Systematics and Phylogenetics Ch. 23.1, 23.2, 23.4, 23.5, and 23.7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Classification of Organisms
Advertisements

Systematics and the Phylogenetic Revolution
Introduction Classification Phylogeny Cladograms Quiz
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Taxonomy & Phylogeny Classification of Organisms.
Lecture 4: Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Campbell: Chapter 26
THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF BIODIVERSITY
Tree of Life Chapter 26.
Phylogeny and Systematics
Fig Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings Overview: Investigating the Tree of Life Phylogeny is the.
Ch. 26 – Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Reconstructing and Using Phylogenies
Systematics Study of the diversity of organisms to classify them and determine their evolutionary relationships Taxonomy: naming, identifying and classifying.
Phylogeny and Systematics
1 Apply Concepts To an evolutionary taxonomist, what determines whether two species are in the same genius 2 Explain What is a derived character 3 Review.
Chapter 18 Classification
PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS
Chapter 26 – Phylogeny & the Tree of Life
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 4- Part II Phylogenetic Inference.
Classification and phylogeny
Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction I. Systematics = Science of biological diversity. Systematics uses taxonomy to reflect phylogeny (evolutionary history).
Phylogeny & The Tree of Life. Phylogeny  The evolutionary history of a species or group of species.
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Chapter 26: Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Objectives 1.Identify how phylogenies show evolutionary relationships. 2.Phylogenies are inferred based homologies.
Warm-Up 1.Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. 2.What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to.
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Chapter 26. Systematics: Discipline focused on classification of organisms.
Systematics and the Phylogenetic Revolution Chapter 23.
The Linnean system, first formally proposed by Linneaus in Systema naturae in the 18th century, has two main characteristics. –Each species has a two-part.
Chapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
PHYLOGENY AND THE TREE OF LIFE Chapter 26 Sections 1-3 and 6.
The Tree of Life.
PHYLOGENY and SYSTEMATICS CHAPTER 25. VOCABULARY Phylogeny – evolutionary history of a species or related species Systematics – study of biological diversity.
PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS Phylogeny- the evolution history of a species Systematics- the study of the diversity of life and its phylogenetic history.
Phylogeny & the Tree of Life
Phylogeny & Systematics Chapter 25. Phylogeny: the evolutionary history of a species.
PHYLOGENY AND THE TREE OF LIFE CH 26. I. Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships A. Binomial nomenclature: – Genus + species name Homo sapiens.
Classification. Cell Types Cells come in all types of shapes and sizes. Cell Membrane – cells are surrounded by a thin flexible layer Also known as a.
All life is interconnected by descent
Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole — Thomson Learning Biology, Seventh Edition Solomon Berg Martin Chapter 22 Understanding Diversity: Systematics.
Chapter 25: Phylogeny and Systematics. “Taxonomy is the division of organisms into categories based on… similarities and differences.” p. 495, Campbell.
PHYOGENY & THE Tree of life Represent traits that are either derived or lost due to evolution.
Phylogeny and Systematics Phylogeny Evolutionary history of a species of a group of related species Information used to construct phylogenies.
Phylogeny and Taxonomy. Phylogeny and Systematics The evolutionary history of a species or related species Reconstructing phylogeny is done using evidence.
Phylogeny & Systematics The study of the diversity and relationships among organisms.
Taxonomy, Classification... and some phylogeny too!
Phylogeny & the Tree of Life
Classification of Organisms
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and Systematics
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Ch. 4 Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Animals
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Chapter 25 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Classification of Vertebrates
Chapter 26- Phylogeny and Systematics
Phylogenetics Chapter 26.
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Phylogeny & Systematics
Presentation transcript:

Systematics and Phylogenetics Ch. 23.1, 23.2, 23.4, 23.5, and 23.7

Diversity Matters Not all species, even closely related ones, interact with their environments the same way Mosquitos and Plasmodia  – Plasmodia causes malaria – Only 3:6 mosquito species can carry the disease and spread it Understanding and categorizing species is important in all areas of biology Systematics  study of life’s diversity and all evolutionary relationships

Linnaeus System Binominal nomenclature (two name system); uses genus and specific epithet (species name) to categorize similar species Taxonomy  groups species through different taxa (levels of similarity) – Domain  most general; Bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya – Species  most specific; Homo sapien Names come from location of habitat, physical trait, scientist who discovered it, etc…

Taxonomic Hierarchy Classification  limited to more inclusive groups (taxa) as you specify the organism – Domain – Kingdom – Phylum – Class – Order – Family – Genus – Species – Subspecies

