Mario was driving when he carelessly threw a banana out in front of Luigi. Luigi hit the Banana, spun out of control and hit the side wall of the track.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Negligence and Unintentional Torts. Weird Tort Claims - Page 365 Do any of these claims have merit? What kind of injury did the plaintiff(s) suffer? How.
Advertisements

What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Torts True or False Torts Defined Torts Completion.
Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Strict Liability
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Negligence and Strict Liability Litigation and Procedure Negligence.
HI5018 Introduction to Business Law Week 4 Law of Torts (2)
By Nicky, Bianca and Jessica. Defamation is aimed at protecting the character of individuals against attempts to discredit their standing in the eyes.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Tort Law Part 2 Negligence and Liability. Negligence Most common tort Accidental or Unintentional Tort Failure to show a degree of care that a “reasonable”
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
Week 4 The Law of Torts.
NEGLIGENCE Law 12 – MUNDY Negligence  Tort law is based on mostly case precedents and certain provincial and federal legislation;  Hence, our.
Negligence The Unintentional Tort (The most common civil action) Negligence.
Legal Studies Unit 2 AoS 1: Civil Law.
Private Wrongs: Torts Negligence and Strict Liability Chapter 14.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Chapter 7.1 – An introduction to civil law
Tort Law – Unintentional Torts. Negligence Action was unintentional Action was unintentional It is planned It is planned Injury occurs Injury occurs anyone.
Negligence and Unintentional Torts
By Monika, Max, Vanja, Nicole KEY PRINCIPLES OF NEGLIGENCE.
By : Lillie Gray 1 st period Business Law Exam.  Crime- an offense against the public at large, which is therefore punishable by the government.  Tort-
Defamation of Character Intentional Torts. Defamation Injury to a person’s reputation or good name by either libel or slander Often with high profile.
Chapter 17 Perils of defamation. Introduction – the aims of this lecture are to help you understand: Australian defamation law The three components of.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 9 Torts Twomey Jennings Anderson’s Business Law and the Legal.
 1. Duty-The accused wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured person  2. Breach of Duty- the defendant’s conduct breached that duty  3. Causation-defendant’s.
Defamation: Written or verbal statements that lower a person’s good reputation in the eyes of the community.
NEGLIGENCE (Unintentional Torts). The elements of negligence: * Negligence * Duty of Care * Standard of Care * Foreseeability * “reasonable person” *
Chapter 4 Section 2 Negligence and Strict Liability.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
The Law Of Torts Chapter #4.
Defamation and defences Chapter 8.3 Sticks and stones may break your bones, but names can never harm you.’ What does this children’s chant mean and why.
Tutorial Business Law Law of Tort. Question 1 The driver of a car driving at a fast speed hits a pedestrian who had just stepped down from the footpath.
Law of torts. The tort of negligence says that you should take reasonable care to ensure that your actions do not cause harm to others. For a plaintiff.
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
3.2 Negligence and Liability
LS 500 Unit Nine Town Hall Saturday, February 11, 2012 John Gray Welcome! Are there any questions about the material.
PE 254. Negligence The legal claim that a person failed to act as a reasonable and prudent person should, thereby resulting in injury to another person.
Negligence. Homework 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter and 20.2 – read Chapter 20.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
The Law of Torts.
LAW OF TORTS QUESTION ONE (a)State the difference between intentional and unintentional tort. Illustrate your answer with examples. (b)Explain briefly.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. DEFAMATION Defamation according to Somali penal code  Art (Defamation). –  Whoever other than in the cases referred to.
NEGLIGENCE “Carelessness” or “Not to give proper care”
Tort Law Summary. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which.
Defences for Negligence. The best defence is Negligence did not exist, or the defendant didn’t owe the plaintiff a duty of care. The best defence is Negligence.
BUSINESS LAW 108 Chapters 3 & 5. Why do we have courts? 1.Impartial way of resolving disputes 2.Procedures to ensure fairness 3.Both sides can present.
CHAPTER 12: NEGLIGENCE THE BASICS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
The Law of Torts Chapter 4. Intentional Torts Crime: –Harm to specific individuals and also to the general welfare Tort: –Private wrong committed by one.
Corporate and Business Law (ENG). 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section B: The Law of Obligations B1. Formation of contract B2.
INTRODUCTION TO LAW OF TORTS. WHAT IS TORT? TORT IS A FRENCH WORD WHICH IS DERIVED FROM THE LATIN WORD “TORTUS” WHICH MEANS TO TWIST AND IMPLIES CONDUCT.
Chapter 20. Conduct that falls below the standard established by law for protecting others against unreasonable risks of harm Surgeon forgets to remove.
Defamation Libel and Slander.
Negligence. Definition Negligence in an unintentional Tort This occurs when a person fails to use reasonable care and it causes harm to another person.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Defences to negligence
Neglect Torts Chapter 20.
Bell-work 1/27/17 Read one of the two quotes under World Government and give a brief meaning.
Tort law: Defamation.
Strict Liability Chapter 21.
Defences for Negligence
Unintentional Torts: Negligence
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Negligence and Other Torts
CIVIL LAW Unintentional Torts.
‘S.
Negligence.
Civil Law 3.4 negligence.
CIVIL LAW Unintentional Torts.
Presentation transcript:

