Slava Bunichev, Moscow State University in collaboration with A.Kryukov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CompHEP Automatic Computations from Lagrangians to Events Ivan Melo University of Zilina Fyzika za Štandardným modelom klope na dvere Svit,
Advertisements

Michael Alves, Patrick Dugan, Robert Daniels, Carlos Vicuna
Vertex Function of Gluon-Photon Penguin Swee-Ping Chia High Impact Research, University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
1 Top Production Processes at Hadron Colliders By Paul Mellor.
Rare B decays in Warped Extra Dimension Model with Custodial Symmetry Cheng Li Theory Division, IHEP Collaborate with Cai-Dian Lϋ 1.
QCD-2004 Lesson 1 : Field Theory and Perturbative QCD I 1)Preliminaries: Basic quantities in field theory 2)Preliminaries: COLOUR 3) The QCD Lagrangian.
Bonn 23 rd Feb1 Simulations of BSM Signals Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University.
CompHEP: Present and Future Alexandre Kryukov on behalf of CompHEP collaboration (E. Boos, V. Bunichev, M. Dubinin, L. Dudko, V. Ilyin, A. Kryukov, V.
1 Bruce Knuteson University of Chicago A Monte Carlo Wishlist 1.Incremental 2.Global.
A COMPUTER BASED TOOL FOR THE SIMULATION, INTEGRATED DESIGN, AND CONTROL OF WASTEWATER TREAMENT PROCESSES By P. Vega, F. Alawneh, L. González, M. Francisco,
Gerard ’t Hooft Spinoza Institute Yukawa – Tomonaga Workshop, Kyoto, December 11, 2006 Utrecht University.
MadGraph + MadEvent Automated Tree-Level Feynman Diagram, Helicity Amplitude, and Event Generation + Tim Stelzer Fabio Maltoni.
Antonio RagoUniversità di Milano Techniques for automated lattice Feynman diagram calculations 1 Antonio RagoUniversità di Milano Techniques for automated.
Some features of processes with gauge bosons in models with large extra dimensions E.E. Boos, M.A. Perfilov, M.N. Smolyakov, I.P. Volobuev Skobeltsyn Institute.
2-nd Vienna Central European Seminar, Nov 25-27, Rare Meson Decays in Theories Beyond the Standard Model A. Ali (DESY), A. V. Borisov, M. V. Sidorova.
Compiler Code Optimizations. Introduction Introduction Optimized codeOptimized code Executes faster Executes faster efficient memory usage efficient memory.
Introduction to MATLAB Session 1 Prepared By: Dina El Kholy Ahmed Dalal Statistics Course – Biomedical Department -year 3.
1 Hybrid methods for solving large-scale parameter estimation problems Carlos A. Quintero 1 Miguel Argáez 1 Hector Klie 2 Leticia Velázquez 1 Mary Wheeler.
Two-body sfermion decays at full one-loop level within the MSSM Mgr. Hana Hlucha.
Algorithmic Problem Solving CMSC 201 Adapted from slides by Marie desJardins (Spring 2015 Prof Chang version)
1.2 – Evaluate and Simplify Algebraic Expressions A numerical expression consists of numbers, operations, and grouping symbols. An expression formed by.
Sypersymmetries and Quantum Symmetries Dubna 2007 K.Stepanyantz Moscow State University Department of Theoretical Physics New identity for Green function.
Lecture 05 Structured Query Language. 2 Father of Relational Model Edgar F. Codd ( ) PhD from U. of Michigan, Ann Arbor Received Turing Award.
1 Advance Computer Architecture CSE 8383 Ranya Alawadhi.
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Algebra By : Monte. Term The number or an Expression that are added in a sum.
Particle Filters for Shape Correspondence Presenter: Jingting Zeng.
Introduction to SimCreator and Multi-Body Dynamics  April 25, 2005.
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ) collaborators Joe Sato (Saitama univ) Nobuhito Maru (Chuo univ) Masato Yamanaka (ICRR) arXiv: (to be published on.
