§ 4.5 - 4.6 The Population and New-States Paradoxes; Jefferson’s Method.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Advertisements

1312. The Political Map of Colonial America Lesson 3 Page 13.
The Thirteen English Colonies
§ 4.3 Hamilton’s Method A MERICA (THE BOOK) § 4.3 Hamilton’s Method “Quipped a jubilant Hamilton, ‘The only way it could fail is if one party gained control.
1 How the Founding Fathers designed algorithms for assigning fair representation for the new United States of America How Will the Next Congress Look?
Insight Through Computing 27. Sensitivity Analysis Congressional Apportionment Sensitivity Analysis.
§ The Apportionment Problem; Basic Concepts “The baby legislature would be cut in half, creating a unique bicameral structure, consisting of.
4.1 Apportionment Problems
Geography Challenge #1 Review the World / US – First 13.
Other Paradoxes and Apportionment Methods
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
States on U.S. Postage Stamps (#1) by Don Fisher.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
Fairness in Apportionment How do you decide whether a method for apportioning representatives is fair?
Chapter 15 Section 4 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Math for Liberal Studies.  The US Senate has 100 members: two for each state  In the US House of Representatives, states are represented based on population.
Discrete Math CHAPTER FOUR 4.1
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 3 - Slide Election Theory Apportionment Methods.
§ Adams’ Method; Webster’s Method Adams’ Method  The Idea: We will use the Jefferson’s concept of modified divisors, but instead of rounding.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.3 Apportionment Methods.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Apportionment Schemes Dan Villarreal MATH Tuesday, Sept. 15, 2009.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
1906 Religious Bodies Census Churches Members Tennessee 631 m. 17,172 f. 24,239 t. 41,411 Texas ,206 19,800 34,006 Arkansas 190 4,651 6,335 11,006.
By darian Hines The Civil war occurred in April 12, 1861 The main causes was slavery and states rights The Civil war had ended in April
Other Apportionment Algorithms and Paradoxes. NC Standard Course of Study Competency Goal 2: The learner will analyze data and apply probability concepts.
Chapter 15: Apportionment Part 7: Which Method is Best? Paradoxes of Apportionment and Balinski & Young’s Impossibility Theorem.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
L30. Sensitivity Analysis Congressional Apportionment Sensitivity Analysis.
Atlantic Ocean Pacific Ocean Washington DC 90. What ocean is on the East Coast of the United States? 89. What ocean is on the West Coast of the United.
COLONIES. What is a colony? A colony is a set of communities that is ruled by another country.
Navigation Northern Colonies Southern Colonies Home.
The 13 Colonies.
Paradoxes of Apportionment The Alabama Paradox, Population Paradox, and the New State’s Paradox.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Chapter 4: The Mathematics of Sharing 4.6 The Quota Rule and Apportionment Paradoxes.
US MAP TEST Practice
MA, GA, NY, NH, VA, NC, PA, RI, DE, MD, SC, CT, NJ Tuesday 09/08
United States History Mastery Test A. Part A 1. True 2. False 3. False 4. True 5. True 6. False 7. True 8. False 9. True 10. False.
By darian Hines The Civil war occurred in April 12, 1861 The main causes was slavery and states rights The Civil war had ended in April
13 Colonies Song (Start it up!). Start it up, Start it up – UP the 13 colonies the start of America the 13 colonies Start it up, Start it up – UP the.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment 4.1Apportionment Problems 4.2Hamilton’s.
1 Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition Peter Tannenbaum.
Chapter 4: The Mathematics of Apportionment. "Representatives...shall be apportioned among the several States, which may be included within this Union,
Independent Practice Problem There are 15 scholarships to be apportioned among 231 English majors, 502 History majors, and 355 Psychology majors. How would.
1 How our Founding Father’s designed algorithms for assigning fair representation for the new United States of America How Will the Next Election Be Decided?
Main people at the Constitutional Convention (May 1787 – Philadelphia) George Washington – elected to chair the meeting – did not take sides James Madison.
Paradoxes of Apportionment
AND.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
1. Connecticut Delaware Georgia Maryland Massachusetts New Hampshire
13 American Colonies Citizenship Question 64
Constitutional Convention & The Great Compromise
Chapter 14: Apportionment Lesson Plan
13 Colonies Advertisement Signup!
Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics
What conclusions can you draw about population using the chart below?
Section 15.4 Flaws of the Apportionment Methods
Section 15.3 Apportionment Methods
Eastern United States Geography Quiz
§ The Apportionment Problem; Basic Concepts
Slave States, Free States
LET’S PLAY JEOPARDY!!.
HAMILTON – JEFFERSON - WEBSTER
Warm Up – 3/7 - Friday Find the Hamilton Apportionment for 200 seats.
Chapter 4—The Mathematics of Apportionment
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
Warm Up – 3/13 - Thursday Apportion the classes using Adams Method
Flaws of the Apportionment Methods
Presentation transcript:

§ The Population and New-States Paradoxes; Jefferson’s Method

The Population Paradox The Population Paradox occurs when one state loses a seat to another even though the first state’s population grew faster than the second state’s. (see Example 4.6, pg 145)

The New-States Paradox The New-States Paradox occurs when the addition of a new state, with its fair share of seats, causes another state to lose seats. (see Example 4.7, pg 147)

Jefferson’s Method  Yesterday we saw that the distribution of surplus seats in Hamilton’s method led to large states being favored over smaller ones.  The Idea behind Jefferson’s method is to modify our standard divisor so that there are no surplus seats.

PLANETANDO RIA EARTHTELLA R VULCA N TOTAL POPULATI ON in billions STD. QUOTA LOWER QUOTA FRACTION AL PART EXTRA SEATS 11 FINAL APPORTIO NMENT Example: THE PLANETS OF ANDORIA, EARTH, TELLAR AND VULCAN HAVE DECIDED TO FORM A UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS. THE RULING BODY OF THIS GOVERNMENT WILL BE THE 139 MEMBER FEDERATION COUNCIL. APPORTION THE SEATS USING HAMILTON’S METHOD.

PLANETANDO RIA EARTHTELLA R VULCA N TOTAL POPULATI ON in billions STD. QUOTA MODIFIED QUOTA POP.  FINAL APPORTIO NMENT Example: THE PLANETS OF ANDORIA, EARTH, TELLAR AND VULCAN HAVE DECIDED TO FORM A UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS. THE RULING BODY OF THIS GOVERNMENT WILL BE THE 139 MEMBER FEDERATION COUNCIL. APPORTION THE SEATS USING JEFFERSON’S METHOD.

Jefferson’s Method  Step 1. Find a modified divisor D such that when each state’s modified quota is rounded down (this number is called the modified lower-quota) the total is the exact number of seats to be apportioned.  Step 2. Apportion to each state its modified lower quota.

Jefferson’s Method: Finding the Modified Divisor (pg. 150) Start: Guess D ( D < SD ). End Make D larger. Make D smaller Computatio n: 1. Divide State Populations by D. 2. Round Numbers Down. 3. Add numbers. Let total = T. T < M T = M T > M

StatePop. (est.)Modified QuotaFinal Apportionment Connecticut236,841 Delaware55,540 Georgia70,835 Kentucky68,705 Maryland278,514 Massachusett s 475,327 New Hampshire 141,822 New Jersey179,570 New York331,589 North Carolina 353,423 Pennsylvania432,879 Rhode Island68,446 South Carolina 206,236 Vermont85,533 Virginia630,560 Total 3,615,920 Example: The first apportionment of the House of Representatives used Jefferson’s Method with M = 105.

Jefferson’s Method  Jefferson’s Method is nice in that it is paradox-free.

Jefferson’s Method  Jefferson’s Method is nice in that it is paradox-free.  However, it violates the quota rule. (In 1832, Jefferson’s method led to New York having 40 seats even though its standard quota was only an upper-quota violation.)