Thurs. Feb. 11. Holzer Buchanan v. Doe (Va. 1993)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tues. Sept. 25. aggregation v. supplemental jurisdiction.
Advertisements

Wed. Feb. 12. pleading and proving foreign law FRCP 44.1 A party who intends to raise an issue concerning the law of a foreign country shall give notice.
Mon. Apr. 14. same-sex marriage and full faith and credit.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
Judicial Notice and Stipulations
The Court System.  Judge: decide all legal issues in a lawsuit. If no jury, the judge’s job also includes determining the facts of the case.  Plaintiff.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 11 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 20, 2002.
Foreign law in US courts Obligations of attorney Role of court in determining foreign law Judicial notice statutes – Compare to common law – Role of parties,
Constitutional Restrictions on Choice of Law. Home Ins. Co. v Dick (US 1930)
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
Characterization. substance/procedure Grant v McAuliffe (Cal. 1953)
Grant v McAuliffe (Cal 1953). P ships goods in Mass using D as transport P received printed bill of lading which contains limitations on liability Under.
Public Policy Exception
Broderick v Rosner NY law allows piercing the corporate veil concerning NY banks to get to shareholders NJ doesn’t like this and wants to protect NJ shareholders.
Renvoi désistement. complex litigation In re Air Crash Disaster near Chicago (7 th Cir. 1981)
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hague (US 1981). member of Minn workforce – commuted to work there Allstate present and doing business in Minn Post-event move of.
McMillan v McMillan (Va. 1979). JONES v RS JONES & Assoc (Va. 1993)
Grant v McAuliffe (Cal 1953). P ships goods in Mass using D as transport P received printed bill of lading which contains limitations on liability Under.
 Is the most common response to a Complaint  Must be served within 30 days in California  Filed with the Court with a filing fee  Mailed to Plaintiff.
Foreign Law in US Courts Move from “fact” to “law” Common law  Statutory innovations Issues How raised? How presented? Who determines? Role of judge?
Foreign Law in US Courts What’s a guy gotta do?. When does foreign law rear its head? Choice of law –Policy: foreign parties, expectations, location dictate.
Thurs. Sept. 13. constitutional restrictions on service.
Substance/procedure. A NY state court wants to know whether it should use PA’s statute of limitations (damages limitations, burden of proof, evidentiary.
Thurs. Sept. 20. federal subject matter jurisdiction diversity and alienage jurisdiction.
Tues. Dec. 4 2:00. issue preclusion If in an earlier case an issue was - actually litigated and decided - litigated fairly and fully - and essential.
Thurs., Oct. 17. PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN STATE COURT.
Mon. Sept. 24. removal 1441(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district.
Foreign Law in US Courts What’s a guy gotta do?. Foreign law rears its head Choice of law –Policy: foreign parties, expectations, location dictate use.
Wed. Apr. 9. Durfee v Duke (US 1963) Clarke v. Clarke (US 1900)
Failure to invoke foreign law Possible consequences of failure – Court applies forum law Court ascertains foreign law Court dismisses – forum non conveniens.
Tues. Oct. 29. venue in federal court Sec Venue generally (b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be brought in-- (1) a judicial district.
Wed., Oct. 15. venue in federal court Sec Venue generally (b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be brought in-- (1) a judicial district.
Mon. Feb. 10. Virginia cases McMillan v McMillan (Va. 1979)
Tues., Oct. 21. practice midterm Wed. 10/ Room 119 Thurs 10/ Room 141 Thurs 10/ Room 127.
Fri., Oct. 17. amendment 15(a) Amendments Before Trial. (1) Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course.
Thurs. Nov. 1. waiver of defenses FRCP 12(g) Joining Motions. (1) Right to Join. A motion under this rule may be joined with any other motion allowed.
McMillan v McMillan (Va. 1979). § 145. The General Principle (1) The rights and liabilities of the parties with respect to an issue in tort are determined.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 21, 2005.
Thurs. Feb. 4. substance/procedure Question of interpretation under 1 st Rest 1) caps on damages 2) certain rules of evidence or burdens of proof 3)
Tues. 2/2/16. characterization substance/procedure.
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION F CLASS 13 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 26, 2003.
Tues. Jan. 19. traditional choice-of-law approach.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 18, 2002.
Tues. Feb. 16. pleading and proving foreign law Fact approach to content of foreign law.
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURT SYSTEM
Course Introduction Review
Introduction to Environmental Law
Mon. Feb. 13.
Thurs., Aug. 29.
Wednesday, Aug. 23.
Tues., Sept. 23.
Wed. Mar. 29.
Wed. Feb. 15.
Mon. Feb. 6.
Conflict of Laws M1 – Class 4.
Mon. Nov. 5.
Thurs., Oct. 12.
Lecture 8 Feb. 5, 2018.
Lecture 10 Feb. 12, 2018.
Lecture 7 Jan. 31, 2018.
Lecture 10 Oct. 3, 2018.
Thurs., Sept. 1.
Lecture 9 Oct. 1, 2018.
Thursday, Aug. 31.
Lecture 6 Mon. Sept. 17, 2018.
Lecture 9 Feb. 7, 2018.
Lecture 7 9/24/18.
Lecture 11 Oct. 8, 2018.
Thurs., Sept. 19.
Mon., Oct. 28.
Presentation transcript:

