The solar dynamo Axel Brandenburg. 2 Importance of solar activity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The solar dynamo(s) Fausto Cattaneo Center for Magnetic Self-Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas Chicago 2003.
Advertisements

Historical Development of Solar Dynamo Theory Historical Development of Solar Dynamo Theory Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute.
The Origin of the Solar Magnetic Cycle Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science.
2011/08/ ILWS Science Workshop1 Solar cycle prediction using dynamos and its implication for the solar cycle Jie Jiang National Astronomical Observatories,
1 The Sun as a whole: Rotation, Meridional circulation, and Convection Michael Thompson High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Chapter 8 The Sun – Our Star.
1. 2 Apologies from Ed and Karl-Heinz
Coronal Mass Ejections - the exhaust of modern dynamos Examples: systematic swirl (helicity) Measuring it quantitatively Connection with the dynamo Axel.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Effects of magnetic diffusion profiles on the evolution of solar surface poloidal fields. Night Song The Evergreen State College Olympia, WA with.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 20 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Solar Turbulence Friedrich Busse Dali Georgobiani Nagi Mansour Mark Miesch Aake Nordlund Mike Rogers Robert Stein Alan Wray.
Influence of depth-dependent diffusivity profiles in governing the evolution of weak, large-scale magnetic fields of the sun Night Song and E.J. Zita,
Relationship between the High and mid latitude Solar Magnetic Field Elena E. Benevolenskaya J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University.
Effects of magnetic diffusion profiles on the evolution of solar surface poloidal fields. Night Song The Evergreen State College Olympia, WA with.
Kinetic and Magnetic Helicities of Solar Active Regions Ram Ajor Maurya, Ashok Ambastha And Vema Reddy Udaipur Solar Observatory Physical Research Laboratory,
Prediction on Time-Scales of Years to Decades Discussion Group A.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetism Feb. 09, 2012.
THE CIRCULATION DOMINATED SOLAR DYNAMO MODEL REVISITED Gustavo A. Guerrero E. (IAG/USP) Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino (IAG/USP) Jose D. Muñoz (UNAL)
Magnetic models of solar-like stars Laurène Jouve (Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie) B-Cool meeting December 2011.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
The Sun’s enduring mysteries To prepare for the coming years What we know What we don’t understand What is important Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm)
Sunspots: the interface between dynamos and the theory of stellar atmospheres Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) 70 yr Guenther.
The Flux Transport Dynamo, Flux Tubes and Helicity The Flux Transport Dynamo, Flux Tubes and Helicity Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian.
Magnetic field generation on long time scales Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
Critical issues to get right about stellar dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Shukurov et al. (2006, A&A 448, L33) Schekochihin et al. (2005,
Large scale magnetic fields and Dynamo theory Roman Shcherbakov, Turbulence Discussion Group 14 Apr 2008.
Overshoot at the base of the solar convection zone What can we learn from numerical simulations? Matthias Rempel HAO / NCAR.
Bern, MHD, and shear Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Collaborators: Nils Erland Haugen (Univ. Trondheim) Wolfgang Dobler (Freiburg  Calgary) Tarek.
1 This is how it looks like… Magnetic helicity at the solar surface and in the solar wind Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Properties of magn helicity.
Modern Solar Mysteries Dr. David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center Dr. David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science.
The Solar Dynamo and Emerging Flux Presented by Angelo P. Verdoni Physics 681 Fall 05 George H. Fisher, Yuhong Fan, Dana W. Longcope, Mark G. Linton and.
Solar activity as a surface phenomenon Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+11Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
Dynamo theory and magneto-rotational instability Axel Brandenburg (Nordita) seed field primordial (decay) diagnostic interest (CMB) AGN outflows MRI driven.
Fifty Years Of Solar Events NOAO 50 th Anniversary Symposium.
Catastrophic  -quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Christer Sandin (Uppsala) Collaborators: Eric G.
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 1: Interior and Photosphere.
Astrophysical Magnetism Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm)
Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of stellar differential rotation and meridional circulation (submitted to A&A, arXiv: ) Bidya Binay Karak (Nordita.
Numerical simulations of astrophysical dynamos Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Dynamos: numerical issues Alpha dynamos do exist: linear and nonlinear.
3D Spherical Shell Simulations of Rising Flux Tubes in the Solar Convective Envelope Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center.
Recent Progress in Understanding The Sun’s Magnetic Dynamo David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center 2004 April 28 University.
Flows in the Solar Convection Zone David Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center 2004 July 21 David Hathaway NASA/MSFC National.
Team Report on integration of FSAM to SWMF and on FSAM simulations of convective dynamo and emerging flux in the solar convective envelope Yuhong Fan and.
The Solar Dynamo NSO Solar Physics Summer School Tamara Rogers, HAO June 15, 2007.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Solar cycle variation of kinetic helicity Collaborators: Junwei Zhao (Stanford,
Self-assembly of shallow magnetic spots through strongly stratified turbulence Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Brandenburg+13 Warnecke+11.
1 This is how it looks like… The solar dynamo and its spots Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm) Solar & stellar dynamos: differences? Magnetic helicity:
Self-organized magnetic structures in computational astrophysics Axel Brandenburg (Nordita/Stockholm) Kemel+12 Ilonidis+11Brandenburg+13Warnecke+11 Käpylä+12.
Dynamo action in shear flow turbulence Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen) Collaborators: Nils Erland Haugen (Univ. Trondheim) Wolfgang Dobler (Freiburg.
Prograde patterns in rotating convection and implications for the dynamo Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Copenhagen  Stockholm) Taylor-Proudman problem Near-surface.
Turbulent transport coefficients from numerical experiments Axel Brandenburg & Matthias Rheinhardt (Nordita, Stockholm) Extracting concepts from grand.
What the Long-Term Sunspot Record Tells Us About Space Climate David H. Hathaway NASA/MSFC National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, AL,
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
CSI /PHYS Solar Atmosphere Fall 2004 Lecture 04 Sep. 22, 2004 Solar Magnetic Field, Solar Cycle, and Solar Dynamo.
H. Isobe Plasma seminar 2004/06/16 1. Explaining the latitudinal distribution of sunspots with deep meridional flow D. Nandy and A.R. Choudhhuri 2002,
Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.
Overview of dynamos in stars and galaxies
An update on convection zone modeling with the ASH code
Is solar activity a surface phenomenon?
THEORY OF MERIDIONAL FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION
Paradigm shifts in solar dynamo modelling
Introduction to Space Weather
SUN COURSE - SLIDE SHOW 7 Today: waves.
Introduction to Space Weather
Helioseismology Solar 5 min oscillations Discrete frequencies
Catastrophic a-quenching alleviated by helicity flux and shear
Presentation transcript:

