Social Identity Theory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination Social Context of Prejudice.
Advertisements

Prejudice.
Identity Formation.
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
1 Survey Research (Gallup) Would you vote for a qualified Black presidential candidate? Would you vote for a qualified Black presidential candidate? 1958:
Lecture 6: Intergroup Behaviour (Chapter 11; Hogg & Vaughan)
Factors contributing to the development of prejudice Factors that may reduce prejudice.
Themes in 12 Angry Men Groupthink Obedience to Authority Conformity
Social Cognition AP Psychology.
Answer questions when you see them. What are the factors we attribute to a late arriving date?
Intergroup Relations: Prejudice and Discrimination
Social Psychology Lecture 12 Inter-group relations Jane Clarbour Room: PS/B007 jc129.
Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination
Joli Jackson, Cedria Reid, Asia Johnson, Ana C..  Race is a category of people who share inherited physical characteristics and whom others see as being.
Prejudice. 2 What is the difference between: Race? Ethnicity? Minority Group?
Social cognition Explanations of Prejudice. Learning Objectives To understand what psychologists mean by the term prejudice. To know and understand 3.
In-Group Bias: Stereotypes, Prejudice and Discrimination

Intergroup Processes November 11th, 2009 : Lecture 18.
Intergroup Relations Theory and Research: An overview.
Subjective Perception: Attribution theory and Prejudice.
Why Can’t We Live Together? Group discussion of Friday’s movie Turn in group discussion sheet but keep movie worksheets until our final exam. Group discussion.
Experiments in inter-group discrimination Henri Tajfel (1970) Tajfel is perhaps best known for his minimal groups experiments. In these studies, test subjects.
+ WARM UP Have you ever been discriminated against? If so, what was the situation?
You will be placed in a group at random-coin toss.
Attitudes The Nature of Attitudes –Relatively stable Beliefs – facts and general knowledge Feelings – love, hate, like, dislike Behaviors – inclination.
Prejudice  What is prejudice?  Why are people prejudiced?  Individual view  Intergroup view  Can prejudice be reduced? psychlotron.org.uk.
Social Identity Theory
Social Identity Theory. Tajfel, 1971 Boys assigned randomly to groups based on ‘ preference ’ for art ( Kaninsky or Klee ) –More likely to identify with.
Is there prejudice and discrimination between groups?
Chapter 5 Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination.
Prejudice; Disliking Others
AP Psychology 8-10% of AP Exam
SC 3 The 3 C’s C’los, Ciri, and Contrel. What is Social Identity Theory?!
Intercultural Communication Social Psychological Influences.
Social Identity Theory By Mr Daniel Hansson. Questions for discussion 1.List all the social categories that you belong to (e.g. Swede, over 30, son, brother,
 In the Social Identity Theory, a person has not one, “personal self”, but rather several selves that correspond to widening circles of group membership.
Social Identity Theory In groupsOut Groups KCVIRegi.
Social identity theory As proposed by Tajfel. In Brief A person has not one “personal self” but rather several selves that corresponds to widening circles.
Attitudes Shape Behaviors
I am trying to get you guys involved, and have a pleasurable next few minutes…I know these presentations are boring, and you just wanna sit there, but.
Theories of Prejudice 8 June Today’s Lecture Cultural Theories of Prejudice Realistic Conflict Theory (Sherif) Social Identity Theory –Minimal Groups.
Prejudice. An unjustifiable attitude toward a group and its members Based on the exaggerated notion that members of other social groups are very different.
Socio-Cultural LOA Social Identity Theory. What Type of Doodler are you? Psychological research has identified two types of doodler, Concrete Abstract.
Stereotypes and Prejudice Chapter 5. What Caused the Holocaust? Pure Evil/ Psychopathology –can possibly explain Hilter’s actions, but can it explain.
Stereotypes and Prejudice Chapter 5. Stereotypes and Prejudice Chapter 5.
Dr Tabassum Alvi Assistant Professor Psychiatry/Behavioural Sciences Majmaah University.
Social Identity. Rules of Culture Language –Written and body movement/gestures Italians & Jews embellish speech with hand movements –Larger radius  Italians.
Social Identity (and Categorization) Theory Henri Tajfel 3biii – Evaluate Social Identity Theory, making reference to relevant studies.
Perceiving the Self and Others
LO#8: EXPLAIN THE FORMATION OF STEREOTYPES AND THEIR EFFECT ON BEHAVIOR (SAQ) Stereotyping.
INTERGROUP RELATIONS Social psychologists study in-groups vs. out-groups, ethnocentrism, and the difference between prejudice and discrimination.
Social Thinking: Attitudes & Prejudice. What is an attitude? Predisposition to evaluate some people, groups, or issues in a particular way Can be negative.
Prejudice & Discrimination Heuristics to Hate. Social CategoriesStereotypesPrejudice Discrimination Prejudice & Discrimination COGNITIVEAFFECTIVEBEHAVIORAL.
PREJUDICE & DISCRIMINATION Pastor Fred Waldron Phelps, of Westboro Baptist Church. The church is known for its hate speech, especially hate speech against.
Social Identity Theory
University of Texas at El Paso
Social Identity theory Tajfel (1971)
Prejudice.
Social Identity Theory Tajfel (1971)
1. What is the common theme?
Social Psychology.
Social Identity Theory
Complete the cartoon activity
The social approach Attitudes.
The social approach Prejudice Social Approach.
Ch 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, & Discrimination
The social approach Attitudes.

