Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A Crosswalk Between College and Career Ready Standards and Educator Evaluation Systems 2012 ESEA Title II, Part A - National Meetings March 5-7, 2012.

Advertisements

Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.

Overview. Review background of Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Examine features of the standards Review what the CCSS mean for Oregon Session Objectives.

Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.

MINNESOTA P-16 EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP January 28, 2009 Overview of Potential Future P-16 Partnership Initiatives to Strengthen Teacher Effectiveness.

Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,

August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.

THE OFFICE OF EDUCATOR QUALITY Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education August 15, 2011 Missouri Model Teacher and Leader Standards.

Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.

POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.

Illinois P-20 Council January 27, ISBE MISSION STATEMENT The Illinois State Board of Education will provide leadership, assistance, resources.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por

Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.

NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.

Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.

Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements

1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.

Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.

Presentation to Commission Legislative Update July 2011.

State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.

Agenda Pedagogy Presentations Break INTASC standards.

Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.

College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.

Teacher & Administrator Standards October 21, 2011.

National Conference on Student Assessment

Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

Focus Group on the Draft InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards.

October 7, Ensure that all students meet or exceed high academic standards and are prepared for their next steps (e.g., the world of work and/or.

Tiered Licensure & Developmental Continuums August 9, 2011 CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)

DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.

Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.

Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

Oregon’s Future Starts Here Superintendents’ vision for turning our good schools into great schools.

Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.

BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.

TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.

Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria. Connected to:  Beginning teacher evaluation  Experienced teacher evaluation  Induction / Mentoring  Professional.

Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.

Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.

CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.

About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School

6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.

The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.

Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)

Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,

FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.

Overview of CAEP Guidelines 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014 Presenters: Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP Hilda R. Tompkins, CAEP, Emerson.

DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.

Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?

Partnership for Practice

Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria

PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat

Professional Development

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Document Submission

Five Required Elements

21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development

OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions

State Board of Education Progress Update

February 21-22, 2018.

Profile of a Virginia Graduate Updates to Collaborative Profile Work

Presentation transcript:

Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011

SB 290 Teacher & Administrator Standards Legislative Action – Partner Collaboration State Board Adoption by January 1, 2012 TSPC Adopt Same Standards – January 2012 Used in Evaluations of Teachers & Administrators July 1, 2013

Educator Effectiveness Collaborative Efforts – Greater Coherence “Coalition for Quality Teaching & Learning”

Educator Effectiveness From CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness INDUCTION & MENTORING

Purpose of Standards for Adoption Foundation for aligned education system Anchor for coherent education system

Core Teaching Standards InTASC (Interstate Teacher Assessment & Support Consortium) Key Themes: Personalized Learning for Diverse Learners Application of Knowledge and Skills Improved Assessment Literacy Collaborative Professional Culture New Leadership Roles

Core Teaching Standards InTASC Effective Teaching Leads to Improved Student Achievement Performance Essential Knowledge Define Standards Critical Disposition

Educational Leadership/ Administrator Standards ISLCC = Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium ELCC = Educational Leadership Constituents Council Visionary Leadership Instructional Improvement Effective Management Inclusive Practice Ethical Leadership Socio-Political Content

Core Teaching and Administrator Standards Inform: Preparation Licensure Induction & mentoring Professional learning throughout a career

SB 290 Core Teaching & Admin Standards must: Provide multiple measures-encompass a range of behaviors Provide evidence of student academic growth Be research-based Be separately developed for teachers and administrators Be customized based on collaboration of teachers, administrators, & bargaining reps.

Evaluation must attempt to: Strengthen knowledge, skills, disposition and practices Refine the support, assistance and professional growth based on individual needs Establish a growth process that supports professional learning Use evaluation methods, professional development, support targeted to individual needs

SB 290 – Public Comment Require at least 4 performance levels in evaluation Student Academic growth & learning as a significant factor in educator evaluations

Recommendation – OAR Adoption Adopt Standards as Presented Foundation for ESEA Waiver Application Foundation for Development and Adoption of State Guidelines for Evaluation System – June 2012