 Effective Use of Incentives and Sanctions in Juvenile Drug Court Jacqueline van Wormer, Ph.D. Washington State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Conceptual Feedback Threading Staff Development. Goals of Presentation What is Conceptualized Feedback? How is it used to thread the development of staff?
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
JACQUELINE VAN WORMER, PH.D. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY NCJFCJ Using Science to Guide Incentives and Sanctions in your JDC.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
1 Juvenile Drug Court Dependency Drug Court Family Drug Court Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Juvenile Treatment Court.
1 Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Judge.
Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
1 WIA YOUTH PROGRAM Case Management. 2 ò Case management is a youth-centered, goal- oriented process for assessing needs of youth for particular services.
Family Dependency Treatment Court An Introduction.
The Honorable John R. Roach, Jr. 296 th Judicial District Court Alyse Ferguson, Esq. Attorney Director, MHMC Program.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Recreational Therapy: An Introduction
 Juvenile Drug Courts (Part II): Incentives and Sanctions Sandra J. Altshuler, Ph.D., L.I.C.S.W. Spokane County Behavioral Health Therapeutic Courts With.
Debra J. Rose, Ph.D. Co-Director, Fall Prevention Center of Excellence California State University, Fullerton Evidence-Based Multifactorial.
Introduction to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Positive Behavior Support in Juvenile Facilities: Webinar Mary Magee Quinn, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist American Institutes for Research.
The Center for Prevention & Early Intervention Director, Nick Ialongo, Ph.D. Co-Director, Phil Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School Of Public Health.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Proactive Strategies for Prevention and Intervention.
Community Corrections Campus
ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH Children’s Behavioral Health.
PATHS ® PROMOTING ALTERNATIVE THINKING STRATEGIES Insert Agency Logo Here Saving $$ for Our Community: Helping Children & Schools.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
ACE Personal Trainer Manual 5th Edition
NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 Ray Wahl Deputy State Court Administrator.
Nevada Counselor / Psychologist Survey Data Prepared for the Legislative Committee on Education July, By Marina McHatton CTE Counseling and Assessments,
MPER-CAMHPS School Mental Health Leadership Academy Session II January 15, 2008.
SMART Goals: Writing Attendance Goals. Learning Outcomes Learners will: Create specific, measurable goals related to attendance Understand the process.
Chapter 12 Token Economies. Token Economies token economies are reinforcement systems that employ a monetary system(token reinforcers) and backup reinforcers.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Learning to lead a drug-free life style for the chronically addicted often involves repeated relapses and related frustrations before drug-free behavior.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Continuous Quality Improvement for CBT Groups Jennifer Lux, M.A. Research Associate, Corrections Institute Center for Criminal Justice Research University.
Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.
 Juvenile Drug Courts (Part I): Creating a Phase Structure that Makes Sense for Youth and Families Sandra J. Altshuler, Ph.D., L.I.C.S.W. Spokane County.
Managing Participant Behavior in Treatment Courts: Maximizing the available tools Cary Heck, Ph.D. University of Wyoming and Denver District Adult Drug.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Adult Drug Courts: The Effect of Structural Differences on Program Retention Rates Natasha Williams, Ph.D., J.D., MPH Post Doctoral Fellow, Morgan State.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Are Incentives Effective in Improving Participation and Outcomes in Treatment for Substance-Abusing Offenders? Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Elizabeth.
Sanctions and Incentives Length of time is important: The longer a patient stays in treatment, the better they do. Coerced patients tended to stay longer.
1 Helping Foster Parents & Child Care Workers Prevent and Reduce Adolescent Violence.
Intensive Supervision Probation (or Parole) Initial Rise to Prominence Research on First Gen ISP Programs Finding Something Useful in ISP.
8/21/2015 Scott Ronan Idaho Supreme Court Senior Manager, Problem-Solving Courts and Sentencing Alternatives.
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
Tailoring Your Juvenile Drug Court Program to the Brain Development of Participants Michigan Association of Drug Court Professionals: 15 th Annual Conference.
Virginia WebEx Program Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Performance Plan Meeting Attendance Child Study: Full Time Staff (>30 hours/week) are expected to attend 85% of Child Study meetings. Part.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
ACT Enhanced Parenting Intervention to Promote At-Risk Adolescents’ School Engagement Larry Dumka, Ph.D. Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics ARIZONA.
JOT2 – LEARNING THEORIES
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Check In Check Out Technical Assistance. Think and Respond  Where are you at with your development and implementation of CICO?
Tamara Layne MS, OTR/L Integrated Services Coordinator COMMUNITY ACCESS TO RECOVERY SERVICES (CARS) BRANCH 1.
Evidenced Based Protocols for Adult Drug Courts Jacqueline van Wormer, PhD Washington State University NADCP/NDCI.
Response to Intervention Presented by Valerie Mendez-Farinas.
For Parents and Teachers of Children with ADHD.   Most approaches to psychosocial intervention for children with ADHD focus on either the family or.
Educational Technology and Science Teaching. Reading Assignment Chapter 13 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
U SING I NCENTIVES TO M OTIVATE Y OUTH IN THE J USTICE S YSTEM CJJ 2016 Conference April 22, 2016 Martha-Elin Blomquist, Ph.D. NJCFCJ, Reno NV Lindsey.
Roles in JDTC Discipline Specific Breakout Session.
Joleen Joiner CJ420 Lisa Hancock September 5, 2010.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Presentation transcript:

 Effective Use of Incentives and Sanctions in Juvenile Drug Court Jacqueline van Wormer, Ph.D. Washington State University

This I Believe I believe juvenile drug court teams and professionals are strengthened, enlightened, and reinvigorated when I provide valuable training, technical assistance, and resources, which improves their knowledge level and adherence to the preferred model, which, in turn, may increase positive outcomes for youth and families in their community.

Learning Objectives  Participants will review and discuss proper phase structuring for adolescents – and why this matters in the proper use of incentives and sanctions.  Participants will learn about what DOES and what DOES work to promote positive behavior change in youth.  Participants will learn about contingency management for adolescent’s substance abuse and use.  Participants will learn how about contingency management theories and they work in juvenile drug courts.  Participants will learn how to develop behavior and activity contracts.

Are juvenile drug courts effective? 4 Yes! But not always…. Depends on how (and if) they implement the model

Are juvenile drug courts effective?  Early research:  Small samples and poor designs.  Negative effects found by Hartmann & Rhineberger (2003);  No effects on recidivism found by Wright and Clymer (2001); Anspach et al., (2003)  Positive Findings:  Lutze & Mason (2007); Latessa et al (2002), Rodriguez & Webb (2004), Shaffer et al., (2008) Hickert (2010), Hennegeler (2006, 2012), NPC Research (2006, 2010)  Latessa report (2013)  Meta-Analysis:  Null-findings for both Wilson et al (2006); Shaffer (2006)  Small effect size – Mitchell et al (2012)

Taking a Closer Look CCBCHCSMCAA Savings$9,070$8,762$5,702$2, Court Sessions 357/29407/26283/12341/13315/40 2 weeks 3 weeks4 weeksweekly Drug Tests Self pay Family Counseling Yes No Self pay ParentingYesNo Treatment Youth and parent Youth Gender Specific + MH Youth + MH YouthSelf pay

 Part I Building a Responsive Phase Structure

Can We Strengthen Our Court Sessions to Bring About Stronger Behavior Change?  What is the purpose of using sanctions in your JDC?  What is the purpose of using incentives in your JDC?  What do youth behaviors look like during phase one?  How do you want them to look by phase four?

Frustrating Behaviors

It begins with the phase structure Phase One Phase Two Phase Three Phase requirements for youth and family should start out small, increase, and then decrease again after the youth work through treatment and court related goals.

Phase I: setting the stage Phase II: learning skills Phase III: maintaining the change Readiness and engagementInvolvement, stabilizationReflection, enrichment Focus on complianceBeyond complianceMaintain drug testing, court appearance High level of structureSkill developmentExpanded development activities Clarifying expectations, building trust Completing assignmentsEnriching community connections Phase Structure Source: Betty Gurnell

The Four Steps  Behavior to target  Current behavior  Desired behavior  Small, achievable increments

Decision Matrix – Phase I Phase I IncentivesSanctions Behavior*ResponseResponse Attend school at least 18 out of 20 days Teacher signs attendance card each day present and acknowledges Small prize or coupon for each week with no absences After school study hall for each day absent over the limit to make up all missed work

Decision Matrix – Phase II Phase II IncentivesSanctions Behavior *Response Attend regularly Complete all assignments Select a book, notebook, pen after two weeks of success Praise from teacher, family, court Grades improve After school study hall to complete assignments (with help as needed)

Decision Matrix – Phase III Phase III IncentivesSanctions Behavior *Response Attend regularly Complete all assignments Improve grades Praise from teacher, family, court for improvement Certificate of achievement Select school related gift: tuition, book Determine if tutor is needed Attend extra class or session for help Tighten curfew

7 (Easy) Steps to Individualizing Your Juvenile Drug Court Start with… 1. Screening and assessment And 2. Use the results to drive case planning So we can… 3. Emphasize individualized responses over generic, pre- determined requirements Which should help us… 4. Work with youth and families to inform the process And 5. Focus on strengths And 6. Create lasting educational linkages And 7. Develop individualized incentives and sanctions

 Part II Incentives and Sanctions

Goal-Oriented Incentives and Sanctions  Strategy Fifteen: “Respond to compliance and noncompliance with incentives and sanctions that are designed to reinforce or modify the behavior of youth and their families”  Research:  Gendreau (1999)  NPC (2006, 2010)  Henggeler et al., (2006, 2012 (a) (b))  Salvatore et al., (2010)

Why We Want to Use Alternatives Probation/court monitoring, group homes, and correctional facilities have, at best, only modest favorable effects on subsequent recidivism. Some studies show negative effects (Lipsey and Cullen, 2007; Petrosino, Turpin-Petrosino, and Guckenburg, 2010).

