Lecture 14 Push Down Automata (PDA) Topics:  Definition  Moves of the PDA  Languages of the PDA  Deterministic PDA’s June 18, 2015 CSCE 355 Foundations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 Pushdown Automata
Advertisements

Pushdown Automata Section 2.2 CSC 4170 Theory of Computation.
C O N T E X T - F R E E LANGUAGES ( use a grammar to describe a language) 1.
Pushdown Automata CPSC 388 Ellen Walker Hiram College.
CS21 Decidability and Tractability
Introduction to Computability Theory
1 Introduction to Computability Theory Lecture7: PushDown Automata (Part 1) Prof. Amos Israeli.
Costas Busch - RPI1 Pushdown Automata PDAs. Costas Busch - RPI2 Pushdown Automaton -- PDA Input String Stack States.
1 … NPDAs continued. 2 Pushing Strings Input symbol Pop symbol Push string.
Courtesy Costas Busch - RPI1 Pushdown Automata PDAs.
Foundations of (Theoretical) Computer Science Chapter 2 Lecture Notes (Section 2.2: Pushdown Automata) Prof. Karen Daniels, Fall 2009 with acknowledgement.
Fall 2004COMP 3351 Pushdown Automata PDAs. Fall 2004COMP 3352 Pushdown Automaton -- PDA Input String Stack States.
Fall 2006Costas Busch - RPI1 Pushdown Automata PDAs.
1 Pushdown Automata Definition Moves of the PDA Languages of the PDA Deterministic PDA’s.
CS5371 Theory of Computation Lecture 8: Automata Theory VI (PDA, PDA = CFG)
Fall 2006Costas Busch - RPI1 PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages.
Prof. Busch - LSU1 Pushdown Automata PDAs. Prof. Busch - LSU2 Pushdown Automaton -- PDA Input String Stack States.
Fall 2005Costas Busch - RPI1 Pushdown Automata PDAs.
1 Pushdown Automata PDAs. 2 Pushdown Automaton -- PDA Input String Stack States.
CS 3240: Languages and Computation Pushdown Automata & CF Grammars NOTE: THESE ARE ONLY PARTIAL SLIDES RELATED TO WEEKS 9 AND 10. PLEASE REFER TO THE TEXTBOOK.
1 CD5560 FABER Formal Languages, Automata and Models of Computation Lecture 8 Mälardalen University 2010.
CSCI 2670 Introduction to Theory of Computing September 21, 2005.
Pushdown Automata.
CS 461 – Sept. 26 CFG correctness Section 2.2 – Pushdown Automata.
Pushdown Automata CS 130: Theory of Computation HMU textbook, Chap 6.
Pushdown Automata (PDAs)
Definition Moves of the PDA Languages of the PDA Deterministic PDA’s Pushdown Automata 11.
Push-down Automata Section 3.3 Fri, Oct 21, 2005.
1 Pushdown Automata Definition: relation to  -NFA Moves of the PDA Languages of the PDA Deterministic PDA’s Quiz Wednesday on CFGs lecture #3.
1 CDT314 FABER Formal Languages, Automata and Models of Computation Lecture 6 Mälardalen University 2010.
PushDown Automata. What is a stack? A stack is a Last In First Out data structure where I only have access to the last element inserted in the stack.
Foundations of (Theoretical) Computer Science Chapter 2 Lecture Notes (Section 2.2: Pushdown Automata) Prof. Karen Daniels, Fall 2010 with acknowledgement.
CSCI 3130: Automata theory and formal languages Andrej Bogdanov The Chinese University of Hong Kong Pushdown.
Formal Languages, Automata and Models of Computation
1 Chapter 6 Pushdown automata Sagrada Familia ( 聖家 堂 ), Barcelona, Spain.
1 Pushdown Automata Definition Moves of the PDA Languages of the PDA Deterministic PDA’s.
CSC 3130: Automata theory and formal languages Andrej Bogdanov The Chinese University of Hong Kong Pushdown.
Lecture 16b Turing Machines Topics: Closure Properties of Context Free Languages Cocke-Younger-Kasimi Parsing Algorithm June 23, 2015 CSCE 355 Foundations.
CSC 3130: Automata theory and formal languages Andrej Bogdanov The Chinese University of Hong Kong Pushdown.
Pushdown Automata Hopcroft, Motawi, Ullman, Chap 6.
1.Draw a parse tree for the following derivation: S  C A C  C A b b  b b A b b  b b B b b  b b a A a a b b  b b a b a a b b 2. Show on your parse.
Grammar Set of variables Set of terminal symbols Start variable Set of Production rules.
1 CDT314 FABER Formal Languages, Automata and Models of Computation Lecture 8 Mälardalen University 2011.
Costas Busch - LSU1 PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages.
Lecture 11  2004 SDU Lecture7 Pushdown Automaton.
CSCI 2670 Introduction to Theory of Computing September 22, 2004.
6. Pushdown Automata CIS Automata and Formal Languages – Pei Wang.
Formal Languages, Automata and Models of Computation
Pushdown Automata.
Lecture 14 Push Down Automata (PDA)
Non Deterministic Automata
CSE 105 theory of computation
Pushdown Automata (PDA). Part 2
Pushdown Automata PDAs
Pushdown Automata PDAs
Pushdown Automata PDAs
Pushdown Automata PDAs
Chapter 7 PUSHDOWN AUTOMATA.
AUTOMATA THEORY VI.
Pushdown Automata.
CSE322 Definition and description of finite Automata
Definition Moves of the PDA Languages of the PDA Deterministic PDA’s
Definition Moves of the PDA Languages of the PDA Deterministic PDA’s
CSE 105 theory of computation
… NPDAs continued.
Pushdown automata The Chinese University of Hong Kong Fall 2011
CSE 105 theory of computation
Non Deterministic Automata
CSE 105 theory of computation
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 14 Push Down Automata (PDA) Topics:  Definition  Moves of the PDA  Languages of the PDA  Deterministic PDA’s June 18, 2015 CSCE 355 Foundations of Computation

