Technology Resource of the Southeast, Inc. Valuing Inventions October 20, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AN OVERVIEW OF IP ASSET VALUATION
Advertisements

AN OVERVIEW OF THE PATENT PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS THAT HOPES CREEK CAN PERFORM FOR YOU Hopes Creek Portfolio Analysis.
Generating Sales in the Business Market Sherry L. Flint, CLU ® Regional Vice President – Business Owner and Executive Solutions.
Financial Management F OR A S MALL B USINESS. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2 Welcome 1. Agenda 2. Ground Rules 3. Introductions.
LICENSING “One Way of Putting Your I.P. to Work for Your Organization” Inventing and Patenting Seminar May 16, 2001.
Three Approaches to Value There are three general approaches that we use to value any asset. –Discounted Cash Flow Valuation –Relative Valuation –Contingent.
October 12 th, 2009 presentation:. "FASB stands for the Financial Accounting Standards Board. They are among the most useless people on the planet and.
Valuation FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
Real Estate Valuation. Real Estate Valuation: Market Comparison Approach.
Contemporary Investments: Chapter 12 Chapter 12 COMPANY ANALYSIS: THE HISTORICAL RECORD What are the components of a company analysis report? How do analysts.
The Purpose of Financial Statements
Real Estate Valuation. Real Estate Valuation: Market Comparison Approach.
A MAP OR A MAZE UNDERSTANDING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Solution Resources n A must for small business owners.
Ryan Williams. Learning Objectives Prepare common-sized Income Statements and Balance Sheets. Compute financial ratios listed in Table 4.1. Discuss uses.
Financial Strategy and Financial Objectives “Running by the Numbers”
Valuation Techniques 1.Balance sheet analysis, 2.Income statement multiples, and 3.Discounted cash flows…
T9.1 Chapter Outline Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Organization 9.1Net Present Value 9.2The Payback Rule 9.3The Discounted.
Financial Information and Accounting Concepts
Evaluating Financial Performance. The Key Questions: 1.Does the firm have the ability to meet maturing financial obligations? 2.Does management do a good.
Technology Resource of the Southeast, Inc. Valuation Workshop TechTransfer Tactics March 19, 2009.
CHAPTER 18 Investments Equity Valuation Models Slides by Richard D. Johnson Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
 El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. Meeting of Shareholders November 20, 2012Scottsdale, AZ.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Growth Options Martin Development Co. is deciding whether to proceed with Project X. The cost would be $9 million in Year 0. There is a 50 percent chance.
Hosted by How to Negotiate Your Enterprise Software Agreement Why can’t we all just get along…. Nancy Gendron Vice President, AMR Research Contract Negotiation.
Valuation Consulting The Hop Exchange, 24 Southwark Street, London, SE1 1TY Tel: Fax:
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Reporting and Interpreting Cost of Goods Sold and Inventory Chapter 7.
Value: An Introduction to Alternative Structures and Transactions Involving MHS Presentation to the City Assets & Enterprises Sub- Committee of the Committee.
Federal Lab Consortium Regional Meeting Valuation of Intellectual Property Judy A. Byrd Mark J. Chandler September 21, 2006.
CHAPTER 10: MEASURING OUTCOMES OF BRAND EQUITY: CAPURING MARKET PERFORMANCE Lecture 17.
Cash Flow Estimation Chapter 7 in the book Financial Policy and Planning (MB 29)
September 12, 2002CFO Roundtable - Valuing Biotech.
10.1 CHAPTER 10: MEASURING OUTCOMES OF BRAND EQUITY: CAPURING MARKET PERFORMANCE Kevin Lane Keller Tuck School of Business Dartmouth College.
Business Valuations. Reasons for wanting to know about value:  Market transactions  Scorecards  Estate planning  Family transfers  ESOP  Litigation.
Financial Statement Analysis A Student Who’s Results are Better? Which Company is better? How do we Compare These ?
Technology Resource of the Southeast, Inc. Technology Bundling & Clustering May 17, 2007.
Writing A Business Plan. Lesson Goals: Entrepreneurs will learn: –The reasons for preparing a business plan –The components of a business plan –The format.
Factors that Makeup Prices Analyzing Revenues, Costs, & Expenses.
Chapter 12: Intangible Assets 1. 2 Intangible Assets Intangible Assets Intangible assets characterized by – (1) lack of physical evidence, and – (2) high.
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Capital Budgeting 13.
Product Design and Development
3.6 Ratio Analysis Chapter 23 – Part 2.
Receivables and Inventories Chapter 6 Lecture 22.
Accounting Clinic III McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
23-1 Intermediate Accounting,17E Stice | Stice | Skousen © 2010 Cengage Learning PowerPoint presented by: Douglas Cloud Professor Emeritus of Accounting,
23-1 Intermediate Accounting James D. Stice Earl K. Stice © 2012 Cengage Learning PowerPoint presented by Douglas Cloud Professor Emeritus of Accounting,
Chapter 4 Accounting for Merchandising Businesses.
1 Analysis of Financial Statements. 2  Organize a systematic financial ratio analysis using common-size financial statements and the DuPont framework.
Interpreting Financial Information Securities and Investments.
Chapter 12 – Single Investment Risk Analysis u Reasons for looking at risk from a single project prospective u lack comprehensive knowledge u of the rest.
Research Administration Forum May 2005 Tom Hagerty Office of Technology Management.
© 2005 Accounting 1/e, Terrell/Terrell External Reporting Issues Chapter 12.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Case Study on Profit Split / Intangibles Workshop on Transfer Pricing and Exchange of Information Guatemala 2.
Published by Flat World Knowledge, Inc. © 2014 by Flat World Knowledge, Inc. All rights reserved. Your use of this work is subject to the License Agreement.
Gross method and retail method (lower of average cost or market)
Determining the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres and reward systems.
Financial Strategy and Financial Objectives
Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation [Course number]
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing (OTL)
Chapter One Introduction McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Chapter One Introduction McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Kevin J. Collins, CPA/PFS, MST
Accounting, Fifth Edition
University of Iowa Research Foundation
INTERPRETING FINANCIAL RESULTS
Loose Ends II.
Loose Ends.
Presentation transcript:

Technology Resource of the Southeast, Inc. Valuing Inventions October 20, 2008

What does the EVALUATION process look like? Verification of all pertinent facts Patent Hierarchy Analysis Technical Assessment of the Technology Market Assessment of the Technology Competitive Assessment of the Technology

What does the VALUATION Process look like? Various methodologies for accomplishing the same end result. This can be simple or comprehensive, depending on your needs Full Valuation Analysis using “Triangulation” Methodology Valuation and Financial Modeling to build a framework for negotiation issues

Types of Valuation Methodologies - Basic Book Value or Cost method 25% Rule Comparable Transactions Industry Standard Royalty Rates Replacement Cost Method Relief from Royalty Method

Types of Valuation Methodologies - Advanced Income Method Discounted Cash Flow Monte Carlo Method Options Pricing Theory (OPT) & Black-Scholes

Why Value an invention? What does it accomplish? What do you do with it? Is it accurate? How does it work?

Example – Cost Method Biomarker for lung cancer Funded through NIH Grants - $1,375,000 Utility Patent application filed - $15,000 Self-funded lab research - $85,000 Cost Method Value = $1,475,000 (one time fee)

Example – 25% Rule Biomarker for lung cancer Licensed to ABC Diagnostics Co. Company has Exclusive W.W. rights Typical Net Profit is $20.00/assay Equals $5.00 in royalties/assay 200,000 assays sold $4,000,000 Gross Net Profit $1,000,000 in royalties/year

Example – Market Comparables Biomarker for lung cancer Licensed to XYZ Diagnostics Co. Company has Exclusive W.W. rights Net Sales per unit = $ % Royalty agreement 200,000 units sold $26,000,000 Net Sales Revenue $1,560,000 Royalty Income/year

Comparisons per year Cost Method =$1,475,000 (one time fee) 25% Rule =$1,000,000/year Market Comparables=$1,560,000/year

Comparisons over Patent life Cost Method=$1,475,000 25% Rule=$20,000,000 Market Comparables=$31,200,000

Which Valuation model to use? Why are they different values?Why are they different values? How do I know which is the best for my purposes?How do I know which is the best for my purposes? How do I maximize the value for negotiations?How do I maximize the value for negotiations? How do I equalize the values?How do I equalize the values? What else is available?What else is available?

In-depth analysis What resources are available? What can a CPA firm do to help? What else can I do? In-house vs. outside help

Basic Triangulation Methodology Used for analysis based on a technology value. If B approximates C and C approximates B, and if A compliments B, then C must compliment A and thus confirms the Technology Value.

Technology Value Triangle The Technology Triangle within a triangulation model Each component compliments and verifies each other component –A approximates B –B approximates C –C approximates A

One final reason to Value

Why doesn’t everyone value technologies themselves? It takes a lot of time to conduct a proper search for critical information Not all of the information needed may be available All technologies must be clean and Patentable Foreign rights must be in a preserved state All agreements must be “exclusive licenses”

Presenter Richard W. Sheehan, President Technology Resource, Johnson City, TN (423)