SYSTEMS DESIGN REVIEW Team Bass. BACKGROUND Suction Feeding is a method used by telost fish to force food and water in their mouths. To do this, the fish.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PLANNING CHECK LIST: have you got:
Advertisements

P15503 Electrophotographic Cascade Test Rig System Level Design Review Dalton MeadBridget Kearney Mike WarrenRuishi Shen Tom WossnerZack Foggetti.
AAT Injector Nozzle Test Chamber P15681 Calibration Fluid Exhaust System Zach Huston, Hayden Cummings, Adam Farnung, Tim Nichols, Robert Moshier, Andrew.
PIV Lung Model Test Setup December 14 th, Components Model Pump Pressure measurement Pressure control.
Development of Laser Fuser Test Bed Project Number: P07501 Justin McMillan.
EDGE™ Final Project Presentation P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Controller Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2007 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.
Detailed Design Review of Magnetic Field Centering Device Project # P08028 “Develop a Design and Methodology to Ensure the Concentricity between the Magnetic.
Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2006 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
P14311: PCB Isolation Routing System Problem Definition Review.
FINAL PRESENTATION P The Team Austin Frazer Role: Lead Engineer - Analysis Major: Mechanical Engineering Eileen Kobal Role: Lead Engineer – Mixtures.
Doppler Ultrasound Test Stand Background Information and Voice of the Customer Allan Andranikian.
Developing Products and Services
“HEAR IT AND FORGET IT, SEE IT AND REMEMBER IT, DO IT AND UNDERSTAND IT” R12310: ME and ChemE Lab and Demo Hardware Development DPM – Spring 2012.
MSD II –Managerial Presentation Spring 2009 P09454: Design & Testing of Centrifugal Pump Components.
Bicycle Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation MSD-I RIT-Systems Design Review Winter/Spring P12414 January 13, 2012 Group # P12414.
HISTORY MARKET The Development of Concept Companies into Entrepreneurial Business SEED STAGE & EARLY STAGE VENTURE CAPITAL Funding Mentoring UNIQUENESS.
Greg Hyde Raymond Zheng Joseph Rojano Katie Bentley Lori Liebman P14414 P3 ARBORLOO WIND RESISTANCE TEST STAND 1.
S/W Project Management
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 7 Quality and Innovation in Product and Process Design.
CPIS 357 Software Quality & Testing
Systems Level Design Review P15010: Arc Wheelchair Swing Maggie Bates, Sean Kennelly, Owen Breese, Elizabeth Cutolo.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Role-Based Guide to the RUP Architect. 2 Mission of an Architect A software architect leads and coordinates technical activities and artifacts throughout.
MSD I – Mid Project Presentation Winter 08/09 P09454: Design & Testing of Centrifugal Pump Components.
Technology The practical use of human knowledge to extend human abilities and to satisfy human needs and wan ts.
Preliminary Detailed Design Review P15080 Flow Culture System November 13, 2014.
© 2012 xtUML.org Bill Chown – Mentor Graphics Model Driven Engineering.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Pleasing in appearance.
Sami Lottes Team Leader Electrical Engineer David Sawyer ElliottChief Engineer Mechanical Engineering Coty Winchell Mechanical Engineering Michael Ballow.
Mechanical Desktop Design Process Key Concepts in this Lesson: The design process Part modeling Overview This lesson explains the designer process, and.
Gravity Fed System Team Members: Chris Kulbago, Lauren Pahls, Ted Rakiewicz, Patrick O’Connell, Sarah Salmon, James Brinkerhoff Group Number:
through Introduction  Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) uses a sheet laser beam to illuminate particles that cross the sheet.  The particles.
Sponsor: Carrier Corporation Advisor: Dr. H. El-Mounayri May 3, 2007 Design Team: Mike Abel Braden Duffin Simon Marin Joe McGuire.
"Using Simulation with Scheduling Visualization to evaluate Change Initiatives in a Bio-Pharma Environment”
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
Systems Design Review Team Bass.
P16453 Subsystem Design Loading, Measurement, Control, and Test of a Journal Bearing Test Platform Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony.
E-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Problem Definition Review.
P16081: SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION MODEL Jacob Zaremski – Lead Engineer Mallory Lennon – Project Manager John Ray – Communications Manager Fabian Perez – Purchasing.
Greg Hyde Raymond Zheng Joseph Rojano Katie Bentley Lori Liebman P14414 P3 ARBORLOO WIND RESISTANCE TEST STAND 1.
E-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola.
P.I.V and D.U.S. of Suction Feeding in Largemouth Bass Background Information and Voice of the Engineer Allan Andranikian.
P16452: Active Reciprocating Compressor Valve Assembly Week 9: Subsystem Design Review.
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System System Design Review 9/29/15.
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Team 15503:Zach Foggetti (ME) Dalton Mead (ME) Bridget Kearney (EE) Ruishi Shen (ISE) Tom Wossner (ME)
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Zachary FoggettiBridget Kearney Dalton MeadRuishi Shen Michael WarrenThomas Wossner.
ING XBRL Proof of Concept July 19, ©2005 page 2. Utilizing XBRL  ING Objectives  Benefits  Goals  Proof of Concept Plan  Stat  USGAAP  Pain.
TEAM 14 DESIGN PROJECT I DORIS HO, KEVIN MASTERTON, KYLE NICHOLSON, RYAN SHERIDAN.
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 10/01/15.
Request for Proposal (RFP) In response to the RFP – the first step is to prepare a proposal 1. Review Customer Requirements and come up with candidate.
The Four-legged Water Walker
Turbomachinery Flow Visualization P08453
Aquarium Wave Generator
Introduction to New Product Development (Portfolio)
Multidisciplinary Senior Design I: Problem Definition Review
Concept Level Project Plan P08453 – Turbomachinery Flow Visualization
CAD/CAM services ensure complete tooling process coverage for mold tooling design in catia. You can use our CAD/CAM Services for mold tooling design.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
MOOG EMA Installation MSD1 - P12251
Systems Level Design Review P15010: Arc Wheelchair Swing
Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio
Systems Design Review : Heart Pump and Circulatory System
P15661 Reciprocating Friction Tester Base Subsystem
Team P15441 Mini Air Sub-System Design Review
P15611: Digital Microfluidics Packaging
Presentation transcript:

