TM Project web site www.arl.org/libqual/ Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LibQUAL+ ® : The UK and Irish Experience Selena Killick Library Quality Officer, Cranfield University J. Stephen Town Director of Information, The University.
Advertisements

The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
1 What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Years of CUL LibQUAL Data Liane O’Brien, Linda Miller, Xin Li May 21, 2008.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
How Assessment Will Inform Our Future 1. Administration of on-going user surveys and focus groups to enhance reference services 2. Analysis of LibStats.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
The New Library User in Sweden: a LibQUAL+™ study 6th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measures in Libraries and Information Services.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Perspectives from two UK institutions Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
TM Project web site Report Meeting Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Martha Kyrillidou July 28, 2003 Durham United Kingdom.
Going Beyond The Numbers How We Are Benefiting From Our Experience With LibQUAL+® The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey Carolyn Gutierrez Associate.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
Project web site old.libqual.org TM November 12, 2002 San Francisco, CA Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson AAHSL Spring 2002 Results Results.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Project URL – TM QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE Washington, DC June, 2007 Presented by: Colleen Cook.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site Report Meeting Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Martha Kyrillidou Jonathan Sousa June 21, 2003 ALA Toronto CANADA.
Project URL – TM QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE Auckland, NZ April 5, 2005 Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson.
TM Project web site New Ways of Listening to Users: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Consuella Askew Waller April 10-13, 2003 ACRL 11 th.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
The Notre Dame Experience LIB 527 Management Of Libraries.
A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Texas A&M University, Colleen Cook Dean
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2007
Using LibQUAL+® as a Foundation for the Library’s Support of
MaineHousing’s Homeless Initiatives Academy & Launchpad
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

TM Project web site Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA

American English All Faculty & Students FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.29 (1.23)67,381IC02Making elec resources access 8.25 (1.24)64,500IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r 8.24 (1.20)68,530IC05Lib Web site enabling locate 8.23 (1.17)67,698IC14Mod equip lets me easily acce 8.18 (1.19)67,929IC16Easy access tools allow find

American English All Faculty & Students FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.81 (1.44)65,981AS13Employees deal with users in a c 7.77 (1.63)65,071LP08Quiet space for individual activ 7.50 (1.57)65,330AS01Employees instill confidence in 7.24 (1.96)58,737LP21Comm space for group learning an 7.23 (1.73)66,188AS04Giving users individual atten

American English Faculty Only FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.48 (1.03)12,626IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r 8.42 (1.13)12,778IC02Making elec resources access 8.41 (1.08)12,912IC05Lib Web site enabling locate 8.36 (1.10)12,875IC10The elec info resources I nee 8.31 (1.07)12,824IC16Easy access tools allow find

American English Faculty Only FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.47 (1.71)12,073LP12A comfortable and inviting lo 7.35 (1.91)11,781LP03Lib space that inspires study 7.30 (2.03)11,166LP17A getaway for study, learning, o 7.10 (2.06)10,887LP08Quiet space for individual activ 6.17 (2.41) 8,796LP21Comm space for group learning an

American English Grad Students Only FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.48 (1.04)17,560IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r 8.48 (1.05)17,908IC02Making elec resources access 8.41 (1.03)18,068IC10The elec info resources I nee 8.40 (1.06)18,156IC05Lib Web site enabling locate 8.33 (1.08)17,798IC14Mod equip lets me easily acce

American English Grad Students Only FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.75 (1.62)17,306LP03Lib space that inspires study 7.73 (1.65)16,864LP08Quiet space for individual activ 7.55 (1.55)17,092AS01Employees instill confidence in 7.30 (1.69)17,370AS04Giving users individual atten 7.02 (2.05)14,589LP21Comm space for group learning an

American English Undergrad Only FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.18 (1.21)37,324IC14Mod equip lets me easily acce 8.15 (1.32)36,695IC02Making elec resources access 8.11 (1.29)37,462IC05Lib Web site enabling locate 8.07 (1.26)37,176IC16Easy access tools allow find 8.04 (1.36)34,314IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r

American English Undergrad Only FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.80 (1.43)36,132AS13Employees deal with users in a c 7.78 (1.41)35,520AS15Employees understand the needs o 7.59 (1.66)35,352LP21Comm space for group learning an 7.37 (1.58)35,742AS01Employees instill confidence in 7.04 (1.78)36,158AS04Giving users individual atten

