Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jan 29, JLab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling of Data. Basic Bayes theorem Bayes theorem relates the conditional probabilities of two events A, and B: A might be a hypothesis and B might.
Advertisements

Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.
Kriging.
Use of Kalman filters in time and frequency analysis John Davis 1st May 2011.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 10 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem, random variables, pdfs 2Functions.
1 6 th September 2007 C.P. Ward Sensitivity of ZZ→llνν to Anomalous Couplings Pat Ward University of Cambridge Neutral Triple Gauge Couplings Fit Procedure.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Curve-Fitting Regression
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
Chi Square Distribution (c2) and Least Squares Fitting
Radial Basis Function Networks
TOPLHCWG. Introduction The ATLAS+CMS combination of single-top production cross-section measurements in the t channel was performed using the BLUE (Best.
Physics 114: Lecture 15 Probability Tests & Linear Fitting Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.
Prof. Dr. S. K. Bhattacharjee Department of Statistics University of Rajshahi.
R. Kass/W03P416/Lecture 7 1 Lecture 7 Some Advanced Topics using Propagation of Errors and Least Squares Fitting Error on the mean (review from Lecture.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Sept 24, JLab.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10, JLab.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Jin Huang, also for Xin Qian For Transversity Analysis Meeting Feb 20, JLab.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: ML and Simple Regression Bias of the ML Estimate Variance of the ML Estimate.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
ICCS 2009 IDB Workshop, 18 th February 2010, Madrid 1 Training Workshop on the ICCS 2009 database Weighting and Variance Estimation picture.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Analysis Meeting Jun 18, JLab.
Ice model update Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison IceCube Collaboration meeting, Calibration session, March 2014.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Mar 26, JLab.
Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.
Femtoscopy in √s = 200 GeV p+p collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Andrew Glenn for the collaboration Lawrence Livermore National Lab HAW09: Joint APS/DNP JPS Meeting.
Machine Learning 5. Parametric Methods.
Jin Huang, Xin Qian For Transversity Analysis Meeting May 3, 2010.
RHIC CNI Polarimeter status RHIC CNI Group February 26, 2008.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
Transversity 2005, Como Two-hadron Adam Mielech INFN Trieste on behalf of COMPASS collaboration 7-10th. September 2005.
Richard Kass/F02P416 Lecture 6 1 Lecture 6 Chi Square Distribution (  2 ) and Least Squares Fitting Chi Square Distribution (  2 ) (See Taylor Ch 8,
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Analysis Meeting Feb08, JLab.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
R. Kass/Sp07P416/Lecture 71 More on Least Squares Fit (LSQF) In Lec 5, we discussed how we can fit our data points to a linear function (straight line)
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 4: mostly about model fitting. The model is our estimate of the parent function. Let’s express.
1 CLAS-eg1 pol.-proton analysis H.Avakian (JLab) semi-SANE Collaboration Meeting April 21, 2005.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Analysis Meeting Sept 10, JLab.
International Committee for Spin Physics Symposia XIII WORKSHOP ON HIGH ENERGY SPIN PHYSICS Dubna, Russia September 1 - 5, 2009 AZIMUTHAL ASYMMETRIES IN.
Probability Theory and Parameter Estimation I
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
kT Asymmetry in Longitudinally Polarized Collisions
Chi Square Distribution (c2) and Least Squares Fitting
on behalf of the COMPASS collaboration
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
kT Asymmetry in Longitudinally Polarized pp Collisions
New Results on 0 Production at HERMES
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jan 29, JLab

Overview Goals, Focuses Comparison of MLE Application of MLE in Transversity Yield Calculation Asymmetry Estimation Angular Modulation Estimation Discussion Asymmetry Cross Check SSA HRS/BigBite Single DSA HRS Single DSA Overview Summary and TODOs Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 2

Goals, Focuses Comparison of MLE Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 3

 Knowing ◦ total charge and DAQ/electronics life time of each spin state ◦ target/beam polarization, density and luminosity ◦ for each event, physics event type, which spin/helicity state it’s from and related kinematics variables  Wanted: angular modulations Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 4

 Maximum likelihood Estimation (MLE) is a popular statistical method providing estimates for the model’s parameters  At large total event numbers, MEL is ◦ asymptotically unbiased  its bias tends to zero as the sample size increases ◦ asymptotically efficient  no asymptotically unbiased estimator has lower asymptotic mean squared error than the MLE. Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 5