The solar dynamo Axel Brandenburg

2 Importance of solar activity

3 Solar 11 year sunspot cycle Sunspots between +/- 30 degrees around equator New cycle begins at high latitude Ends at low latitudes –equatorward migration butterfly diagram

4 Sunspots

5 Sunspots

6 Large scale coherence Active regions, bi-polarity systematic east-west orientation opposite in the south

7 22 year magnetic cycle Longitudinally averaged radial field Spatio-temporal coherence –22 yr cycle, equatorward migration Poleward branch or poleward drift? butterfly diagram

8  -effect dynamos (large scale) Differential rotation (faster inside) Cyclonic convection; Buoyant flux tubes Equatorward migration New loop    - effect

9 The Sun today and 9 years ago Solar magnetograms: Line of sight B-field from circularly polarized light

10 Sunspot predictions

11 Grand minima/maxima?

12 Cycic Maunder mininum: 10 Be record

13 Long time scales: different oscillators instead of chaos? Saar & Brandenburg (1999, ApJ 524, 295)

14 News from the 5 min oscillations Discovered in 1960 (Leighton et al. 1962) Was thought to be response of upper atmosphere to convection

15 Solar granulation Horizontal size L=1 Mm, sound speed 6 km/s Correlation time 5 min = sound travel time

16 Degree l, order m

17 5 min osc are global Roger Ulrich (1970) Franz-Ludwig Deubner (1974)

18 GONG global oscillation network group Since late 1980ties

19 Current state of the art SOHO Space craft 1993 – now lost in 1998

20 Only p-modes observed

21 g-modes Would probe the center Are evanescent in the convection zone

22 Refraction Reflection Top: reflection when wavenlength ~ density scale height Deeper down: Sound speed large

23 Inversion: input/output Duval lawSound speed

24 Internal angular velocity

25 Internal angular velocity from helioseismology spoke-like at equ. d  /dr>0 at bottom ? d  /dr<0 at top

26 Cycle dependence of  (r,  )

27 In the days before helioseismology Angular velocity (at 4 o latitude): –very young spots: 473 nHz –oldest spots: 462 nHz –Surface plasma: 452 nHz Conclusion back then: –Sun spins faster in deaper convection zone –Solar dynamo works with d  /dr<0: equatorward migr

28 Activity from the dynamo

29 Buoyant rise of flux tubes

30 A long path toward the overshoot dynamo scenario Since 1980: dynamo at bottom of CZ –Flux tube’s buoyancy neutralized –Slow motions, long time scales Since 1984: diff rot spoke-like –d  /dr strongest at bottom of CZ Since 1991: field must be 100 kG –To get the tilt angle right Spiegel & Weiss (1980) Golub, Rosner, Vaiana, & Weiss (1981)

31 The 4 dynamo scenarios Distributed dynamo (Roberts & Stix 1972) –Positive alpha, negative shear Overshoot dynamo (e.g. Rüdiger & Brandenburg 1995) –Negative alpha, positive shear Interface dynamo (Markiel & Thomas 1999) –Negative alpha in CZ, positive radial shear beneath –Low magnetic diffusivity beneath CZ Flux transport dynamo (Dikpati & Charbonneau 1999) –Positive alpha, positive shear –Migration from meridional circulation

