Caren Hagner – 15.5.2012 LENA: Low Energy Neutrino Astronomy The LAGUNA Liquid Scintillator Detector Caren Hagner (Hamburg University) for the LAGUNA-LENA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

R&D on Liquid-Scintillator Detectors R&D and Astroparticle Physics Lisbon, January 8th 2008 Michael Wurm Technische Universität München.
LENA Scintillator Characterization Transregio 27 SFB-Tage in Heidelberg 9/10. Juli 2009 Michael Wurm.
New Large* Neutrino Detectors
Sensitivity of the DANSS detector to short range neutrino oscillations
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
suekane 05 Erice School1 KamLAND F.Suekane Research Center for Neutrino Science Tohoku University Erice School
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 2 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
Liquid Scintillation Detectors for High Energy Neutrinos John G. Learned Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii See: arXiv:
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
Lens ALens B Avg. Angular Resolution Best Angular Resolution (deg) Worst Angular Resolution (deg) Image Surface Area (mm 2 )
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
LENA Low Energy Neutrino Astrophysics L. Oberauer, Technische Universität München LENA Delta EL SUD Meeting.
Physics Potential of the LENA Detector Epiphany Conference Cracow January 8, 2010 Michael Wurm Technische Universität München.
PINGU – An IceCube extension for low-energy neutrinos Uli Katz on behalf of the PINGU Collaboration European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation.
1 LENA Low Energy Neutrino Astronomy NOW 2010, September 6, 2010 Lothar Oberauer, TUM, Physik-Department.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
Simulation study of RENO-50 Jungsic Park Seoul National University RENO-50 International Workshop June 13-14, 2013 Hoam Faculty House, Korea.
Lino MiramontiJune 9-14, 2003, Nara Japan 1st Yamada Symposium Neutrinos and Dark Matter in Nuclear Physics.
2004/Dec/12 Low Radioactivity in CANDLES T. Kishimoto Osaka Univ.
LAGUNA Large Apparatus for Grand Unification and Neutrino Astrophysics Launch meeting, Heidelberg, March 2007, Lothar Oberauer, TUM.
A VLBL experiment to Measure CP, sin 2 2  13 and  m 2 23 sign Yifang Wang.
SNS2 Workshop August 28-29, 2003 Richard Talaga, Argonne1 Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector Outline –OMNIS Experiment and Detectors.
LSc development for Solar und Supernova Neutrino detection 17 th Lomonosov conference, Moscow, August 2015 L. Oberauer, TUM.
J.T. White Texas A&M University SIGN (Scintillation and Ionization in Gaseous Neon) A High-Pressure, Room- Temperature, Gaseous-Neon-Based Underground.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Application of neutrino spectrometry
Hyper-Kamiokande project and R&D status Hyper-K project Motivation Detector Physics potential study photo-sensor development Summary Kamioka.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
1 水质契仑科夫探测器中的中子识别 张海兵 清华大学 , 南京 First Study of Neutron Tagging with a Water Cherenkov Detector.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
Neutrinos from the sun, earth and SN’s: a brief excursion Aldo IFAE 2006 Pavia April 19 th.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Detection of the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background in LENA & Study of Scintillator Properties Michael Wurm DPG Spring Meeting, E15.
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.
1/27/2016Katsushi Arisaka 1 University of California, Los Angeles Department of Physics and Astronomy Katsushi Arisaka XAX 10.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Liquid Scintillator Detector Lena Low Energy Neutrino Astronomy L. Oberauer, TUM.
LSc experiment set-up and research results LAGUNA 2014 Hanasaari, August 25, 2014 Wladyslaw H. Trzaska.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Detector R&D for European projects Liquid Scintillator: LENA ICFA Neutrino European Meeting Paris, January 8 – 10, 2014 Wladyslaw H. Trzaska.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Fast neutron flux measurement in CJPL
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Muon and Neutron detector of KIMS experiment
XAX Can DM and DBD detectors combined?
Search for sterile neutrinos with SOX: Monte Carlo studies of the experiment sensitivity Davide Basilico 1st year Workshop – 11/10/17 Tutors: Dott. Barbara.
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
Presentation transcript:

