MODERATING DELIBERATIVE FORUMS—AN INTRODUCTION Winter/Spring, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Facilitating Effective Meetings
Advertisements

Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
Collaborating By: Mandi Schumacher.
How to Have a Conversation
PRESENTATION FOR SOCIAL ASSISTANCE REVIEW WORKSHOPS Effective Advocacy.
Ground Rules for Meetings
Renée A. Daugherty, Ph.D. and Sue E. Williams, Ph.D. Developing Effective Leaders Citizen Engagement through Public Deliberation.
Managing the Captain and the Coach “The ate dot points”
Training Module 10. What You’ll Learn In This Module Why it is essential to maintain good legislative relationships. Why positive messages are key when.
Self Determination in the IEP
From the work of Paul Axtell Conversation A spoken exchange of thoughts, opinions and feelings; talk.
Rights and Responsibilities Life Skills necessary for group functioning.
Community Forum Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Community Forum June 13, 2013 Using Deliberative Methods to Engage the Public: Facilitating.
 Discussion: A cooperative exchange of information, opinions, and ideas.  One of the best methods for solving problems  Group members bring all sides.
Assessing Impacts of Citizen Engagement Through Public Deliberation Presented by Sue Williams, Ph.D. Ron C. Powers, Ph.D. Renée Daugherty, Ph.D. Wendy.
Grupo Signum Puerto Rico1 Moderating for Deliberation Tips for an effective moderating Prof. Alfredo Carrasquillo-Ramírez Sacred Heart University San Juan,
Focus Groups for the Health Workforce Retention Study.
Effective Questioning in the classroom
L ISA A. D EXTER Teaching Values and Identity... So far!
The David Mathews Center for Civic Life Mission: The Mathews Center is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit, non-partisan, tax- exempt corporation that works with.
Facilitating Effective Community Dialogues. Agenda Introductions National Dialogue on Mental Health Facilitation Roles and Tips Questions and Discussion.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Techniques For Leading Group Discussions.
Focus groups ScWk 242 – Session 4 Slides.
How Adults Learn Initial Training. 1)No one will be called on. You are encouraged to contribute, but it is your choice. 2)We will all strive to make sure.
October 25, 2014 Chicago, IL.  What is this organization? ◦ The American Student Government Association is the professional organization that serves.
Difficult Conversations WA Equal Justice Community Leadership Academy.
14 Dialogue: Learning by Talking1 Chapter 14 Dialogue: Learning by Talking Dialogue: Persuade Negotiate Learn Effective Dialogue is an ethical relationship.
How Adults Learn. 1)No one will be called on. You are encouraged to contribute, but it is your choice. 2)We will all strive to make sure everyone feels.
Moderator Training How to Moderate a Forum ALA Center for Public Life Prepared by Nancy Kranich April 13,
Wolcott High School School Counseling Department.
Center for Civic Life at Ashland University. A group of citizens committed to citizen solutions to issues that concern them.  Host deliberative forums.
Academy for Civic Renewal & University Internship Programs University of Virginia.
Talk to friends family coworkers managers Read handouts websites Read Talk Challenge both sides.
Community Journalism Relationship b/w Journalists, Community & the Media.
Dating Violence Awareness PowerPoint Slideshow #1 A workshop for individuals with disabilities and low English literacy.
DO NOW: 1.State whether you agree or disagree with this statement-and tell me WHY- “Everyone learns the same way.” Be prepared to justify your answer.
Medical Advocacy and Advance Directives Session 3 Staying in the Circle of Life.
6 Steps for Resolving Conflicts STEP 1. Begin the Process Calmly approach the person you are having the conflict with, and explain to them that you have.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
1 Welcome to Oklahoma Moderators and Recorders Academy Prepared by: Renée Daugherty, Ph.D. Oklahoma State University.
1 Civic Engagement through Public Deliberation Renée A. Daugherty Oklahoma Partnership for Public Deliberation.
Attending Meetings at School Louise Mottershead Aspire North West 2015.
How To Be An Effective Facilitator Colorado State University Center for Public Deliberation Workbook Dr. Martin Carcasson PART 3: THE BASICS OF FACILITATING.
1 Moderating for Deliberation. 2 What Does Moderating for Deliberation Mean? Any experienced moderators or facilitators? Moderating for deliberation –Choice.
Please feel free to chat until the seminar begins at the top of the hour!
“HANDLING THE GUESTS”. HANDLING THE GUESTS APPROPRIATELY IS ESSENTIAL. WE HAVE TO WELCOME AND GREET PEOPLE NICELY AND ASSIST THEM TO GET WHAT THEY WANT.
RESPONDING TO RULES HOW TO: MAKE COMPLAINTS TAKE “NO” FOR AN ANSWER DISAGREE APPROPRIATELY CHANGE RULES.
Walking in the Other Person’s Shoe : How Can We Strengthen America’s Democracy From the views of a 21 year old, college student.
n Taking Notes and Keeping a Journal n Listening Skills n Working Together n Managing Your Time.
Dealing with Conflict Relationships. What is Conflict? Conflict is a disagreement or struggle between two or more people. It happens in ALL relationships,
Purpose of Deliberative Issues Forums  Provide productive spaces for public discourse on complex issues  Encourage conversation that identifies underlying.
Purpose of Deliberative Issues Forums  Provide safe spaces for public discourse on complex issues  Encourage conversation that identifies underlying.
“Youth Hungry at School” What Can Be Done? Youth Civic Leaders Summit March 3, 2012 Welcome to the Forum! This material is based upon work supported by.
MODERATING DELIBERATIVE FORUMS: AN INTRODUCTION
Effective communication
“Youth Ready for Science” What Can Be Done?
MODERATING DELIBERATIVE FORUMS—AN INTRODUCTION Winter/Spring, 2016
Purpose of Deliberative Issues Forums
Advise the President and Deliberative Classrooms
“Youth Engaged as Citizens” What Can Be Done?
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
FACILITATING DELIBERATIVE FORUMS—AN INTRODUCTION Summer 2016
Welcome! Frank Niepold, NOAA
Choosing representatives and writing our letters
WHY DELIBERATE? Deliberation is a conversation in which people tackle controversial problems that are not easily solved and weigh different approaches.
Report to the CAN Board of Directors
Decision Making, Character and Other Health Related Skills
Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
WHY DELIBERATE? Deliberation is a conversation in which people tackle controversial problems that are not easily solved and weigh different approaches.
Presentation transcript:

MODERATING DELIBERATIVE FORUMS—AN INTRODUCTION Winter/Spring, 2016

 Getting Started  Background  Moderating Forums  Q&A  Next Steps TODAY’S PRESENTATION

WHAT IS THE NATIONAL ISSUES FORUMS AND WHO’S INVOLVED? A nationwide network that promotes deliberation on tough public issues. Non-partisan, non-profit Libraries, schools, colleges and universities, community organizations, senior centers, book clubs, and more National Issues Forums Institute publishes issue guides, reports forum results, and connects the people and organizations that convene and moderate forums.

Partnership with The Kettering Foundation, a nonprofit operating foundation rooted in the American tradition of cooperative research.

KETTERING FOUNDATION The Foundation trades insights from its research with this broad network of institutions, organizations, and individuals from over 80 countries.

WHAT WE’LL COVER TODAY How moderators can plan and structure a forum Key responsibilities of the moderator Some strategies to help encourage a respectful, open exchange of ideas Sample questions moderators can use in each segment of a deliberative forum Frequently asked questions

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY “DELIBERATION” (AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT)?  NOT a debate or simply a discussion  Looks at different options for addressing a problem  Considers advantages AND trade-offs for each option  Asks people to recognize that every action will have a down side and urges people to realistically consider which of these trade-offs they are willing to accept  Asks participants to think about priorities and what matters most to themselves, their families, their communities, and our country as a whole

WHAT DO PARTICIPANTS DO IN A DELIBERATIVE FORUM? Look at different ways of thinking about a problem Exchange views with others Weigh benefit and trade-offs of different approaches Listen and reconsider in a safe environment

WHAT ARE MY MAIN RESPONSIBILITIES? Encourage an exchange of views Press participants to focus on tradeoffs Stay Neutral Bring in points- of-view that may be missing Keep conversation respectful and on-task

WHO ARE THE KEY PLAYERS? A CONVENER Someone who brings people together to talk PARTICIPANTS The real drivers of deliberative forums A MODERATOR Responsible for getting people to weigh choices and listen to each other A RECORDER Records key themes, concerns, and questions

WHAT MATERIALS CAN I USE? NIF issue guides are the basis for the deliberation. These lay out 3 or 4 different options for participants to consider. See all the guides at Many guides can be downloaded free of charge. Print copies can be ordered at very reasonable cost Participant questionnaires Moderator response forms PowerPoint handouts, other presentational aids Find the materials you need at

HOW SHOULD I USE THE TIME? Most moderators divide forums into specific segments. Generally, forums run about 2 hours. INTRO: A basic introduction—who you are, what will happen in the forum. Introduce the ground rules. (10 min) PERSONAL STAKE: A short discussion of how the issue affects people individually and/or the community as a whole (10 min.) EXAMINING THE OPTIONS: Discussion of each of the 3 or 4 options in the book. (20 min each, or a total of 1 hour) REFLECTIONS—where we tend to agree, where we’re still divided, where we still undecided, what questions we have. 20 min. QUESTIONNAIRE: There are participant questionnaires for many issues These can be completed and returned to NIF. We use these to report on what citizens are saying in the forums across the country.