32 Paradigm shifts i)1980: magnetic buoyancy (Spiegel & Weiss)  overshoot layer dynamos ii)1985: helioseismology: d W /dr > 0  dynamo dilema, flux transport dynamos iii)1992: catastrophic a -quenching a~ Rm - 1 (Vainshtein & Cattaneo)  Parker’s interface dynamo  Backcock-Leighton mechanism

(i) Is magnetic buoyancy a problem? Stratified dynamo simulation in 1990 Expected strong buoyancy losses, but no: downward pumping Tobias et al. (2001)

(ii) Before helioseismology Angular velocity (at 4 o latitude): –very young spots: 473 nHz –oldest spots: 462 nHz –Surface plasma: 452 nHz Conclusion back then: –Sun spins faster in deaper convection zone –Solar dynamo works with d  /dr<0: equatorward migr Yoshimura (1975) Thompson et al. (1975) Brandenburg et al. (1992)

35 Near-surface shear layer: spots rooted at r/R=0.95? Benevolenskaya, Hoeksema, Kosovichev, Scherrer (1999) Pulkkinen & Tuominen (1998)  =  AZ  =(180/  ) (1.5x10 7 ) (2  ) =360 x 0.15 = 54 degrees!

36 (iii) Problems with mean-field theory? Catastrophic quenching? –  ~ R m -1,  t ~ R m -1 –Field strength vanishingly small? Something wrong with simulations –so let’s ignore the problem Possible reasons: –Suppression of lagrangian chaos? –Suffocation from small scale magnetic helicity?

37 Revisit paradigm shifts i)1980: magnetic buoyancy  counteracted by pumping ii)1985: helioseismology: d W /dr > 0  negative gradient in near-surface shear layer iii)1992: catastrophic a -quenching  overcome by helicity fluxes  in the Sun: by coronal mass ejections

38 Arguments against and in favor? Flux storage Distortions weak Problems solved with meridional circulation Size of active regions Neg surface shear: equatorward migr. Max radial shear in low latitudes Youngest sunspots: 473 nHz Correct phase relation Strong pumping (Thomas et al.) 100 kG hard to explain Tube integrity Single circulation cell Too many flux belts* Max shear at poles* Phase relation* 1.3 yr instead of 11 yr at bot Rapid buoyant loss* Strong distortions* (Hale’s polarity) Long term stability of active regions* No anisotropy of supergranulation in favor against Tachocline dynamosDistributed/near-surface dynamo Brandenburg (2005, ApJ 625, 539)

39 Application to the sun: spots rooted at r/R=0.95 Benevolenskaya, Hoeksema, Kosovichev, Scherrer (1999) – –Overshoot dynamo cannot catch up  =  AZ  =(180/  ) (1.5x10 7 ) (2  ) =360 x 0.15 = 54 degrees!

40 Simulating solar-like differential rotation Still helically forced turbulence Shear driven by a friction term Normal field boundary condition

41 Simulating solar-like differential rotation Still helically forced turbulence Shear driven by a friction term Normal field boundary condition

42 Cartesian box MHD equations Induction Equation: Magn. Vector potential Momentum and Continuity eqns Viscous force forcing function (eigenfunction of curl)

43 Tendency away from filamentary field Cross-sections at different times Mean field

44 Current helicity and magn. hel. flux Bao & Zhang (1998), neg. in north, plus in south (also Seehafer 1990) Berger & Ruzmaikin (2000) S N DeVore (2000) (for BR & CME)

45 Magnetic Helicity J. Chae (2000, ApJ)

46 Helicity fluxes at large and small scales Negative current helicity: net production in northern hemisphere Mx 2 /cycle Brandenburg & Sandin (2004, A&A 427, 13) Helicity fluxes from shear: Vishniac & Cho (2001, ApJ 550, 752) Subramanian & Brandenburg (2004, PRL 93, 20500)

47 Simulations showing large-scale fields Helical turbulence (B y ) Helical shear flow turb. Convection with shear Magneto-rotational Inst. Käpyla et al (2008)

48 Origin of sunspot Theories for shallow spots: (i) Collapse by suppression of turbulent heat flux (ii) Negative pressure effects from - vs B i B j

49 clockwise tilt (right handed)  left handed internal twist Build-up & release of magnetic twist New hirings: 4 PhD students4 PhD students 4 post-docs (2yr)4 post-docs (2yr) 1 assistant professor1 assistant professor 2 Long-term visitors2 Long-term visitors Upcoming work: Global modelsGlobal models Helicity transportHelicity transport coronal mass ejectionscoronal mass ejections Cycle forecastsCycle forecasts Coronal mass ejections