Session 15 Pay-Off Matrix and Table Formulation Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Gender Analysis Framework

Advertisements

COUNTRY UPDATE THE GAMBIA. 1. Status of national planning process VISION 2020 exists as the long term development framework for the country to be operationalised.

1 Marsh Risk Profiling User Guide for all Schools and Departments.

1 Project Design Module 5 Session 5. 2 Summary This session provides introduction to project preparation, project documents, and checklist for questions.

Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.

Project Overview 2010 Programme FA: 14 June 2007 Start: 2 Sept 2007 Completion: 31 June 2011 Budget: €10,155,000 (EU), €155,000 (National)

Introduction to TIDE Transferability Methodology TIDE Workshop: Transferring walking innovation in the European context Walk21, Munich, 11 th September.

Session 6 SWOT Analysis Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.

SSATP ANNUAL MEETING 2010 Kampala, UGANDA OCTOBER 18-21, 2010 TRANSPORT STRATEGY UPDATING PROCESS IN BURKINA FASO Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program.

1 Danube Transnational Programme Zsuzsanna Drahos Ministry for National Economy Department of Territorial Development Planning 17 April 2015.

Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Policy Responses and Follow-up Session 4.

Ev Session 4 Problem Analysis and Solution Analysis Project for Capacity Development to Implementing Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES Relate Food Security Policies (FSPs) to a framework for action to combat hunger and alleviate food insecurity in a country; Explain.

FIDIC Conference, Beijing Sustainable Quality Consulting Services Robert Robertson ADB Director Consulting Services 7 September 2005.

The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA

Proposed methodology for prioritization of investment projects along selected Euro-Asian routes By the External Consultant Dimitrios A. Tsamboulas Associate.

Course descriptions TEMPUS EcoBRU PROJECT. Environmental education as a basic component of the technosphere employees’ biospherically compatible activity.

Session 7 C/P Policy Guidance Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Objective- and Strategic Analysis

Tool for Assessing Statistical Capacity (TASC) The development of TASC was sponsored by United States Agency for International Development.

PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.

Session 5 Development Planning Calendar Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Engaging with stakeholders: Adding value to the energy system 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Porto Pedro.

PEFA Performance Measurement Framework A Tool For Budget Reforms THE GEORGIA EXPERIENCE.

USING THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT MODEL OF EXCELLENCE (PPME) TOOL TO IDENTIFY CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS A PRESENTATION BY A.B. ADJEI CHIEF EXECUTIVE – PUBLIC.

Session 8 Scoring Method Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Session 13 CPIP Formulation Process Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Session 11 Table of C/P Development Framework Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC.

Republic of the Sudan The National Audit Chamber (NAC) Presentation to: INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee (CBC) Stockholm – September 8, 2015.

Session 17 Structure of the CPIP Book Project for Capacity Development for the Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC.

Session 9 CPDP M&E Process and Indicators for the C/P Development Framework Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital.

MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.

UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.

Session 12 Structure of the CPDP Book Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Session 3 CPDP Formulation Process Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Regional policy European Commission EN Update on IPA Component III - environment Brussels, 28 November 2008 Erich Unterwurzacher REGIO.I4 – IPA/ISPA.

SYSTEM ANALYSIS.

Session 14 Preparation of Tables for the CPIP Project for Capacity Development for the Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level.

Session 10 Table of Situational Analysis Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.

SC. Asia Project Training on Developing National Action Plans on Sustainable Consumption Adriana Zacarias & Fu Lu UNEP SC. Asia Project 17 March 2005 Manila.

Session 2 Laws and Regulations Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Methodologies and Tools for Technology Needs Assessment: an Overview Zou Ji Dept. of environmental Economics and Management, Renmin University of China.

Guidelines for Sustainable Health Care Waste Management in Gauteng Presented by - Albert Marumo, Gauteng Department of Health - Niels Juul Busch, RAMBØLL.

Regional Workshop to disseminate Water Supply and Sanitation Standards of Service, adapted to LDCs Préparation to the ISO TC 224 Drafts Standards test.

PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.

PLANNING CYCLE An Overview. CONTENT Expected achievements Expected achievements Why IWRM Planning? Why IWRM Planning? Why a strategic approach? Why a.

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.

ASSESSING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN FISCAL POLICY PROPOSED INDICATOR.

Session 1 Introduction Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Improving Transparency, Consultation and Communication of RIAs March 2009.

M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.

RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR CONVERGING MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDER’S EXPECTATIONS Organised by National Treasury Presented by WELEKAZI DUKUZA CEREBRO.