– 2 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 2 Pushdown Automata  The PDA is an automaton equivalent to the CFG in language-defining power.  Only the nondeterministic PDA defines all the CFL’s.  But the deterministic version models parsers. Most programming languages have deterministic PDA’s.

– 3 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 3 Intuition: PDA  Think of an ε -NFA with the additional power that it can manipulate a stack.  Its moves are determined by: 1. The current state (of its “NFA”), 2. The current input symbol (or ε ), and 3. The current symbol on top of its stack.

– 4 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 4 Intuition: PDA – (2)  Being nondeterministic, the PDA can have a choice of next moves.  In each choice, the PDA can: 1. Change state, and also 2. Replace the top symbol on the stack by a sequence of zero or more symbols.  Zero symbols = “pop.”  Many symbols = sequence of “pushes.”

– 5 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 5 PDA Formalism  A PDA is described by: 1. A finite set of states (Q, typically). 2. An input alphabet ( Σ, typically). 3. A stack alphabet ( Γ, typically). 4. A transition function ( δ, typically). 5. A start state (q 0, in Q, typically). 6. A start symbol (Z 0, in Γ, typically). 7. A set of final states (F ⊆ Q, typically).

– 6 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 6 Conventions  a, b, … are input symbols. But sometimes we allow ε as a possible value.  …, X, Y, Z are stack symbols.  …, w, x, y, z are strings of input symbols.  , ,… are strings of stack symbols.

– 7 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 7 The Transition Function  Takes three arguments: 1. A state, in Q. 2. An input, which is either a symbol in Σ or ε. 3. A stack symbol in Γ.  δ (q, a, Z) is a set of zero or more actions of the form (p,  ). p is a state;  is a string of stack symbols.

– 8 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 8 Actions of the PDA  If δ (q, a, Z) contains (p,  ) among its actions, then one thing the PDA can do in state q, with a at the front of the input, and Z on top of the stack is: 1. Change the state to p. 2. Remove a from the front of the input (but a may be ε ). 3. Replace Z on the top of the stack by .

– 9 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 9 Example: PDA  Design a PDA to accept {0 n 1 n | n > 1}.  The states: q = start state. We are in state q if we have seen only 0’s so far. p = we’ve seen at least one 1 and may now proceed only if the inputs are 1’s. f = final state; accept.

– 10 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 10 Example: PDA – (2)  The stack symbols: Z 0 = start symbol. Also marks the bottom of the stack, so we know when we have counted the same number of 1’s as 0’s. X = marker, used to count the number of 0’s seen on the input.

– 11 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 11 Example: PDA – (3)  The transitions: δ (q, 0, Z 0 ) = {(q, XZ 0 )}. δ (q, 0, X) = {(q, XX)}. These two rules cause one X to be pushed onto the stack for each 0 read from the input. δ (q, 1, X) = {(p, ε )}. When we see a 1, go to state p and pop one X. δ (p, 1, X) = {(p, ε )}. Pop one X per 1. δ (p, ε, Z 0 ) = {(f, Z 0 )}. Accept at bottom.

– 12 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 12 Actions of the Example PDA q Z0Z0

– 13 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 13 Actions of the Example PDA q XZ0XZ0

– 14 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 14 Actions of the Example PDA q XXZ0XXZ0

– 15 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 15 Actions of the Example PDA q XXXZ0XXXZ0

– 16 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 16 Actions of the Example PDA p 1 XXZ0XXZ0

– 17 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 17 Actions of the Example PDA p 1 XZ0XZ0

– 18 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 18 Actions of the Example PDA p Z0Z0

– 19 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 19 Actions of the Example PDA f Z0Z0

– 20 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 20 Instantaneous Descriptions  We can formalize the pictures just seen with an instantaneous description (ID).  A ID is a triple (q, w,  ), where: 1. q is the current state. 2. w is the remaining input. 3.  is the stack contents, top at the left.