 Cross check with existing methods  Do not require binning for angular modulation estimation ◦ Use all angular information since do not bin data  bin data = assume all data coming from bin center or loosing angle information O(bin size/2π)  Possible to 1 st order canceling by using weighted center ◦ More stable if statistics is low  Fitting method require statistics is high in each bin, or Poisson Distribution is near Gaussian. Eg. It will fail if average bin count <1 Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 6

 A trade over in current version of MLE method ◦ Lower statistical uncertainty for risk of higher systematical bias due to yield drift ◦ Size of trade over is related to local charge asymmetry  To be Further discussed  Avoidable if performing local pair MLE (under development) Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 7

Yield Calculation Asymmetry Estimation Angular Modulation Estimation Discussion Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 8

 MLE yield estimation expression is simple: ◦ effective charge (life time, target density corrected)  Comparing with weighted sum (Chi2 fit) ◦ Weight sum break down at low-each-bin statistics Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 9

 weighted sum show bias when statistics of each bin is low (<10)  Similar situation for angular binned fitting Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 10

 For polarized asymmetry between multiple ±spin states, MLE result is ◦ combination of sums, Easy to calculate  With assumption: Yield do not drift ◦ Causing the stat. for sys. trade over ◦ Avoidable by removing this assumption Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 11

 Naive example: Consider an experiment with 2 pair of spin states Spin Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 12 C 1+ C 1- C 2+ C 2-

 or local A C = globe A C ◦ MLE result = local pair result  or large local A C ◦ Local Pair match within pair, loosing stat. ◦ MLE match beyond local pair for best stat. uncer. ◦ However, MLE have higher risk of comparing two states far away and more biased by yield drift Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 13 C 1+ C 1- C 2+ C 2- C 1+ C 1- C 2+ C 2-

 Local Paired MLE ◦ From MLE equation for each pair ◦ And combine as  Under study, hopeful Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 14

 In Matrix format ◦ Matrix Elements are Event by Event sums + charge asymmetry-acceptance corrections Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 15

 Similar format as SSA  Very low charge asymmetry -> ◦ MLE As reliable as local pair method in case of yield drift ◦ Dependence on knowledge of acceptance is tiny  Longitudinal terms show up as corrections  Higher precision on modulation since leading twist is only one term Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 16

 Combinable with Blue team method ◦ Full MLE, good for low stat channels and DSA ◦ MLE for angular modulation on local pair then combine all together. Low systematics, difficult since some state have low counts ◦ Angular bin the data, use MLE to get asymmetry in each bin, then do 2D angular fitting: only useful for cross check ◦ MLE supporting local pairs (under development) Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 17

SSA HRS/BigBite SingleDSA HRS Single DSA Overview Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 18

 Comparing MLE asymmetries with existing ones ◦ SSA: Compared with Blue  Blue Team algorithm: local pair sum  Different code after replay  In depth cross check ◦ DSA: Compared with results reported in last collaboration meeting  Last algorithm: fitting over state-by-state asymmetry (similar as blue team old method)  data for each spin state is identical  Demonstrate Difference between algorithm Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 19

Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 20  Consistent within 1 σ 1. No Yield Correction Applied Yet 2. Possible Different Run List (HRS problem only run)

Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 21

 Similar to No-Pol. Case ◦ Bias due to approximation in MLE is small Polarizations will be included since this slide Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 22

 Trend is consistent  Although some points differs more Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 23

Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 24

 Trend is consistent  Also show T1/T6 difference Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 25

Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 26

 Consistent to high precision ◦ Because of small charge asymmetry Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 27

 Believe or Not, we have more than 500 asymmetries (channels, kinematics bins)  Fit method and MLE consist at high statistics  The difference could be significant when statistics is low Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 28 Coinc (e’ π) Coinc (e’ K+) Coinc (e’ K-)

Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 29

 MLE ◦ Useful ◦ Could extract Yield/Asymmetry/DSA,SSA Modulations  Cross Check ◦ MLE perform great for DSA ◦ Consist within error bar with blue team SSA (no correction yet) Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 30

 Test angular modulation with real data/corss check  Local Pair MLE  Background removal Transversity Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 31