SYSTEMS DESIGN REVIEW Team Bass

BACKGROUND Suction Feeding is a method used by telost fish to force food and water in their mouths. To do this, the fish must create a pressure drop between the inside of the mouth and the outside water by expanding the buccal cavity prior to opening the mouth. This causes a fluid flow into the fish. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Doppler Ultrasound technology are widely used to visualize flow of fluid internally and externally. PIV is most useful for external fluid flow since the internal fluid must be optically accessible. In the scenario when that is not the case, Doppler Ultrasound is used to see through various membranes to visualize internal fluid flow. The drawbacks of these technologies include inaccessibility to internal fluid for optimal visualization and inaccuracies in ultrasound equipment.

PROBLEM STATEMENT Currently, the understanding of fluid flow during suction feeding inside the mouths of fish is relatively nonexistent. Up to this point in time, there has only been one test rig employed to collect data on this subject (using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technology to observe fluid flow outside of fish). The goal of this project is to design and build a test rig that utilizes both PIV and Doppler Ultrasound (DUS) technologies; the device will have the ability to output streamlines of fluid flow in and around the mouth of a largemouth bass, as well as capture live video/images of how this unique method occurs. To do this, the two selected technologies must work synchronously both as data acquisition tools and as verification checks on one another. The resulting design and prototype will adhere to safety and size constraints while including all specialized concepts required for specific research. The data collected by this test rig will be of key importance in fully understanding the entire physics behind suction feeding in fish.

CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS NumberReasoningCustomer Requirements Customer Weights 1 Data collectionObtain full external velocity of entire event area 3 2 SafetySafe for humans 3 3 Data collectionUtilize current PIV technology and equipment 3 4 Data collectionUtilize current DUS technology and equipment 3 5 Ease of useUtilize one interface for data acquisition and control 3 6 Data collectionAutomatic acquisition triggering 3 7Data Collection Track target to assure sensors are within functional distances from the fish 3 8 SafetySafe to use for fish 3 9 PortabilityManageable test rig size for two researchers people to move 2 10 FundingManageable budget 2 11 Ease of useAutomated fish feeder 1 12 AestheticsProfessional looking product (determined by users) 1 13 Ease of useClose proximity to power 1 14 SafetyFish tank filter and pump on the tank 1 15 SafetyCleanable tank 1 16Safety Minimal impact on the fish from motion of rig and moving the fish 2 17 Ease of useRig can be used on multiple species of suction feeding fish 2 18 LongevityLasts 5 years with tests per day 2 19 Data collectionComparable data to previous tests 3 20 Data collectionObtain full internal velocity profile 3 21 Data collectionReliable with respect to consistency of acquiring data 3

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS NumberEngineering Requirements Target Accept able Units 1 Distance from vertical plane of data acquisition to vertical center plane along the length the of fish 0< 5Millimeters 2 External area captured by PIV with the center located at the lower lip of the fish 60 > 25Centimeters² 3 Maximum size of captured internal area with origin at lower lip, X pointed along the fish and the y pointed vertically up 12 X 10> 8 X 7X in cm by Y in cm 4 Rate of data capture 500 Frames/sec 5 Amount of water spilled on the user 0< 0.25Gallons 6 Distance from outlet 1< 3Meters 7 Total cost 250< 1000Dollars 8 Space allocated on vibration isolation table 1 X.875 < 2 X Meters x Meters 9 Customers opinions on the professional aesthetics of the rig Yes Professional Opinion 10 Repeatability of position of fish with respect to the center of the field of view 1< 5Centimeters 11 Number of different acceptable types of bait for automated feeding 5> 0 different types of bait 12 Number of independent computers used for imaging 1< 2 Number of computers 13 Follow all requirements listed in New York State health and safety Law section 50 with regards to lasers Yes Binary 14 Distance between Doppler sensor and the side of the fish 0.5< 5Centimeters 15 Weight 23< 45Kilograms Number Engineering Requirements Target Accept able Units 16 Supported fish sizes 35 X 16 X 16 > 20 X 10 X 10 L in cm by H in cm by W in cm 17 Dimensions of flow profile 3D2D Dimensions with time 18 Percent of times rig triggers data acquisition during an event 100> 90 % of data collected 19 Volume of water from the tank filtered in an hour 150> 75Gallons / hour 20 Percent tank accessible without disassembly by the customer 100> 70 % of tank surface area 21 Predicted allowable wear on mechanical system found with simulation 10> 5 Years of continuous use 22 Manufactures supplied data on life of all individual electronic components 10> 5 Years of continuous use 23 Base sizes of fish tanks supported any>.5 X 1Meters x Meters 24 Amount of time required to assemble the rig into a fully functional state by the customer 1< 2Hours 25 Time required for cleaning tank by the customer to a state that does not harm the fish 0.5< 1.5Hour 26 Follows all state and national IACUC standards Yes Binary 27 Placement of bait with respect to center of field of view aligned with laser plane 0.52Centimeters 28 Distance between where the rig thinks the fish's mouth is respect to where it actually is 14Centimeters

HOUSE OF QUALITY AND REQUIREMENTS Metrics – How to test Ranges – Model Covers Requirements Conflict analysis (ie. want a lot of inertia but also want lightweight) Sawyer Done (9/29) Customer Requirements Engineering Requirements Proportionality of Engineering Requirements Strength and Correlation of CR and ER Difficulty and Importance

WHY HOW FUNCTIONAL DECOMPOSITION Focus on critically important and/or hard to do Does it enable me to develop the concepts that need to be developed? Hierarchy and how functions relate to each other Add safety compliance to functional decomposition Sami (9/23) Critically Important Aspects & Use in Concept Selection A) Plant Bait B) Locate/Track Fish C) Trigger Data E) Aggregate Data G) Simulate Flow Dr. Day’s Responsibility

MORPHOLOGICAL CHART 50+ concepts Stretch and safe concepts 3 concepts for morph chart Mike Ballow Everyone adds their drawings by (9/23) Done (9/30)