Thurs. Feb. 11

Holzer

Buchanan v. Doe (Va. 1993)

Dreher v. Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc. (Va. 2006)

“The statutes of New York imposing a showing of financial responsibility as a condition to the registration and operation of motor vehicles express a strong public policy that a person injured by the negligence of a driver should have recourse to a defendant able to respond in damages.” The New York legislature intended this responsibility to extend extra- territorially. The provisions of N.Y. Law § 388 have been viewed as showing a “commendable concern not only for residents of [New York], but residents of other States who may be injured as a result of the activities of New York residents.”

pleading and proving foreign law

Fact approach to content of foreign law

Must be pleaded Proved Jury Limited appellate review

Conception of a cause of action as remedial rule of forum Personal jurisdiction

Law approach to foreign law

FRCP 44.1 A party who intends to raise an issue concerning the law of a foreign country shall give notice by pleadings or other reasonable written notice. The court, in determining foreign law, may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The court's determination shall be treated as a ruling on a question of law.

failure to plead foreign law

P sues D for looking at him funny – asks for $100 in mental anguish D’s only defense is a denial that he looked at P funny What happens to case?

Sua sponte?

P sues D under gambling contract D’s only defense is that he did not breach

consent of parties regulatory interest of state

P sues D (Californians) under gambling contract (California K) in Nevada ct D’s only defense is that he did not breach

…nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.

P sues D (Iranians) under gambling contract (Iranian K) in Nevada ct D’s only defense is that he did not breach

- presume complaint is sufficient - court may introduce foreign law sua sponte? - court must introduce foreign law sua sponte?

failure to offer evidence of foreign law

P sues D Court or D say foreign law applies P doesn’t know about foreign law

- Swift v. Tyson - federal and sister state courts would come to own judgment about the general common law in a state even in the face of contrary decisions

presumptions - that common law applies in a common law jurisdiction (that is, has not been abrogated by statute) - that fundamental law applies in a jurisdiction - that law of the jurisdiction is like the forum’s

- put burden on plaintiff and dismiss - put burden on defendant and assume states a claim - put burden on party best able to identify law - put burden on court - use presumption about what law is like to allow case to proceed

- New York state courts assume that unsettled sister state law is the same as New York law - P sues D in federal court in New York on an unsettled Pa cause of action…

- A nationwide class action is brought in NY state court concerning a provision in the UCC - New York courts have read the provision in one way - 6 other states have read the same provision a different way - what about the 43 other states…?

Walton v Arabian American Oil Co (2d Cir 1956)

Louknitsky v. Louknitsky - California state court determining spousal rights in marital property of couple, now domiciled in Ca., while they were in China - presumed Chinese law was the same as California’s community property system

Statutory solutions