American English All Faculty & Students FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem ‑.06 (2.22)64,500IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require.13 (2.08)64,758IC07The printed lib materials I need fo.28 (1.93)67,929IC16Easy access tools allow find things.28 (1.98)67,691IC10The elec info resources I need.29 (2.20)67,381IC02Making elec resources access home o

American English All Faculty & Students FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.68 (1.85)66,014AS18Willingness to help users.72 (1.91)65,981AS13Employees deal with users in a cari.80 (2.38)58,737LP21Comm space for group learning and g.81 (1.95)66,188AS04Giving users individual attention.84 (1.94)65,330AS01Employeesinstill confidence in user

American English Faculty Only FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem ‑.70 (2.27)12,626IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require ‑.30 (2.21)12,474IC07The printed lib materials I need fo ‑.11 (2.01)12,912IC05A lib Web site enabling locate info ‑.09 (2.05)12,875IC10The elec info resources I need ‑.07 (2.21)12,778IC02Making elec resources access home o

American English Faculty Only FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.73 (2.25)12,073LP12A comfortable and inviting location.79 (1.83)12,660AS04Giving users individual attention.82 (1.93)12,496AS01Employeesinstill confidence in user.83 (1.84)12,523AS13Employees deal with users in a cari 1.10 (2.45) 8,796LP21Comm space for group learning and g

American English Grad Students Only FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem ‑.37 (2.18)17,560IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require ‑.02 (2.07)16,953IC07The printed lib materials I need fo ‑.01 (2.00)18,068IC10The elec info resources I need.07 (2.18)17,908IC02Making elec resources access home o.10 (1.96)18,156IC05A lib Web site enabling locate info

American English Grad Students Only FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.65 (1.83)17,361AS18Willingness to help users.69 (1.90)17,326AS13Employees deal with users in a cari.82 (1.95)17,092AS01Employeesinstill confidence in user.82 (2.43)14,589LP21Comm space for group learning and g.82 (1.91)17,370AS04Giving users individual attention

American English Undergrad Only FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.34 (2.14)34,314IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require.35 (2.01)35,331IC07The printed lib materials I need fo.43 (2.30)37,320LP08Quiet space for individual activiti.44 (1.95)37,176IC16Easy access tools allow find things.46 (2.26)37,564LP03Lib space that inspires study and l

American English Undergrad Only FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.70 (1.94)36,132AS13Employees deal with users in a cari.70 (2.15)37,569LP12A comfortable and inviting location.72 (2.33)35,352LP21Comm space for group learning and g.81 (2.01)36,158AS04Giving users individual attention.85 (1.93)35,742AS01Employeesinstill confidence in user

British English All Faculty & Students FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.14 (1.33)18,410IC02Making elec resources access 8.13 (1.28)17,715IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r 8.06 (1.22)18,860IC14Mod equip lets me easily acce 8.03 (1.28)18,946IC05Lib Web site enabling locate 7.99 (1.25)18,780IC16Easy access tools allow find

British English All Faculty & Students FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.62 (1.49)18,793LP12AM/BR A comfortable and inviting lo 7.45 (1.47)18,616AS01BR Lib staff who instill confidence 7.44 (1.53)18,437AS13BR Lib staff who deal with users in 6.99 (2.05)16,822LP21BR Space for group learning and gro 6.84 (1.74)18,643AS04AM/BR Giving users individual atten

British English Faculty Only FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.53 (.94)2,000IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r 8.42 (1.13)2,013IC02Making elec resources access 8.38 (1.07)2,032IC10The elec info resources I nee 8.35 (1.09)2,043IC05Lib Web site enabling locate 8.22 (1.10)2,019IC16Easy access tools allow find

British English Faculty Only FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.25 (1.94)1,861LP03Lib space that inspires study 7.21 (1.61)1,976AS04Giving users individual atten 7.11 (1.85)1,907LP12A comfortable and inviting lo 6.98 (2.19)1,717LP08Quiet space for individual work 5.32 (2.67)1,312LP21Space for group learning and gro

British English Grad Students Only FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.30 (1.20)4,068IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r 8.26 (1.25)4,111IC02Making elec resources access 8.21 (1.17)4,198IC10The elec info resources I nee 8.15 (1.21)4,226IC05Lib Web site enabling locate 8.08 (1.23)4,195IC14Mod equip lets me easily acce

