PRIMA Investigator Meeting Friday, June 16, 2006 Grand Sofitel Demeure, Amsterdam Stéphanie Baulu, Delphine Germain & Gilles Salles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 US Investigator Meeting DIAS-4, Chicago, July 2011 Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for Investigators and the Research Team.
Advertisements

Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Billing & Documentation for Professional Charges for Clinical Trials.
An Intergroup Randomised Trial of Rituximab versus a Watch & Wait Approach in Patients with Advanced Stage, Asymptomatic, Non-bulky Follicular Lymphoma.
Common Mistakes & Audits 05/21/2014. Summary of audit findings by category.
Audit Ebru Mutlu-Omega CRO. General Purpose to help quality (to maintain quality at present) to assure quality (make sure that quality in future is maintained)
Focused on Pulmonology and Hepatology
Verifying Source Documents. 2 Source Documentation First place the data are captured Original documents, data, and records Certified Copies Should contain.
Adverse Event Reporting. Reporting Adverse Events Adverse Events (AEs) are “... any untoward medical occurrence in a subject that was not previously identified.
Welcome to ACST-2! Guidance & Useful Information
Regulatory Submission Process  Clinical Study Application: 1. Submit an appointment requestappointment request 2. Fill one of the three templates: - BE.
Consensus or Controversy? Investigator Perspectives on Practical Issues and Research Questions in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Friday, December 6, :00 PM.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Developed by Klinikos; Roy Fraser (2012) Investigator Study File
Trial Procedures and Forms
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
PRIMA Investigator Meeting Sunday, September 12, 2004 Corinthia Towers Hotel, Prague.
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
CALGB Informational Session June 22, 2007 David Hurd, MD Interim Chair Data Audit Committee.
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
Template for study specific training for Intrapartum Research Studies [ Please see guide before using this]
PRIMA Investigator Meeting Saturday, December 9th, 2006 Orlando – ASH meeting.
SAE Reporting Judy Breed, BA, RN June, 2011 CONFIDENTIAL.
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
IBCSG 22-00: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a low- dose chemotherapy regimen, hypothesized to have anti- angiogenic activity, administered following.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
Project Charter Document Control Directory Structure Shared Network Drive 0703-O O-001.xls Data Contacts 0703-S S-001.xls 0703-O-002.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
Ensuring Human Subject Protection A Guide for Those who Obtain Research Informed Consent Documents 10/15/20151.
SMART Study Closeout Washington ICC Meeting 03 June 2007.
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
PRIMA Investigator Meeting Wednesday, June 8, 2005 Villa Castagnola, Lugano.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Immune Related Response Criteria (irRC) Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors Training Presentation v3.0.
SAE data entry: Clinical versus Pharmacovigilance standards Daniel Becker Solvay Pharmaceuticals Hannover, Germany T:
Phase II in Second Line NSCLC DefinitionPhase II: BI 6727 vs. BI 6727+pemetrexed vs. pemetrexed in second line advanced NSCLC Early stopping.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
EAE Training EAE Reporting and Assessment Overview DAIDS Regional Training Event, Regulatory Compliance Center Kampala, Uganda, September 2009 DAIDS Regional.
Investigator’s Meeting
How To Design a Clinical Trial
PRIMA Investigator Meeting Gilles Salles Vienna, June 07.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Project Chartering & Approval Process
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring
ACRIN CV Committee ACRIN PDRC ACRIN PA 4008 Protocol and Regulatory Requirements Patricia Atkinson, Quality Control Monitor.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
Lifespan GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE Record Management GCP May 2005.
Medidata Rave Start-Up Information
D3 ) Not Recovered d5) Fatal Was a post-mortem undertaken?YesNo Was the SAE ongoing at time of death from other cause? Yes No d d m m y y y y d1) Recovered.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring Barbara Gallagher, RN Clinical Research Nurse Jefferson Clinical Research Institute.
The Role and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Coordinator
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Reasons for Auditing There are many reasons for auditing. Some examples of these reasons might be: Requested by the IRB Committee Requested by an IRB.
Aiming for complete data
*Continue on SAE supplemental page CTT21 A if more space is required
Kahl BS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract LBA-6.
ARCADIA Coordinator Webinar
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
Understanding the Process of Documenting Informed Consent
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

PRIMA Investigator Meeting Friday, June 16, 2006 Grand Sofitel Demeure, Amsterdam Stéphanie Baulu, Delphine Germain & Gilles Salles

Agenda Status of the study Status of the study Regulatory issues Regulatory issues Flow of CRFs and queries Flow of CRFs and queries Flow of SAEs Flow of SAEs Medical questions Medical questions Financial aspects Financial aspects Other questions ? Other questions ?