Psychology of aggression
Presentation transcript:

Social Identity Theory Henri Tajfel

Social identity is a person’s sense of who they are based on - their group membership(s). Tajfel proposed that the groups (e.g. social class, family, football team etc.) which people belonged to were an important source of pride and self-esteem. Groups give us a sense of social identity: a sense of belonging to the social world.

In order to increase our self-image we enhance the status of the group to which we belong. For example, England is the best country in the world! We can also increase our self-image by discriminating and being prejudice against the out group (the group we don’t belong to). For example, the Americans, French etc. are a bunch of losers! Therefore we divided the world into “them” and “us” based through a process of social categorisation (i.e. we put people into social groups). This is known as in-group (us) and out-group (them). Social identity theory states that the in-group will discriminate against the out-group to enhance their self-image.

The central hypothesis of social identity theory is that group members of an in-group will seek to find negative aspects of an out-group, thus enhancing their self-image. Prejudice between cultures may result in racism; in its extreme forms, racism may result in genocide, such as occurred in Germany with the Jews, in Rwanda between the Hutus and Tutsis and, more recently, in the former Yugoslavia between the Bosnians and Serbs.

Henri Tajfel proposed that stereotyping (i. e Henri Tajfel proposed that stereotyping (i.e. putting people into groups and categories) is based on a normal cognitive process: the tendency to group things together. In doing so we tend to exaggerate: 1. the differences between groups 2. the similarities of things in the same group.

We categorise people in the same way We categorise people in the same way. We see the group to which we belong (the in-group) as being different from the others (the out-group), and members of the same group as being more similar than they are. Social categorisation is one explanation for prejudice attitudes (i.e. “them” and “us” mentality) which leads to in-groups and out-groups.

Examples of In groups – Out-groups • Northern Ireland: Catholics – Protestants • Rwanda: Hutus and Tutsis • Yugoslavia: the Bosnians and Serbs • Germany: Jews and the Nazis • Politics: Labour and the Conservatives • Football: Liverpool and Man Utd • Gender: Males and Females • Social Class: Middle and Working Classes

Social Identity Theory Outline Social identity theory was developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in 1979. Tajfel and Turner proposed that there are three mental processes involved in evaluating others as “us” or “them” (i.e. “in-group” and “out-group”. These take place in a particular order.

The first is categorisation The first is categorisation. We categorise objects in order to understand them and identify them. In a very similar way we categorise people (including ourselves) in order to understand the social environment. We use social categories like black, white, Australian, Christian, Muslim, student, and bus driver because they are useful. If we can assign people to a category then that tells us things about those people, and as we saw with the bus driver example we couldn't function in a normal manner without using these categories; i.e. in the context of the bus. Similarly, we find out things about ourselves by knowing what categories we belong to. We define appropriate behaviour by reference to the norms of groups we belong to, but you can only do this if you can tell who belongs to your group. An individual can belong to many different groups.

In the second stage, social identification, we adopt the identity of the group we have categorised ourselves as belonging to. If for example you have categorised yourself as a student, the chances are you will adopt the identity of a student and begin to act in the ways you believe students act (and conform to the norms of the group). There will be an emotional significance to your identification with a group, and your self-esteem will become bound up with group membership.

The final stage is social comparison The final stage is social comparison. Once we have categorised ourselves as part of a group and have identified with that group we then tend to compare that group with other groups. If our self-esteem is to be maintained our group needs to compare favourably with other groups. This is critical to understanding prejudice, because once two groups identify themselves as rivals they are forced to compete in order for the members to maintain their self-esteem. Competition and hostility between groups is thus not only a matter of competing for resources like jobs, but also the result of competing identities.

Just to reiterate, in social identity theory the group membership is not something foreign or artificial which is attached onto the person, it is a real, true and vital part of the person. Again, it is crucial to remember in-groups are groups you identify with, and out-groups are ones that we don't identify with, and may discriminate against.

Further Information Henri Tajfel's Minimal Groups