Russian Academy of Science Franco-Russia Forum Dec Denis Perret-Gallix CNRS ACPP Automated Calculation in Particle Physics France-Japan-Russia.
Introduction to Software Development. Systems Life Cycle Analysis  Collect and examine data  Analyze current system and data flow Design  Plan your.
The last talk in session-3. Full one-loop electroweak radiative corrections to single photon production in e + e - ACAT03, Tsukuba, 4 Dec LAPTH.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
FLUKA dose and fluence simulations for CBM experiment I.Kadenko, O.Bezshyyko, V.Pluyko, V.Shevchenko National Taras Shevchenko University of Kiev.
Recent Results in Combined Coding for Word-Based PPM Radu Rădescu George Liculescu Polytechnic University of Bucharest Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications.
The SAMPER project (Semi-numerical AMPlitude EvaluatoR) W. Giele, TeV4LHC, 20/10/05 Giulia Zanderighi, Keith Ellis and Walter Giele. hep-ph/ hep-ph/
Algorithms 2005 Ramesh Hariharan. Algebraic Methods.
CompHEP development for distributed calculation of particle processes at LHC
Electroweak Correction for the Study of Higgs Potential in LC LAPTH-Minamitateya Collaboration LCWS , Stanford U. presented by K.Kato(Kogakuin.
One particle states: Wave Packets States. Heisenberg Picture.
1 Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics 1- Literature : Lattice QCD, C. Davis Hep-ph/ Burcham and Jobes By Leila Joulaeizadeh 19 Oct
Learning to Detect Faces A Large-Scale Application of Machine Learning (This material is not in the text: for further information see the paper by P.
Matrices: Simplifying Algebraic Expressions Combining Like Terms & Distributive Property.
Experience with CalcHEP H. S. Goh Univ. of Arizona very little West Coast LHC Theory Network -- UC Irvine May
MadGraph/MadEvent Automatically Calculate 1-Loop Cross Sections !
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #2.
Two-dimensional SYM theory with fundamental mass and Chern-Simons terms * Uwe Trittmann Otterbein College OSAPS Spring Meeting at ONU, Ada April 25, 2009.
Six-Fermion Production at ILC with Grcft Calculation of the Six-Fermion Production at ILC with Grcft -New algorithm for Grace- KEK Minamitateya group Yoshiaki.
Quasi-Classical Model in SU(N) Gauge Field Theory A.V.KOSHELKIN Moscow Institute for Physics and Engineering.
Announcements 11/7 Today: 8.9, 8.11 Friday: 9.1, 9.2, 9.4 Monday: 9D-9F 9.4 Draw at least thirteen tree-level Feynman diagrams for the process qq*  gg,
Anders Nielsen Technical University of Denmark, DTU-Aqua Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission An Introduction.
Final Project for Phys 642: An Introduction to Quantum Information and Quantum Computing Fall 2013 Implementing a Computer Simulation of Shor’s Quantum.
SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.
2006 5/19QCD radiative corrections1 QCD radiative corrections to the leptonic decay of J/ψ Yu, Chaehyun (Korea University)
Automatic Generation of the Partial Wave Analysis Program For Physics Processes Jian-Xiong Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Academia Sinica 1. Brief.
Session 3 J. Fujimoto KEK May 27, Feynman Diagram Calculations automatization tree level loop level multi-loop Event Generators.
Current status A.Kryukov Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University On behalf of CompHEP Collaboration.
Automated Tree-Level Feynman Diagram and Event Generation
CompHEP Automatic Computations from Lagrangians to Events
Particle Physics Tour with CalcHEP
Evaluating Semi-Analytic NLO Cross-Sections
K Kato, E de Doncker, T Ishikawa and F Yuasa ACAT2017, August 2017
Quantum properties of supersymmetric gauge theories

