How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 A report on the status and advertisement of the tools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
Michigan State University 4/15/ Simulation for Level 2 James T. Linnemann Michigan State University NIU Triggering Workshop October 17, 1997.
Progress on ERT  0 efficiency study Spin PWG June 6,2002 LVL-1 meeting June 14,2002 Analysis meeting June 14,2002 Kensuke Okada.
9/25/2006 Group Meeting 1 Measuring bremsstrahlung photons in pp collisions Ali Hanks Group Meeting Sep. 25, 2006.
Simulation of the RPC Response José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
Bingchu Huang, USTC/BNL 1 Bingchu Huang (for STAR Collaboration) University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
ATLAS Analysis Model. Introduction On Feb 11, 2008 the Analysis Model Forum published a report (D. Costanzo, I. Hinchliffe, S. Menke, ATL- GEN-INT )
4/23/06 Ali Hanks - APS 1 A method for directly measuring bremsstrahlung photons from jets Ali Hanks APS Conference April 23, 2006.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
J. Tinslay 1, B. Faddegon 2, J. Perl 1 and M. Asai 1 (1) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, (2) UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Verification.
10/20/06 Hard/Photon Analysis Fest 1 Measuring bremsstrahlung photons in pp collisions (update) Ali Hanks Group Meeting Oct. 16, 2006.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Introduction to Hall-D Software February 27, 2009 David Lawrence - JLab.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
28 April 0 Yaxian Mao, Daicui Zhou, Yves Schutz In ALICE Physics Workgroup: High p T and photons ( for ALICE collaboration -- Wuhan)
Mock Data Challenge PbPb collisions - July 2010 Prashant Shukla Nuclear Physics Division BARC, Mumbai India 1 India CMS, July 2010, BARC, Mumbai.
Darren Price – HLT B-trigger offline status report :: B-Physics meeting July 23 rd ‘08Page 1 HLT B-trigger offline monitoring status Darren Price, LANCASTER.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
Introduction Advantages/ disadvantages Code examples Speed Summary Running on the AOD Analysis Platforms 1/11/2007 Andrew Mehta.
Pure D0 : 950 MuDst files (400 possibles D0 per file) |Zvertex| < 20 cm NHitsFit > 15 histos in 2-d to investigate possible cuts Cuts in MuKpi-update HF.
Quest for omega mesons by their radiative decay mode in √s=200 GeV A+A collisions at RHIC-PHENIX ~Why is it “Quest”?~ Simulation Study Real Data Analysis.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
8/13/101 Updates on the simulation. 8/13/102 Some news I finally have the event generator working, for which the ‘physics’ event has 5 D D 0 bar,
LHC Physics Analysis and Databases or: “How to discover the Higgs Boson inside a database” Maaike Limper.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Year -2 topics simulations needs for these Barbara Jacak March 2, 2001.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
3/12/2003 ACAT03 - Giuseppe Lo Re Study of the K*(892) 0 signal in pp ALICE events Giuseppe Lo Re INFN-CNAF, Bologna (Italy) ACAT03, 12/3/2003.
Offline Status Report A. Antonelli Summary presentation for KLOE General Meeting Outline: Reprocessing status DST production Data Quality MC production.
Particle Identification with TRD Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at International Workshop on TRD 27 th September.
Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.
Simulation Status for Year2 Running Charles F. Maguire Software Meeting May 8, 2001.
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
PWG3 analysis (barrel)
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Mid-rapidity pi0 production in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=62 and 200 GeV measured by the PHENIX detector at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
1 A (very) preliminary study of channel pp->h->ZZ->4mu via gg fusion with CMSSW Alessandro Giacobbe Cristina Botta Daniele Trocino Relatrice: Chiara Mariotti.
M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Study of influence of particle identification and resonances excitation on correlation functions mesured by ALICE setup. 1. Influence of particle identification.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.
HYDRA Framework. Setup of software environment Setup of software environment Using the documentation Using the documentation How to compile a program.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus
Di-electron elliptic flow in
Check of Lambda Simulations in TOF-West
Study of hadronic resonances in the ALICE experiment
Run4 f K+K- analysis: analysis train
Reconstruction of short-lived resonances in pp collisions
Framework for the acceptance and efficiency corrections
Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum
fK+K- yield analysis update
2 Getting Started.
2 Getting Started.
Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 A report on the status and advertisement of the tools Methods geared toward heavy ions, low pt Goals: service (providing tools) and education (including my own) Group: subset of Thermal Photon PWG (but anybody is welcome!) Principal players up to now: Shunji, Ken, Saskia, Craig, Gabor Focus on: photon PID Basic tool: EMCal evaluator chain, ntuples Pion spectrum: reconstructed via event mixing (one particular method) Comparison of GEANT and measured

How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 Prerequisites Processing (simulated) PRDF files with the evaluator detailed and short documentation available tested on 20, ,000 events outputs available on dataxx disks nonstandard output – GEANT and measured OR Processing DST files (currently no evaluation, just measured) in the works (Saskia) documentation coming OR Processing standard reconstruction/evaluation chain output planned both GEANT and measured

How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 The “Nishimu-Oyama method” Framework (compiled code) gg2pi to establish photon PID cuts and to check their efficiency use GEANT PID or PID based upon measured quantities Boolean (yes/no) cuts primary cut: slewing corrected TOF with E-dependent sigma secondary cut: charge overlap tertiary cut: an empirical combination of cluster characteristics compared to an ASCII database easy to change and tune output: ntuple with all accepted photon pairs (single and pair data) can provide output with event mixing applying the same cuts mltslice split gg2pi input according to event multiplicity mkhist generate invariant mass histograms from gg2pi output in bins of pt manipulate the output yourself (example provided)

How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 Example: how to check the efficiency of your photon PID? - bit 1 is set if GEANT PID is “photon” - bit 2 is set if cluster passes your TOF cut - example only: doesn’t mean you cannot do better! Nishimu-Oyama method

How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 Nishimu-Oyama method Example: 2000 events, PID with measured quantities - processed with gg2pi and mkhist, plotted with pi0_pac_plot.C pt range 1.0 – 1.5 GeV/c 2.0 – 2.5 GeV/c

How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 Nishimu-Oyama method 20,000 events GEANT PID, deposited energy GEANT PID, reconstructed energy measured PID, reconstructed energy

How to… (a.k.a. Photon PID and Pizero Analysis) G. David, April 20, 2000 The “Szillasi method” Framework (CINT macros to help establish probabilistic “combined” cuts) ntread.c select a set of measured quantities A, B… appropriate for PID plot their distributions for photons and non-photons get the probability that for a given value a,b… it’s a photon p(a), p(b)… assign P = w(A)p(a) x w(B)p(b) x … to each cluster as “probability of being a photon” (currently w(A)=w(B)=…=1.0) your main job will be to find proper A,B quantities and w weights you can now use this probability P to tag your photons the histoes and an ntuple with the data of all particles is written ntopti.c using the output histoes of ntread.c it calculates the efficiency and the cleanness of your cuts for all values of P The code is very transparent: easy to read and modify