Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development QSAR Application Toolbox -filling data gaps using available information- McKim Conference, September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QSAR-based Prediction of Inhalation Toxicity Kendall B. Wallace, Eli Petkova, Gilman D. Veith University of Minnesota – Duluth Medical School & International.
Advertisements

Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Chemical Category Formation: Toxicology and REACH Dr Steven Enoch Liverpool John Moores University 14 th May 2009.
AIIDA V3.0 (AQUATIC IMPACT INDICATOR DATABASE) PRESENTATION & TRAINING.
1 OECD Work on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials Environment, Health and Safety Division Environment Directorate OECD.
1 Understanding the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD - Rob Visser Deputy Director, Environment Directorate Head - Environment,
GHS CLASSIFICATION ONLINE. Registration: Click on “Register”
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
AMBIT Chemoinformatics Software for Data Management Joanna Jaworska Nina Jeliazkova P&G Brussels, Ideaconsult Ltd., Belgium Bulgaria.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
New functionalities in Toolbox Multi-document application 2. QA of chemical structures 3. Working on 2D or 2.5D mode INPUT.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics December 12, 2006.
Mike Comber Consulting TIMES-SS Assessment of skin sensitisation hazard Presented on behalf of the TIMES-SS consortia.
AMBIT Chemoinformatics Software for Data Management Joanna Jaworska Nina Jeliazkova P&G Brussels, Ideaconsult Ltd., Belgium Bulgaria.
Use of Toxicological Pathways for Hazard Assessment in OECD (Q)SAR Toolbox: McKim Conference September 2008, Duluth, USA LMC, Bourgas University, Bulgaria.
Mike Comber TIMES-SS Application of Reactivity Principles in Screening for Skin Sensitisers Presented on behalf of the TIMES-SS consortia & International.
December 2006Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce 1 Using the EPA HPVIS to Form Chemical Categories for Hazard Assessment Sandra Reiss Murphy, PhD Arkema.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology
The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) for Skin Sensitisation (SS): How We Got Here and Where We are Going 1 T. W. Schultz Professor Emeritus The University.
The McKim Conferences for the Strategic Use of Testing Gitchee Gumee Conference Center Duluth, Minnesota June 27-29, 2006.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
T. W. Schultz Presented at the McKim Conference September 17, 2008.
OECD’s work on Adverse outcome pathways
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
Barcelona April, 2008 Overview of the QSAR Application Toolbox Gilman Veith International QSAR Foundation Duluth, Minnesota.
Prioritization Process and Development of the Hazard Characterization Documents Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Narcosis as a Reference Gilman Veith.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 16-18, 2008 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
McKim Workshop on Strategic Approaches for Reducing Data Redundancy in Cancer Assessment Duluth, MN, USA 19 May, 2010.
1 State of play and outlook of modelling based prioritisation Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre, European.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
ECB INFODAYS, Zagreb, Croatia, December 2006 EU Notification Scheme (New Substances) and New Chemicals Database ECB INFODAYS, Zagreb, December.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
Copyright © 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. Managing Items and Item Catalogs.
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Development of the High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) December 12, 2006 Characterizing Chemicals.
Strategies to build toxicity databases for data mining Chihae Yang June 28, 2007 Leadscope, inc.
QSAR Application Toolbox: First Steps - Data Gap Filling (Read-Across by Analogue Approach)
QSAR Application Toolbox Workflow
QSAR Application Toolbox Workflow
Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry,
QSAR Toolbox Database Import/Export
General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox
Forming Chemical Categories..
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
QSAR Application Toolbox: Step 12: Building a QSAR model
General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
Background This is a step-by-step presentation designed to take the first time user of the Toolbox through the workflow of a data filling exercise.
Status of the Glutathione Reactivity Database for Skin Sensitization
OAK CREEK Toxicology & Risk Assessment Consulting
Outlook Background Objectives Specific Aims
New functionalities in Toolbox 2.0
QSAR Toolbox Database Import/Export
OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.2 An example illustrating RAAF Scenario 2 and related assessment elements.
Category elements for assessing category consistency
Outlook Background Objectives Specific Aims
Evaluating alert performance accounting for a metabolism
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
Ovanes Mekenyan, Milen Todorov, Ksenia Gerova
Report Of further work on Prioritization 5th meeting WG-E
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
QSAR Toolbox Customized search (Query Tool)
The Category Approach for Predicting Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
T. W. Schultz Presented at the Logan Workshop March 23-24, 2010
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
EFSA’s Chemical Hazards Database
Presentation transcript:

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development QSAR Application Toolbox -filling data gaps using available information- McKim Conference, September 2007, Duluth, MN

QSAR Application Toolbox Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development First “organized” discussions – ‘Red Lobsters’, Duluth filling data gaps using available information- Historical Notes Organized actions of EU and OECD – coming with REACH The role of the “revolutionary” notions – category, analogues OECD and EU Guidance documents on ‘Category’, ‘QSAR’ Need for translation documents into a working machinery

QSAR Application Toolbox Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Improve accessibility of (Q)SAR methods and databases Facilitate selection of chemical analogues and categories Integrate metabolism/mechanisms with categories/(Q)SAR Assist in the estimation of missing values for chemicals -ENV/JM(2006)47 -filling data gaps using available information- General Objectives

Bob Diderich Gilman Veith Terry Schultz Take Fukushima Environment Directorate OECD Paris

Special thanks to: DG Environment European Chemicals Bureau Danish Ministry of the Environment US EPA Environment Canada NITE Japan CEFIC MultiCase (USA) SRC (USA) A collaborative effort of all member countries and stakeholders

Developers of the system: Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry, Bourgas, Bulgaria

Typical queries included in the (Q)SAR Application Toolbox Is the chemical included in regulatory inventories or existing chemical categories? Has the chemical already been assessed by other agencies/organisations? Would you like to search for available data on assessment endpoints for each chemical?

Explore a chemical list for possible analogues using predefined, mechanistic, empiric and custom built categorization schemes? Group chemicals based on common chemical/toxic mechanism and/or metabolism? Design a data matrix of a chemical category? Typical Queries included in the (Q)SAR Application Toolbox

Fill data gaps in a chemical category using: –read-across, –trend analysis or –QSAR models Report the results: –Work history –Export the data matrix –IUCLID 5 harmonized templates Typical Queries included in the (Q)SAR Application Toolbox

System Workflow

Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

User Alternatives for Chemical ID: A. Single target chemical Name CAS# SMILES/InChi Draw Chemical Structure Select from User List/Inventory B. Group of chemicals User List Inventory Specialized Databases Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Presentation of species according to their taxonomic rank Consistency between CAS and structure across inventories and databases

User Alternatives for Chemical ID: A. Single target chemical Name CAS# SMILES/InChi Draw Chemical Structure Select from User List/Inventory B. Group of chemicals User List/Inventory Specialized Databases Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage  Toolbox Inventories: US EPA TSCA Canadian DSL OECD HPVCs, US EPA HPVCs EU EINECS Japanese MITI DANISH EPA

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined Mechanistic Empirical Custom Metabolism Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information: CAS Name Structural formula OECD Global portal Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined: US EPA categorization OECD categorization Database affiliation Inventory affiliation Substance type: polymers, mixtures, discrete, hydrolyzing Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined: US EPA categorization OECD categorization Database affiliation Inventory affiliation Substance type: polymers, mixtures, discrete, hydrolyzing Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined Mechanistic: Acute Toxicity MOA Protein binding (OASIS) DNA binding (OASIS) Electron reach fragments (Superfragments) BioBite Cramer Classification Tree (ToxTree) Veerhar/Hermens reactivity rules (ToxTree) Lipinski rules (MultiCase) Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined Mechanistic: Acute Toxicity MOA (OASIS) Protein binding (OASIS) DNA binding (OASIS) Electron reach fragments (Superfragments) BioBite Cramer Classification Tree (ToxTree) Veerhar/Hermens reactivity rules (ToxTree) Lipinski rules (MultiCase) Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined Mechanistic Empirical: Chemical elements Groups of elements Natural functional groups AIM (EPA/SRC) Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined Mechanistic Empirical Custom: Mechanistic boundaries example (aldehydes forming Shiff base but not Michael type addition) Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