Compiler Code Optimizations
in SU(N) Gauge Field Theory
Adnan Bashir, UMSNH, Mexico
Transverse Axial Vector and Vector Anomalies in U(1) Gauge Theories
Zhao Li IHEP-CAS 2016-June-17, CPHEPII
ENERGY 211 / CME 211 Lecture 27 November 21, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Slava Bunichev, Moscow State University in collaboration with A.Kryukov

CompHEP ● CompHEP is a package for computation of Feynman diagram in quantum field theory from Lagrangian until event flow. ● Main feature of the package is an exact symbolic calculation of tree level diagrams for Standard Model and beyond (2HDM, MSSM, mSUGRA,... ). ● CompHEP is able to compute processes with many particles (ap to 6) in the finale state taking into account all the QCD and EW diagrams, masses of fermions and bosons and width of unstable particles. ● CompHEP has user-friendly GUI and highly optimized for fast calculations and effective memory usage.

Price for this approach was high specialization of the module for the symbolic calculations. For example, a fixed number of symbolic structures allows in symbolic expressions under evaluation. Such specialization is too heavy for further development of CompHEP package!

CompHEP structure: The symbolic part includes diagram generator and symbolic calculator. The numerical part includes Monte Carlo integration module and event generator. We have to change the module for symbolic calculations.

FORM To have more advantage symbolic part of CompHEP we incorporate the computer algebra FORM for automatic evaluation of squared Feynman diagrams. We choose the FORM because: FORM is rather fast and good quality computer algebra program, FORM is a standard de-facto in HEP applications.

CompHEP-FORM-CompHEP To save the compatibility of old version of CompHEP with new one and to minimize programming we decide to incorporate FORM in a parallel. Thus, the new scheme was realized by adding the following modules: “form_code.c” is the FORM code generator “procedur.prc” is a set of auxiliary FORM programs

Scheme of the CompHEP-FORM-CompHEP interface

Example of diagrams generating e +,e -   ,   

Example of symbolic calculations

Example of numerical calculations

Example of the FORM output #include #define real double #include"out_ext.h" #include"out_int.h" #include"var_def.h" FNN F1; real F1(void) { real FACTOR,RNUM,DENOM,result; FACTOR= 1./4.*pow(EE,4); RNUM= (32*pow(Mm,2) + 32*dp(0) - 64*dp(1))*dp(0) + 64*pow(dp(1),2); DENOM= 4*pow(dp(0),2); result=FACTOR*RNUM/DENOM; return result; }

We have to optimize C-code for improving calculation time in numerical part. So we introduce the algorithm for reducing number of multiplications in algebraic expressions. (results of working this algorithm is similar with Gorner scheme) Optimization

Bu-algorithm 3*d1*d2*d3 + 5*d2 2 *d3 + 7*d2*d *d1*d3 + 3*d2 = rename: d1=d11, d1 2 =d11*d12,... 3*d11*d21*d31 + 5*d21*d22*d31 + 7*d21*d31*d32 + 2*d11*d31 + 3*d21 = find most rare multiplier: 3*d11*d21*d31 + 5*d21*d22*d31 + 7*d21*d31*(d32) + 2*d11*d31 + 3*d21 = 3*d11*d21*d31 + 5*d21*(d22)*d31 + 7*d21*d31*(d32) + 2*d11*d31 + 3*d21 = combine terms with similar terms: 3*d11*d21*d31 + (5*d22 + 7*d32)*d21*d31 + 2*d11*d31 + 3*d21 = repeat procedure: 3*(d11)*d21*d31 + (5*d22 + 7*d32)*d21*d31 + 2*(d11)*d31 + 3*d21 = (3*d11 + 5*d22 + 7*d32)*d21*d31 + 2*(d11)*d31 + 3*d21 = (3*d11 + 5*d22 + 7*d32)*(d21)*d31 + 2*(d11)*d31 + 3*(d21) = ((3*d11 + 5*d22 + 7*d32)*d21 + 2*d11)*d31 + 3*(d21) = ((3*d1 + 5*d2 + 7*d3)*d2 + 2*d1)*d3 + 3*d2

Conclusion ● We completely incorporate FORM in CompHEP ● Crosscheck (we get the same results for both calculators) ● We optimize FORM-output for numerical calculation

Future plans: ● We plan to implement new algorithms to increase efficiency of symbolic calculations ● Perform calculations in theories with extra dimensions ● Introduce new complicated structures in the vertices (e.g. Form- factors) ● Use the dimentional regularization ● Perform polarized calculations by introducing the corresponding density matrices for external lines of squared diagrams. ● Include calculations with extention to 1-loop case ● Incorporate the gauge invariant classes of diagrams, etc.