Localization,Translocation and Binding Properties of Murine PH Domains in RAW 264.7 Cells T. Mukai, J. W. Whalen, W. Park, E. Gehrig, J. Zavzavadijian,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cell Communication Cells need to communicate with one another, whether they are located close to each other or far apart. Extracellular signaling molecules.
Advertisements

AfCS Microscopy Laboratory Department of Molecular Pharmacology Stanford University Tobias Meyer Lead Scientists: Nancy O’Rourke Grischa Chandy Mary Verghese.
Microscopy Based Biosensors and Functional Assays Receptor Inputs Signaling Proteins Second Messengers Secretion Endocytosis Pinocytosis Phagocytosis Cell.
Supplementary Figure 1. A) PBXIP1/HPIP expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast dataset. 1. Breast normal (n=61), 2. Invasive breast carcinoma.
Cat # P0507 Store at C cDNA Clone pEGFP-PH Domain from Btk Gaither Drive Gaithersburg, MD FAX TEL
Mapping of Calmodulin Binding Sites on the IP 3 R1 N. Nadif Kasri, I. Sienaert, J.B. Parys, G. Callewaert, L. Missiaen and H. De Smedt Laboratory of Physiology,
Methods: IP/WB Combination Purpose: to identify binding partners for a protein (e.g., integrin alpha6) Method: Immunoprecipitate integrin alpha6, using.
Class 1 The most abundant class of fusion protein expression patterns is that which demonstrates staining of the cytosol and nucleus with enriched staining.
A Single Cell PIP 3 Assay Based on Akt PH domain Translocation Nancy O’Rourke Microscopy Lab, Stanford University Jim Whalen, Takako Mukai, Wei Sun Park,
A Single-Cell PIP3 Assay Based on Akt PH Domain Translocation in Raw Cells J. Whalen, E. Gehrig, T. Mukai, W. Park, I. Vadivelu, J. Zavzavadijian,
Figure 1. RP2 possesses potential sites for N-terminal acylation
Reliable and Global Measurement of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Using Fluorescence Microscopes  Zongping Xia, Yuechueng Liu  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Single Channel Function of Recombinant Type-1 Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Splice Variants  Josefina Ramos-Franco, Sean.
Pericentrosomal Localization of the TIG3 Tumor Suppressor Requires an N-Terminal Hydrophilic Region Motif  Tiffany M. Scharadin, Gautam Adhikary, Kristin.
MEKK4 Sequesters RIP2 to Dictate NOD2 Signal Specificity
Lorri R. Marek, Jonathan C. Kagan  Immunity 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase γ by Ras
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Erica M. Dutil, Alex Toker, Alexandra C. Newton  Current Biology 
The Arl4 Family of Small G Proteins Can Recruit the Cytohesin Arf6 Exchange Factors to the Plasma Membrane  Irmgard Hofmann, Amanda Thompson, Christopher M.
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Claudia D. Andl, John R. Stanley  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
The Polycomb Protein Pc2 Is a SUMO E3
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Silvia Bolland, Roger N Pearse, Tomohiro Kurosaki, Jeffrey V Ravetch 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (January 2000)
ARAP3 Is a PI3K- and Rap-Regulated GAP for RhoA
Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad cross-reactivity with IAV strains of different subtypes. (A), Amino acid sequence ... Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad.
BTK Regulates PtdIns-4,5-P2 Synthesis
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages (January 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
Paxillin Serves as an ERK-Regulated Scaffold for Coordinating FAK and Rac Activation in Epithelial Morphogenesis  Shuta Ishibe, Dominique Joly, Zhen-Xiang.
Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay Involves the Selective Targeting of PMR1 to Polyribosome-Bound Substrate mRNA  Feng Yang, Daniel R Schoenberg  Molecular.
Christopher G Burd, Scott D Emr  Molecular Cell 
Microscopy Lab - Cell Preferences
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 10, Issue 22, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Alex Sobko, Hui Ma, Richard A. Firtel  Developmental Cell 
Satoru Funamoto, Ruedi Meili, Susan Lee, Lisa Parry, Richard A. Firtel 
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Recruits the Cellular Inositol Phosphatase SHIP2 to Regulate Actin-Pedestal Formation  Katherine Smith, Daniel Humphreys,
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
The oncogenic membrane protein LMP1 sequesters TRAF3 in B-cell lymphoma cells to produce functional TRAF3 deficiency by Pradeep Bangalore-Prakash, Laura.