General characterization by the following grouping schemes: Substance information Predefined Mechanistic Empirical Custom Metabolism: Documented: microbial, liver Simulated: microbial, liver, GI tract, skin Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap Report Finding Data for SIDS and Other Endpoints Selecting Data Base(s): Toolbox databases  Publicly available  Proprietary databases Toolbox Links to External Databases (DSSTOX) Selecting type of extracting data: Measured Data Estimated Data Both Endpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap Report Extracting SIDS and Other Endpoints Selecting Data Base(s): Internal databases  Publicly available  Proprietary databases Toolbox Links to External Databases (DSSTOX) Selecting type of extracting data: Measured Data Estimated Data Both Endpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Measured data summary of the Current Toolbox 1.Biodegradation DB – 745 chemicals 2.Genotox DB chemicals 3.ISSCAN Genotox – 873 chemicals 4.Skin sensitization DB chemicals 5.Estrogen RBA chemicals 6.Bioaccumulation DB – 700 chemicals 7.ECOTOX database – 5071 chemicals 8.ECETOC database – 777 chemicals

Estimated Data Summary of the Current Toolbox 1. Danish EPA DB - data for chemicals

Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap Report Finding Data for SIDS and Other Endpoints Selecting Data Base(s): Toolbox databases  Publicly available  Proprietary databases Toolbox Links to External Databases (DSSTOX) Selecting type of extracting data: Measured Data Estimated Data Both Endpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Categorization and QSAR Basic Concept Each QSAR estimate is a result of two predictions: Qualitative prediction of predominant interaction mechanisms and hazard identification (defined by category) Quantitative prediction of the intensity (potency) of the specific mechanisms of interaction (predicted by QSAR) Wrong selection of the mechanism could cause greater errors than the potency estimate by the QSAR model

Example: Phenols are polar narcotics, uncouplers or electrophilic chemicals. QSAR models for each mechanism have comparable uncertainty The potency of the electrophilic mechanism can be orders of magnitude greater than polar narcotics Wrong categorization of chemicals could cause significant errors in defining the potency Categorization and QSAR Basic Concept

The logic for selecting a specific model for a specific chemical (category) is the cornerstone of regulatory acceptance Categorization and QSAR Basic Concept OECD QSAR AD-Hoc group meeting,Madrid, April 2007

Forming and Pruning Categories: Predefined Mechanistic Empirical Custom Metabolism Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Forming and Pruning Categories: Predefined OECD categorization US EPA categorization Inventory affiliation Database affiliation Substance type Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Current categorization status of chemical inventories OECD CategoriesUS EPA Categories HPVCs 4843 substances

Forming and Pruning Categories: Predefined Mechanistic Acute Toxicity MOA Protein binding DNA binding Electron reach fragments (Superfragments) Cramer Classification Tree Veerhar/Hermens reactivity rules Lipinski rules Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Example Target chemical: hexanal Target endpoint: Acute Toxicity to Fish Monoaldehydes: Formation of Schiff bases with amino groups [1-4] Aldehydes having α,β-configuration with another π- bond: Michael-type addition at carbon-carbon double bond [3-5] Aldehydes having halogen atoms at β-position [3-5]: Nucleophilic substitution 1. Kamlet JJ, Doherty RM, Veith GD, Taft RW, Abraham MH Environ Sci Technol 20: Kamlet JJ, Doherty RM, Taft RW, Abraham MH, Veith GD, Abraham JD Environ Sci Technol 21: Lipnick, RL In Hermens JLM, Opperhuizer A, eds, QSAR in Environmental Toxicology – IV. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp Karabunarliev S, Mekenyan OG, Karcher W, Russom CL, Bradbury SP Quant Struct-Act Relat 15: Hermens, JLM Electrophiles and Acute Toxicity to Fish, Environ Health Perspec 87:

Logical sequence of components usage Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints US EPA Aldehydes Schiff – base formationMichael type addition Subcategory Mechanism US EPA Aldehydes acting by Schiff - base formation, only Existing categoryProtein – binding category

Forming and Pruning Categories: Predefined Mechanistic Empirical: Chemical elements Groups of elements Natural functional groups Structural similarity AIM (EPA/SRC) Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Forming and Pruning Categories: Predefined Mechanistic Empirical Custom: Mechanistic boundaries example (Shiff base but not Michael addition) Metabolism boundaries example (having specific fragment in parents and/or metabolites) Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Forming and Pruning Categories: Predefined Mechanistic Empirical Custom Metabolism Documented: microbial, liver Simulated: microbial, liver, GI tract, skin Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Use of Metabolism in Chemical Categories Identifying and pruning anomalous metabolism Subcategory formation based on common metabolites Category definition without metabolism Generate Metabolites Search for specific metabolites/pathways Revised Category pruning Logical sequence of components usage Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints

CAS # , Phenol,_2-ethoxy- US EPA Category: Phenols MW < 1000 log Kow < 7.4

………… Free radical protein adduct formation Michael-type nucleophilic addition Subcategory of phenols - binding with proteins after skin metabolism CAS # , Phenol,_2-ethoxy- US EPA Category: Phenols MW < 1000 log Kow < 7.4

Number of chemicals Nucleophilic substitution of haloalkanes Schiff base formation Nucleophilic substitution of cyclic dicarbonyls Michael-type nucleophilic addition Nucleophilic heterocycle ring opening Free radical protein adduct formation N-hydrohylamine condensation with proteins Nucleophilic addition to ketones Subcategory of phenols: - binding with proteins after skin metabolism 44 chemicals - not binding with proteins as parents or metabolites 83 chemicals Total number – 127 chemicals US EPA Category: Phenols MW < 1000 log Kow < 7.4

Number of chemicals Nucleophilic substitution of haloalkanes Schiff base formation Nucleophilic substitution of cyclic dicarbonyls Michael- type nucleophilic addition Nucleophilic heterocycle ring opening Free radical protein adduct formation N- hydrohylamine condensation with proteins Nucleophilic addition to ketones Subcategory of phenols: - binding with proteins after skin metabolism 44 chemicals - not binding with proteins as parents or metabolites 83 chemicals Total number – 127 chemicals US EPA Category: Phenols MW < 1000 log Kow < 7.4

Logical sequence of components usage Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Category formation … Defining New Categories – Category editor …

Defining New Categories: Setting boundaries: - Structural - Parametric - Mechanistic - Metabolic - Similarity Logical sequence of components usage Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints

Structural boundaries: - Presence of fragment - Absence of fragment Parametric boundaries: - MW < LogKow < 6.0 (for acute toxicity to fish and aquatic invertebrates) - LogKow < 6.4 (for toxicity to green algae) - LogKow < 8.0 (for chronic toxicity to aquatic organisms) Logical sequence of components usage Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints

Mechanistic boundaries: Logical sequence of components usage Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Yes Schiff base formation No Michael type addition No Nucleophilic substitution No Non – binding with proteins

Metabolic boundaries: OECD Category: Mono and Di – methyltins Representatives: CAS # ; CAS # ; CAS # ; CAS # ; CAS # ; CAS # ; CAS # Subcategory: Monomethyltin chloride and selected esters Logical sequence of components usage Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Common metabolite after gastric metabolism

Simulated gastric metabolism of MMT(2-EHMA)/(IOMA) R1 = CH(CH2CH3)CH2CH2CH2CH3 ………. MMT(2-EHMA) R2 = CH2CH2CH2CH2CH(CH3)CH3 MMT(IOMA) Common metabolite

Data gaps filling approaches Read-across Trend analysis QSAR models Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap Report Endpoints Logical sequence of components usage

Data gaps filling approaches Read-across Trend analysis QSAR models Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap Report Endpoints Logical sequence of components usage

TetrahymenaPyriformis LC50, 96 h Example Target chemical: hexanal Target endpoint: Acute Toxicity to Ciliate

Example Target chemical: hexanal Target endpoint: Acute Toxicity to Ciliate Subcategory: Based on Interaction Mechanism Aldehydes having α,β-configuration with another π-bond Michael-type addition at carbon-carbon double bond Monoaldehydes Formation of Schiff bases with amino groups

Example Target chemical: hexanal Target endpoint: Acute Toxicity to Ciliate Monoaldehydes Formation of Schiff bases with amino groups Subcategory: Based on Interaction Mechanism Target chemicals is interacting by Schiff base formation mechanism

Report the results: QMRF/QPRF IUCLID 5 Harmonized Templates SIDS Dossiers (Data matrix) History of the Toolbox Application User-Defined Reports Documentation: Description of the system Description of Category Editor Chemical input ProfilingCategory Definition Filling data gap ReportEndpoints Logical sequence of components usage