1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: Tropopause Folding Turbulence Product (TFTP) June 14, 2011 Presented By: Anthony Wimmers SSEC/CIMSS University of Wisconsin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Advances in the Processing, Targeting and Data Assimilation Applications of Satellite-Derived Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMVs) Howard Berger 1,
Advertisements

Satellite based estimates of surface visibility for state haze rule implementation planning Air Quality Applied Sciences Team 6th Semi-Annual Meeting (Jan.
Aerosol-Precipitation Responses Deduced from Ship Tracks as Observed by CloudSat Matthew W. Christensen 1 and Graeme L. Stephens 2 Department of Atmospheric.
ASII-NG: Developments and outlook NWCSAF 2015 Users Workshop.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 AIRS Products for the National Weather Service Brad Zavodsky SPoRT Science Advisory.
Hayden Oswald 1 and Andrew Molthan 2 NASA Summer Intern, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 1 NASA SPoRT Center, NASA/MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama.
Jet Streams.
AOS 100: Weather and Climate Instructor: Nick Bassill Class TA: Courtney Obergfell.
1 GOES-R AWG Ocean Dynamics Team: Ocean Currents and Offshore Ocean Currents Algorithm June 14, 2011 Presented By: Eileen Maturi 1, Igor Appel 2, Andy.
Joe Sienkiewicz 1, Michael Folmer 2 and Hugh Cobb 3 1 NOAA/NWS/NCEP/OPC 2 University of Maryland/ESSIC/CICS 3 NOAA/NWS/NCEP/NHC/ Tropical Analysis and.
GOES-R Synthetic Imagery over Alaska Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Regional And Mesoscale Meteorology Branch (RAMMB)
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for {JPSS Algorithm} Presented by Date.
Modeling and Understanding Rapidly Intensifying Extratropical Cyclones Christopher Castellano Cornell University Atmospheric Science ‘10 NWS/NCEP/OPC Joseph.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Page 1© Crown copyright Distribution of water vapour in the turbulent atmosphere Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer & Richard.
June, 2003EUMETSAT GRAS SAF 2nd User Workshop. 2 The EPS/METOP Satellite.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Potential June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 GOES Solar Radiation Products in Support of Renewable Energy Istvan Laszlo.
The GOES-R Algorithm Working Group (AWG) program requests a high quality of proxy data for algorithm developments, testing and assessments. The central.
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
GOES–R Applications for the Assessment of Aviation Hazards Wayne Feltz, John Mecikalski, Mike Pavolonis, Kenneth Pryor, and Bill Smith 7. FOG AND LOW CLOUDS.
1 Geostationary Cloud Algorithm Testbed (GEOCAT) Processing Mike Pavolonis and Andy Heidinger (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR) Corey Calvert and William Straka III (UW-CIMSS)
Hurricane Intensity Estimation from GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite Eye Sounding Fourth GOES-R Users’ Conference Mark DeMaria NESDIS/ORA-STAR,
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: Convective Initiation June 14, 2011 Presented By: John R. Walker University of Alabama in Huntsville In Close Collaboration.
1 GOES-R AWG FSW Team: ABI Flood/Standing Water ( FSW ) Algorithm (AFSWA) June 15, 2010 Presented by: Donglian Sun 1 With contributions from FSW team:
Evaluation of the WVSS-II Sensor Using Co-located In-situ and Remotely Sensed Observations Sarah Bedka, Ralph Petersen, Wayne Feltz, and Erik Olson CIMSS.
On the Use of Geostationary Satellites for Remote Sensing in the High Latitudes Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Xuanji Wang 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Jun Li.
