1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CM-22 Magnet Issues, 6 June MICE Magnet Cool Down and Other Issues Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
Advertisements

Introduction to Closed Cycle Cooling Systems (for MICE) Tom Bradshaw Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE Video conference 24 th March 2004.
Basic Refrigeration Cycle
10 June 2006MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Can MICE Solid and Liquid Absorbers be Characterized to better than 0.3 Percent? Michael A. Green 1, and.
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.
1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.
Magnet Cooldown Scheme 17 th February 2012 Roy Preece (STFC RAL)
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
1 Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Cost Update Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 10 February 2005.
Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek - LBNL MICE Video Conference #129 February 25, 2010.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
11/26/2002Edgar L Black IIT MICE Video Conference November 27, 2002 Summary of safety implementation for proposal.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM24 at RAL June 1, 2009.
MICE collaboration meeting RAL 28 October 2004 Absorber R & D Plan by Wing Lau – Oxford University.
MICE absorber and Window / flow Design Wing Lau, Giles Barr & Stephanie Yang Oxford University MICE Meeting Berkeley, Oct 2002.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
MICE Collaboration meeting at CERN March 28 – April 1, 2004 MICE Cooling Channel --- AFC Module progress update Wing Lau – Oxford.
1 Technical Arguments in Favor of using the Cryomech PT-415 Cooler for Cooling the LH 2 Experiment Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
Magnet and Absorber Heat Loads and Cooling with Various Small Coolers
12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.
1 Absorber Heat Transfer and Other Issues A Comparison between MICE and the Forced Flow Absorber System Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting #26 University of California.
MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Is the the pulse tube cooler a must or is it simply better for the MICE AFC module? Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley.
MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.
Liquid-hydrogen absorber: Shigeru Ishimoto KEK Contents (1)Introduction (2)MICE absorber design (3)Prototype absorber test at KEK (4)MICE absorber instrumentation.
TOTEM Collaboration Meeting, Feb. 2005, F. Haug, CERN Cooling System for TOTEM Friedrich Haug and Jihao Wu Cryogenics for Experiments CERN TOTEM Collaboration.
CASIPP Design of Cryogenic Distribution System for CFETR CS model coil Division of Cryogenic Engineering and Technical Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Status and Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL June 15, 2007.
LBNL Test Cryostat Preliminary Design Review Tuning – Field Correction Soren Prestemon, Diego Arbelaez, Heng Pan, Scott Myers, Taekyung Ki.
MTA Cryogenics: Where We Are The Work of Fermilab AD/Cryo Barry Norris, Christine Darve and a host of wonderfully talented Cryogenic Personnel John Thompson,
Magnet quench during a training run Successfully trained to peak currents and operationally tested Thermal performance requirements met 3D magnetic bore.
Hall B Cryogenics CLAS and CLAS12 David Kashy Hall B Lead Engineer May 26, 2010.
Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Spectrometer Solenoid Overview Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Spectrometer Solenoids MICO 214 Steve Virostek LBNL February 6, 2013.
Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Hall D Target System Review J. FochtmanSeptember 28,2011 Preliminary Design Work.
Magnet vacuum vessel w/radiation shield and cold mass in place Magnet leads (left) and the three cryocoolers on the top of the spectrometer solenoid service.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting #28 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC at LBNL January 25, 2009.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 120 May 7, 2009.
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Test Results Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.
Spectrometer Solenoid Background Info Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Review: Phone Meeting October 5, 2009.
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
-1- Steve Virostek (LBNL) and Li Wang (SINAP) Instrumentation for the MICE Coupling Coil Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab February.
MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Recovery Review - December 3-4, Steve Virostek MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Assembly.
Cooling Circuit Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab February 29, 2012 MICE Coupling Coil Cryostat Design Review Lawrence Berkeley National.
Michael A. Green and Heng Pan
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
Presentation transcript:

1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL

2 The Key Issues Why use small coolers for MICE Small cooler requirements for MICE Coolers and the magnet temperature margin Cool down of the MICE magnets Cooler requirements for the absorbers Cooler connection to the absorber Cool down of the absorber and filling of the absorber with liquid hydrogen or helium

3 Backup Reports on the Coolers M. A. Green, “Cooling the MICE Magnets using Small Coolers” Oxford University Physics Report, 10 Sept. 04 M. A. Green, “Cooling the MICE Absorbers using Small Coolers,” Oxford University Physics Report, 3 Sept.. 04

4 Why use small coolers for MICE? The RAL infrastructure costs are much lower. The cost of the coolers is part of the cost of the various magnets or the AFC module. The coolers are installed RAL as the magnets and absorbers are installed. Coolers permit the magnets and absorbers to be tested away from RAL (at the vendor). The expenditure profile for MICE is more favorable.

