Bang is the object of study of P-25 physicists.
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
SP- 41 magnet ZDC RPC (TOF) DC ST Target T0 detector MPD / NICA and / Nuclotron Experiments Picosecond Cherenkov detectors for heavy ion experiments.
ADC values Number of hits Silicon detectors1196  6.2 × 6.2 cm  4.2 × 6.2 cm  2.2 × 6.2 cm 2 52 sectors/modules896 ladders~100 r/o channels1.835.
FEE for Muon System (Range System) Status & Plans G.Alexeev on behalf of Dubna group Turin, 16 June, 2009.
QA Tests Tests for each sensor Tests for each strip Tests for structures Process stability tests Irradiation tests Bonding & Module assembly Si detectors1272.
ESS | Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurements| | C. Böhme Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurement Overview of evaluated methods.
TPC R3 B R3B – TPC Philippe Legou Krakow, February nd
Beam detectors in Au+Au run and future developments - Results of Aug 2012 Au+Au test – radiation damage - scCVD diamond detector with strip metalization.
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
Vasilisa Lenivenko Vladimir Palichik (LHEP, JINR ) Alushta, June 2016.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
MINOS: a new vertex tracker for in-flight γ-ray spectroscopy
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

Proportional chambers with cathode readout in high particle flux environment Michał Dziewiecki

The GSI GSI – a heavy ion research facility, Darmstadt, Germany FAIR – Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research – a future heavy ion accelerator centre CBM –Compressed Baryonic Matter Experiment – Its main aim will be to obtain a quark-gluon plasma at very high nuclear matter density but moderate temperatures. It can be achieved by colliding heavy (Au) ions against an Au target. Density ρ/ρ 0 Temperature T (MeV)

Detector setup of CBM Heavy ion (Au) beam 25 AGeV Target (0.3mm Au) Silicon tracker RICH (Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detector) TRT 1 (Transition Radiation Tracker) TRT 2TRT 3 Beam hole TRTs: 1 st :5.8 x 3.9 m 2 nd :8.7 x 5.8 m 3 rd :11.6 x 7.7 m Each TRT module consists of 6 independent detectors. Total TRTs’ area:  500 m 2

TRT at CBM  Large Area Tracker (23-89 m 2 )  Main goal  particle selection The aim is to extract high energy electrons from a huge amount of pions crossing the detector plane. Requested pion suppression factor -  300 The detector can be also used for particle track reconstruction.  Total amount of 18 detectors 3 modules, 3 double detectors per module, inclined at angle of 0, +10 and –10 degrees vs the vertical orientaton  Main problem: high particle flux High collision multiplicity ( particles per collision), up to millions of collisions per second

TRT operation principle Radiator (a set of foils) Straw chamber High energy electron Electron + photon beam  Each transition of a high energy particle between radiator mediums (foil and air) invokes X-ray emission  The X-ray photons (and the particle itself) are detected through straw detectors  Pions (at relatively low energies) do not generate X-rays – this feature lets us determine what kind of particle crossed the detector. CBM: Radiator: foils Straws: 3-6mm diameter, metalized Kapton

Proportional counter – single section of a straw chamber 1.Charged particle produces ionization clusters 2.A photon produces only one, but relatively large cluster 3.Electrons drift to the anode along the potential gradient 4.Near the anode the electric field is strong enough to cause a secondary ionization (electron avalanche). 5.Resultant ions drift to the cathode, causing measurable current flow through the counter. Charged particle or photon Gas Avalanche Ionization cluster Cathode (GND)Anode (+HV)

Position estimation Anode readout  The time between particle appearance and signal registration is utilized.  The coordinate perpendicular to straw axis is measured  There is a left-right indetermination problem  A TAC (Time to Amplitude converter) or TDC (Time to Digital converter) circuitry is used  An additional fast detector (trigger) is necessary to generate TAC start signal x Δt = f(x) time Amplified signal

Position estimation Cathode readout Cathode strips Straws  We take advantage of signal differences between the cathode strips.  The coordinate parallel to straw axis is measured  If two particles cross the detector in the same (or near) time, the readings of the positions will disturb each other – it’s called frequency effects. It’s one of the most significant problems by cathode readout.

Pad readout an enhancement of cathode readout  Cathode strips are split to relatively short pads  Errors induced by frequency effects are lower There occurs a partial separation along the axis perpendicular to straws.  The disadvantage of this solution is a very big count of analog channels The entire count of TRT pads in the CBM experiment can reach 1 million!

Pad readout and frequency effects  Each ionization causes a signal on every pad Largest errors are caused by ‘near ionizations’ in the area of measured pads and in their neighbourhood.  Frequency effects manifest as random errors on calculated position  There are two ways of reducing these errors:  Decreasing pad dimensions Moreover, we must reduce the diamater of straws to decrease effective pad dimensions. This leads to reduction of detection efficiency.  Speeding up the electronics, thus we can enhance the time resolution The ADCs at CBM will be working at 20MHz sampling rate, thus the pulse width can not be shorter than  200ns.

Computer simulation  All steps of the signal development were considered: cluster generation electrons drift gas amplification signal forming at cathode signal shaping at the amplifier  The simulator calculated the difference between computed and real position of particles  Results were presented in form of error distribution graphs Error[mm ] Samples count Exemplary error distribution (central part) A Monte-Carlo simulation was executed in order to analyze the problem

Simulation results and conclusions 5x50x2.5mm, 2100cz/mm^2*s error [mm] Particle flux[part·mm -2 ·s -1 ] ·100 Guarateed accuracy for 80, 90 and 95% of particles Exemplary error distribution  The problem  long error distribution tails (see figure) Error values spread from 0 to few mm, dependig on pad width; the tails are effect of „near ionizations”, where the readings of two avalanches run into one another.  Large tails cause that relatively many readings are too inaccurate to be accepted.  Predetermined accuracy (200 μm) will be hard to achieve.

Experimental verification of obtained results A  40·40cm multiwire proportional chamber with pad readout Four-channel amplifier – shaper – base line restorer – ADC circuitry 250 ns pulse shaping, 20 MHz max sampling rate A PC for data acquisition and processing A multi-threaded Visual C++ program for better HT-processors utilization. BLRADC BLRADC BLRADC BLRADC HARDWARE SOFTWARE Software BLR Pulse detection Signal oversampling Peak detection Position calculation HDD A small model of chamber is being built to verify the simulation results.

Thank you for your attention