Model School Applications 2011-2012 Online Chat January 23, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dcsdgrantaid.com March Background Information 1)First Section of Application Form provides Background Information 2)Make sure you read this section.
Advertisements

Introduction to the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) Revised version of the presentation given at the Summer 2012 Minnesota PBIS Institute.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager Radford University.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Model School Application Process. 2 Model School Candidates Ask your Coaches if any of their schools are planning to apply for Model.
Model School Application Process. 2 Model School Candidates Ask your Coaches if any of their schools are planning to apply for Model.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.
How to Teach Students Rules and Expectations for Behavior Under Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) Answers to 12 most common questions about.
Booster/Refresher Training Selecting the Modules Half Day Practice Problem Solving at Tier 1 Action Planning Full day Developing Schools’
Applying for AAFCS Awards, Grants, Fellowships, and Scholarships 1 American Association of Family & Consumer Sciences 106 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPO June.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Developing a Comprehensive State-wide Evaluation for PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
CFDA E 2012 Application Technical Assistance Webinar.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
1 Year-at-a Glance Monthly Coaching Meeting Module A DC Name and Date Here.
1 Coaching Essentials Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Module BB DC Name and Date Here.
Mid Year Evaluation Monthly Coaching Meeting Module D Add DC Name Here.
2012 Tools & Strategies for Districts. Finance Membership Program Unit Service Leadership and Governance Balanced Scorecard The balanced scorecard for.
1 School Improvement Planning and your Title I, Part A Programs
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
PBIS Assessment Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers 2.5 Information & Instructions.
© 2010 School Nutrition Foundation Make Your Way to Excellence.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Module H Providing Input for District Action Planning Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Module E Providing Feedback from Mid-Year Reports Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through the University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Teacher Data Teams FOR RTI MODULE 5 ..
Scheme to Support National Organisations Application Guidance 19 th January, 2016 Pobal is a not-for-profit company that manages programmes on behalf of.
1 Welcome Back PBS Coaching Meeting Module A DC Name and Contact Information Date Here.
1 Tier 1 Effective Coaching Overview Monthly Coaching Meeting 2011 Module B DC Name and Date Here.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 4: Scoring an Individual SLO 1.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
PFE Student Performance Evaluations PFE Program Coordinator Instructions.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
PBIS Team Leader Coaching Support
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
Section 236 Program Year End Requirements Excess Income Reporting Annual Certification of Use (ACU) (for Retained Excess Income) Annual Certification.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Introduction to Model School & the Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI)
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
To the ETS – Agreement Management Online Training Course
Year-at-a Glance Monthly Coaching Meeting
Resource Allocation Strategy & Planning August 2017
Welcome to the DE-PBS Cadre Meeting
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Data and Recognition September 2017.
General Grants Program Process
To the ETS – Agreement Management Online Training Course
ETS – Air Data submission Training
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Model School Applications Online Chat January 23, 2012

2 Agenda Overview Timelines Prerequisites Application Criteria Annual Assessment Next Steps Online System

Model Schools Description, Application & Walkthrough available on Project website under Model Schools at:

Model Schools Application can be downloaded and used to prepare for direct entry into on-line system (targeting PBSES) Walkthrough & BAT are to be completed and entered into PBSES as part of end-year evaluation data to be considered for Model School application review DC recommendation to be gathered verbally by FL PBS:RtIB Project staff similar to MS cycle

Application Availability June 16, 2012 through August 31, 2012 Data can be entered during this timeframe only Access to on-line entry for Model School application contingent upon meeting all pre- requisites

Prerequisites All PBSES activities, i.e., Mid-Year Part 1 & 2, End-Year, BAT, Walkthrough FLPBSES will notify you of eligibility when you click on Model School application within PBSES Missing data and/or not meeting criteria = no access to enter MS application (ineligible to submit) All Data entered & meeting eligibility criteria = access to on-line application (eligible to submit)

Model Schools All entries must be submitted in the on-line system (PBSES) with artifacts (depending on level applying for) uploaded –System will close after August 31, Nothing accepted after this date! Must use 2012 application and Tier 1 PBS Walkthrough form (Old versions/forms will NOT be processed) Download or print application from project website to gather information to be entered into on-line system (targeting PBSES) ahead of time

8 Model School Application Description of purpose and levels of Model Schools Criteria 6 Sections to complete 1 & 2: General Information & Two questions. Q1 = outcome data as reported via PBSES. 3 & 4: Two questions and uploading of 1-2 artifacts (Silver and Gold applicants also complete) 5 & 6: One question and uploading of additional 1-2 artifacts (Gold applicants also complete)

9 Sections 1 & 2 General Information & Two questions. Q1 = outcome data as reported via PBSES. If ODR, ISS, and/or OSS data per 100 students reflects decrease or <15% increases in all outcome data categories as reported in PBSES, indicate within answer, OR If ODR, ISS, and/or OSS data per 100 students indicates 15% or more increase in any and/or all outcome data categories as reported in PBSES, then indicate within answer.

