BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY The central question is Can we link biological processes or structures directly to human behaviour?

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY Research suggests that brain dysfunction may PREDISPOSE a person to being violent The FRONTAL brain region may be associated with violent behaviour Some violent offenders plead NGRI (not guilty by reason of insanity) to murder charges

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY Discussion points What are the advantages to the Biological explanation of behaviour? What are the disadvantages? Why is this approach described as determinist? How else can violent behaviour be explained?

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY RAINE The Raine hypothesis is that some seriously violent individuals have localised brain damage in certain areas of the brain including the prefrontal cortex; the amygdala; the thalamus; the hippocampus; and the corpus callosum. Top tip: take time to get to know the ‘brain’ see I Learn for brain tutorials!

ADRIAN RAINE, MONTE BUCHSBAUM, AND LORI LACASSE (1997) BRAIN ABNORMALITIES IN MURDERERS INDICATED BY POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY.

Typical Criminals?

THE FRONTAL LOBE is important for voluntary and planned motor behaviours - such things as voluntary movement of the eyes, trunk, limbs and the many muscles used for speech

prefrontal Raine suggests three reasons why prefrontal deficits may cause antisocial personality: self-restraint 1.The region appears to be critical for self-restraint and deliberate foresight. "One thing we know about anti- socials is that they do not think ahead" 2.It’s crucial for learning conditioned responses e.g. a child learns to link the thought of a misdeed with anxiety over punishment. "Unconscious mental-emotional associations such as these lie at the core of what we call conscience" 3. Prefrontal deficits are associated with low levels of autonomic arousal. eople with Antisocial personality Disorder (APD) may unconsciously be trying to compensate by seeking stimulation "For some kids one way of getting an arousal-buzz is by robbing stores or beating people up”

CORPUS CALLOSUM  Is the enormous bundle of fibres which interconnects the left and right cerebral hemispheres.  It disseminates information from the cerebral cortex on one side of the brain to the same region on the other side – it is a communication bridge.

TEMPORAL LOBE (TEMP' OR UL)  Various parts of it are important for the sense of hearing, for certain aspects of memory, and for emotional/affective behaviour.

RAINE (1997) THE STUDY The participants: 41 murderers (39 males 2 females) Charged with murder/manslaughter in California/USA All pled NGRI All were referred for physiological and psychological examination

RAINE (1997) THE STUDY The ‘histories’ head injury/brain damage(23) drug abuse (3) affective disorder (2) epilepsy (2) hyperactivity & learning impairment (3) personality disorder (2) Schizophrenia (6)

RAINE (1997) THE STUDY CONTROL GROUP 41 normal individuals (non murderers) matched for sex and age including 6 ‘murdering’ schizophrenics who were matched with 6 ‘ non murdering’ schizophrenics IQ, ethnicity, brain injury not matched!

RAINE (1997) THE STUDY The method A ‘natural’ experiment (quasi) using independent measures design where participants were matched on key criteria. The procedure PET Scans were used to examine the brain

RAINE (1997) THE STUDY What does ‘PET’ as in PET scan mean? Positron Emission Tomography How does it work? This method assesses the amount of metabolic activity in various parts of the brain A scanning machine detects positrons which are emitted. High amounts are associated with a higher level of metabolic activity.

RAINE ET AL (1997) BRAIN ABNORMALITIES IN MURDERERS PET scans showing ‘hot spots’ for cognitive activities

RAINE ET AL (1997) BRAIN ABNORMALITIES IN MURDERERS PET scan of a subject whilst practicing a new language skill A scan of the same subject demonstrating this skill after it had become familiar

PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY - RAINE THE PET SCAN process Patients are injected with fluorodeoxyglucose tracer (radioactive glucose) For about 30 minutes before the PET SCAN the participants are engaged in a ‘continuous activity’ task This activity aimed to activate the FRONTAL LOBES, and the RIGHT TEMPORAL and PARIETAL LOBES

FINDINGS Both groups performed similarly on performance task There were certain characteristics that were NOT CONTROLLED..i.e 6 murderers were left handed 14 murderers were non white 23 murderers had history of head injury

RAINE FOUND SOME SIGNIFICANT RESULTS He suggested there was evidence for DIFFERENCES in the brains of the murderers He found amongst other things LOWER ACTIVITY in some CORTICAL REGIONS of the brain

NORMAL MURDERER

Diagrams from Raine’s research

SUMMARY OF DIFFERENCES IN THE BRAINS OF THE MURDERERS Reduced activity in prefrontal cortex & corpus callosum The Left hemisphere showed less activity than the right Abnormal asymmetries in the amygdala

PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY - RAINE Pre Frontal deficit - associated with impulsivity Amygdala - associated with aggressive behaviour Amygdala - reduced activity associated with fearlessness Corpus Callosum - dysfunction associated with predisposition to violence

CONCLUSION It is unlikely that violence is due to a single brain mechanism There is evidence that - murderers pleading NGRI may have different brain functions to ‘normal’ people There is some evidence that - murderers have different brain functions to psychiatric patients

WHAT these findings DO demonstrate That there MAY BE a link between brain activity and a predisposition towards violence which should be investigated further

WHAT THESE FINDINGS DO NOT DEMONSTRATE That violent behaviour is ‘caused’ by brain pathology That murderers are NOT RESPONSIBLE for their actions That brain dysfunction causes violent behaviour

EVALUATION ISSUES Is the research Valid? Areas of brain selected based on previous research but Could IQ differences be a factor? Is the research Reliable? Could the same technique be used on other people?

ETHICS How might you criticise this study from an ethical point of view? Raine’s findings raise important ethical questions about culpability and free will. "To what extent, should we take disordered brain functioning into account as part of the reason for certain types of crime? “Assuming these people are not responsible for their own brain damage, should we hold them fully responsible for their criminal acts?"

GENERALISATION Can the findings of this study be generalised to all murderers? Why or why not? Application - how is this study useful?

INTERVENTIONS Raine suggested a number of interventions that could be applied. Cognitive and behavioural therapy and drug therapy. Biofeedback – training children or adults to control their own arousal levels. Children could be channelled into safe activities that might satisfy their natural stimulation-seeking and aggressive proclivities.

QUESTIONS Describe the strengths & weaknesses of the NATURAL (Quasi) experimental method. What do you think might be the main difficulty in drawing conclusions from PET observed ‘brain activity’? Identify one thing that cannot be concluded from this study