Cooperative Activation of PI3K by Ras and Rho Family Small GTPases
Mechanism of Persistent Protein Kinase D1 Translocation and Activation
Inositol Lipids: To PHix or Not to PHix?
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Cooperative Activation of PI3K by Ras and Rho Family Small GTPases
Uma B. Karadge, Minja Gosto, Matthew L. Nicotra  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
GFP-Myo10 overexpression increases TNT numbers in neuronal CAD cells.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
LAT Palmitoylation Immunity
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (April 1998)
CIN85 interacts with PHD2. CIN85 interacts with PHD2. A, Endogenous PHD2 was immunoprecipitated (IP) with CIN85 antibody from MDA-MB-231, BT-549, and Hs.
WW domain of Rsp5p blocks TBSV RNA replication in yeast.
A Novel Role for FAK as a Protease-Targeting Adaptor Protein
Presentation transcript:

Localization,Translocation and Binding Properties of Murine PH Domains in RAW Cells T. Mukai, J. W. Whalen, W. Park, E. Gehrig, J. Zavzavadijian, I. Vadivelu, J. Zavzavadjian, E. Wall, A. Maer, G. Chandy and N. A. O’Rourke Alliance for Cell Signaling (AfCS) Microscopy Lab, Stanford University, AfCS Mol. Biology Lab, Caltech, AfCS, Bioinformatics Lab, UCSD Introduction The pleckstrin homology (PH) domain is a regulatory domain contained in many signaling proteins that binds to lipids and targets the proteins to the vicinity of their substrates or activators on cell membranes. The PH domain from Akt binds to PI(3,4,5)P 3 and PI(3,4)P 2.. Increases in the levels of PI(3,4,5)P 3 recruit the PH domain to the membrane, thus causing the full length protein to translocate from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Tobias Meyer and colleagues generated a GFP-tagged version of the PH domain from Akt that serves as a “biosensor” for increases in PI(3,4,5)P 3 levels in the cell. To learn more about the role of PH domains in signaling proteins and develop novel “biosensors” for monitoring signaling events, we are attempting to clone all the PH domains present in mouse signaling proteins. So far, we cloned 135 PH domains and generated constructs with an N- terminal YFP or CFP tag for each one. For proteins with two PH domains, both of the PH domains are cloned separately and in some cases in tandem. The PH domain constructs were transfected into the RAW macrophage cell line. We screened the entire set of PH domain constructs in RAW cells to determine where they localize in quiescent cells. In addition,, we used time-lapse confocal microscopy in RAW cells to determine whether the PH domains translocate upon stimulation with 100 nM C5a. Finally, we used a lipid binding assay to determine the binding selectivity of each of the PH domains. The knowledge gained from these three complementary assays will add to our understanding of PH domains and aid in the design of new biosensors. Generation of PH Domain Constructs Included up to 50 AA of flanking sequence up to but not including neighboring domains. Each construct is N-terminally tagged with YFP and CFP. Two PH domains from 1 protein are denoted PH1A and PH2A. In six cases, tandem PH domains from a single protein were cloned with intervening sequence. PH Domain Localization in RAW Cells To determine the localization patterns of the PH domains, we transfected the constructs into the RAW cell line. The YFP- tagged proteins were visualized in the cells using a Nipkow lens-enhanced confocal microscope. We assayed the localization of 135 PH domain constructs in RAW cells. The majority, 72, localized to the cytosol and nucleus (Table, above top). The remainder were localized in the cytosol, nucleus and plasma membrane or in other combinations of organelles (Table, above bottom). These data are available on the AfCS website ( Localization of Multiple PH domains from One Protein In several instances, we screened the localization pattern of 2 PH domains from the same protein. The localization patterns for the