LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Visible and Invisible Higgs Decays at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
Track Timing at e + e - Linear Collider with the Silicon Drift Detector Main Tracker R. Bellwied, D. Cinabro, V. L. Rykov Wayne State University Detroit,
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
1 Physics Impact of Detector Performance Tim Barklow SLAC March 18, 2005.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Linear Collider Physics School 2009 – CLIC Detector Michael Hauschild - CERN, 22-Aug-2009, page 1 CLIC Detector (What is the difference between an ILC.
Higgs self-coupling studies at CLIC (preliminary) Tomáš Laštovička (IoP AC, Prague) Jan Strube (CERN, Geneva) LCWS2012, Arlington, TX October 22-26, 2012.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
Determination of Heavy Smuon and Selectron Mass at CLIC Outline Physics motivation Mass measurement methods (Energy scan, End Point) Energy spread, ISR.
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge  LoI loose ends  New physics studies?  What next... Future Plans… This talk:
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
1http:// 22/4/2010 Introduction WG4 Outline: Mandate of the WG Timescale How to proceed? Vertex detector requirements Collecting input on.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Vienna Fast Simulation LDT Munich, Germany, 17 March 2008 M. Regler, M. Valentan Demonstration and optimization studies by the Vienna Fast Simulation Tool.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Performance and occupancies in a CCD vertex detector with endcaps Toshinori Abe and John Jaros 04/21/04.
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
May 31th, 2007 LCWS C. Gatto 1 Tracking Studies in the 4 th Concept On behalf of 4th Concept Software Group D. Barbareschi V. Di Benedetto E. Cavallo.
Update on CLIC_ILD detector studies necessarily incomplete, but attempting to give you a “glimpse” presented by K. Elsener (CERN), for the CLIC detector.
T RACKING E FFICIENCY FOR & CALORIMETER S EED TRACKING FOR THE CLIC S I D Pooja Saxena, Ph.D. Student Center of Detector & Related Software Technology.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Roberto Barbera (Alberto Pulvirenti) University of Catania and INFN ACAT 2003 – Tsukuba – Combined tracking in the ALICE detector.
Benchmarking Tracking & Vertexing Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford) SiD Tracking Meeting, 7 December 2007.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
1http:// Lucie Linssen LCWS /3/2010 SiD and CLIC Outline: Adaptation of SiD detector for CLIC Use of SiD software for CLIC Tracking.
 Background at CLIC and Requirements on Time Stamping Marco Battaglia UC Berkeley, LBNL and CERN Jean Jacques Blaising LAPP, Annecy and contributions.
Dominik Dannheim (CERN), André Sailer (HU Berlin / CERN) Beam-induced backgrounds in the CLIC detector models ALCPG Workshop March 2011 Eugene,
Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade Ivanka Bozovic-Jelisavcic, Strahinja Lukic, Mila Pandurovic Branching ratio.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge Detectors for a Multi-TeV Collider: “what can be learnt from the ILC” ALCPG Meeting, Albuquerque, 29/9/2009.
Palaiseau, 13/1/ 2005 P. Colas - Optimising tracking 1 Optimising a Detector from the Tracking Point-of-View P.Colas, CEA Saclay constraints role Optimisation.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Tracking: An Experimental Overview Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 0 Recent results on vertex charge reconstruction Sonja Hillert.
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Studies for Phase-II Muon Detector (|η| = ) – Plans
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
CLIC detector at SiD meeting 28/3/2010
Starting up the CLIC detector design study CLIC Workshop, 15. Okt 2008
Detectors for Linear Colliders - ILC and CLIC -
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
Presentation transcript:

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H + H –  tbbt + background E cm = 3 TeV --

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 2 Momentum Resolution Requirements I Same as at ILC  momentum resolution dictated by Higgs mass determination from Higgsstrahlung process e + e –  Zh  mass reconstruction from system recoiling against Z  μ + μ − CLIC challenges  higher E CM = higher track momenta o more stringent requirements as at ILC Required momentum resolution σ pT /p T 2 ≈ 2 · 10 −5 GeV −1  recoil mass spectrum significantly broader if momentum resolution > 2 · 10 −5 GeV −1 o beamstrahlung spread dominates at ~2 · 10 −5 GeV −1 E cm = 500 GeV, m H = 120 GeV

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 3 Momentum Resolution Requirements II Determination of smuon and neutralino masses  from muon momentum distribution in e + e −  μμ  μ + μ − Χ 1 Χ 1  significant deterioration of high end mass spectrum if resolution > 4 · 10 −5 GeV −1 ~~ ~ 0

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 4 Time Stamping Requirements CLIC bunch crossing rate is 0.5 ns  need “time-stamping”: identification of tracks from individual BX o overlay of physics events with background from γγ  hadrons (3.2 events per BX) o time stamping of each individual BX would be extremely challenging (rather impossible)  physics performance not significantly degraded if time stamping accuracy is ~ 5 – 10 BX e + e –  H 0 A 0  bbbb --

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 5 CLIC Detector Study + CDR Early CLIC Detector Study finished in 2004  very basic detector studies only (Toy MC)  not much progress until ~2008 Study relaunched in 2009 for a CLIC-CDR in December 2011  starting point: use existing ILD and SiD detector concepts + software  modify where needed and create “CLIC flavours” of both ILC detectors o “ILD-like 3 TeV = CLIC_ILD o “SiD-like 3 TeV = CLIC_SiD CLIC detector ≈ “90% ILC detector” + “10% CLIC specifics”  CLIC is profiting a lot from ongoing ILC detector R&D and design studies  but ILC also profits from CLIC studies o CLIC detector = “extreme” ILC detector  win – win situation for both communities o e.g. common work on Particle Flow Algorithms o W-HCAL, TPC simulation, engineering studies (push – pull)

