FY17 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 27, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FY15 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 22, 2014.
Advertisements

MASBO February Bi-Monthly Meeting February Doubletree Inn, Milford MA Update on C70 and Other Funding In Governors Budget Roger Hatch and Jay Sullivan.
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
Property Tax Levy. Key Tax Levy Components The Board of Education must set the FY tax levy no later than November 1, 2012 The tax.
Chapter 70 FY14 Preliminary House 1 Proposal Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1/23/2013.
1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
1 School Funding Discussion November 15, 2007 Brighton Area Schools.
1 Governor’s Budget Proposal. Governor’s Budget Governor declares that deficit is erased Second budget in a decade without a projected deficit.
FUNDING FOR ACHIEVEMENT A Report and Comprehensive Proposal for State Education Aid Reform: Why We Need to Change Educational Funding New York State Association.
January 7, 2011 Overview of Governor’s Introduced Amendments to the Direct Aid to Public Education Budget (and other Public Education Funding)
Sequestration How Does it Work. Passed the Congress in August 2011 Established the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction It’s the Law! P.L
* * 0 PUBLIC EDUCATION FINANCE IN PENNSYLVANIA: UNEQUAL AND INADEQUATE Prepared by The Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia March 2008.
State Superintendent Evers Fair Funding for our Future Plan For more details visit: Fairfundingforourfuture.org.
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2004 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department August.
School Finance 101 by Ben Irwin Business Manager Parkview School District.
Kansas Legislative Research Department SCHOOL FINANCE BASICS 1 January 2013.
FAIR EDUCATION FUNDING: Recommendations of the Education Finance Working Group Tom Melcher Schools for Equity in Education Meeting November 30, 2012.
FY16 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 1 Proposal March 4, 2015.
Wisconsin Public Schools Revenue Limits. History 1949 –State adopted a system to address property- wealth differences among districts, which provided.
1. In Massachusetts, the definition of an adequate spending level for a school district, given the specific grades, programs, and demographic characteristic.
Local Taxes in New York: Easing the Burden Citizens Budget Commission Conference December 6, 2007 Held at the Rockefeller Institute, Albany, NY.
Preliminary Procedures for Community Eligibility Provision and National School Lunch State Categorical Funding.
A Changing Metric: Low Income vs. Economically Disadvantaged Revised July 6, 2015.
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2007 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department April.
The Elmont Union Free School District Reaching and Teaching for Excellence 2014 – 2015 School Year Budget.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
Chapter 70 Massachusetts School Funding Formula. Massachusetts School Revenues FY00-FY12 (in billions) 1/23/ School spending is primarily a local.
AN OVERVIEW OF HOW OHIO FUNDS ITS SCHOOLS School Funding Legislative Service Commission April 2015.
And now…. 84 th Legislature Public Education Video 2 Presented by Doug Karr 1 hour, 10 minutes.
1 Virginia Department of Education Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues October 2012.
A Crossroads for Public Education in Minnesota Parents United for Public Schools …Committed to quality public schools for all Minnesota children.
LOCAL AID What’s in House 1: Reductions with Reform March 4, 2003.
Equity in School Lunch Pricing Section 205 Indiana Department of Education School and Community Nutrition April 13, 2011.
MFP 101: Seven Easy Steps to Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula LEADS Conference July 26, 2006.
1. *Unduplicated Pupil Percentage (UPP) must be above 55% 2 Necessary Small School Base Grant (by grade span) Grade Span Adjustment K Supplemental.
Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of the Foundation Budget and Local Contribution Roger Hatch Melissa King MASBO Annual Institute May 17 th, 2013.
Chapter 70 Aid FY14 Budget 7/12/2013. FY14 Chapter 70 Summary Aid 73 districts receive foundation aid to ensure that they do not fall below their foundation.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Brief History of School Finance Litigation 1994: Woonsocket, Pawtucket, and West Warwick receive successful ruling at trial of Pawtucket v. Sundlun. 7/20/95:
Community Meeting May 31, Agenda: 7:00 – 8:00 Topics to include: An overview of the “foundation funding” system of the past several years. (Mr.
A Crossroads for Minnesota’s Public Schools Parents United for Public Schools Committed to Quality public schools for ALL children A Crossroads for Public.
 Educate the Sutton community on the annual budget process  Provide a five year overview  Provide the Sutton community with an opportunity to ask questions.
MARS General Meeting Nashoba Valley, Feb 12, 2013 Chapter 70 And State Budget Update Roger Hatch, Jay Sullivan, Christine Lynch, ESE.
Title I, Part A Program Title I, Part A provides educational services to schools with high percentages of children from low-income families by providing.
Fulfilling the Education Promise Michael J. Borges, Executive Director, New York State Association of School Business Officials Joint Legislative Budget.
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
School Finance 101 NALEO Education Leadership Initiative March 8, 2014 San Diego, California.
State Foundation Funding in FY16 and FY17 Daria Shams, Senior Policy Analyst Office of Budget and School Funding.
BUDGET HEARING II Presented to the Board of Education MAY 10, 2016.
Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Michael Brooks Division of School Finance Special Education.
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education (Kirwan Commission) Formed in June 2016.
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
State Budget Connections to Career Tech
Why Levies? Parents United for Public Schools Committed to quality public schools for ALL children A Crossroads for Public Education in Minnesota.
General Appropriations Act (GAA) July 8, 2016
Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 24, 2018
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
School Finance Mary Lynn Christel
General Appropriations Act July 26, 2018
Update on Foundation Budget Review Commission
The Big Picture about Kids Texas Center for the Judiciary F
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
FY20 House 1 Budget Overview
Fair School Funding Plan A comprehensive, fair school funding plan for Ohio Slide Sponsors: State Representatives Bob Cupp & John Patterson.
Charter School Funding in Massachusetts Policy and Practice
FY20 Budget Development Update – SWM Recommendations
FY20 Budget Development Update – HWM Recommendations
General Appropriations Act July 2019
Presentation transcript:

FY17 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 27, 2016

Highlights from House 2 FY17 Chapter 70 (prelim) is $4.58B $72M (1.6%) increase from FY16 Foundation budgets are lowered by an inflation factor of -0.22%. The equity component of the formula continues to be phased in. Those communities required to contribute more than their targets will have the gap between their required and target local contributions reduced by 70%. All districts receive at least $20 per pupil in additional aid over the prior year. Free and reduced price lunch data is no longer available for all districts as a result of districts’ participation in the USDA’s Community Eligibility Program. As a result, the foundation budget will now be calculated using economically disadvantaged enrollment in place of formerly available low income enrollment. The rate has changed to reflect the new metric. 2 1/27/2016

Economically Disadvantaged Enrollment in the Foundation Budget Free and reduced price lunch data is no longer available for all districts as a result of districts’ participation in the USDA’s Community Eligibility Program. As a result, the foundation budget will now be calculated using economically disadvantaged enrollment in place of formerly available low income enrollment. Most districts have fewer economically disadvantaged students than they had low income students. In FY16, statewide low income enrollment was 376,810 and in FY17, statewide economically disadvantaged enrollment is 312,203. This new measure is based on a student's participation in one or more of the following state-administered programs: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Transitional Assistance for Families with Dependent Children (TAFDC) Department of Children and Families' (DCF) foster care program MassHealth (Medicaid) Please refer to: Redefining Low Income - A New Metric for K-12 Education Data for more information.Redefining Low Income - A New Metric for K-12 Education Data 1/27/2016 3

Economically Disadvantaged Enrollment in the Foundation Budget To offset the fiscal impact of this lower student count, the foundation budget rates were adjusted. The foundation budget rate applied to a district’s economically disadvantaged students is based on a district’s concentration of those students Number of economically disadvantaged students / Foundation enrollment = % economically disadvantaged Districts are then sorted into deciles based on this calculation. Each decile group corresponds to a foundation budget rate 1/27/2016 4

Economically Disadvantaged Enrollment in the Foundation Budget The base economically disadvantaged rate is $3,775. In FY16, the low income rates were $3,474 and $2,809. Each subsequent decile increases by $40 increments up to $4,135 for those districts with the highest concentration of economically disadvantaged students. As a result, this component of the foundation budget rose statewide from $1.236 billion in FY16 to $1.292 billion in FY17. 1/27/2016 5

Goal of the Chapter 70 formula 6 To ensure that every district has sufficient resources to meet its foundation budget spending level, through an equitable combination of local property taxes and state aid. 1/27/2016

Chapter 70 aid is determined in three basic steps 7 A district’s Chapter 70 aid is determined in three basic steps: 1.It defines and calculates a foundation budget, an adequate funding level for each district, given the specific grades, programs, and demographic characteristics of its students. 2.It then determines an equitable local contribution, how much of that “foundation budget” should be paid for by each city and town’s property tax, based upon the relative wealth of the community. 3.The remainder is funded by Chapter 70 state aid. Local Contribution + State Aid = a district’s Net School Spending (NSS) requirement. This is the minimum amount that a district must spend to comply with state law. 1/27/2016