Mario was driving when he carelessly threw a banana out in front of Luigi. Luigi hit the Banana, spun out of control and hit the side wall of the track damaging his car and damaging his leg also and was hospitalised for the next few days. After coming out of hospital Luigi ed the other characters from the Mario Kart game saying Mario was unreliable, not safe to be around, a moron and that he should be removed from the game. The two parties took each other to court.

A person is negligent when they fail to take reasonable care and harm by the action/inaction is foreseeable. There are 3 key principles of negligence: 1.The person who was negligent owed a duty of care to the injured person 2.The duty of care was breached 3.The Breach caused loss of damage If you can prove these principles in court the person is able to claim damages from defendant.

The injured person was owed a duty of care if: Was the risk foreseeable? Yes, the risk was foreseeable as throwing a banana on a race course track is dangerous. The risk was significant? Yes, the risk was significant because if another racer hit the Banana they could spin out and damage their vehicle and be seriously injured. A reasonable person in the same position would have take precautions to eliminate harm? A reasonable would not have been able to eliminate harm after a unavoidable banana was thrown right in front of them on a track.

Breach of Duty of care Did the defendant fail to do what a reasonable person would of done? Yes, a reasonable person would not throw a banana out on the middle of a race track. The defendant broke the law in littering as well. What is a reasonable person? To consider whether the person is a reasonable person the court must consider Likely risk of harm of persons actions. Likeliness of serious harm. Burden of taking precautions to avoid the risk of harm. The benefit of activity that creates the risk of harm.

The breach caused the loss or damage Was the harm caused by the breach of the of Duty of care? The physical harm was caused by the breach of duty of care, when Mario threw the banana onto the track right in front of Luigi he broke the duty of care he owed to Luigi on the racetrack and caused damage to Luigi’s car and also caused the damage to Luigi’s leg.

There are 3 main defences to negligence 1.The three elements of negligence were not breached. - A duty of care was not owed. - There was no breach of duty of care - the harm injury was too far remote from the defendants action/inaction. 2.The plantiff helped to cause harm in some way or is partly to blame for the harm caused. 3.Individual accepts the risk of injury. None of the defence above apply to this case.

Defamation The tort of defamatory is aimed at protecting the character of individuals against attempts to discreet their standing in the eyes of the community

Defamatory statement? Yes the statement was defamatory as Luigi ed the other characters from Mario Cart saying that Mario was-  Unreliable  Not safe to be around  Luigi also said he was “a moron and should be removed from the game” This has clearly proven that Mario’s reputation has been damaged by the sent around by Luigi

Does the statement refer to the plaintiff? Yes the statement does refer to the plaintiff as Luigi explained in the that Mario was-  Unreliable  Not safe to be around  A moron and should be removed from the game

Was the statement published? Yes the statements were published other to just the plaintiff because Luigi ed other members of Mario Cart including Bowser, Princess Peach, Wario, Yoshi, Toad and Donkey Kong. Yes Marios name was published

Defences  Justification- Luigi said that Mario was Unreliable, not safe to be around, a moron and should be removed from the game,  Justification says that is applies when a statement is substantially true. Mario is not is not safe to be around, he did throw a banana in front of Luigi

Absolute privilege- The defamatory material was published in relation to proceedings of parliament, courts, tribunals or communication between husband and wife This is defamatory as it was ed towards the members of Mario Cart

Honest opinion- This was a honest opinion of Luigi, it was based on proper material as Mario through a banana in front of Luigi causing him to be broken Triviality- Luigi said that Mario should be kicked of the game therefore Mario was harmed and triviality will be caused