STATUS 25 countries in Prima Study 25 countries in Prima Study 23 active countries (at least 1 patient) 23 active countries (at least 1 patient) 740 patients registered (13/06/06) 740 patients registered (13/06/06) 270 patients randomized (13/06/06) 270 patients randomized (13/06/06)

PRIMA RECRUITMENT

Chemo regimen chosen R-CHOP54773% R-CVP16722% R-FCM 31 4% Recent increase in R-CVP treated patients

Regulatory Aspects To be provided to GELARC : To be provided to GELARC :  CV of Principal Investigator in each center  Approvals (Ethics Committee and Health Authorities) for amendment n°2 + regulatory certification document Insurance extension (OK for all countries) Insurance extension (OK for all countries) After reception of approvals, PI of each center will sign an Amendment form After reception of approvals, PI of each center will sign an Amendment form

CRFs FLOW CHART Baseline part (p1 to 9) => sent to GELARC before randomization Baseline part (p1 to 9) => sent to GELARC before randomization Induction / randomization parts (p10 to 18) => sent as soon as possible Induction / randomization parts (p10 to 18) => sent as soon as possible Maintenance part => every 4 visits (with evaluation and toxicity pages) Maintenance part => every 4 visits (with evaluation and toxicity pages) Progression, events, deaths : as soon as possible Progression, events, deaths : as soon as possible AE and original forms of SAE => sent after each monitoring visit AE and original forms of SAE => sent after each monitoring visit Remember that all parts have to be monitored before sending them to GELARC

QUERY & DATA MANAGEMENT CRFs validation CRFs validation  parametered tests + medical review CRFs are validated as follow : CRFs are validated as follow :  Baseline + induction treatment  Maintenance (every 4 visits)  Follow-up / progression / death / AEs (at reception) Clinical data correction Forms will be sent by GELARC after the validation of each part Clinical data correction Forms will be sent by GELARC after the validation of each part

QUERY & DATA MANAGEMENT Clinical data correction Forms will be sent by e- mail to the local coordinator (study group, Roche or other) Clinical data correction Forms will be sent by e- mail to the local coordinator (study group, Roche or other) Answers must be completed directly on the form by the investigator (do not forget to sign and date form ! ) Answers must be completed directly on the form by the investigator (do not forget to sign and date form ! ) One copy must be kept in the CRF One copy must be kept in the CRF Each completed form has to be faxed to GELARC (ASAP) and original forms have to be sent after the next monitoring visit (with CRF pages) Each completed form has to be faxed to GELARC (ASAP) and original forms have to be sent after the next monitoring visit (with CRF pages)

Clinical data correction form Identification of Patient and center Name and signature of investigator Your answerQuestion Proposal for answer Actual Data reported on CRF CRF Page (s) Item concerned by query

Serious Adverse Events 172 SAEs recorded 172 SAEs recorded Record medical diagnosis and not a list of symptoms Record medical diagnosis and not a list of symptoms Do not forget to send follow-up if necessary Do not forget to send follow-up if necessary Queries on SAE are sent directly to the center by fax => answer in the same way (write answer on the Query form) Queries on SAE are sent directly to the center by fax => answer in the same way (write answer on the Query form)

Some clinical aspects “inclusion criteria” (1) Please note than those have to be fulfilled Please note than those have to be fulfilled Remember: Remember: Diagnosis on LYMPH NODE biopsy Diagnosis on LYMPH NODE biopsy Steroids during the last 4 weeks < 20 mg/day equivalents Steroids during the last 4 weeks < 20 mg/day equivalents Stage I/II should have a high tumor burden Stage I/II should have a high tumor burden Spleen is always > 7 cm and is not a bulk criteria by itself !! Spleen is always > 7 cm and is not a bulk criteria by itself !! Issues with hepatitis (HIV) Issues with hepatitis (HIV) Don’t hesitate to ask… Don’t hesitate to ask…

Some clinical aspects “randomization” (1) Inclusion criteria should be met ! Inclusion criteria should be met ! The inclusion data should be sent to GELA-RC The inclusion data should be sent to GELA-RC Treatment has to follow the initial protocol schemes : doses and schedules Treatment has to follow the initial protocol schemes : doses and schedules Only CR and PR patients randomized Only CR and PR patients randomized Why are they only 14 days day tolerated ? Why are they only 14 days day tolerated ?

Some clinical aspects “maintenance or observation” 1 ) Please follow the protocol recommendations for - visits every 8 weeks - CT scans every 6 months 2) Please indicate any event/progression as soon as it occurs

The future of PRIMA - With more than 730 pts recruited, PRIMA is already the largest trial ever performed in first line follicular lymphoma patients - Rhythm of inclusion extremely high allowed to extend the population from 640 to 900 pts (675 pts randomized) - An opportunity for answering a very important question with a high standard quality trial : - Rituximab maintenance benefit after R-chemo

Thanks to all of you for your cooperation for your cooperation