Districts receive different levels of Chapter 70 aid, because their community’s ability to pay differs 1/27/2016 8

Key Factors in School Funding Formula 1/27/2016 Foundation Budget Enrollment Wage Adjustment Factor Inflation Local Contribution Property value Income Municipal Revenue Growth Factor These six factors work together to determine a district’s c70 aid. 9

Foundation budgets are an indication of student need 1/27/

A district's foundation budget is derived by multiplying the number of pupils in 13 enrollment categories by cost rates in 11 functional areas. 11 All of your students are counted in categories Special education and economically disadvantaged costs are treated as “costs above the base” and are captured in /27/2016

Foundation budget rates reflect differences in the cost of educating different types of students. 1/27/

Instructional categories comprise 70% of the statewide foundation budget. 1/27/

Local Contribution Establishing local ability to pay The foundation budget is a shared municipal-state responsibility. Each community has a different target local share, or ability to pay, based on its property values and residents’ incomes. Prior to this policy, required local contributions had become less linked to ability to pay. A process was established in 2007 to move each community from its 2006 baseline to its new target. 14 1/27/2016

How is the required local contribution calculated? Determining each community’s target local share starts with the local share of statewide foundation. 15 Determine local share of statewide foundation. Statewide, determine percentages that yield ½ from property and ½ from income. Property and income percentages are applied uniformly across all cities and towns to determine the combined effort yield from property and income. Calculate statewide foundation budget. 59% Local Contribution $5.975B 41% State Aid $4.153B Property Effort % $2.987B Income Effort % $2.987B Statewide Foundation Budget $10.128B 1/27/2016

Individual communities’ target local shares are based on local property values and income, and foundation budget. 16 To determine local effort, first apply this year’s property percentage (0.3792%) to the town’s 2014 total equalized property valuation Then apply this year’s income percentage (1.4701%) to the town’s 2013 total residential income Local Property Effort + Local Income Effort =Combined Effort Yield (CEY) Target Local Share = CEY/Foundation budget Capped at 82.5% of foundation In FY17, 147 of 351 communities are capped. 1/27/2016

Getting Closer To the Target Contribution Determining the Upcoming Year’s Local Contribution Preliminary Contribution Increase last year’s required local contribution by the municipality’s Municipal Revenue Growth Factor (MRGF) – Calculated annually by the Department of Revenue – Quantifies the most recent annual percentage change in each community's local revenues, such as the annual increase in the Proposition 2½ levy limit, that should be available for schools Required Contribution If the preliminary contribution is above the target, reduce by the effort reduction percent (70% in FY17). If the preliminary contribution is below by less than 2.5%, the preliminary contribution becomes the new requirement. If the preliminary contribution is below by more than 7.5%, an additional 2% is added to the preliminary contribution. For those below by between 2.5 and 7.5%, 1% is added. 1/27/

Each community transitions to its target local share at a different pace. 18 EverettCambridge 1/27/2016

Reaching the Targets Over Time All Municipalities 19 1/27/2016

Progress towards Target Local Share 1/27/

How is the district’s required local contribution calculated? Once the city or town’s required local contribution is calculated, it is allocated among the districts to which it belongs. 21 Town of Berkley 1/27/2016

Calculating Chapter 70 Aid 1/27/ Foundation aid is the core of Chapter 70. It provides additional funding for districts to spend at their foundation budgets. Foundation Budget – Required Local Contribution = Foundation Aid Start with prior year’s aid FY16 c70 (statewide: $4.511B) Add together the prior year’s aid and the required local contribution. If this year’s foundation aid exceeds last year’s total Chapter 70 aid, the district receives the amount needed to ensure it meets its foundation budget. 78 districts

Calculating Chapter 70 Aid 1/27/ Districts are held harmless to the previous year’s level of aid. In FY17, “minimum aid” is also available. District receives at least $20 per pupil in additional aid over FY16 (249 operating districts).

Progress towards Target Aid Shares All Districts 1/27/

Progress towards Target Aid Share 1/27/

Net School Spending 26 Net School Spending requirements continue to be enforced. FY 2016 Section 3 preamble “The department of elementary and secondary education shall not consider health care costs for retired teachers to be part of net school spending for any district in which such costs were not considered part of net school spending in fiscal year 1994, and in which such district has not accepted the provisions of Section 260 of Chapter 165 of the Acts of 2014.” 1/27/2016

Most Districts Spend in Excess of Their Net School Spending Requirement 27

Chapter 70 Website 1/27/

Chapter 70 Contact Info Melissa King, Roger Hatch, /27/