Phylogenetics Just categorization is no longer important; now we are looking for the evolutionary connection between organisms Phylogeny  evolutionary history of a species Phylogenetic tree  visual representation of their phylogeny – Species at the base are common ancestors – Species in the branches are close variants

Anagenesis Trees can be large; cover all known organisms Trees can be small; cover only a specific genus Trees can show specific changes through format – Straight lines show anagensis; gradual changes as a new species changes from the original population; no increase in biodiversity

Cladogenesis Branching points depict two species diverging from a common ancestor; increase in biodiversity – Branches meet at their common ancestor – Branches can split again into “branchlets” which can form “twigs” Every node (branching point) is the “root” for the generations that spring from it (clade) – Aves  clade for birds – Birds of Prey  nested clade inside Aves Sister clads  clades that share same node Sister spices  species that share the same node

Types of Phylogenetic Trees 1)Monophyletic  – All species connected to one ancestral clade – Felidea  clade all species of cat (tigers, house cat, lion, etc…) lead back to – Animalia  clade all animals lead back too 2)Polyphyletic  – Organisms of different clades but not their common ancestor – Vertebrates capable of flight (Birds and Bats); common ancestor (extremely ancient) not included

Types of Phylogenetic Trees 3) Paraphyletic  – Clade of an ancestor but not all its descendants – Clade of birds and terrestrial dinosaurs; linkage to birds shown but not all descendants made by terrestrial dinosaurs Depending on what information needs to be explained, this different types are necessary

Cladistics Traditional systematics  organizing trees based on morphology and evolutionary relationship – Popular up till the 1960s Cladistics  phylogenetic trees should reflect just evolution patterns of physical traits (characters; character states) Ancestral character states  original traits of the common ancestors Derived character states  new traits branching from the ancestral ones

Making a Cladogram Cladistic method groups species into clade by shared derived characteristics; generate a cladogram – Hypothesized evolutionary connection – Node  common ancestor – Branch  monophyletic group; sometimes contain specific synapomorphies in clade Molecular sequencing (protein, DNA, RNA) also used with synapomorphies comparisons – Help deal with convergent evolution, which presents false synapomorphies

Comparing Character States Character states can be compared to each other in any number of ways – Often compared with other species that don't possess the character Apomorphy  derived character Synapomorphy  derived character found in multiple species – Shared characteristics shows species are part of the same clade – Markers for monophyletic lineages; adaptive radiation after major adaptation

Principle of Parsimony Large cladograms, with 100s of species, have too many factors for humans to consider Computer programs must be used to find the “best” cladogram – Principle of Parsimony  simplest evolutionary history is the most likely; rare for many complex evolution events to have occurred Molecular statistics have a major effect – Non-coding DNA, degenerate DNA codons, substitution rates of nucleotides all influence the statistical amount of mutation a population can experience

Statistics is the Key Taking both fossil and evolutionary statistical data, two methods can be used to find the best cladogram 1)Maximum Likelihood Method  – Data compared with other established cladograms to find the “most likely” clade 2)Bayesian Method  – Compares the distribution of character traits to the evolutionary model that would be needed for them to occur

Using Synapomorphies Comparison of the species that do and do not have an apomorphy can organize the clade Vertebral column in animals: – Most species of animals are invertebrates (no backbone) – Vertebrates (fish, mammals, birds, etc…) do have a backbone – Comparing the synapomorphies: No backbone  Ancestral Backbone  Derived

Using Synapomorphies to Support Data If there is not enough data from fossils, apomorphies can still be compared with outgroup comparisons – Ingroup  species in question with derived trait – Outgroup  closely related species (not in clade) with ancestral trait Butterfly legs  groups of 6 and 4 – Outgroup comparisons show most insects have 6 legs – 6 legs  ancestral – 4 legs  derived

Using Molecular Data Clades can have conflicting models that both have large support Molecular comparing is sometimes the only method of categorizing group properly Domains: Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya – All similar to each other in various ways – Evolution places Eukarya branching from Bacteria and Archaea branching from Eukarya – However, after their branching point, the transfer of some genetic material may have occurred (Horizontal gene transfer) through transformation, transduction, and even viral infections

Homework Suggested Homework: – Test Your Knowledge Actual Homework: – Discuss the Concepts #3 – Design the Experiment – Interpret the Data Test Next Wednesday on Ch. 22, 23, and 24! Final covers  All chapters since mid-term (not 18 and 19)