The Controversy Regarding HS3 Surface Pressure Observations During The Rapid Intensification of Edouard on September 14-15 Scott Braun NASA/GSFC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mesoscale Features of the 31 January 2011 Oklahoma Storm Jennifer Newman School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma.
Advertisements

Introduction to Hurricane Forecasting John P. Cangialosi Hurricane Specialist National Hurricane Center HSS Webinar 13 March 2012 John P. Cangialosi Hurricane.
~525 m ~800 m ~1200 m Hurricane Rita (2005) 2D wind mapping using DOW data and surface roughness DOW Radar in Galveston, Texas. Hurricane Ike (2008) Correlation.
Hurricane watch is issued 24 to 48 hours before a storm arrives to cities that could be hit. A hurricane warning is issued when it is forecasted that it.
HEDAS ANALYSIS STATISTICS ( ) by Altug Aksoy (NOAA/AOML/HRD) HEDAS retrospective/real-time analyses have been performed for the years
Hurricane Katrina (2005): Complex Lifecycle of an Intense Tropical Cyclone Eyad Atallah, Ron McTaggart-Cowan, Lance Bosart and John Gyakum.
A Review of the NOAA IFEX Hurricane Field Experiments Conducted in 2007 John F. Gamache NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division.
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3): 2014 Results Dr. Scott Braun, HS3 PI Paul Newman, HS3 Deputy PI NASA Goddard Space Flight Center IHC, Jacksonville,
Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) 1 Near uniform spatial resolution of approximately 10 km. Coverage up to 52 deg latitude % flash detection day.
August- September NSF NOAA NRL NCAR UW UM RAINEX Workshop, Miami, 5-7 June 2006.
Vorticity Structures Accompanying Eyewall Replacement in Hurricane Rita (2005) R.A. Houze, Jr., and B.F. Smull Department of Atmospheric Sciences University.
A Case Study of Hurricane Formation in Strong Shear: Claudette (2003) Kay Shelton University at Albany, SUNY.
CORP Symposium Fort Collins, CO August 16, 2006 Session 3: NPOESS AND GOES-R Applications Tropical Cyclone Applications Ray Zehr, NESDIS / RAMM.
August- September NSF NOAA NRL NCAR UW UM 27th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Monterey, CA, 27 April 2006.
August- September NSF NOAA NRL NCAR UW UM AGU, San Francisco, 12 December 2006.
Upper Air. Using just the surface is like diagnosing a sick person using only an examination of the soles of the feet.
Analyses from the Final Two MDR Flights & Hurricane Edouard Jason P. Dunion 1, Ryan Torn 2, Gary Wick 3, Robbie, Hood 3, Mike Black 4 1 University of Miami.
IntroIntro Objective 04/27/12 Describe the formation of hurricanes. What is the difference between a hurricane, a typhoon, and a cyclone?
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Observing the Tropics.
Radar Sea Level Pressure Remote Sensing for Improvements in Hurricane Predictions 04 March 2008 Charleston, SC Qilong Min Roland Lawrence Bing Lin, Yongxiang.
Comparison of Airborne SFMR, Best Track and Dvorak ADT Maximum Surface Wind Estimates in Atlantic Tropical Cyclones Peter G. Black (1), Stephanie Mullins.
Dr. Scott Braun Principal Investigator. Hurricane Intensity Is Difficult To Predict Intensity prediction is difficult because it depends on weather at.
The Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Karl (2010): Insights from New Remote Sensing Measurements Collaborators: Anthony Didlake (NPP/GSFC),Gerry Heymsfield.
Jonathan Vigh NCAR Earth Systems Laboratory & Advanced Study Program Research Review 10:00 AM 27 May 2010 FL NCAR is sponsored by the National Science.
NASA’s Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3): Results from the 2012 Deployment and Plans for 2013 Scott Braun Paul Newman (NASA/GSFC) 3/5/201367th.
Chapter 11 Hurricanes. Hurricane Katrina Flooded 80% of New Orleans The US’s deadliest hurricane in terms of deaths happened in 1900 in Galveston, Tx.
Meteorology 112 Lecture 3: Hurricanes Dr. Craig Clements 11 Sept
Lightning Outbreaks in the Eyewall MET 614 Seminar Antti Pessi.
Work summarized in collaboration with: Roger Smith, Jun Zhang, S. Braun, Jason Dunion On the dynamics of secondary eyewall formation in Hurricane Edouard.
Hurricane Intensity Estimation from GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite Eye Sounding Fourth GOES-R Users’ Conference Mark DeMaria NESDIS/ORA-STAR,
Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Earl (2010): Vorticity and Mass Flux Budgets 1. Motivation: Various studies have emphasized the importance of different.
Predictability and dynamics of the rapid intensification of Hurricane Edouard (2014) Erin Munsell and Fuqing Zhang (Penn State) Jason Sippel (EMC/IMSG)