British English Grad Students Only FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.58 (1.50)4,165LP12A comfortable and inviting lo 7.54 (1.45)4,139AS01Lib staff who instill confidence 7.48 (1.51)4,109AS13ib staff who deal with users in 7.07 (1.68)4,151AS04Giving users individual atten 6.64 (2.20)3,521LP21Space for group learning and gro

British English Undergrad Only FIVE MOST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 8.05 (1.37)12,286IC02Making elec resources access 8.04 (1.22)12,682IC14Mod equip lets me easily acce 8.00 (1.33)11,647IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll r 7.97 (1.40)12,757LP08Quiet space for individual work 7.97 (1.35)12,629LP17A haven for study, learning, or

British English Undergrad Only FIVE LEAST DESIRED Mean(SD)nItem 7.60 (1.43)11,201AS22Dependability handling users^ 7.43 (1.52)12,365AS13Lib staff who deal with users in 7.38 (1.46)12,500AS01Lib staff who instill confidence 7.28 (1.81)11,989LP21Space for group learning and gro 6.70 (1.76)12,516AS04Giving users individual atten

British English All Faculty & Students FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem ‑.38 (2.26)17,715IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require ‑.35 (2.15)17,818IC07The printed lib materials I need fo ‑.34 (2.39)18,821LP03Lib space that inspires study and l ‑.32 (2.54)18,564LP08Quiet space for individual activiti ‑.20 (2.29)18,537LP17A getaway for study, learning, or r

British English All Faculty & Students FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.41 (2.17)18,851AS06Employees are consistently courteou.42 (1.84)18,335AS11Employees have knowledge to answer.47 (1.95)18,643AS04Giving users individual attention.51 (2.00)18,437AS13Employees deal with users in a cari.64 (1.92)18,616AS01Employees instill confidence in use

British English Faculty Only FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem ‑.85 (2.14)2,000IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require ‑.35 (2.17)2,013IC02Making elec resources access home o ‑.35 (1.99)2,032IC10The elec info resources I need ‑.32 (2.10)1,878IC07The printed lib materials I need fo ‑.25 (2.51)1,861LP03Lib space that inspires study and l

British English Faculty Only FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.51 (1.79)1,987AS18Willingness to help users.52 (1.85)1,976AS04Giving users individual attention.63 (2.00)2,023AS06Employees are consistently courteou.67 (1.89)1,963AS13Employees deal with users in a cari.78 (1.88)1,977AS01Employees instill confidence in use

British English Grad Students Only FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem ‑.60 (2.33)4,068IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require ‑.55 (2.63)4,090LP08Quiet space for individual activiti ‑.49 (2.43)4,151LP03Lib space that inspires study and l ‑.46 (2.18)3,994IC07The printed lib materials I need fo ‑.36 (2.35)4,099LP17A getaway for study, learning, or r

British English Grad Students Only FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.34 (1.85)4,103AS11Employees have knowledge to answer.40 (1.95)4,151AS04Giving users individual attention.40 (2.09)4,183AS06Employees are consistently courteou.48 (1.99)4,109AS13Employees deal with users in a cari.56 (1.94)4,139AS01Employees instill confidence in use

British English Undergrad Only FIVE WORST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem ‑.31 (2.15)11,946IC07The printed lib materials I need fo ‑.30 (2.36)12,809LP03Lib space that inspires study and l ‑.26 (2.49)12,757LP08Quiet space for individual activiti ‑.22 (2.23)11,647IC20Pr and/or elec journal coll require ‑.21 (2.66)11,989LP21Comm space for group learning and g

British English Undergrad Only FIVE BEST ADEQUACY Mean(SD)nItem.42 (1.99)12,677IC05A lib Web site enabling locate info.46 (1.85)12,241AS11Employees have knowledge to answer.48 (1.96)12,516AS04Giving users individual attention.49 (2.02)12,365AS13Employees deal with users in a cari.65 (1.91)12,500AS01Employees instill confidence in use

LibQUAL+  Related Documents LibQUAL+  LibQUAL+  Web Site LibQUAL+  LibQUAL+  Bibliography Survey Participants Procedures Manual

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.