PH domains from T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1 (Tiam-1) and Plekstrin (Plek) are shown above. For Tiam-1, the two PH domains are localized in the same pattern and the lipid bindig specificity of the two domains is similar. For Plekstrin, the first PH domain (PH1A) is localized to the plasma membrane, cytosol and nucleus, while the second PH domain (PH2A) is localized to the cytosol and nucleus only. In the lipid binding analysis (right), we found that Plek(PH1A) binds more specifically to PI(3,4)P 2 and PI(3,4,5)P 3 than PLEK(PH2A). PH domain Translocation in RAW Cells For our translocation studies, we transfected RAW cells with YFP-tagged PH domain constructs and then serum-deprived the cells 1-3 hours prior to performing the screen. The cells were placed on the confocal microscope stage and imaged every 10 seconds for 40 scans. After 5 scans, we stimulated the cells with C5a (100nM). We found that 10 PH domains translocated from the cytosol to the plasma membrane upon stimulation of the cells. Translocation of the Bam 32 and SH3BP2 PH domains RAW cells expressing either the YFP-tagged PH domains from the adaptor/scaffold proteins Bam32(above) or SH3BP2 (below) were stimulated with 100 nMC5a. The montage above shows 8 images from every 5 th scan (50 secs.) in a time series, with the addition of the ligand after the 50 seconds. The PH domains are found initially in the nucleus and cytosol. Upon cell stimulation, the PH domains translocate to the plasma membrane. Conclusions The majority of the PH domains are expressed throughout the cytosol and nucleus, while some are distributed in the plasma membrane or other organelles as well. We identified 10 PH domains that undergo translocation upon stimulation with 100 nM C5a. In the lipid binding study, we found that 29 of the PH domains show strong selective binding to a subset of the phosphoinosotides. Tiam-1 (PH2A) Tiam-1 (PH1A) Plek (PH1A)Plek (PH2A) Bam32 (PH1A) SH3BP2 (PH1A) PH Domain Binding selectivity CTH3(PH1A)Akt3(PH1A)PLCd1(PH1A) RalGPS2(PH1A) Hapip1(PH1A) PI(3,4,5)P 3 PI(3,4,)P 2 PI(3,4,5)P 3 PI(4,5)P 2 PI(3,4)P 2 PI(4,5)P 2 PI(3,4,5)P 3 PI(3,4)P 2 Sphingosine-1-phosphate PtdIns(3,4)P 2 PtdIns(3,5)P 2 PtdIns(4,5)P 2 PtdIns(3,4,5)P 3 Phosphatidic acid Phosphatidylserine Blank Lysophosphatidic acid Lysophosphatidylcholine Phosphatidylinositol(PtdIns) PtdIns(3)P PtdIns(4)P PtdIns(5)P Phosphatidylethanolamine Phosphatidylcholine Lipid Binding Categories: PI(3,4,5)P 3 CTH3(PH1A), Myo10(PH1A), ITK(PH1A), H056(PH2A), EtOHD4(PH1A), APS(PH1A), Afap(PH1A), TEC(PH1A) PI(3,4)P 2 and PI(3,4,5)P 3 Gab1(PH1A), Gab2(PH1A), Bam32(PH1A), CTH2(PH1A), IRS-1(PH1A), Osbp13(PH1A), Plek(PH1A), TNFidp(PH1A), Akt2(PH1A), Akt3(PH1A), Akt1(PH1A), LL5(PH1A), Arl61(PH1A), BCRa(PH1a) PI(4,5)P 2 and PI(3,4,5)P 3 PLCd1(PH1A), Spnb2(PH1A), RalGPS2*(PH1A), Centb5(PH1A), Cnk2(PH1A) PI(3,4)P 2 Plek2(PH2A), Hapip1(PH1A) Results of Lipid Binding Assay Of the 127 PH domains tested, 29 show strong specificity in binding to PIP molecules. We placed them in categories based on the phosphoinositides that they bind with the highest affinity. A representative example for each of the PIP-binding classes is shown in the figure panels above. Each of these classes (with the exception of the one shown in the final panel, included specific binding to PI(3,4,5)P 3 Assay for Lipid-Binding Specificity of PH domains The PH domains of many proteins bind to specific phosphoinositides (PIPs). We developed a lipid- blot assay to learn more about the binding specificity of the murine PH domains that we have cloned. In the assay, YFP-tagged PH domain constructs were transfected into 293 cells. Cell lysates were then incubated with nylon membranes bearing a series of specific phosphoinositide spots (below). The YFP-PH domain constructs that had bound to the membrane were then detected using an anti-YFP antibody. We screened 127 PH domains to determine their lipid binding properties. The results of the assays are presented below.