Caren Hagner – LENA: Low Energy Neutrino Astronomy The LAGUNA Liquid Scintillator Detector Caren Hagner (Hamburg University) for the LAGUNA-LENA working group See also Posters:  LENA as Far Detector for Beam Neutrinos (Kai Loo)  LENA Low Energy neutrino physics (Michael Wurm)  Neutrino Oscillometry with LENA (Yuri Novikov and W. Trzaska)  LENA Detector Design (Daniel Bick)

Caren Hagner – Physics Options at Low Energies Neutrino Sources  Galactic Supernova neutrinos 10 4 /SN  Diffuse Supernova neutrinos 10/yr  Solar neutrinos 10 4 /d  Geoneutrinos 10 3 /yr  Reactor neutrinos /yr  Neutrino oscillometry 10 4 /Mci  Pion decay-at-rest beam  Indirect dark matter search Substantial progress with event reconstruction at few 100MeV – few GeV:  Long Baseline Neutrino Observation possible → mass hierarchie Low energy threshold, Radiopurity

Caren Hagner – LENA Whitepaper just published Astroparticle Physics 35 (2012)

Caren Hagner – LENA Detector Design (Pyhäsalmi Option) Liquid Scintillator Active Mass = 50.8kt of LAB Concrete Tank (+Steel Sheets) r = 16m, h = 100m Wall Thickness = 60cm Total Mass = 69.1kt of LAB PMT Support Structure Inner face at r = 14m, h = 96m about 30,000 12‘‘-PMTs with Winston cones optical coverage: 30% Electronics Hall dome of 15m height Top Muon Veto vertical muon tracking Water Cherenkov Veto ´´PMTs, D min > 2m fast neutron shield inclined muons Egg-Shaped Cavern about m 3 Rock Overburden 4000 mwe Detector Lifetime foreseen: > 30 years

Caren Hagner – Cylindrical Tank in Egg-shaped Cavern D cl = 71.2mD cs = 44.6m

Caren Hagner – Choice of the Liquid Scintillator Properties of LAB Chemical data Chemical formula Molecular weight Density Viscosity Flash Point C 18 H kg/l 4.2 cps 140 °C HMIS ratings Health Flammability Reactivity Optical parameters Index of refraction Attenuation length Absorption length Abs.-reemission length Rayleigh scattering length 1.49 ~15 m 40 m 60 m 40 m LAB (linear-alkyl-benzene) as solvent + 3g/l PPO (2,5-diphenyl-oxazole) + 20 mg/l Bis-MSB (1,4-bis-(o-methyl-styryl)-benzene) add solutes: non-radiative 280nm non-radiative 390nm Light emission 430nm, τ < 5ns (see Whitepaper for discussion of other options PXE, DIN,…)

Caren Hagner – PMTs and Optical Modules Properties12’’ PMT OM front diameter OM aperture OM length PMT length Light cone length Weight 450 mm 410 mm 700 mm 330 mm 320 mm 30 kg Maximum current HV requirement Power per OM mA 2.0 kV 0.25 W Effective optical coverage required: 30% (Winston cones increase effective area by factor 1.85) Encapsulation:  Protect against cleaning water  Protect against pressure (13bar)  Protect against gamma rays from its own material

Caren Hagner – Read-out electronics Requirements Possible Layout  Large dynamic range: single pe  >100 pe  Time resolution: at 1ns level, e.g. for proton decay  High trigger rates: >1kHz for SN detection  Complete PMT pulse shapes (?) multi-particle tracking DAQ Racks: FADCs bundled cables Software trigger PMT preamp HV-gener. scaffolding cable feed- throughs

Caren Hagner – Vertex Reconstruction (E v < 10MeV) Events with E vis < 10 MeV: point-like in space and time Described by 5 coordinates: x,y,z, t 0, E vis Fit (neg. log likelihood) to:  hit times of first photons  #photons detected on each PMT (N pe = 220 at 1 MeV) Difference True – Reconstructed Position 1MeV Difference True – Reconstructed Energy 1MeV

Caren Hagner – Multi-flavor detection of SN neutrinos Event rates for “standard“ SN of 8M , =14MeV at galactic center: ~ 10 4 e inverse beta decay a few 10 3  p-scattering, 12 C a few 10 2 e e-scattering, 12 C _ Astrophysics  observe initial neutronization burst  time-resolved cooling phase  observe explosion shock-wave  trigger for grav. waves, SNEWS Neutrino physics  mass hierarchy  Earth and SN matter effects  collective oscillations (low threshold and good  E/E)  e  e conversion in NB  more exotic phenomena _ Kate Scholberg, TAUP2011 Golden Channel: Inverse Beta Decay Observation of v µ,τ