Why We Want to Use Alternatives Deterrence-oriented programs that focus on discipline, surveillance, or threat of punitive consequences (e.g., prison visitation Scared Straight–type programs, boot camps, and intensive probation supervision) have no effect on recidivism and may actually increase it (Lipsey, 2009).

Because… “Therapeutic” programs oriented toward facilitating constructive behavior change have shown very positive effects—even for serious offenders (Lipsey, 2009; Lipsey and Cullen, 2007; Lipsey and Wilson, 1998).

Reasons Why JDCs Should Implement CM  Theories are based on cognitive behavioral therapy, which has been proven to work with adolescents, and is vastly used in outpatient settings  It can be easily adapted within the JDC  In their study of six juvenile drug courts, Henggeler et al (2006) found stronger outcomes for those youth who received MST AND CM then standard process

Can We Strengthen Our Court Sessions to Bring About Stronger Behavior Change?  What is the purpose of using sanctions in your JDC?  What is the purpose of using incentives in your JDC?  What do youth behaviors look like during phase one?  How do you want them to look by phase four?

Incentives & Sanctions, Continued  Historical CJ responses vs. modification of behavior through a coordinated and thoughtful (research informed) process  Punishment for a “wrong” is not the goal – behavior change is the goal  The JDC should use a balance of incentives, sanctions and treatment responses

Incentives and Sanctions, continued  Key components:  Immediate, certain, fair and of appropriate intensity  Do not rely solely on standardized “lists”  Should be proportional and balanced  Punishment alone is least effective way to change behavior  Be comfortable in combining incentives and sanctions  Be cognizant of time  Perceptions of fairness – it all begins with individualization  Make sure youth understand their positive and negative reinforcers

Contingency Management So how do we strengthen the use of CM in our treatment settings, and utilize the same methods within our Juvenile Drug Courts?

Point & Level Reward Systems  Contract  Reward Menu  3 for 3  Most Valued Privilege  Checkbook System

Most Valued Privilege  This is a privilege that the youth values and will work hard to earn  Work with the youth and family to determine what the MVP is, preferably a family-based reward (i.e., video games, cell phone use, time w/ friends)  The MVP is given or taken away with each drug screen  IMPORTANT – youth does not earn points if there is a positive drug screen but points that have already been earned are not taken away (Henggeler et al, p )

Make it Transparent MVP Sally – Use of cell phone John – Curfew extension on Saturday night Mary – Allowed to use Mom’s car on Friday afternoon Jack – Ride to school, rather than walk

Checkbook System  Basic checkbook set up – date; transaction description; debit/credit; and balance  Basic personal checks that the youth can draft and use to purchase items on the reward menu  Make this very visual and tangible for the youth  Consider working with a local bank to provide life skills training on how to keep a checking account and write checks or to provide free checkbooks and/or personalized checks (Henggeler et al, p )

3 for 3 Program 1. Pass all UAs 2. Bring JTDC Notebook 3. Make all appointments / contacts with case manager

Behavior Contracts  “Rewards for Responsible Behavior in Other Domains” (Henggeler et al, p. 131)  How to target specific behaviors (i.e., school attendance)  How to add a step-by-step process for the youth to follow  How to get youth working towards “things” they are interested in  How to engage families/guardians in the process  How to increase communication between the youth and judge  And …how to implement these components in your program

Behavioral Contract Example GoalBehaviors/ Tasks IncentivesNon- compliance Sanction Enroll in GED program Call or visit GED center by xxxxx date Praise Recognition from Team Appointment Calendar XXXXXX Failure to contact by XXXX Increased reporting to PO Increase in curfew EM

Recommended Reading  Contingency Management for Adolescent Substance Abuse: A Practitioner’s Guide, by: Scott W. Henggeler, Phillippe B. Cunningham, Melisa D. Rowland, Sonja K. Schoenwald and Associates  Making Sense of Incentives and Sanctions in working with the Substance-Abusing Youth: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (Juvenile & Family Justice TODAY. 2012, Volume 21, Number 2)  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Juvenile Drug Courts by Integrating Evidence-Based Practices (Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2012, Vol. 80, No. 2, )

Contact Information Jacqueline van Wormer, Ph.D. Washington State University SAC 403A Spokane, WA (509) (cell)