10 Sections 1 & 2 More Specifically General Information & Two questions. Q1 = outcome data as reported via PBSES If PBSES outcome data reflect >15% increase in any category & question 1 is NOT answered completely using the data reported in PBSES, application is ineligible for further review If increase(s) occur in consecutive years in any or all outcome data categories, the application may not be eligible for review or Model School status

Model School Criteria  Completed Mid- & End-Year Evaluations  ALL data must be submitted into PBSES.  DC recommendation confirmed by FLPBS:RtIB Project  Completed on-line application & uploaded artifacts  Completed (1) Tier 1 PBS Walkthrough by another FLPBS:RtIB Coach or DC supporting BoQ score & entered into PBSES by Coach along with other end- year evaluation data

Outcome Data Submitted on PBSES  Outcome data (ODR/100, ISS/100, and OSS/100) as reported via PBSES will be used to evaluate responses to Model School Application submissions.  Missing data = ineligible for further application review  Outcome data reported in PBSES not corresponding to answers provided in Model School Application = ineligible for further application review

13 Model School Levels Bronze Silver Gold

14 Bronze Model School Levels meets minimal criteria with sections 1-2 on application completed, DC & FL PBS:RtIB Project recommendation and Tier 1 PBS Walkthrough entered into PBSES

15 Silver Model School Levels meets Bronze level requirements, demonstrates higher implementation fidelity, sections 1-4 on application completed, 1-2 electronic artifacts submitted showcasing visibility, political support, funding strategies, parental involvement with RtIB, “drilling down” into data, and/or steps taken to build systems of support for behavior at Tier 2

16 Gold Model School Levels meets Bronze and Silver level requirements, demonstrates highest implementation fidelity, sections 1-6 on application completed, 1-2 electronic artifacts submitted showcasing Silver-Level characteristics AND 1-2 electronic artifacts showcasing systems of behavior support at Tiers 2 and 3 and/or evidence of formalized policies/procedures to ensure support of RtIB implementation above & beyond foundational supports

17 Silver: Model Schools Artifacts 1-2 artifacts total, may include but are not limited to: –Products used to build parent, community or political support with RtIB –Products used to solicit funding for RtIB activities –Evidence of behavior strategies used to address needs of specific groups of students –Products used as part of Tier 2 behavior interventions –Evidence of “drilling down” into school behavioral data

18 Gold : Model Schools Artifacts 3-4 artifacts total, may include but are not limited to: –1-2 artifacts showcasing Silver-Level characteristics AND –Examples addressing systems-level behavior issues at Tier 2 and/or Tier 3 –Evidence of formalized policies and/or procedures that help ensure support of RtIB implementation, above & beyond foundational supports

19 Model Schools Assessed Annually Revised annually to reflect continued growth and implementation fidelity expected Model School status earned each year according to revised criteria school year = increased outcome data criteria as reported via PBSES –Reflective of positive outcomes for students over years –Must use system to be recognized by system

20 Now What? List of Model Schools posted on FLPBS:RtIB Project Website soon Review criteria/revised application with Coaches –Determine the following: Gatherer of information Availability of application entry/upload PBSES data need to be complete & accurate –MS answers must reflect PBSES data for eligibility Must use system to be recognized by system

21 Review with Coaches NOW Review criteria and revised application –Discuss who will gather information for application –Determine who will be available (June 16- August 31, 2012) to complete online Model School application Ensure access to: –PBSES –11-12 Model School application & corresponding answers –Artifacts (if applying for Silver or Gold level)

22 Model School: On-line System Targeting PBSES as on-line system Application answers will be entered, retrieved, and scored Pre-requisites for eligibility to be linked to access to data entry of Model School Application in PBSES Model School Tutorial will be available in February on project website In DC Corner- Monthly Coaches Meeting Modules will be sent to DCs with notification of website post