Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Advertisements

“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1 March 2013.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Connecting the Common Core State Standards and TPEP 1.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Combining Multiple Measures Into a Summative Rating 1 Updated April 2014.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Gathering Evidence 1 June 2013.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Applying Multiple Measures.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Session Materials  Wiki
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Framework for Teaching Aug. 27 th Title II Day.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Citywide Expectations for
Hosted by Julie Milder Unpacking the Classroom Environment and Culture and Professional Collaboration and Communication Dimensions of 5D+
The School Effectiveness Framework
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Avon Grove School District October 2009
The New Educator Evaluation System
State Board of Education Progress Update
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,

Entry Task Today, we’ll be working on educator goal setting. Please take a moment to reflect on your own professional and personal experiences with SMART goals. Which of these pieces of a SMART goal do you think presents the most challenges to enact? S = Specific and Strategic M =Measurable A =Action-Oriented R =Rigorous, Realistic, and Results-Focused (the 3 Rs) T =Timed and Tracked Place a sticky note on the chart you think represents the most challenging work of setting SMART goals. 2

5-10 minutesEntry Task 20 minutesAgenda, Norms, Targets & Danielson Framework 15 minutesSelf-reflect Domain 3 45 minutesDiving into Step 2 of cycle 10 minutesBreak 45 minutesGoal Setting 25 minutesStudent Growth Goals 15 minutesClosure/Next Steps/Reflection 3 Welcome!

Session Norms Pausing Paraphrasing Posing Questions Putting Ideas on the Table Providing Data Paying Attention to Self and Others Presuming Positive Intentions What Else? 4

Essential Question(s) Why is it important to measure teacher practice on levels of performance? How can a teacher show growth, professionally or instructionally, on either the comprehensive or focus evaluations?

Understandings The Danielson Framework promotes teacher professional and instructional growth Coherent instruction = student engagement Comprehensive and Focus evaluations both increase the dialogue between teacher and evaluator Levels of performance are essential for growth

Targets Participants will know and be able to: Support the articulation of goal setting as part of the educator evaluation process Build connections back to past learning on multiple measures and self- assessment to support ongoing evaluation planning in alignment with the Washington State Criteria 7

Evaluation Process Teacher Self- Assessment Goal Setting /Pre-Conference (Danielson & Student Growth) Gathering Formative Evidence against the framework (Shared Responsibility) Conference focused on Formative Feedback Repeat Cycle of Formative Evidence Gathering, Conference & Feedback Summative Scoring Step 1 Step 2 Step 3Step 4 Step 5 Final

Self Reflection On Aug. 27 you used the framework to reflect on your practice in Domain 2 You may have set a professional or instructional goal in this process Now take 10 minutes to reflect on your practice in Domain 3 ◦ What might be an instructional or professional goal you would set? 9 First Step in Evaluation cycle

Goal Setting ConferencePre-Conference 10 Between administrator and teacher At the beginning of the school year Purpose ◦ Set an instructional goal; ◦ Set a professional goal ◦ Determine student learning goals for state Criterions 3, 6, and 8 Between administrator and teacher Prior to lesson to be observed Purpose is to: ◦ Gather evidence for Domain 1 ◦ Prep for the observation Second step in the evaluation cycle

10 Questions and Domain 1 1. To which part of your curriculum does this lesson relate? (SC4-1a) 2. How does this learning “fit” in the sequence of learning for this class? (SC4-1a, SC4 -1e) 3. Briefly describe the students in this class, including those with special needs (SC3-1b) 4. What are your learning outcomes for this lesson? What do you want the students to understand? (SC4-1c) 5. How will you engage the students in the learning? What will you do? What will the students do? (SC4-1e) 6. Will the students work individually or groups? (SC4-1e) 7. How will you differentiate instruction for different individuals or groups of students in the class? (SC4-1e) 8. What instructional materials or other resources, if any, will you use? (SC4-1d) 9. How and when will you know the students have learned what you intend? (SC6-1f) 10. Is there anything that you would like me to specifically observe during the lesson? 11

Making connections Split into 5 teams (or more) of 3-4 participants Each group will explore the pre-conference questions and how they relate to the Danielson components Team 1 gets questions1 & 3 Team 2 gets question 2 Team 3 gets questions 4 & 5 Team 4 gets questions 6 & 7 Team 5 gets questions 8 & 9 12