Measuring Institutional Capacity for Sustainability Mark D. Bardini, Ph.D. Chemonics International AEA Webinar September 15, 2011.

Module 3: Ensuring Sustainability Session 1. Empowerment of the Community 1 CBDRR Framework Training - Myanmar Red Cross Society.

© ARVIR Balancing Funding Priorities for Innovation Projects; Does the South African Government Address the Issue of Portfolio Management?

Budgeting for implementation of the EFA Plan Considerations for Ministry of Education 2 nd Africa Region Education Capacity Development Workshop “Country.

Strengthening Industrial Statistics in the Lao PDR

Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates

GOOD PRACTICES AND REFORM OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Audit Guideline on Delivering the 2030 Agenda through Environmental Audit WGEA’s Work Plan Goal 1 - Developing guidance materials available.

A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation

The Republic of Iraq .

Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements

Criteria for prioritizing health-related problems for research

Lao PDR Landscapes and Livelihoods Project (IDA/GEF +) ໂຄງການຄຸ້ມຄອງພູມີທັດ ແລະ ພັດທະນາຊີວິດການເປັນຢູ່ (IDA/GEF +)

Training module 8 Adoption of territorial assessment tools

Central New York HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COALITION

Presentation transcript:

Session 15 Pay-Off Matrix and Table Formulation Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)

Objectives and Content Objective of Session 15: Training participants understand and can use the Pay-Off Matrix for the formulation of the table of project proposals for the CPIP. Content:1. Presentation: Pay-Off Matrix 2. Exercise: Pay-Off Matrix and table formulation 3. Sharing and Q&A 1

2 Pay-Off Matrix When the number or total cost of project proposals prepared by respective stakeholders is over the ceiling set by the PWG, respective stakeholders screen the number of project proposals by using the Pay-Off Matrix. (Sub-Step 1-2)

3 Pay-Off Matrix Possibility of implementation Impact DifficultEasy Large Small Efforts needed Bonus chance! Waste of time Quick implementation

4 Definitions of Technical Terms Category Criteria Explanation ImpactPossibility of implementation Bonus chanceLargeEasyThe projects in this category should be priority candidates as the impact is large and the implementation is easy. Quick implementation SmallEasyThe projects in this category may be considered for implementation as the implementation is easy although the impact is small. Waste of timeSmallDifficultThe projects in this category should be discarded. Efforts neededLargeDifficultThe projects in this category should be carefully considered with regard to possibility of implementation.

5 Process of Pay-Off Matrix (1) 1. Each stakeholder prepares the first draft table of project proposals. At this stage, the table is essentially a wish list, and no screening process is applied. 2. Each stakeholder confirms the ceiling on the total cost and the number of projects set by the PWG. 3. In the case of sectoral departments and institutions, the listed projects are screened by the Pay-Off Matrix directly. In the case of organizations that tackle general issues such as the MDK and NGOs, the screening is conducted for the project proposals under the same component, if the total number of project proposals is over ten.

6 Process of Pay-Off Matrix (2) 4.The positions of respective projects are fixed in four categories of the Pay-Off Matrix through discussion. Note: After positioning all projects, it is recommended that the positions be reconsidered and adjusted. 5. After fixing all positions of projects, priority projects are selected considering the ceiling on the total cost and the number of projects. 6. Each stakeholder fills out the selected projects in the table of project proposals.

7 Sample of project positioning Possibility of implementati on Impact Difficult Easy Large Small Efforts needed Bonus chance! Waste of time Quick implementation Project A Project B Project C Project D First choice Project E Project F Project G Discard

8 Exercise 1. The same four groups in the previous session work together. 2. One sample table of project proposals out of the four sample sets is assigned to each group, and each group conducts analysis by the Pay-Off Matrix. 3. Each group fixes four priority projects through discussion referring to the result of Pay-Off Matrix analysis. 4. Each group makes independently the consolidated table of project proposals using the exercise result of the four groups.

9 Exercise 5. Projects in the consolidated table of project proposals are given the following priority order by the Scoring Method: High, Medium, and Low. Note: “Policy Prioritization” is chosen as one of the criteria for the Scoring Method, and the table of the C/P development framework made in Session 11 is referred to. 6. “2.1c Table of C/P three-year investment projects (Uncommitted Projects)” is prepared.

10 Sample Table of Scoring Method Each group chooses three or four criteria from Urgency, Technical Aspects, Cost, Policy Prioritization, Beneficiaries, Sustainability, Gender, Environmental Aspects, and Feasibility. ProjectsXX Policy Prioritization Total Project A Project B Project C The Score ranges from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Note. The scores should be fixed in vertical direction.

11 Thank You