Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safe Driving Rules and Regulations
Advertisements

Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Chapter 5 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Negotiating Intersections
F IRST C APITAL E NGINEERING 48 S. Richland Ave. York PA | Phone: | Fax: | TRAFFIC REPORT Kingston Road &
By: Vanessa Victor Scott Yoshida Travis Hills Lucas Sprague.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
Rules of the Road. Introduction This training will assist Spanish- speaking Motor Carriers in understanding some of the important traffic regulations.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
SPEED LIMITS Joe Gorfida, Jr. Main Office: (214) Direct Dial: (214) TEXAS MUNICIPAL COURTS EDUCATION CENTER 2012 Municipal.
Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C & G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Chapter 4. NEVER drive faster than weather or road conditions allow Always slow down On narrow winding roads At intersections or railroad crossings On.
Chapter 4.
Freeway Signing Plan Design April 29, 2008
Chapter 5 Signs, Signals, and Markings
1 Channelization and Turn Bays. 2 Island Channelization flush, paved, and delineated with markings – or unpaved and delineated with pavement edge and.
EVALUATION OF “TARGETED PEDESTRIAN ENFORCEMENT” Philip M. Salzberg and John M. Moffat Washington Traffic Safety Commission Olympia WA
Pedestrian rights and responsibility (a) Upon the immediate approach of an authorized emergency vehicle making use of an audible signal meeting.
HOW CAN YOU COMMUNICATE YOUR VISIBILITY TO OTHER DRIVERS?
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David Rayburn.
Starting, Moving, and Stopping the Vehicle
Lec 25, Ch.7, pp : Intersection types and design principles (Objectives) Become familiar with the typical intersection types (See figures 7-1 thorugh.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Guidelines for Traffic Control at Surface Mines
VTA Light Rail System and Safety Enhancements MTC Railroad Crossing Seminar May, 21, 2008.
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
CHAPTER 3 SIGNS, SIGNALS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Signals,Road Markings, Intersections, Sharing the Road
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Signs, signals, and pavements markings
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Aren Cambre
Rules and Regulations for Safe Driving
Revisions There is a column with dates that the plans were revised in the bottom right corner of the title sheet.
SAFE DRIVING RULES AND REGUALTIONS
Safe Driving Rules & Regulations.  25 MPH = School zones, business or residential districts  35 MPH = Suburban business and residential districts 
1 At-Grade Intersection Design. 2 Objectives Define general intersection design objectives Describe factors that influence curb return design For a nice.
Signals,Road Markings, Intersections, Sharing the Road.
1 Urban Intersections Slides prepared by Dale S. Harrington, P.E.
Revisions to Chapter 2C – Warning Signs and Object Markers
Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C.
Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments Topic 1 -- Characteristics of Expressways Topic 2 (through Lesson 1)-- Entering, Changing Lanes, and.
 SIGN, SIGNALS, & ROADWAY MARKINGS Do Now - Create a list with as many different road signs you are able to think of. What does each sign tell you? Classify.
Intersections.
COUNTY ROAD 517 Improvements from State Highway 172 to Howe Drive DECEMBER 16, 2015 At Tribal Multipurpose Facility.
156 th Street Design in Bennington Public Open House Meeting October 28, 2009 City of Bennington, NE.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
ROADWAY MARKINGS A roadway marking gives a warning or direction. Roadway markings are usually lines, words, or symbols painted on the roadway. Some markings.
Intersection Control Chapter 8 Dr. TALEB AL-ROUSAN.
Edward L. Fischer P.E..  Ed, it was hard to read slides from back of room with this background.  Can I change it? Nancy Brickman.
What are the 2 ways to signal a turn?? 1.Blinker 2.Hand Signals ** Must signal 100 feet before turn!
Signal timing CTC-340. Key Elements Development of safe and effective phase plan and sequence Determination of vehicle signal needs –Timing of yellow.
2.2- Traffic Signals. Traffic Lights Green Light- GO – You can proceed only if the intersection is clear. When approaching a green light, check traffic.
Lesson Plan For Day Two Power point presentation 30 min Video– AAA- signs, signals, etc. 20 min Quiz- Signs Etc 10 min Correct 10 min H/O- Signs 10 min.
Intersections.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY PROBLEMS WITHIN ROAD TRANSPORT DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Nikolay Georgiev eng. Violina Velyova ‘Todor Kableshkov’ University.
Intersection Design Spring 2017.
Chapter 3 Regulatory, Warning & Guide Signs Overview
Chapter 3 Regulatory, Warning & Guide Signs Overview
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas
Chapter 3 Regulatory, Warning & Guide Signs Overview
WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE FOR PULLING TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD IN AN
Rules of the Road.
Midblock Crossings Lesson 12 Publication No. FHWA-HRT
ALABAMA COURSE OF STUDY #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 AND #7
Safety Audit Components
Traffic Study Presented by Keith Wenners, pe, ptoe
Presentation transcript:

Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C & G) FRONTING DEVELOPMENT SPEED CHECK (DATE/LOC) 2-YEAR ACCIDENT DATA THRU 7-07 COMMENTS TOTAL MIDBLOCK ACC: 2 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC EXISTING SPEED ZONE – 35 MPHPROPOSED SPEED ZONE – 35 MPH ACCIDENT RATE: 1.49 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILESDISTRICT 7 AVERAGE: 1.98 ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES NO. W/SPEEDING: 0 PREDOMINATE: Lost control HBD, DRUNK, H&R: 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 39 MPHCRITICAL SPEED: 43 MPH10 MILE PACE: MPH STREET: PVDE DATE: ENGINEER: JACK RYDELLSIGNATURE: LIMITS: Crest Rd - Miraleste Dr (SHEET 1 OF 2) MAP SYMBOLS S SCHOOL TRAFFIC SIGNAL R-1 STOP SIGNR1 40R-2 SPEED LIMIT CROSSING GUARD SCHOOL CROSSWALK CROSSWALK G S P PARK N n.t.s miles (7,700 ft) – 0.24 miles (1,300 ft) this sheet Flat and straight. No Stopping Any Time n/o Crest Rd on w/s. Two lanes in each direction separated by painted/raised center median. Frontage Road on the e/s s/o Calle Aventura. Fronting residential on w/s. Concrete curb and gutter on w/s. Concrete curb and gutter on e/s 100’ n/o Crest Rd changing to rolled asphalt. 50’ - 58’ 7,660 – 5/06 9/5/07 – 1,000 ft n/o Crest Rd (sheet 1 limits) (sheet 2 limits) PVDE R1 Calle Aventura Crest Rd San Ramon Dr Miraleste Dr Diamonte Ln Corsini Pl Via Frascati Via Colinita Via Subida R1 35 PVDE Diamonte Ln Via Frascati Via Subida R1 35 R1 La Vista Verde Dr Miraleste Pl R1 30 See Reverse Side Note: Speed limit signs shown are existing. They shall be modified as appropriate upon adoption of speed zone recommendations.

Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes STREET: PVDE Comments: This segment of roadway is generally characterized by one travel lane in each direction with substantial fronting single-family residential development and numerous sharp horizontal curves. In addition to driveway access, there are also several intersecting roadways, both public and private. It has been evaluated in two parts to acknowledge the distinctly different roadway characteristics on the short southern portion, between Crest Road and Calle Aventura, which is detailed on this sheet (sheet 1 of 2). This portion has two lanes in each direction, which is different from the rest of Palos Verdes Drive East. These additional travel lanes result in some motorists driving in a manner that can be unexpected to other motorists and in a manner that would be inappropriate for other portions of Palos Verdes Drive East. The southern portion constitutes only 0.24 miles of the segment’s 1.45 miles total length. The northern portion is 1.21 miles long and is detailed on sheet 2 of 2. The California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which is authorized by the California Vehicle Code (CVC) as the legal procedure for establishing speed zones, states that speed zones should not be less than 0.5 miles in length (see pages 2B-8 and 2B-10). Therefore, shorter portions must be combined into longer segments. The southern portion (sheet 1 of 2) has insufficient length to support a separate speed zone based on MUTCD procedures. In addition to the above MUTCD requirement, short speed zones are not appropriate due to their adverse effect on traffic safety by: Increasing motorist confusion and potentially unexpected driver behavior due to changing traffic regulations; Hampering enforcement efforts by issues associated with speed limit boundaries; and, Increasing the potential for motorists to drive at different speeds, which increases conflict and accident potential. One radar speed measurement was taken for this portion of the segment, with the 85 th percentile speed suggesting that a speed zone of 45 mph would be appropriate and the potential application of an additional 5 mph reduction from the 85 th percentile speed. However as detailed above, the extremely short length of this portion does not allow a separate speed zone from the adjacent segments. The segment to the south (from Crest Road southerly) is recommended at 35 mph, and the portion of this segment to the north, beginning at Calle Aventura and continuing to Miraleste Drive (comprising 83% of the total segment length) is also recommended for 35 mph. Based on the procedures found in the MUTCD and the other factors identified above, it is inappropriate for this short stretch of roadway to have a separate speed zone from the adjacent segments. Therefore it should be combined with the portion to the north, creating a 35 mph speed zone between Crest Road and Miraleste Drive. This would result in a continuous 35 mph speed zone between the switchbacks (2,900 feet north of Palos Verdes Drive South) and Miraleste Drive. PROPOSED SPEED ZONE – 35 MPH LIMITS: Crest Rd - Miraleste Dr (SHEET 1 OF 2)