Caren Hagner – Expected rate: 2-20 e /(50 kt yrs) (in energy window from 10-25MeV) (First) Detection of DSNB flux Isotropic flux of all SN ‘s emitted in the history of the Universe. Faint signal:  ≈ 10 2 /cm 2 s Detection of e by inverse  decay Remaining background sources  reactor and atmospheric e ‘s  cosmogenic backgrounds Scientific gain  first detection of DSNB  information on average SN spectrum _ _ _

Caren Hagner – DSNB Flux at LENA DSNB Signal Spectra in LENA: Assumed total energy 0.5 x erg Maxwell-Boltzmann (MB) emission spectra

Caren Hagner – Geo-Neutrinos: The Earth heat flow problem Surface measurement: thermal power = 47 ± 2 TW Models: heat from radioactive decays of U, Th, K = TW. Is there a difference? And what accounts for the deficit? _

Caren Hagner – Geo-Neutrinos in LENA IBD threshold of 1.8 MeV e from U/Th decay chains At Pyhäsalmi  expected geo- rate:2x10 3  reactor- background:7X10 2 What can we learn?  contribution of U/Th decays to Earth‘s total heat flow  1%  relative ratio of U/Th  5%  with several detectors at different sites: disentangle oceanic/continental crust  test for hypothetical georeactor _ U U+Th reactor bg

Caren Hagner – Neutrino oscillometry Concept: Short-baseline oscillation experiments using neutrinos from radioactive sources. Radioactive neutrino sources  e (monoenergetic) from EC sources: 51 Cr, 37 Ar  e (E= MeV) from 90 Sr ( 90 Y)  large activity necessary: 1MCi or more Oscillation baseline  for  m 2 32 (  13 ): 750m for 51 Cr (747keV)  for  m 2 41 (sterile): 1.3m Scientific objectives  check P ee (r)  check CPT for and  very sensitive in sterile searches (sin 2 2  ≈ ) _ _

Caren Hagner – „high energy“ event reconstruction (sub-GeV, GeV) Track length in Liquid Scintillator: few 10cm – few m Reconstruct track direction using time information of light front (Borexino: angular resolution of 3 o for muons crossing scintillator volume)

Caren Hagner – Tracking in the sub-GeV range Use patterns of first photon arrival times + integrated charge per PMT Charge seen by each PMT Time of first photon (time of flight corrected) Example: 500 MeV muon

Caren Hagner – MeV muons created in the center of the detector, horizontal direction Reconstruction of starting point: DirectionEnergy

Caren Hagner – Tracking in the 1-5 GeV range Work in progress: Use individual pulse shapes from each PMT Example: Backtracking method

Caren Hagner – LENA as Far Detector for Neutrino Beam Cern - Pyhäsalmi Cern - Frejus

Caren Hagner – Background from NC events   + (44%) → looking for µ +, tagging efficiency 86%   0, but no  + (32%) → multivariate analysis (boosted decision trees)  e ±, ,  0,± or heavier, but not  0,+ (1.7%)  Pure   (7%) → pulse shape  p, n (15%) → pulse shape Recognition of NC background is a challenge v + X → v + X * + other particles Conservative assumption (for electrons): NC 11%, CC 27% More optimistic (for electrons): NC 10%, CC 50%

Caren Hagner – CP Violation (Cern – Pyhäsalmi) 50kt 10 years running Energy resolution 5% mass density along beamline: error ≈ 1%

Caren Hagner – Mass Hierarchy (Cern – Pyhäsalmi) 50kt 10 years running Energy resolution 5% mass density along beamline: error ≈ 1%

Caren Hagner – Summary LAGUNA/Liquid Scintillator (LENA) optimized for Neutrino Detection in the MeV energy range Extremely rich physics program includes Supernova Neutrinos, Solar Neutrinos, Geo Neutrinos, Reactor Neutrinos, Neutrino Oscillometry, Indirect Dark Matter Searches, Proton Decay. Significant progress with tracking in the GeV energy range. Work on neutral current background is ongoing. LENA as far detector in a neutrino beam (Cern-Pyhäsalmi) has potential to discover mass hierarchy at 5 σ.