Discuss in your teams: What does this question mean to them? Is this new practice? Using the rubric determine available evidence for each of the elements listed in proficient for your chosen question and component Using the rubric determine available evidence for each of the elements listed in distinguished for your chosen question and component Complete a poster to share 13

Share out Each team shares out their posters to the larger group As each team is presenting jot notes in the packet down about how their ideas may apply to you during your pre- conference 14

10 minute break 15

Preparing Teachers for Goal Setting 16 Self-Assessment Step Step 1: Student Data Analysis Step 2: Professional Practice Rating Goal Type Student Learning Goal Professional Practice Goal A capital “G!” indicates that the guidance represents Washington State law. A lowercase “g” indicates that the guidance represents research-based best practice but is not mandated by law.

Understanding Goal Setting Instructional practice goal Focused on improving specific instructional practices identified in the Danielson framework 17 Professional practice goal  Focused on improving professional practices tied to Danielson framework (e.g., seeking PD, collaborating with colleagues, etc.)

Understanding Goal Setting Connections to Be Made: Rooted in Washington State Teacher Criteria Aligned to the Danielson framework and informed by recommended best practices and tools within that framework Coordinated with district, school, team, and grade-level goals 18

Example Instructional Practice Goal Our ninth-grade team will research and become more familiar with strategies proven to help build sustainable and ongoing partnerships with service learning organizations in our community that are willing to be supportive and engaged with our students. We will implement a minimum of three of the approaches or strategies by the end of the school year. As a result of our efforts, we will see at least two partnership that represent either new, or significantly strengthened and improved, relationships with service learning organizations. Our students will experience more meaningful and coherent service learning experiences as a result. 19

What Makes Our Goals SMART ? Individually: Read handout pages 3-5, “What Makes a Goal ‘S.M.A.R.T.’?” Underline one phrase that you find most significant in the reading, that resonates with or pushes your thinking about goal setting. In a triad: Share your phrases and discuss any insights about the reading and implications for your goal setting Answer Part A Answer Part B 20

Learning Wrap Up Effective educator goal setting: ◦ Connects back to self-assessment work and reinforces the process of using multiple measures ◦ Includes a focus on student learning and professional practice ◦ Is a process informed by the SMART goals framework, as well as the structures and tools from Danielson ◦ Coordinates the work of individual teachers and principals with teams, the school, and the district 21

Your instructional/professional goals Take 10 minutes to reflect on your instructional/professional goals ◦ Are they SMART? ◦ Are they rooted in the criteria? ◦ Are they aligned to the Danielson framework? ◦ What evidence? ◦ How will you measure success? ◦ If not, take time now to re-write them in the packet 22

Stretch break – 2 minutes 23

Student Learning Goal - Setting a Measure Goal-setting a measure of educator performance: How do you incorporate goal-setting as a source of evidence? ◦ How will you and your principal identify evidence to demonstrate achievement of or progress on goals? ◦ How will you measure success of or progress towards achieving the goal using evidence? One Approach: Evidence Collection 24

Student Learning Goal - Setting a Measure Goal-setting as measure of educator performance: Review the “results-oriented path” you created in the last activity: ◦ Part C: What sources of evidence could be used to assess the 9 th grade team’s progress along that path?  Make a list of at least 3 potential sources of evidence. ◦ Part D: What evidence statements could you produce from your sources of evidence for the 9 th grade team? 25

Evaluation Process Teacher Self- Assessment Goal Setting /Pre-Conference (Danielson & Student Growth) Gathering Formative Evidence against the framework (Shared Responsibility) Conference focused on Formative Feedback Repeat Cycle of Formative Evidence Gathering, Conference & Feedback Summative Scoring Step 1 Step 2 Step 3Step 4 Step 5 Final

Reflecting Please complete the district reflection form Add to your reflection: What will you do to continue to get SMARTer, as you consider goal setting’s role in teacher evaluation? Take a few minutes and create at least two sticky notes for the “what went well/didn’t” Chart on your way out. ◦ Went well: What was a real “plus” in today’s session? What went well and should be repeated? ◦ Didn’t go well: Where is there room for improvement and change? 27

What’s Next? Next Session is Student Learning Goal Setting on the Sept. 25 th half day 28