CONCEPT SELECTION Pugh chart Done (9/24) Once morph chart is done and compiled, everyone makes a Pugh chart with 3 concepts each by (9/24) Pull out criteria and 2 winning columns

FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FMEA Cost models? Testing models? Cost, weight, rough position model, rough analysis, project plan, testing Done (9/30) 3D Fish Model: How long will it take to create a fish model and how will we test for functionality that resembles a real fish? - Wait time for rapid prototyping machines: Unknown - Time to print all parts (using pre-existing CAD files): 3 Days - Time to assemble components: 5 Days - Time to create and assemble “Skin”: 7 Days - Time for complete integration of pump: 5 Days -Time for testing/adjustment of flow created: 10 Days (use iterative process of comparing flow data and adjusting pump settings) Total Time for Creation: 30+ Days 3D Fish Model: How much cost will be involved in the creation of the 3D fish model? - CAD files: $0 - 3D printing cost: $0? (Possibly no cost to create components in the Brinkman Lab) - Latex sheet (12 in. x 12 in.): $8 (per sheet) - Electric pump: $25 -Various tubing and accessories: $30 Total Cost: $63+

FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS CON’T FMEA Cost models? Testing models? Cost, weight, rough position model, rough analysis, project plan, testing Done (9/30) Test Rig Scaffolding Structure: How much will the test rig structure weight and how much will all the materials cost? - Top of tank dimensions: 0.6 m x 0.6 m - Material to use: 6061 Aluminum - Approximate size/number of pieces: 0.05 m x 0.02 m x 0.6 m (4 pieces) - Density of 6061 Aluminum: 2700 kg/m^3 Total Weight of Scaffolding Structure: 6.4 kg Total Cost of Raw Material: $55 (Price does not include manufacturing work to create fixturing) Fish Feeder: How do we create a fish feeder that consistently delivers the right amount of food at the right time (and be compatible with a wide range of food sources)? - Benchmark against “fish feeders” that are on the market today (Fish Mate F14). - Brainstorm ideas on how to adapt a product meant for dry food to accommodate live bait. - Perform extensive testing to validate subsystem concept.

RISK ASSESSMENT SCALE Projected risk/time (sum of importances) Causes  Models Abatement strategies Priority Owners Project/program/team Target completion Mike (9/23)

RISK ASSESSMENT Projected risk/time (sum of importances) Causes  Models Abatement strategies Priority Owners Project/program/team Target completion Mike (9/23)

RISK ASSESSMENT CON’T Projected risk/time (sum of importances) Causes  Models Abatement strategies Priority Owners Project/program/team Target completion Mike (9/23)

RISK ASSESSMENT CON’T Projected risk/time (sum of importances) Causes  Models Abatement strategies Priority Owners Project/program/team Target completion Mike (9/23)

RISK ASSESSMENT CON’T Projected risk/time (sum of importances) Causes  Models Abatement strategies Priority Owners Project/program/team Target completion Mike (9/23)

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Incorporates all subsystems Block diagram format Interfaces (shows connections between systems) Color coded Energy Material Information Structure All functions included Sawyer Done (9/30)

PROJECT PLAN Dates Readable Milestones Owners of deliverables Slack (put it in test time) Coty Review (9/24)

TEST PLAN AND ACTION ITEMS FOR PHASE 3 Yes Finalize and review Powerpoint on (9/29) Run through presentation with Jerry (9/30) Draft Test Plan Simulations for mechanical components Research/datasheets for individual components Use 3D Model fish for flow rate testing Test and Behavior research on fish in varying environments Prototype automated fish feeders Action Items for Phase 3 Call Dr Schwartz specs on Ultrasound machine (including features and capabilities) Continue to demo equipment with Dr Day Order fish from fish farm and set up environment and behavior testing Confirm price of 3D printing and access to materials for 3D model fish Contact vendors, technicians, and experts (SME)

BIGGEST CHALLENGES DUS

PHASE REVIEW AND EFFICIENCY Efficiency from ZOHO

QUESTIONS?