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 6 CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD tracking systems Main tracking detectors identical to ILD (TPC) / SiD (5-layer Si) Main modification w.r.t. ILC in vertex detectors  vertex detector + beam pipe at larger radius to account for increased backgrounds  barrel vertex detector moved out by factor ~2 in inner radius o CLIC_ILD: 31 mm o CLIC_SiD: 27 mm CLIC_SiDCLIC_ILD

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 7 Tracking Algorithms CLIC_ILD: 3 step tracking algorithm  pattern recognition + track fitting separately in TPC and Si detectors o tracks curling in TPC for p T < 1.2 GeV = many not connected low p T helix segments in standalone TPC tracking  execute FullLDC tracking o combines track segments from both TPC + Si and refit combined track o helix segments combined to a single track CLIC_SiD  SeedTracker algorithm in org.lcsim o finding track seeds = looking for combinations of at least three hits that fulfill a helix fit o track seeds extended by successively adding more hits  vertex constraint to reduce number of possible combinations o ±5 mm in r ϕ, ±10 mm in z (loose enough to find tracks from displaced vertices)

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 8 Tracking Efficiency (single muons) CLIC_SiD  single muon tracking efficiency close to 100% for p T > 0.3 GeV o slight drop for small polar angles step drop for Θ < 7 o (less than 7 Si hits) o drop by 2% at transition region barrel – endcap around 30 o Very similar picture for CLIC_ILD o flat distribution, no drop in transition region CLIC_SiD

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 9 Tracking Efficiency (tt events) CLIC_ILD tracking efficiency still ~99% for p T > 2 GeV o > 97% for p T > 0.4 GeV  some drop for high momenta around 100 GeV (further studies needed) No effect for p T > 1 GeV when adding background  background from γγ  hadrons, 3.2 events per BX, 60 BX overlayed - CLIC_ILD

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 10 Tracking Efficiency (di-jets from Z’ decays) Di-jets from Z’ (m Z’ = 3 TeV)  qq (q = u,d,s) even more challenging than tt events o 2 very narrow jets with high p T tracks, challenging for pattern recognition  drop of efficiency (CLIC_SiD) at high p T due to high occupancy o interesting effect: background (γγ  hadrons) helps for low p T tracks adding random background hits increases overall number of hits per track (tracks w/o background hits might fail minimum number of hits cut) - – CLIC_SiD

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 11 Fake Rate (di-jets from Z’ decays) CLIC_SiD track quality cut  track must have > 75% of correctly assigned hits (otherwise “fake”) o only 1 wrongly assigned hit for tracks with 6 or 7 hits Only few percent of tracks have > 1 wrongly assigned hit  higher fake rate (~10%) for high p T tracks (more likely in center of jet)  fake rate lower in forward region (more pixelated detectors) CLIC_SiD

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 12 Fraction of Badly Rec. Tracks (tt events) - CLIC_ILD track quality cut  track must have > 96% of correctly assigned hits o no effects on resolution etc. if no more than 4% wrongly assigned hits 1 – 3% fraction of badly reconstructed tracks for p T < 25 GeV  raising to 10% for higher p T  no effect of background (γγ  hadrons) for p T > 1 GeV CLIC_ILD

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 13 Momentum Resolution (Single Muons) Momentum resolution parameterized a = contribution from curvature measurement b = multiple scattering contribution CLIC_SiD CLIC_SiD (single muons) Δp T = p T,MC – p T,rec. requirement of σ pT /p T 2 < 2 · 10 −5 GeV −1 fulfilled

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 14 Momentum Resolution (Single μ + tt events) Momentum requirement of < 2 * GeV -1 also fulfilled in CLIC_ILD  both for single muons and in tt events - CLIC_ILD tt events - single muons

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 15 Time Stamping in CLIC_ILD TPC does not provide direct time stamping information  z coordinate reconstruction requires BX time information o z TPC = (t drift + Δt BX · BX) v drift TPC information can be combined with information from the outer silicon envelope SET  SET gives z coordinate (50 μm resolution), no timing information needed from SET o low occupancy of SET o matching is mostly unambiguous Time stamping accuracy 2.8 BX  90% of tracks can be correctly reconstructed within ±5 BX BX MC – BX rec.

LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 16 Conclusions Requirements from physics performance o momentum resolution: σ pT /p T 2 ≈ 2 · 10 −5 GeV −1 o time stamping accuracy: 5 – 10 BX (2.5 – 5 ns) CLIC tracking systems adapted from ILD and SiD o main tracker unchanged o inner radius of vertex detector further moved out (~2 x larger inner radius w.r.t. ILC) Tracking efficiency  97 – 99% for tracks in tt events (CLIC_ILD) or di-jets (CLIC_SiD) from 2 – 20 GeV o slight drop at higher momenta (needs further study) o no degradation by background for p T > 2 GeV  fake rate at percent level Momentum resolution ≤ 2 · 10 −5 GeV −1 fulfilled for both CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD  time Stamping capabilities for CLIC_ILD demonstrated