5 Cooler Options for Magnets and Absorbers Either the Gifford McMahon (GM) coolers or the pulse tube (PT) coolers can be used for cooling MICE magnets and the liquid absorbers. The available PT coolers and GM coolers put out about the same amount of cooling at 20 K. At 4.2 K, the best GM cooler puts out more cooling (1.5 W) than the best PT cooler (1.0 W). At 50 K the PT cooler is somewhat better than the GM cooler. The MICE absorbers can be cooled with coolers, because there is no beam heating in MICE.

6 A Preliminary Cooler Specification for MICE Magnets and Absorbers The coolers must produce at least 1 W at 4.2 K on the second stage cold head while producing at least 40 W at 50 K on the first stage cold head, while operating on 50 Hz Power. The cold head maintenance interval must be at least hrs. The compressor maintenance interval must be at least 3000 hrs. There may be other cooler requirements that are dictated by the operating conditions at RAL.

7 Cooling the MICE Magnets With Small Coolers

8 The use of Small Coolers and the Magnet Temperature Margin ~ 2.0 K ~ 0.6 K

9 The magnet temperature distribution is dependent on where the cooling is applied to the magnet surface. T = 4.43 KT = 5.38 K T = 4.3 K Cooling Applied to Outer SurfaceCooling Applied along a Line  T = 0.13 K  T = 1.08 K

10 Coupling Magnet Performance on a Single Cooler ParameterRDK-415DPT K MLI Heat Load (W) K Cold Mass Support (W) K Instrumentation Wires (W) K Piping Heat Load (W) K Copper Current Lead Heat Load (W)~27.0 Total 50 K Heat Load (W)~33.1 First Stage Temperature (K)~48~43 4 K MLI Heat Load (W) K Cold Mass Support (W) K Instrumentation Wires (W) K Piping Heat Load (W) K HTS Current Lead Heat Load (W) Total 4 K Heat Load (W) Second Stage Temperature (K) Excess 4.2 K (W)0.80.4

11 Focusing Magnet Performance on One or Two Coolers Parameter1-RDK-415D2-RDK-415D2-PT K MLI Heat Load (W) K Cold Mass Support (W) K Instrumentation Wires (W) K Piping Heat Load (W) K Copper Current Lead Heat Load (W)54.0 Total 50 K Heat Load (W)62.6 First Stage Temperature (K)~75~46~41 4 K MLI Heat Load (W) K Cold Mass Support (W) K Instrumentation Wires (W) K Piping Heat Load (W) K HTS Current Lead Heat Load (W) Total 4 K Heat Load (W) Second Stage Temperature (K) Excess 4.2 K (W)

12 Detector Magnet Performance on Two or Three Coolers Parameter2-RDK-415D3-RDK-415D3-PT K MLI Heat Load (W) K Cold Mass Support (W) K Instrumentation Wires (W) K Piping Heat Load (W) K Copper Current Lead Heat Load (W)91.8 Total 50 K Heat Load (W)107 First Stage Temperature (K)~63~48~43 4 K MLI Heat Load (W) K Cold Mass Support (W) K Instrumentation Wires (W) K Piping Heat Load (W) K HTS Current Lead Heat Load (W) Total 4 K Heat Load (W) Second Stage Temperature (K) Excess 4.2 K (W)

13 Magnet Cooler Selection Only two coolers meet the basic cooler specification. These coolers are the Sumitomo RDK-415 D GM cooler and the Cryomech PT-410 pulse tube cooler. If one were to buy the coolers today, the Sumitomo RDK-415D cooler would be the recommended, because one can get more cooling margin at 4.2 K. The MICE magnets must be engineered so that the regular maintenance can be performed on the cooler cold heads. In a year or two, the cooler recommendation may change, because of pulse tube cooler improvements.

14 Connection of the Coolers to the MICE Coupling Magnet The heat pipe reduces T2-T0 to < 0.1 K. See page 9 for reduction T3-T2 within the coil. T3-T0 < 0.2 K There is no copper strap Shown between the cooler and the magnet.

15 Cool Down of the MICE Magnets The MICE magnets can be cooled down using the cooler, provided the cooler cold head and magnet are connected by an OFHC copper strap. Cool down of the coupling magnet using a cooler will take about 20 days. Cool down of the focusing magnet with two coolers will take about 9 days. The conductance of the copper strap limits the cool down rate, when a cooler is used for the cool down. The MICE magnets can be cooled down in < 8 hours using liquid nitrogen and liquid helium. The magnet cryogenic system must be designed for this type of cool down.