11 The Cryosphere Team Members  Cryosphere Application Team  Jeff Key (Lead; STAR/ASPB) »Peter Romanov (CREST) »Don Cline (NWS/NOHRSC) »Marouane Temimi.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Derived Motion Winds Jaime Daniels (STAR) Wayne Bresky (IMSG, Inc) Steve Wanzong (CIMSS) Chris Velden.
GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground H. Zhang 1, R. M. Hoff 1, S. Kondragunta 2, A. Huff 3, M. Green 4, S. A. Christopher 5, B. Pierce.
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
1 Developing Assimilation Techniques For Atmospheric Motion Vectors Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Derived for the GOES-R Advanced Baseline.
Key RO Advances Observation –Lower tropospheric penetration (open loop / demodulation) –Larger number of profiles (rising & setting) –Detailed precision.
Studies of Advanced Baseline Sounder (ABS) for Future GOES Jun Li + Timothy J. Allen Huang+ W. +CIMSS, UW-Madison.
5.32 Estimating regions of tropopause folding and clear-air turbulence with the GOES water vapor channel Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz Cooperative Institute.
Jets Dynamics Weather Systems – Fall 2015 Outline: a.Why, when and where? b.What is a jet streak? c.Ageostrophic flow associated with jet streaks.
Future GOES Satellite Product Upgrades Donald G. Gray Office of Systems Development NOAA/NESDIS, Washington, DC Satellite Direct Readout Users Conference.
GOES-R Aviation Weather Applications Frederick R. Mosher NWS/NCEP Aviation Weather Center.
1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: SO 2 Detection Presented By: Mike Pavolonis NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
Inertia-Gravity waves and their role in mixing Geraint Vaughan University of Manchester, UK.
1 GOES-R AWG Land Team: ABI Land Surface Albedo (LSA) and Surface Reflectance Algorithm June 14, 2011 Presented by: Shunlin Liang Dongdong Wang, Tao He.
Ocean Dynamics Algorithm GOES-R AWG Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/SOCD, Igor Appel, STAR/IMSG, Andy Harris, CICS, Univ of Maryland AMS 92 nd Annual Meeting,
Doppler Lidar Winds & Tropical Cyclones Frank D. Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 7 February 2007.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Hydrology Application Team Bob Kuligowski (STAR)
Methodology n Step 1: Identify MOG (EDR ≥ 0.25) observations at cruising altitude (≥ FL250). n Step 2: Account for ascending/descending flights by filtering.
High impact weather nowcasting and short-range forecasting using advanced IR soundings Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: ABI Visibility Algorithm (VP) June 14, 2011 Presented By: R. Bradley Pierce 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS LIMB CORRECTION OF POLAR- ORBITING IMAGERY FOR THE IMPROVED INTERPRETATION.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
GEO Turbulence Detection: Tropopause Folds and Clear Air Turbulence Tony Wimmers Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS), UW-Madison.
1 GOES-R AWG Land Surface Emissivity Team: Retrieval of Land Surface Emissivity using Time Continuity June 15, 2011 Presented By: Zhenglong Li, CIMSS Jun.
정지궤도기상위성 연구 실무그룹 발표 자료 발표자 : 김나리 국가기상위성센터.
1 Product Overview (Fog/Low Cloud Detection). Example Product Output 2.
A Probabilistic Nighttime Fog/Low Stratus Detection Algorithm
  Robert Gibson1, Douglas Drob2 and David Norris1 1BBN Technologies
GOES-R Risk Reduction Research on Satellite-Derived Overshooting Tops
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz
RECENT INNOVATIONS IN DERIVING ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS AT CIMSS
What direction do high and low pressure systems spin
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Objective Overshooting Top and Cold V Detection
GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development
GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: SO2 Detection
VALIDATION OF DUAL-MODE METOP AMVs
Presentation transcript:

1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: Tropopause Folding Turbulence Product (TFTP) June 14, 2011 Presented By: Anthony Wimmers SSEC/CIMSS University of Wisconsin - Madison

2 Outline  Executive Summary (1 slide)  Algorithm Description (9 slides)  ADEB and IPR Response Summary (1 slide)  Requirements Specification Evolution (2 slides)  Validation Strategy (5 slides)  Validation Results (4 slides)  Summary (1 slide)

3 Executive Summary  This ABI Tropopause Fold Turbulence Product (TFTP) generates the Option 2 products of tropopause fold-generated turbulence in terms of the upper/lower bounds and the two most hazardous crossing directions  Version 5 was delivered in June. The ATBD (100%) is on track for a June 30 delivery  The product requirements are met. For the accuracy requirement, this means 50% accuracy of predicting turbulence within the volume of a turbulent tropopause fold object  The validation strategy employs a 16-month dataset of automated aircraft Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) observations, a commonly accepted proxy for quantifying turbulence intensity.

4 Algorithm Description

What Is a Tropopause Fold? (~100 km) subtropical air mass polar air mass stratosphere Pressure (hPa) Height (km) tropopause front Upper-air front J  Tropopause folding describes an event at the tropopause break in which the tropopause folds into the troposphere due to ageostrophic flow around the jet stream.  This frequently leads to dynamical instability (enhanced turbulence) because of high levels of vertical shear across the boundary of the tropopause fold, which contains elevated potential vorticity. Enhanced turbulence

What Is a Tropopause Fold? (~100 km) subtropical air mass polar air mass stratosphere Pressure (hPa) Height (km) tropopause front Upper-air front J  Tropopause folding describes an event at the tropopause break in which the tropopause folds into the troposphere due to ageostrophic flow around the jet stream.  This frequently leads to dynamical instability (enhanced turbulence) because of high levels of vertical shear across the boundary of the tropopause fold, which contains elevated potential vorticity. Enhanced turbulence

7 Algorithm Summary The Tropopause Folding Turbulence Product (TFTP) generates Option 2 products of regions in which aircraft are prone to Moderate Or Greater turbulence due to passage through tropopause folding events The algorithm uses image processing techniques that produce synoptic-scale tropopause fold objects from major water vapor gradients in the hemispheric imagery (rather than a pixel-wise computation). Ancillary model fields help to assign height ranges to the tropopause fold objects The chosen channel set includes the 6.2 µm channel (ABI ch. 8), and the 7.0 µm channel (ABI ch. 9) as a backup (next slide)

8 Motivation for Algorithm Channel Selection The TFTP relies on the geostationary retrieval of upper-tropospheric (UT) water vapor Major gradients in UT water vapor correspond to air mass boundaries that give rise to tropopause folding and turbulent flow where those boundaries are dynamically unstable Any geostationary UT water vapor channel can resolve this feature (GOES-IM, GOES-NOP, Meteosat, MTSAT, etc.) GOES-ABI ch. 8 (~6.2µm) is best suited for retrieval in the upper troposphere, and ch. 9 (~7.0µm, midtroposphere) would have only a minor horizontal displacement and image gradient bias as a backup data source

Expected ABI Performance Relative to Other Sensors At 2km horizontal resolution, GOES-ABI would present a clear advancement in the product’s horizontal precision.

10 TFTP Processing Schematic Produce tropopause fold objects from image gradients INPUT: BT 8 or BT 9, model temperature, pressure Assign object height relative to model tropopause height Filter objects for most turbulent sections OUTPUT: Upper/lower bounds, Directions of most likely turbulence, binary mask Used for tropopause height assignment, humidity gradient calculation Locates the turbulent areas in 3 dimensions All directions experience turbulence, but turbulent eddies are anisotropic, so some directions are more vulnerable

Example TFTP Output GOES WV channel input Turbulence lower bounds (kft) Turbulence upper bounds (kft)

Example TFTP Output GOES WV channel input Direction #1 most favorable to turbulence (deg) Direction #2 most favorable to turbulence (deg)

13 Algorithm Changes from 80% to 100%  Product output was filtered more restrictively to meet/exceed the 50% detection requirement  Navigation methodology revised to match latest Geocat updates (to streamline calculations at prime meridian and antimeridian)  Added a binary mask to output  Quality Flags, Product Quality Identifiers completed