The Re-analysis of Hurricane Andrew (1992) The Re-analysis of Hurricane Andrew (1992) Chris Landsea NOAA/Hurricane Research Division Miami, Florida, USA.
3D Vortex and Warm Core Structure for Selected HS3 Cases Using NCAR- NOAA Dropsonde Data Jeffrey B. Halverson, P.I. UMBC Alex Martin, UMBC.
Tracking and Forecasting Hurricanes By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist NWS Corpus Christi, Texas.
Results from 2007 & 2008 with some comments related to future applications Dr. Stephen J. Katzberg Distinguished Research Associate NASA Langley Research.
The Potential for Improved Short-term Atlantic Hurricane Intensity Forecasts Using Recon-based Core Measurements Andrew Murray, Robert Hart,
Tropical Cyclone Processing for the CFS Reanalysis Bob Kistler.
The Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Karl (2010): Insights from New Remote Sensing Measurements Anthony Didlake (NPP/GSFC),Gerry Heymsfield (GSFC), Paul.
HS3 Review and Planning Meeting Scott Braun. Goals of Meeting Review 2012 campaign – Initial science results – Lessons learned Prepare for 2013 campaign.
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA HS3 Science & Deployment Preparation Meeting, 7-9 May, 2013 A New TC Observing Strategy Peter G. Black 1,
Analysis of Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Within 16 Landfalling Hurricanes Danielle Nagele.
1 Aircraft observations of the multiscale structure and evolution of rapidly intensifying tropical cyclones Robert Rogers 1, Paul Reasor 1, Jun Zhang 2,
Hurricane Karl’s landfall as seen by high-resolution radar data and WRF Jennifer DeHart and Robert Houze Cyclone Workshop NASA grants: NNX13AG71G.
Surface Chart Interpretation John Bravender, Aviation Program Manager National Weather Service – Honolulu, HI (808)
Intensity change and possible unusual eye wall replacement cycle of Edouard between 14 – 15 September 2014 Ed Zipser Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
Purpose To deepen your knowledge to use satellite images for practical nowcasting during situations of summer convection  Model monitoring  Interpretation.
2015 HS3 Science Team Meeting Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
Science Questions What is role of hot towers in TC intensification and RI? Are they a cause of intensification or an effect? How does wind and temperature.
Convective Oscillations in a Strongly Sheared Tropical Storm Jaclyn Frank and John Molinari The University at Albany, SUNY.
Instruments. In Situ In situ instruments measure what is occurring in their immediate proximity. E.g., a thermometer or a wind vane. Remote sensing uses.
Dynamics and predictability of the rapid intensification of Hurricane Edouard (2014) Erin Munsell Summer 2015 Group Meeting August 17 th, 2015.
1 Simulations of Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Guillermo with Data assimilation Using Ensemble Kalman Filter and Radar Data Jim Kao (X-2, LANL) Presentation.
Multi-Scale Analysis of the Kinematic and Thermodynamic Structure of TS Humberto Using Dropsonde and Satellite Data Jeffrey B. Halverson, UMBC Alex Martin,
VORTRAC – A Utility to Deduce Central Pressure and Radius of Maximum Wind of Landfalling Tropical Cyclones Using WSR-88D Data Wen-Chau Lee NCAR/EOL Paul.
Twenty-Three Foot Waves on Lake Michigan! Examining Storm Events on the Lake Mike Bardou and Kevin Birk Courtesy Mike Bardou.
1 Current and planned research with data collected during the IFEX/RAINEX missions Robert Rogers NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division.
INNER CORE STRUCTURE AND INTENSITY CHANGE IN HURRICANE ISABEL (2003) Shuyi S. Chen and Peter J. Kozich RSMAS/University of Miami J. Gamache, P. Dodge,
JP1.18 Physical processes associated with surface wind field uncertainty in Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (2005): Use of present and future observational.
Shuyi S. Chen Rosenstial School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami Overview of RAINEX Modeling of 2005 Hurricanes In the eye of Katrina.
EXTREME WINDS AND PRECIPITATION FROM SPACE
WP-3D Orion Instrumentation
Dynamics and predictability of the rapid intensification of Hurricane Edouard (2014) Erin Munsell Fall 2015 Group Meeting December 11th, 2015.
Hurricanes.
Source:
A LATENT HEAT RETRIEVAL IN A RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING HURRICANE
Defining Uncertainty in Hurricane Maximum Surface Wind Estimation
A Comparison of In-Situ Data with Meso-Scale Forecasts
Presentation transcript:

The Controversy Regarding HS3 Surface Pressure Observations During The Rapid Intensification of Edouard on September Scott Braun NASA/GSFC

Controversy over Dropsonde Data During Sept Flight NHC night shift rejected HS3 dropsonde measurements of surface pressure during flight Morning shift reversed decision, upgraded storm intensity However, final storm report did not accept HS3 central pressure estimates

NOAA P-3 and GH MSLP Measurements Date/TimeLocation relative to center Psfc (mb) Wind Speed (kt) Estimated MSLP(mb)** P3 14/1500Eye center9834 P3 14/1707NE GH 14/2103N GH 15/0031N GH 15/0034S GH 15/0217W_SW GH 15/0428N GH 15/0552NW **Surface pressure adjusted 1 mb for each 10 kt Adjusted Psfc derived from lowest altitude pressure measurement

GH Surface Pressures and Winds Surface PressureSurface Winds Pressures and winds appear consistent with strong storm Wind barbs show storm-relative winds

NHC Final MSLP Time Series

P-3 drops North-side GH drops South-side GH drops North-side GH drops

The Beginning of a Convective Burst 9/ UTC 9/ UTC 9/ UTC9/ UTC Convective burst began near 1045 UTC on NW side of eye Over time, CB cloud shield expanded and moved to southern side As cloud shied expanded, the eye was obscured

The First P-3 Drop 9/ UTC 9/ UTC 9/ UTC NOAA P-3 dropsonde reported MSLP of 983 mb, 2 m s -1 surface wind The eye is still obscured by CB cirrus shield

Gradual Formation of a New Eye 9/ UTC9/ UTC 9/ UTC9/ UTC CB cloud shield continues to circle around southern to eastern sides New eye begins to for by ~1645 UTC 9/ UTC

Last P-3 Drop 9/ UTC 9/ UTC NOAA P-3 dropsonde reported MSLP of 984 mb, 41 m s -1 surface wind. Suggests possible MSLP closer to 976 mb, a 7 mb decrease from the dropsonde 2 hours before. Very small, well-defined eye present by 1715 UTC

GH dropsonde at 2103 UTC reported MSLP of 972 mb, 46 m s -1 (89 kt) surface wind. Suggests possible MSLP closer to 963 mb, a 13 mb decrease from the P-3 dropsonde 4 hours before. 9/ UTC 1 st GH “Eye” Drop

2 nd GH Eye Drop GH dropsonde at 0031 UTC reported MSLP of 967 mb, 44 m s -1 (86 kt) surface wind. Suggests possible MSLP closer to 958 mb, a 5 mb decrease from the GH dropsonde 3.5 hours before.