– 21 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 21 The “Goes-To” Relation  To say that ID I can become ID J in one move of the PDA, we write I ⊦ J.  Formally, (q, aw, X  ) ⊦ (p, w,  ) for any w and , if δ (q, a, X) contains (p,  ).  Extend ⊦ to ⊦ *, meaning “zero or more moves,” by: Basis: I ⊦ *I. Induction: If I ⊦ *J and J ⊦ K, then I ⊦ *K.

– 22 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 22 Example: Goes-To  Using the previous example PDA, we can describe the sequence of moves by: (q, , Z 0 ) ⊦ (q, 00111, XZ 0 ) ⊦ (q, 0111, XXZ 0 ) ⊦ (q, 111, XXXZ 0 ) ⊦ (p, 11, XXZ 0 ) ⊦ (p, 1, XZ 0 ) ⊦ (p, ε, Z 0 ) ⊦ (f, ε, Z 0 )  Thus, (q, , Z 0 ) ⊦ *(f, ε, Z 0 ).  What would happen on input ?

– 23 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 23 Answer  (q, , Z 0 ) ⊦  (q, , XZ 0 ) ⊦  (q, 01111, XXZ 0 ) ⊦  (q, 1111, XXXZ 0 ) ⊦  (p, 111, XXZ 0 ) ⊦  (p, 11, XZ 0 ) ⊦  (p, 1, Z 0 ) ⊦  (f, 1, Z 0 )  Note the last ID has no move.  is not accepted, because the input is not completely consumed. Legal because a PDA can use ε input even if input remains.

– 24 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 24 Aside: FA and PDA Notations  We represented moves of a FA by an extended δ, which did not mention the input yet to be read.  We could have chosen a similar notation for PDA’s, where the FA state is replaced by a state-stack combination, like the pictures just shown.

– 25 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 25 FA and PDA Notations – (2)  Similarly, we could have chosen a FA notation with ID’s. Just drop the stack component.  Why the difference? My theory:  FA tend to model things like protocols, with indefinitely long inputs.  PDA model parsers, which are given a fixed program to process.

– 26 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 26 Language of a PDA  The common way to define the language of a PDA is by final state.  If P is a PDA, then L(P) is the set of strings w such that (q 0, w, Z 0 ) ⊦ * (f, ε,  ) for final state f and any .

– 27 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 27 Language of a PDA – (2)  Another language defined by the same PDA is by empty stack.  If P is a PDA, then N(P) is the set of strings w such that (q 0, w, Z 0 ) ⊦ * (q, ε, ε ) for any state q.

– 28 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 28 Equivalence of Language Definitions 1.If L = L(P), then there is another PDA P’ such that L = N(P’). 2.If L = N(P), then there is another PDA P’’ such that L = L(P’’).

– 29 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 29 Proof: L(P) -> N(P’) Intuition  P’ will simulate P.  If P accepts, P’ will empty its stack.  P’ has to avoid accidentally emptying its stack, so it uses a special bottom-marker to catch the case where P empties its stack without accepting.

– 30 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 30 Proof: L(P) -> N(P’)  P’ has all the states, symbols, and moves of P, plus: 1. Stack symbol X 0, used to guard the stack bottom against accidental emptying. 2. New start state s and “erase” state e. 3. δ (s, ε, X 0 ) = {(q 0, Z 0 X 0 )}. Get P started. 4. δ (f, ε, X) = δ (e, ε, X) = {(e, ε )} for any final state f of P and any stack symbol X.

– 31 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 31 Proof: N(P) -> L(P’’) Intuition  P” simulates P.  P” has a special bottom-marker to catch the situation where P empties its stack.  If so, P” accepts.

– 32 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 32 Proof: N(P) -> L(P’’)  P’’ has all the states, symbols, and moves of P, plus: 1. Stack symbol X 0, used to guard the stack bottom. 2. New start state s and final state f. 3. δ (s, ε, X 0 ) = {(q 0, Z 0 X 0 )}. Get P started. 4. δ (q, ε, X 0 ) = {(f, ε )} for any state q of P.

– 33 – CSCE 355 Summer 2015 ialc slides Ullman Stanford 33 Deterministic PDA’s  To be deterministic, there must be at most one choice of move for any state q, input symbol a, and stack symbol X.  In addition, there must not be a choice between using input ε or real input.  Formally, δ (q, a, X) and δ (q, ε, X) cannot both be nonempty.