14 ADEB and IPR Response Summary  All updates w.r.t. coding standards have been addressed  All ATBD errors and clarification requests have been addressed  No feedback required substantive modifications to the approach

Requirements Specification Evolution 15 NameUser &PriorityGeographicCoverage(G, H, C, M)VerticalResolutionHorizontalResolutionMappingAccuracyMeasurementRangeMeasurementAccuracyProduct RefreshRate/CoverageTime (Mode 3)Product RefreshRate/CoverageTime (Mode 4)Vendor AllocatedGround LatencyProductMeasurementPrecision Tropopause Folding Turbulence Prediction GOES- R FD M SFC – 100 mb 2 km 1 km Binary yes/no detection above boundary layer for moderate or greater condition 50% correct detection of Moderate or Greater turbulence 15 min 5 min 159 sec N/A M – Mesoscale FD – Full Disk

Requirements Specification Evolution 16 NameUser &PriorityGeographicCoverage(G, H, C, M)TemporalCoverageQualifiersProductExtentQualifierCloud CoverConditionsQualifierProductStatisticsQualifier Tropopause Folding Turbulence Prediction GOES-RFD, MDay and nightQuantitative out to at least 70 degrees LZA and qualitative at larger LZA Clear conditions down to feature of interest associated with threshold accuracy Over the lengths of separate flight transects through the region of positive prediction FD – CONUS M - Mesoscale

17 Qualifiers The following qualifiers apply:  Ancillary model fields are available  Sensor zenith angle < 70 degrees  Objects must be 300 km away from bad pixels

18 Validation Strategy

19 Trop Folding Turbulence Approach – Offline Validation: Data, Methods  Test data »GOES-12 Northern Hemisphere (domain of validation data) »Corresponding ancillary NWP files: GFS 12 hour forecasts covering observation times »1132 images from November 2005 to February 2007

20 Trop Folding Turbulence Approach – Offline Validation: Data, Methods  Truth data »Automated in-situ observations of eddy disturbance from commercial aircraft (737s and 757s) »Generally limited to the airspace of the continental U.S. »Turbulence metric is “EDR” (Eddy Dissipation Rate)

21 Trop Folding Turbulence Approach – Offline Validation: Data, Methods  Method: Compare Tropopause Fold product with collocated EDR observations All EDR observations +/- 30 minutes from the image time  Moderate turbulence is yellow/orange.  (Light is green)

22 Trop Folding Turbulence Approach – Offline Validation: Data, Methods  Method: Compare Tropopause Fold product with collocated EDR observations All EDR observations +/- 30 minutes from the image time EDR observations collocated with Tropopause Fold product (with vertical and directional constraints).

23 Trop Folding Turbulence Approach – Offline Validation: Data, Methods  Method: Compare Tropopause Fold product with collocated EDR observations EDR observations collocated with Tropopause Fold product (with vertical and directional constraints). (Sub-sampled to the volume of the tropopause fold)

24 Validation Results

25 TFTP Validation: Time of year Upper air mass boundaries are weak in the summer months and generate very few cases to sample Average accuracy: 54% (requirement: 50%)

26 TFTP Validation: Image gradient magnitude The algorithm uses tropopause fold objects at image gradients above a threshold magnitude value (highlighted). Turbulence generally increases with gradient magnitude.

27 TFTP Validation: Direction “0” means a direct path of an aircraft across the orientation of the tropopause fold object. “90” means a path along the object orientation The higher frequency of turbulence at the “0” bin shows the value of presenting “caution direction” product output

28 Validation Results Summary ParameterValue (spec) Data set1132 images Time period16 months Accuracy53% (50%)

29 Summary  The Tropopause Folding Turbulence Product is a unique retrieval of turbulent regions in the atmosphere which will be made more spatially precise with the ABI.  Version 5 is delivered and the 100% ATBD is coming at the end of June.  These products meet the specifications and are ready for operational application.