2 nd GH Eye Drop GH dropsonde at 0031 UTC reported MSLP of 967 mb, 44 m s -1 (86 kt) surface wind. Suggests possible MSLP closer to 958 mb, a 5 mb decrease from the GH dropsonde 3.5 hours before

Edouard Appears to Undergo an ERC 9/ UTC9/ UTC9/ UTC 9/ UTC9/ UTC9/ UTC

Storm Evolution and Intensity Change CB begins Small eye forms Small eye begins breakdown Large eye begins to form >3 hPa/h pressure fall

Is the Observed Rate of Pressure Fall Likely? Used HURDAT data from to compute 6-h pressure changes for all named storms during mid-August to mid-October Here expressed as 1-h pressure change rates and shown as a function of max. wind speed at time of pressure change 3 hPa/h rates only observed for storms that go on to become Cat 4-5

Is the Observed Rate of Pressure Fall Likely? Max wind change vs min SLP change 25 hPa/9.5 h (2.6 hPa/h) pressure drop implies ~31 kt increase in max winds Storm max wind should have increased from ~72 to ~103 kt (Cat 3) 2103Z Sep 14 sounding had 89 kt (46 m s -1 ) NHC had storm as 80 kt (strong Cat 1)

Is the Observed Rate of Pressure Fall Likely? Max wind change vs min SLP change 22 hPa/9.5 h (2.3 hPa/h) pressure drop implies ~28 kt increase in max winds Storm max wind should have increased from ~72 to ~100 kt (Cat 3) 2103Z Sep 14 sounding had 89 kt (46 m s -1 ) NHC had storm as 80 kt (strong Cat 1)

Conclusions P-3 and GH dropsondes were consistent with satellite indications of rapid intensification Several drops indicated likely central pressures in the 960’s mb Magnitude of pressure drop appears too intense (typical of Cat 4-5 storms and very rare) Do we declare that this was an unusual Cat 3 storm or re-examine the validity of the measurements? Is there a region of ~51 m s -1 somewhere in here?

Extra slides

15 Past Storms With  P/  T≤3mb/h Anita (1977, 5)-18mb/6h, -32mb/12h in consecutive times Gloria (1985, 4)-24mb/6hsecond period of -30mb/12h Gilbert X 2 (1988, 5)-18mb/6h, -29mb/6h, -64mb/18h Hugo (1989, 5)-22mb/6h-39mb/12h Opal X 2 (1995, 4)-18mb/6h,-19mb/6h in consecutive times Edouard (1996, 4)-18mb/6h,-27mb/12h Bret (1999, 4)-21mb/6h Keith (2000, )-22mb/6h Iris (2001, 4)-25mb/6h, -38mb/12h Ivan (2004, 5)-22mb/6h,-32mb/12h Katrina (2005, 5)-21mb/6h Rita X 2 (2005, 5)-21mb/6h,-23mb/6h,-58mb/18h Felix X 2 (2007, 5)-18mb/6h,-27mb/6h,-50mb/18h Ike X 2 (2008, 4)-23mb/6h,-21mb/6h, -54mb/18h Igor (2010, 4)-22mb/6h,-39mb/12h, -50mb/18h

Is the Observed Rate of Pressure Fall Likely? Used HURDAT data from to compute 6-h pressure changes for all named storms during mid-August to mid-October Here expressed as 1-h pressure change rates and shown as a function of max. wind speed at time of pressure change 3 hPa/h rates rarely observed Generally happen for systems of hurricane strength

GH Surface Pressures and Winds Surface Pressure Surface Winds Approximate RMW from 18Z P-3 LF radar image Dual-Doppler wind analysis at 0.5 km valid 15Z Pressures and winds appear consistent with strong storm HRD Doppler analysis suggests max winds (in NE eyewall) probably were not sampled by dropsondes

Each of Last 3 Eye Drops Entered Eyewall

9/ UTC 9/ UTC 9/ UTC9/ UTC

9/ UTC9/ UTC9/ UTC 9/ UTC9/ UTC 9/ UTC 9/ UTC9/ UTC9/ UTC

NHC Final MSLP Time Series Compared to P-3 and GH Dropsondes

NOAA P-3 and GH MSLP Measurements Date/TimeP (mb)GPS Alt.TempSLPWind Speed (ms -1 ) Adjusted Psfc (mb)** P3 14/ P3 14/ GH 14/ GH 15/ GH 15/ GH 15/ GH 15/ GH 15/ **Surface pressure adjusted 1 mb for each 10 kt Psfc derived from lowest altitude pressure measurement with GPS altitude, adjusted to surface using corresponding temperature and hypsometric Eq.

NHC Final MSLP Time Series Compared to P-3 and GH Dropsondes