WHAT GROUND RULES SHOULD I SET FOR MY FORUM?  Listen to other voices. Listening is as important as speaking.  We'll consider each approach fairly, looking at its benefits and its trade-offs  Everyone is encouraged to participate. No one or two individuals will dominate.  It’s ok to disagree, but do so with curiosity, not hostility. Learning more about how others think is one of the most interesting parts of a forum.  Others you might want to consider?

HOW CAN I OPEN THE FORUM AND GET PEOPLE TALKING?  Why did you come out today?  What interests you about this issue?  How has this issue affected you, your family?  When we think about this issue, what concerns us? What’s valuable to us?  How is this affecting our community? Other ideas for opening a forum?

HOW CAN I HELP PEOPLE WEIGH THE OPTIONS DELIBERATIVELY? Moderators sometimes use questions like these:  Tell me something you like AND something that worries you about this option?  How might people from other walks of life might see this option?  [When people like an option] Are there any ways this idea could go wrong or be taken too far?  Whether you like this option or not, do you think it would make a major difference in addressing the problem?  Do you see any gray areas?

WHEN IS IT TIME TO PLAY THE DEVIL’S ADVOCATE? In forums with a lots of like-minded folks, it’s up to the moderator to fill in the missing voices. What to look for: Everyone quickly rejects one option Everyone quickly agrees on one option People look at an option and say “no one feels that way” Is it time to argue for an option that’s being dismissed out-of-hand? Is it time to point to the cost, trade-offs, and difficulties of an idea everyone seems to like? Is it time to speak for people who may not be in the room?

HOW DO I KNOW IF THIS IS GOING WELL? Moderators often look for signs like these: People acknowledge the difficulty of solving the problem Participants consider a range of views People talk about what really matters to them—rather than quoting what they’ve read or heard on TV People talk about consequences—they acknowledge the cost and risks of the ideas they support Disagreements are aired but in the spirit of looking for understanding and common ground Other signs of deliberation?

HOW CAN I WRAP UP? SOME QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER After hearing everyone talk, are there a couple of things that the people in this room might agree on? How does this deliberation affect our thinking re: what the community should do? How does this deliberation affect our thinking re: what we want our elected official in Washington to do? How does this deliberation affect my thinking re: what I should do myself? What questions do we have now? What more do we need to know and think about?

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Can people combine the options? What if people want more facts? How can I localize the issue?

CAN PEOPLE COMBINE THE OPTIONS? In most deliberations, people tend to like some elements from each of the options, and mixing and matching is often a mark of a good exchange of ideas and looking for common ground. HOWEVER → YOU MAY WANT TO ASK:  How realistic is it to think we can do all these things?  Can we afford to do all these things?  Are there conflicts or tensions if we try to do all these things?  If we don’t have the money or time to do all of these things, which are the most important to you?

WHAT IF PEOPLE WANT MORE FACTS? Sometimes people want more information, and having people leave the forum with questions about the issue is a good sign of deliberation. HOWEVER → YOU MAY WANT TO ASK:  Why is this piece of information important to you?  How would your views change depending on what you find out?  Suppose the information is not available or it’s disputed, how would that change your thinking?

HOW CAN I LOCALIZE THE ISSUE? Nearly all issues have both local and national implications, and considering both is an important part of deliberation. So → YOU MAY WANT TO THINK ABOUT: Would it be helpful to find a few local statistics prior to the forum? Are there people in the room who can talk about how the issue is emerging locally? Are there people in the room who have lived in other communities who can provide important comparisons?

DOES THIS SEEM LIKE A LOT? Get a co-moderator (or two!) One person can handle logistics, timekeeping, turn-taking; the other can handle the content and flow of the conversation! Many forums have different moderators for different segments— one takes the introduction and wrap-up, while one or two others focus on helping the group weigh the options.

AND WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE, HERE’S WHAT MATTERS MOST Reach out to invite a diverse group. This bring different experiences and life stories into the discussion. Take time to prepare yourself to present the options fairly. If you feel confident you understand the values and tensions of each option, you’ll be able to present each with its best foot forward Set a tone where participants are encouraged to work through tensions and tradeoffs. Playing the devil’s advocate is probably the most challenging part of moderating, but honestly facing up to tough questions is what makes a forum rewarding.

Organize a forum Review and order materials Complete participant questionnaires online Learn to moderate an online forum Participate in an online forum— Common Ground for Action  WHAT’S NEXT?

FOR MORE INFORMATION! Kettering Foundation National Issues Forums