16 Magnet Cool Down with LN 2 and LHe

17 Cooling the MICE Absorbers With Small Coolers

18 Absorber Cooler Selection The absorbers should use the same cooler as the magnets. This permits one to cool the absorbers to liquid helium temperatures (say 4.0 to 4.7 K) An absorber that is designed for liquid helium operation must have a heat leak that is an order of magnitude lower than an absorber designed for just liquid hydrogen operation. The MICE absorber can be designed for liquid helium operation, but one has to look at the safety implications as well as the absorber heat leak.

19 Reduction of the Absorber Heat Leak for Liquid Helium Operation For liquid helium operation, one must reduce the absorber heat leak to less than 1 watt. The forces on the absorber are low (F r < 400 N and F z < 5000 N). Reducing the cold mass support heat leak should not be difficult. The absorber body must have > 10 layers of MLI. The windows must have > 4 layers of MLI. The pipes must be well insulated. The MLI is needed to reduce the heat flow in the event the absorber vacuum goes bad. (The vent line diameter is the problem.) Absorber ducts must be tied to the cooler 1 st stage.

20 Absorber Cooling with 1 RDK-415 Cooler First Stage of Cooler (up in the neck) 1 RDK-415 MLI Radiation Heat Leak (W) 1.0 Cold Mass Support Heat Leak (W) --- Plumbing Heat Leak (W) 2.4 Instrumentation Lead Heat Load (W) 0.1 Total Heat Load to 1st Stage per Cooler (W) 3.5 First Stage Temperature (K) ~27 Second Stage of Cooler (the Absorber and LH2 System) Absorber Body MLI Radiation Heat Leak (W) 0.36 Cold Mass Support Heat Leak, buttons plus longitudinal (W) ~0.20 Plumbing Heat Leak and Instrumentation Lead Heat Leak (W) 0.10 Radiation Heat Leak on Window (4 layers of MLI) ~0.37 Total Heat Load to 2nd Stage (W) ~1.03 2nd Stage Temperature (K) ~ 4.0* * Extra Heat (about 14 W) is required to keep cooler cold head above 15 K.

21 Connection of the Absorber to the Cooler

22 Absorber Cool Down and Warm Up The fastest cool down and fill occurs when the absorber is filled with LN 2 and LH 2 directly. The absorber cool down and hydrogen liquefaction can be done using LN 2 and LHe in the absorber heat exchanger. The freezing of LH 2 is an issue. The absorber cool down and hydrogen liquefaction can be done using the cooler alone. The absorber can be warmed up by heating the absorber with a heater or by circulating warm helium gas through the heat exchanger. 2 to 4 hours 6 to 8 hours 24 to 40 hours 6 to 8 hours

23 Why Simple May Be Better One can simplify the absorber by eliminating the wall heat exchanger and its pipes. There is more room for additional MLI and a lower heat leak support. Connect the absorber to the cooler through a copper strap as well as the 2 pipes of gravity feed heat pipe. The absorber can be cooled down using the cooler. The hydrogen gas liquefied in the absorber must be pre-cooled using the cooler first stage. The absorber can be cooled down and filled in 36 to 40 hours using the simplest system. A fast cool down and fill can be done using liquid hydrogen directly.

24 Simplified Absorber with No Heat Exchanger

25 LHe or LH 2 Transfer into the Absorber

26 Some Concluding Comments If the absorbers are to be run with liquid helium, one must cool them with a 4 K cooler. The magnets must be cooled using 4 K coolers. Either type of cooler may be used to cool MICE magnets and absorbers. At this time, the RDK-415D cooler is the best cooler to use. Minimizing the  T between the 2nd stage cold head and the magnet hot spot is very important. Liquid helium absorber operation requires that the absorber body have at least 10 layers of MLI. The absorber windows must have 4 layers of MLI.

27 Concluding Comments cont. The extra MLI on the windows increases their radiation thickness by less than 8 percent. The MLI on the absorber body and the windows is important for safety, when the absorber is filled with liquid helium (pressure rise during a fault). The  T from the hydrogen absorber to the cooler cold head is not important, but the use of a liquid hydrogen heat pipe ensures that there will be liquid hydrogen flow through the absorber. The  T from the helium absorber to the cooler cold head is very important. The heat pipe is needed for a low  T from the absorber to the cold head.

28 Concluding Comments cont. The absorber body can be cooled to 4.2 K using the cooler alone. A liquid helium absorber must be filled with liquid helium from a storage dewar. If the absorber is designed to be cooled down using the cooler, the heat exchanger and its pipes can be eliminated. This simplifies the absorber and the changing of absorbers. If one wants to cool and fill an absorber quickly, the absorber must be cooled down and filled with liquid (N 2 then H 2 or He) from a storage dewar.